You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

January 17, 2019

Bangkok Post HR Watch: Labor Outsourcing in Vietnam

Bangkok Post, Human Resources Watch Column

Since its World Trade Organization accession in 2007, Vietnam has been an attractive destination in ASEAN for foreign investment, with overseas companies eager to offer their goods and services to the growing Vietnamese market. In parallel, Vietnam has emerged as one of the top countries in the world for business process outsourcing (BPO), attracting foreign companies with affordable and skilled Vietnam-based labor to handle back office and IT functions.

The country’s BPO industry has grown at a rate of over 20% annually for the past decade, and a 2015 report from New York-based commercial real estate company Cushman & Wakefield ranked Vietnam as the top BPO location globally. While official data is not publicly available, based on informal conversations with senior staff from the Ministry of Labor, Invalids, and Social Affairs, approximately 210 companies were registered and operating as outsourcing service providers in Vietnam at the end of 2018.

With a population of nearly 100 million, over 60% of whom are under the age of 35, Vietnam offers prospective outsourcers a young, well-educated, and technically skilled workforce at costs that remain low compared to traditional outsourcing hubs like China and India. In addition, the country’s English-language ability has risen rapidly, especially among skilled workers, and a growing number of Vietnamese are developing proficiency in Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages.

Recognizing its competitive strengths in this area, the Vietnamese government has committed to supporting and creating favorable conditions for foreign businesses to outsource to Vietnam. However, despite efforts to improve the institutional framework and transparency, not all of the labor-related legislation is clear and can be fully enforced in practice.

Labor Outsourcing Regulations

Regulations on labor outsourcing are mainly covered under the 2012 Labor Code and Decree No. 55/2013/ND-CP of the Government dated May 22, 2013, as amended on July 23, 2014 (“Decree 55”). Under Article 3 of this legislation, labor outsourcing is defined as a service of subleasing employees to work for other companies to fill vacant working positions for which such companies cannot find workers.

In order to be licensed as an outsourcing service provider, a company must satisfy certain conditions including: having legal capital of VND 2 billion (approximately USD 85,550)—a joint venture outsourcing service provider also needs to have total asset value of at least VND 20 billion (approximately USD427,750), having an office lease of at least two years, and having a legal representative who has at least three years of experience.

It is worth noting that not all categories of vacant working positions can be filled with a replacement based on the labor outsourcing model. Appendix 5 of Decree 55 only allows 17 job categories to be subleased, a somewhat eclectic list including: translators/interpreters/stenographers; secretaries/administrative assistants; receptionists; tour guides; sales assistants; project assistants; programmers for manufacturing machinery systems; technicians for manufacture or installation of television or telecom equipment; technicians for operating, testing or repairing construction machinery and equipment or for manufacturing electrical systems; sanitation workers for buildings and factories; data editors; security guards/bodyguards; telemarketers/customer service workers via telephone; processors of financial or tax issues; technicians for repairing or testing automobiles; industrial technical scanners or draftsmen (artists), interior designers; and drivers.

Vietnamese vendors cannot provide—and foreign companies cannot engage—labor outsourcing services for any job not mentioned in this list. The list has been valid for over 5 years and regulators have no official plan to broaden or update it. This has created some difficulties for companies which desire to have outsourced employees in accordance with their business needs.

For instance, there is a high demand from companies in Vietnam to have a strong and skilled team dedicated to marketing activities, but not all companies—especially small and medium-sized companies—have the resources or the desire to build up their own marketing teams from scratch. Instead, they would prefer to use an available source of skilled marketers provided by a qualified vendor, while maintaining control over the source in various aspects (such as providing training about their products orbeing involved as a consultant in the recruitment process). However, based on the list of 17 job categories above, from a strict view of the law, outsourcing of such activity is not allowed.

Another complication is that the duration of any labor outsourcing must not exceed 12 months (per Article 54.2 of the Labor Code, and Article 26 of Decree 55) and the vendor is prohibited from continuing to use subleased staff after the expiration of the 12-month period (per Article 4.2.c of Decree 55). This drawback might make outsourcing—as part of a company’s long-term business plan—less feasible and less profitable, even when the desired positions for outsourcing are on the permitted list. The flexibility provided by using outsourced personnel is less advantageous if a company has to constantly replace and retrain the staff filling those positions.

An Alternative to Labor Outsourcing

When labor outsourcing is not a viable option, a company can enter into a service contract under which a service provider sends its employees to perform the service in the premises of the service user. There is no specific provision under Vietnamese law that prevents the parties from entering into this arrangement, and, in practice, many companies use this option for outsourced services not expressly permitted under Decree 55.

However, to prevent the risk of this relationship being viewed as (prohibited) labor outsourcing, the service contract must be carefully drafted to avoid any misinterpretation. Accordingly, the contract should not include provisions that allow the service user to directly manage the performance of each employee under the service contract; or request the service provider’s employees to follow the handbooks/policies of the service user (except for provisions on working hours). The service provider should also be licensed to provide the services contemplated in the service contract.

While the abovementioned practice fails to meet the same level of convenience and flexibility as traditional labor outsourcing, it is a practical option to meet business needs while remaining in compliance with Vietnamese laws and regulations.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Vientiane have contributed the Laos chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Laos chapter was prepared by associates Naiyane Xaechao and Sayphin Singsouvong. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Laos chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Cambodia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Phnom Penh have contributed the Cambodia chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Cambodia chapter was authored by Jay Cohen, partner and director of Tilleke & Gibbins’ Phnom Penh office, and Chanvisal Lok, associate. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Cambodia chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
January 14, 2026
Employers operating in Thailand can enforce post-employment noncompete covenants, but success depends on precise drafting and strong evidentiary support. Thai courts will uphold restraints that protect legitimate employer interests and are fair and reasonable in duration, geographic reach, and substantive scope. Overbroad covenants, however, draw judicial skepticism and may fail unless they are drafted in severable, defensible components tied to the employee’s actual role. This article synthesizes recent trends in Thai case practice, explains how Thai courts assess reasonableness in employment restraints, and provides a practical litigation-focused framework for drafting enforceable covenants, preparing evidence, and pursuing relief through the Labor Court. The Legal Framework and Its Practical Implications Thai courts evaluate noncompete covenants under general principles of contract enforceability and public policy, with particular focus on whether a restraint is necessary to protect a legitimate employer interest and proportionate to that objective. In employment matters, this analysis is shaped by the employee-protective tenor of Thai labor law and by the Labor Court’s equitable discretion in determining appropriate remedies. The practical takeaway is that standardized or broadly drafted covenants rarely survive scrutiny. Courts look for a demonstrable nexus between the employee’s actual exposure to confidential information, trade secrets, or customer relationships and the scope of the restraint. Where that nexus is weak or the restraint operates as a blanket prohibition, courts are inclined to decline enforcement or limit relief to a narrowly tailored prohibition. The employer interests most commonly recognized as legitimate in Thai practice include the protection of trade secrets, confidential business information, and goodwill tied to identifiable customer segments or territories. Courts are more likely to enforce restraints where employers can clearly document what information is at risk, why particular customer relationships matter, and how the employee was involved with those assets. Judges also look closely at the
December 19, 2025
On December 12, 2025, Thailand’s Ministry of Labor published a ministerial regulation prescribing the minimum and maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions. The regulation, which takes effect on January 1, 2026, sets a flat minimum base wage of THB 1,650 per month and a phased increase of the maximum base wage over the following six years, as outlined in the table below. Impact on Social Security Benefits Not only will monthly contributions increase as a result of the adjustment to the maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions, but the maximum benefits available to insured persons will also be enhanced, as shown in the next table. Employer Obligations From January 1, 2026, employers must correctly withhold wages and remit social security contributions for both the employer’s and employees’ portions in compliance with the revised thresholds. Failure to comply may expose employers to penalties under the Social Security Act B.E. 2533 (1990). Employers should ensure that payroll systems are updated as necessary to reflect these changes to the wage ceiling used for social security contribution calculations.