You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

January 5, 2018

APFI Food Safety Regulations Series: Vietnam

Asia Pacific Food Industry (APFI)

To better understand the food regulatory landscape in Asia, APFI has spoken to law firms that specialize in food law from five different countries across Asia, which include China, Thailand, Vietnam, Singapore and the Philippines. 

In the third part of the series, we look at food safety regulations in Vietnam. Hien Thi Thu Vu, head of regulatory affairs, Vietnam, Tilleke & Gibbins, shares her advice.

How do food regulation and registration vary depending on the product or category?

Food products, depending on the product category, are regulated and managed by three different ministries: the Ministry of Health (MOH), the Ministry of Industry and Trade (MOIT), and the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD). The MOH has the prevailing general management power.

These ministries have issued three lists of foods, specifying which food belongs to the management of which ministry. The MOH, for example, is in charge of bottled water, functional foods, and nutraceuticals; the MOIT is in charge of wine, beer, and candy; and the MARD is in charge of cereals, meat and meat products, and seafood. This classification affects a number of things, including which authority carries out food safety inspection.

Regardless of their categories, all foreign processed foods must be registered with the Vietnam Food Administration (VFA)—an agency of the MOH—to obtain a Certificate of Conformity Declaration (CCD) before being imported into and/or circulated in the Vietnam market.

Processed foods include two main groups: general food products, and nutraceuticals/functional food products. Depending of the group, food products may have to meet different requirements before getting the CCD. For example, a functional food must have a Free Sale Certificate or Health Certificate or an equivalent certificate granted by competent authorities in the country of origin, along with information and scientific documents supporting the effects of each ingredient contributing to the declared functions of the product. General food products are exempt from these requirements, but must provide testing results from within the past 12 months, including key quality criteria and food safety criteria.

It is strictly required that product labels comply with the country’s labelling requirements, such as compulsory contents in the Vietnamese language.

Have you seen a growth in the number of food and beverage companies entering the markets in Vietnam?

Yes, the market is growing fast and the game is growing more and more competitive. Food and beverage conferences and exhibitions regularly attract hundreds of companies from Europe, Asia, and the Americas looking to introduce their products to the Vietnam market, and business advocates like the European Business Network in Vietnam and the American Chamber of Commerce have organized trade promotion activities in sectors such as canned food, milk, beer, and wine. The launch of the European Union-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement is certain to open the market further to European food and beverage companies.

At present, many foreign businesses are investing in the country’s food and beverage market through mergers and acquisitions to own shares in many of the nation’s domestic companies, such as Kido Group, Dabaco, and Masan Nutri-Science. More than 50 percent of the local beverage market is now owned by foreign businesses.

Which regulatory hurdles should manufacturers be aware of when entering the food market in Vietnam?

When it comes to preparing for market launch, there are some regulatory hurdles that foreign food manufacturers and distributors will inevitably encounter in Vietnam.

The general regulations on the levels, criteria, and requirements for heavy metals, pollutants, microorganisms, etc., related to food safety and hygiene for human health issued by the Ministry of Health have not been updated since 2011, and are not in line with corresponding standards in other countries where the products are often produced.

Although there is an online submission system for registering products in Vietnam, government agencies still require manufacturers to submit original documents such as the Certificate of Analysis, Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points, and ISO 22000 certificates. This slows down the registration process of the product.

Some labelling regulations are not flexible enough to cover exceptions in special cases, such as beverages sold exclusively to bars, and food sold exclusively to manufacturers’ store systems.

Foods circulating in the market are subject to periodic quality testing. At present, however, many labs in Vietnam do not have high-quality operations, which can lead to inaccurate test results, affecting the test quality of products. This in turn can lead to products not being in conformity with the documents registered with government agencies. In this case, the CCD might be revoked, and a sanction may be imposed against the seller/importer.

One common violation of food products is in labelling, when the information on the label is different from the information submitted to the VFA or when the label changes without notice being sent to the VFA. This can result in a fine being imposed on the seller/importer, and the goods being withdrawn from the market. Manufacturers should closely monitor any changes in their products and labels to ensure compliance.

Do you predict any major changes to transpire in Vitnam’s food industry in the next five to ten years?

With a population approaching 100 million, strong gross domestic product growth, rising per capita income, rapid urbanization, and growing concerns about food safety from consumers, Vietnam’s market is promising even more growth and development in the coming time, especially for foreign manufacturers.

The legal regulations for food and drinks are becoming more transparent. There have been some updates of regulatory requirements which facilitate the market launch of products. For example, online submission will be encouraged for registration of food and beverage products, and this process is expected to save time and money for suppliers.

The safety and quality of food is a growing concern for consumers as well as state regulators:

  • Products from highly reputable foreign companies, especially in baby food and health foods, will be more and more in demand.
  • State management agencies will intensify the frequency of inspection of various stages of the manufacturing processes. Non-compliant activities could lead to sanctions such as product recall.

Are there any other thoughts you would like to share with our readers?

Already promising and potentially hugely profitable, the food and beverage market is still growing. There will be increasingly more room and opportunity for foreign manufacturers. In parallel with income growth, consumers are becoming increasingly more selective about their food and drink purchases, particularly the quality and safety of the products, and are willing to spend more for a better choice.

Though seemingly clear and detailed, Vietnam’s legal regulations can be unpredictable in practice, with many grey areas, jurisdictional overlap, and contradictions to cope with. However, we believe that with the growing effort of the government to cut through the red tape, the regulatory hurdles will be significantly lowered in the future.

Please provide an overview of what the firm does.

Tilleke & Gibbins is a regional law firm in Southeast Asia, with 150 lawyers and consultants in Bangkok, Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, Jakarta, Phnom Penh, Vientiane, and Yangon. We represent investors and companies in the key areas of commercial transactions as well as mergers and acquisitions, dispute resolution and litigation, and intellectual property.

One of our important practice areas is regulatory affairs, where we assist companies in the pharmaceutical, cosmetics, consumer products, food and beverages, biotech, medical devices, veterinary products, and other life sciences sectors to enter markets throughout Southeast Asia. We assist companies in research and development and clinical trials to registration and market entry to commercialization and technology transfer, through every stage of a product’s life cycle.

Our Regulatory Affairs practice spans the following disciplines:

  • Clinical Trials and Consumer Testing
  • Registration with Vietnam Food Administration (VFA) or Drug Administration of Vietnam (DAV)
  • Import, Export, and Manufacturing Licenses
  • Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD) Crop Care Registration
  • MARD Animal, Aquatic, and Hazardous Substance Registration
  • MARD Import, Export, and Manufacturing Licenses
  • Regulatory Compliance and Maintenance
  • Labeling and Advertising Clearance
  • Intellectual Property

Article by Farah Nazurah Source: http://apfoodonline.com/industry/food-safety-regulations-series-vietnam/

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 9, 2026
On August 5, 2026, the Consumer Case Division of Thailand’s Civil Court rendered a judgment in a case involving a beauty clinic that advertised acne scar treatments using claims that the clinic was operated by a specialist physician and that the treatment, allegedly involving stem cell technology, could permanently remove acne scars. The plaintiff brought a claim against both the physician-owner and the clinic company, alleging that the advertisements were false and induced her to purchase the treatment. The court found that the clinic was liable for the false representations and that the physician-owner, as both the authorized director of the company and the medical practitioner who provided treatment, was jointly responsible. Although the plaintiff could not fully prove all damages claimed, the court awarded compensation of THB 20,000, together with interest. While the judgment arose from a consumer protection dispute, it serves as a valuable reminder that medical facility advertisements in Thailand are regulated and may expose clinics and healthcare providers not only to regulatory enforcement but also to civil liability from patients who rely on misleading promotional claims. Regulatory Framework Governing Medical Facility Advertisements Medical facility advertising in Thailand is governed by the Medical Facility Act B.E. 2541 (1998), as amended by the Medical Facility Act (No. 4) B.E. 2559 (2016). The principal secondary legislation is the Department of Health Service Support (DoHSS) Notification Re: Rules, Procedures, Conditions, and Fees for an Advertisement or Publication Concerning a Medical Facility, which came into force on November 25, 2019. Under this notification, “advertising” includes any act, by any means, that causes members of the public to see, hear, or otherwise become aware of a message, sound, or image for the commercial benefit of a medical facility. This broad definition covers not only traditional media but also clinic websites, social
September 9, 2026
On June 30, 2026, Indonesia’s National Agency of Drug and Food Control (BPOM) issued BPOM Regulation No. 11 of 2026 on Food Packaging, which expands the list of approved food-contact substances and recognizes a broader range of permissible functions for those substances. The new regulation, which revokes BPOM Regulation No. 20 of 2019, reflects developments in packaging technology and materials science. Although the new regulation provides more advantages to business actors by adding more food contact substances to the approved list for use in food packaging, there are more stringent rules and restrictions for testing. One of the most significant changes is a comprehensive migration-testing framework that sets out requirements for packaging materials, testing conditions, food simulants, and specific migration limits. Overall and Specific Migration Under BPOM Regulation No. 20 of 2019, migration requirements were primarily set out within the lists of approved food-contact substances and packaging materials. BPOM Regulation No. 11 of 2026 instead expressly requires packaging materials that come into direct contact with food to meet both overall and specific migration limits. These are defined as follows: Overall migration: The total quantity of all substances that migrate from the packaging, regardless of whether the substances are hazardous or nonhazardous to health. Specific migration: The quantity of a particular identified substance known to be hazardous to health that migrates from the packaging. Stricter Limits on Heavy Metals The overall migration limit for plastic packaging remains unchanged under both regulations at 60 mg/kg or 10 mg/dm². However, the new regulation introduces significant changes to the regulation of heavy metals. Under the 2019 regulation, four heavy metals—lead, cadmium, chromium VI, and mercury—were subject to a single combined limit of 1 mg/kg. The 2026 regulation, however, requires each heavy metal to meet its own individual specific migration limit, adds arsenic as
September 7, 2026
Indonesia’s Constitutional Court (Mahkamah Konstitusi) has reinstated a key provision limiting pharmaceutical patent protection, signaling a renewed commitment to balancing patent rights with public access to medicines. In its ruling to Case No. 255/PUU-XXIII/2025, the court partially granted a petition for judicial review of Law No. 65 of 2024, which had amended the country’s Patent Law, and ordered the restoration of a provision that had excluded certain pharmaceutical inventions from patentability. The decision took effect immediately upon its pronouncement at the court’s plenary session on August 28, 2026. Background The petition challenged the removal of article 4(f) from Law No. 13 of 2016 concerning Patents (Patent Law), as amended by Law No. 65 of 2024. Article 4(f) had excluded from patentability certain inventions relating to new uses of known substances. The petitioners argued that removing this provision would open the door to patent protection for second medical use inventions and facilitate patent evergreening—practices that can extend exclusivity periods, delay generic market entry, and reduce public access to affordable medicines. The petitioners included several patient advocacy and public-interest organizations: the Indonesian Dialysis Patients Community Association, the Indonesian Association of Drug Abuse Victims (PKNI), the Indonesian Pulmonary Hypertension Foundation (YHPI), the Rekat Peduli Indonesia Foundation, and the Indonesian Positive Women’s Association (IPPI), along with the Indonesia for Global Justice Association and four individual petitioners. The petitioners also challenged the constitutionality of the phrase “interested party” in article 70(1) of the Patent Law, arguing that it should be construed expressly to clarify who has standing to appeal a decision to grant a patent before the Board of Patent Appeal, and to allow a broader range of parties—such as patent holders, licensees, consumer organizations, prosecutors, aggrieved third parties, and others who may suffer direct or indirect harm from the grant of a patent—to
September 4, 2026
Blind boxes and collectibles have become increasingly popular, driven by the excitement of not knowing which character or design will be revealed until the package is opened. While most visible in the art toy market, the same concept is also used in the food industry. Confectionery, snacks, and other food products are sometimes sold with toys, character figures, cards, or other collectibles. A package might, for example, contain one of ten possible characters, with consumers knowing that an item is included but not which one they will receive. Some collections may also feature rare or “secret” items. For food businesses, however, adding a randomized toy or collectible involves more than a marketing decision. The food, the nonfood item, and the randomized mechanism may each raise different regulatory considerations in Thailand. Thai FDA Requirements for Nonfood Objects Packaged with Food The main food regulatory consideration is Ministry of Public Health Notification No. 310 B.E. 2551 (2008), which regulates food packaged together with things or objects that are not food. Under Notification No. 310, certain nonfood objects may be packaged together with food where they fall within specified exceptions, including objects that serve the following purposes: Maintaining the quality or standard of the food, such as a desiccant or oxygen absorber; Serving as a seasoning or as part of food preparation, such as chili powder sachets or seasoning sachets contained in instant noodle packages; or Functioning as an eating or food-preparation utensil, such as a spoon or fork included with instant noodles. Other nonfood objects that do not fall within these categories generally should not be placed inside the food container together with the food. Where a toy, collectible, or other nonfood object is intended to be sold together with a food product, businesses should therefore carefully consider the nature of