You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

January 5, 2018

APFI Food Safety Regulations Series: Vietnam

Asia Pacific Food Industry (APFI)

To better understand the food regulatory landscape in Asia, APFI has spoken to law firms that specialize in food law from five different countries across Asia, which include China, Thailand, Vietnam, Singapore and the Philippines. 

In the third part of the series, we look at food safety regulations in Vietnam. Hien Thi Thu Vu, head of regulatory affairs, Vietnam, Tilleke & Gibbins, shares her advice.

How do food regulation and registration vary depending on the product or category?

Food products, depending on the product category, are regulated and managed by three different ministries: the Ministry of Health (MOH), the Ministry of Industry and Trade (MOIT), and the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD). The MOH has the prevailing general management power.

These ministries have issued three lists of foods, specifying which food belongs to the management of which ministry. The MOH, for example, is in charge of bottled water, functional foods, and nutraceuticals; the MOIT is in charge of wine, beer, and candy; and the MARD is in charge of cereals, meat and meat products, and seafood. This classification affects a number of things, including which authority carries out food safety inspection.

Regardless of their categories, all foreign processed foods must be registered with the Vietnam Food Administration (VFA)—an agency of the MOH—to obtain a Certificate of Conformity Declaration (CCD) before being imported into and/or circulated in the Vietnam market.

Processed foods include two main groups: general food products, and nutraceuticals/functional food products. Depending of the group, food products may have to meet different requirements before getting the CCD. For example, a functional food must have a Free Sale Certificate or Health Certificate or an equivalent certificate granted by competent authorities in the country of origin, along with information and scientific documents supporting the effects of each ingredient contributing to the declared functions of the product. General food products are exempt from these requirements, but must provide testing results from within the past 12 months, including key quality criteria and food safety criteria.

It is strictly required that product labels comply with the country’s labelling requirements, such as compulsory contents in the Vietnamese language.

Have you seen a growth in the number of food and beverage companies entering the markets in Vietnam?

Yes, the market is growing fast and the game is growing more and more competitive. Food and beverage conferences and exhibitions regularly attract hundreds of companies from Europe, Asia, and the Americas looking to introduce their products to the Vietnam market, and business advocates like the European Business Network in Vietnam and the American Chamber of Commerce have organized trade promotion activities in sectors such as canned food, milk, beer, and wine. The launch of the European Union-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement is certain to open the market further to European food and beverage companies.

At present, many foreign businesses are investing in the country’s food and beverage market through mergers and acquisitions to own shares in many of the nation’s domestic companies, such as Kido Group, Dabaco, and Masan Nutri-Science. More than 50 percent of the local beverage market is now owned by foreign businesses.

Which regulatory hurdles should manufacturers be aware of when entering the food market in Vietnam?

When it comes to preparing for market launch, there are some regulatory hurdles that foreign food manufacturers and distributors will inevitably encounter in Vietnam.

The general regulations on the levels, criteria, and requirements for heavy metals, pollutants, microorganisms, etc., related to food safety and hygiene for human health issued by the Ministry of Health have not been updated since 2011, and are not in line with corresponding standards in other countries where the products are often produced.

Although there is an online submission system for registering products in Vietnam, government agencies still require manufacturers to submit original documents such as the Certificate of Analysis, Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points, and ISO 22000 certificates. This slows down the registration process of the product.

Some labelling regulations are not flexible enough to cover exceptions in special cases, such as beverages sold exclusively to bars, and food sold exclusively to manufacturers’ store systems.

Foods circulating in the market are subject to periodic quality testing. At present, however, many labs in Vietnam do not have high-quality operations, which can lead to inaccurate test results, affecting the test quality of products. This in turn can lead to products not being in conformity with the documents registered with government agencies. In this case, the CCD might be revoked, and a sanction may be imposed against the seller/importer.

One common violation of food products is in labelling, when the information on the label is different from the information submitted to the VFA or when the label changes without notice being sent to the VFA. This can result in a fine being imposed on the seller/importer, and the goods being withdrawn from the market. Manufacturers should closely monitor any changes in their products and labels to ensure compliance.

Do you predict any major changes to transpire in Vitnam’s food industry in the next five to ten years?

With a population approaching 100 million, strong gross domestic product growth, rising per capita income, rapid urbanization, and growing concerns about food safety from consumers, Vietnam’s market is promising even more growth and development in the coming time, especially for foreign manufacturers.

The legal regulations for food and drinks are becoming more transparent. There have been some updates of regulatory requirements which facilitate the market launch of products. For example, online submission will be encouraged for registration of food and beverage products, and this process is expected to save time and money for suppliers.

The safety and quality of food is a growing concern for consumers as well as state regulators:

  • Products from highly reputable foreign companies, especially in baby food and health foods, will be more and more in demand.
  • State management agencies will intensify the frequency of inspection of various stages of the manufacturing processes. Non-compliant activities could lead to sanctions such as product recall.

Are there any other thoughts you would like to share with our readers?

Already promising and potentially hugely profitable, the food and beverage market is still growing. There will be increasingly more room and opportunity for foreign manufacturers. In parallel with income growth, consumers are becoming increasingly more selective about their food and drink purchases, particularly the quality and safety of the products, and are willing to spend more for a better choice.

Though seemingly clear and detailed, Vietnam’s legal regulations can be unpredictable in practice, with many grey areas, jurisdictional overlap, and contradictions to cope with. However, we believe that with the growing effort of the government to cut through the red tape, the regulatory hurdles will be significantly lowered in the future.

Please provide an overview of what the firm does.

Tilleke & Gibbins is a regional law firm in Southeast Asia, with 150 lawyers and consultants in Bangkok, Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, Jakarta, Phnom Penh, Vientiane, and Yangon. We represent investors and companies in the key areas of commercial transactions as well as mergers and acquisitions, dispute resolution and litigation, and intellectual property.

One of our important practice areas is regulatory affairs, where we assist companies in the pharmaceutical, cosmetics, consumer products, food and beverages, biotech, medical devices, veterinary products, and other life sciences sectors to enter markets throughout Southeast Asia. We assist companies in research and development and clinical trials to registration and market entry to commercialization and technology transfer, through every stage of a product’s life cycle.

Our Regulatory Affairs practice spans the following disciplines:

  • Clinical Trials and Consumer Testing
  • Registration with Vietnam Food Administration (VFA) or Drug Administration of Vietnam (DAV)
  • Import, Export, and Manufacturing Licenses
  • Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD) Crop Care Registration
  • MARD Animal, Aquatic, and Hazardous Substance Registration
  • MARD Import, Export, and Manufacturing Licenses
  • Regulatory Compliance and Maintenance
  • Labeling and Advertising Clearance
  • Intellectual Property

Article by Farah Nazurah Source: http://apfoodonline.com/industry/food-safety-regulations-series-vietnam/

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

June 24, 2026
Patent enablement requirements are provided under Article 102 of Vietnam’s Law on Intellectual Property (IP Law). In particular, a patent specification must “fully and clearly disclose the nature of the invention to such an extent that, based on the specification, a person having ordinary skill in the relevant art can implement the invention.” In pharmaceutical and biotechnology patents, this requirement is more complicated and subject to more rigorous assessment. The Patent Examination Guidelines (Guidelines) of the Intellectual Property Office of Vietnam (IP Office) were amended in March 2026 to introduce Annexes III and IV for the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors, in which Annex III provides detailed guidelines on the assessment of specification requirements. These amendments were made under a project for strengthening capacity in industrial property examination between the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and the IP Office. Annex III provides detailed instructions on how examiners assess enablement in a pharmaceutical or biotechnology application, and offers examples of acceptable and unacceptable descriptions with regard to the enablement aspect. Enablement Requirements in Pharma and Biotech Patents Article 12.7 of Circular 10/2026/TT-BKHCN (Circular 10) adds to the requirements of Article 102 of the IP Law that the description must demonstrate the novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability of the technical solution. For pharmaceutical composition subject matters, Article 12.9 of Circular 10 sets out that the description must present the results of clinical trials and/or the pharmacological effects of the claimed pharmaceutical composition, and must include at least the following information: Substance/mixture used. Testing method (system) employed. Information on the test results. Correlation between the pharmacological effects obtained from the tests and the application of the pharmaceutical product in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases. The Guidelines note that pharmacological study results should be presented in a quantified manner, and pharmacological
June 19, 2026
For the first time, Thailand’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has published a consolidated list identifying all substances that have successfully passed its novel food safety evaluation process. The list is a step forward in regulatory transparency, but it also highlights a feature of the Thai regime that food companies often overlook: each approval is tied exclusively to the company that applied for it. A substance’s appearance on the list does not give other companies the green light to use it. This article examines the structure of Thailand’s novel food approval framework, the implications of applicant exclusivity, and the strategic choices it requires of food companies looking to bring novel ingredients to the Thai market. Thai FDA Food Safety Evaluation Framework Notification No. 376 of the Ministry of Public Health requires novel food substances to undergo a food safety assessment, with an exemption only for novel foods manufactured exclusively for export. The framework also encompasses “foods that do not qualify as novel foods” but which present characteristics warranting a safety evaluation, such as differing quality standards, increased serving sizes, or applications in specific food categories, where such changes affect consumption levels, nutritional value, or consumer safety. The recently published list of foods that passed the safety evaluation by the Thai FDA is structured by substance category and identifies the approved company (domestic manufacturer or importer), country of origin, substance name and trade name, approved purpose of use, and date of the Thai FDA’s approval notification certificate. A notable feature of Thailand’s novel food regime is that the approval result is tied exclusively to the company that submitted the application. Publication of the consolidated list does not constitute a general authorization to use the approved substances. The Thai FDA’s approval certificate specifies the approved conditions of use and the requirements
June 17, 2026
Thailand’s new labeling requirements for medical devices, which include for the first time a unique device identification (UDI) requirement for software as a medical device (SaMD), take effect on June 20, 2026. The Notification of the Ministry of Public Health regarding Criteria, Methods, and Conditions on Labeling and Instructions for Use for Medical Devices 2025, which replaces a similar notification from 2020, was published in the Government Gazette on December 22, 2025. To ensure clarity, modernity, and patient safety, the regulation requires domestic manufacturers and importers to provide labels and instructions for use (IFU) that are clearly legible, complete, and free of false or misleading claims. It also permits IFU to be provided in electronic format, such as via QR codes, websites, or other digital channels—directly relevant to SaMD, where physical labels are impractical and electronic presentation is the natural medium. The notification distinguishes two categories for labeling language. Home-use medical devices (for lay users outside healthcare facilities) must have labels and IFU in Thai. Professional-use medical devices may display labels and documentation in either Thai or English. This distinction is significant for SaMD developers: software intended for clinical professionals may use English-language interfaces and IFU, while consumer-facing health applications must provide Thai-language content. Labeling and UDI Requirements Labels and IFU must include, at a minimum: Product name and intended purpose Quantity or volume Name and address of domestic manufacturer or importer Thai FDA approval number Lot, version, or serial number Manufacturing date and expiry date For SaMD, the version number requirement is particularly relevant. The regulation also mandates display of a UDI code for SaMD in risk category 2 (moderate-risk), category 3 (moderate- to high-risk), and category 4 (high-risk), according to Thailand’s medical device risk classification system (which complies with the ASEAN Medical Device Directive and the EU
June 5, 2026
On May 25, 2026, Vietnam’s Ministry of Health issued Circular No. 16/2026/TT-BYT governing free-of-charge medicine support programs for medical establishments (Circular 16). Circular 16 will take effect on July 10, 2026, replacing Circular No. 31/2018/TT-BYT, which currently regulates the same subject matter. Circular 16 introduces several significant changes compared to the existing legal framework. Removal of Prior Approval Requirement Under the current regulations, free-of-charge medicine support programs are divided into two categories: (1) entirely free-of-charge provision of medicines for all types of drugs and (2) partially free-of-charge provision applicable only to brand-name drugs under patent protection or drugs whose generic products with identical active ingredients and dosage forms are available in Vietnam. Under the current regulations, partially free-of-charge programs are subject to mandatory registration with the competent authority, while entirely free-of-charge programs could be implemented without prior approval. A key reform under Circular 16 is that it stipulates only entirely free-of-charge medicine support programs applicable to all types of medicines, thereby eliminating the partially free-of-charge category. In addition, free-of-charge medicine support programs may be carried out solely based on a written agreement between the pharmaceutical company and the medical establishment, without any requirement for prior approval from competent authorities prior to implementation. Written Agreement Requirements Circular 16 requires the pharmaceutical company and medical establishment to enter into a written agreement in accordance with a prescribed template. This agreement must include the following compulsory information: Information on the supported medicines Form of support (entirely free-of-charge provision to patients) Quantity of medicines provided Target patient groups and applicable indications Duration of the program Rights and obligations of each party Transitional provisions on the protection of patients’ rights upon completion of the program The agreement may contain other contents as agreed by the parties, provided that these do not contradict applicable laws.