You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 28, 2015

Animal Feed Control: An Update on Thailand’s Legislation

Subscribe to Updates
Informed Counsel

Thailand’s roadmap of food safety, which was approved in 2004, aims to promote the Kingdom as the “kitchen of the world.” Animal feed, i.e., food given to farm animals, plays a major role in the food safety regime—it is part of the stages of food production, dubbed “farm-to-table,” and is an integral component in the overarching food chain. Animal feed must be as safe as meat for human consumption, and therefore registration, inspection, and control of animal feed are vigorously regulated by the regulatory authorities.

The Department of Livestock Development (DLD), Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives (MoAC), is the main authority responsible for putting in place a system for the management and control of animal feed. With the tremendous growth in the animal feed business, a new government unit, the Division of Animal Feed and Veterinary Products Control, was established within the DLD on September 26, 2013. This unit is responsible for the control of animal feed and hazardous substances for use in livestock production, as stipulated in the Animal Feed Quality Control Act and the Hazardous Substance Act, respectively.

Due to the rapid evolution of technology, as well as innovation in animal feed and husbandry, animal feed businesses in Thailand have expanded significantly. Much like the changes in food safety and technology, the law controlling animal feed in Thailand has evolved over time. Animal feed was previously regulated under the Animal Feed Quality Control Act B.E. 2506 (1963 Act). The 1963 Act was replaced with the Animal Feed Quality Control Act B.E. 2525 (1983 Act). Then, in 1999, there was an amendment of the Act. And very recently, the Animal Feed Quality Control Act B.E. 2558 (2015 Act) was announced in the Royal Gazette, which came into force on March 5, 2015.

Under the 2015 Act, “specific control animal feed”  must be registered prior to domestically manufacturing or importing animal feed into the Kingdom of Thailand. This term was not defined under the previous Act. The term is very broad in meaning, as it covers feed that has an impact on socioeconomic problems, feed that will probably harm animals, or feed that will have an effect on consumers of meat.

In the future, the MoAC minister will announce the type, quality standard, conditions, and requirements for registration of such animal feed. The types of animal feed that currently require registration include premix, milk products for animals, feed supplements, feed mixed with veterinary drugs, and more.

Veterinary drugs, on the other hand, are regulated by the Thai Food and Drug Administration. Animal drugs must be registered, following the Drug Act B.E. 2510 (1967), as amended. While a drug product license can be transferred from one juristic person to another, an animal feed registration license cannot be transferred. In addition, if the registered animal feed has not been manufactured or imported for two years, the MoAC minister has the power to revoke the registration license of such animal feed. These are the important precautions that animal feed companies should keep in mind.

The 2015 Act allows officers to inspect premises for the importation or manufacturing of animal feed during the daytime, in cases where unlawful action is suspected. Officers may sample the animal feed in a sufficient quantity for further analysis and testing. Under the 2015 Act, officers are also empowered to issue a requisition letter to call persons to provide testimony or submit documents for further consideration. In addition, the 2015 Act also includes additional provisions regarding the issuance of quality assurance certificates by the DLD and the termination of business.

The 2015 Act is a good sign that the responsible authorities are taking measures to preserve the wellbeing of animals and ensure food safety. Those in the animal feed business should closely monitor animal-feed-related ministerial regulations, which will likely be issued in the near future. It is expected that the 2015 Act will improve the registration and surveillance of animal feed, and ultimately, will ensure greater safety for meat consumers.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Industries

Life Sciences

Practices

Regulatory Affairs

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 13, 2026
Indonesia’s Halal Product Assurance Agency (BPJPH) has issued new regulations establishing clearer procedures for imposing administrative sanctions on businesses that violate halal product assurance requirements. BPJPH Regulation No. 2 of 2026 on the Imposition of Administrative Sanctions for Violations of Halal Product Assurance Implementation, issued on June 5, 2026, strengthens Indonesia’s halal compliance framework, as mandated under Law No. 33 of 2014 on Halal Product Assurance and Government Regulation No. 42 of 2024 on the Implementation of Halal Product Assurance. BPJPH Regulation No. 2/2026 also supports the upcoming mandatory halal compliance deadline of October 17, 2026, which will apply to a broad range of products and services, including imported food and beverages, slaughtering products and services, natural and quasi-drugs, health supplements, cosmetics, chemical and genetically engineered products, clothing and accessories, household goods, prayer equipment, stationery, and class A medical devices. Scope BPJPH is authorized to impose administrative sanctions for violations of halal product assurance requirements committed by businesses, halal inspection agencies (LPH), halal auditors, halal product process companion institutions (lembaga pendamping PPH), and halal product process companions (pendamping PPH). The head of BPJPH has authority to determine, cancel, or amend the imposition of administrative sanctions, including upon receipt of objections. This authority covers revocation of Halal Certificates (including foreign halal certificate registration numbers), withdrawal of goods from circulation, freezing of LPH operations, freezing of halal product process companion institutions, revocation of PPH companion institution registration numbers, revocation of halal auditor registration numbers, and revocation of LPH accreditation status. Administrative Sanctions Businesses may be subject to any of the following administrative sanctions: Written warning; Administrative fine; Revocation of the halal certificate, including revocation of foreign halal certificate registration numbers; and Withdrawal of goods from circulation. The regulation sets out the types of violations that may trigger these sanctions, with each
Read More
July 1, 2026
Obtaining marketing authorization is a fundamental requirement for bringing pharmaceutical products to the Thai market. Companies must navigate the Thai Food and Drug Administration’s registration procedures while also complying with post-approval pharmacovigilance obligations, licensing requirements for manufacturing and importation, data protection rules, and other regulatory requirements. This guide provides an overview of Thailand’s regulatory framework for pharmaceutical marketing authorization, including available registration pathways, review timelines, application fees, postmarketing surveillance obligations, licensing requirements, exemptions, data exclusivity, freedom of information, and parallel import considerations. It is intended as a practical reference for pharmaceutical companies, regulatory affairs professionals, and others involved in bringing medicinal products to the Thai market. Download the guide below for a concise overview of the current requirements and procedures governing pharmaceutical marketing authorization in Thailand.
Read More
June 24, 2026
Patent enablement requirements are provided under Article 102 of Vietnam’s Law on Intellectual Property (IP Law). In particular, a patent specification must “fully and clearly disclose the nature of the invention to such an extent that, based on the specification, a person having ordinary skill in the relevant art can implement the invention.” In pharmaceutical and biotechnology patents, this requirement is more complicated and subject to more rigorous assessment. The Patent Examination Guidelines (Guidelines) of the Intellectual Property Office of Vietnam (IP Office) were amended in March 2026 to introduce Annexes III and IV for the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors, in which Annex III provides detailed guidelines on the assessment of specification requirements. These amendments were made under a project for strengthening capacity in industrial property examination between the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and the IP Office. Annex III provides detailed instructions on how examiners assess enablement in a pharmaceutical or biotechnology application, and offers examples of acceptable and unacceptable descriptions with regard to the enablement aspect. Enablement Requirements in Pharma and Biotech Patents Article 12.7 of Circular 10/2026/TT-BKHCN (Circular 10) adds to the requirements of Article 102 of the IP Law that the description must demonstrate the novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability of the technical solution. For pharmaceutical composition subject matters, Article 12.9 of Circular 10 sets out that the description must present the results of clinical trials and/or the pharmacological effects of the claimed pharmaceutical composition, and must include at least the following information: Substance/mixture used. Testing method (system) employed. Information on the test results. Correlation between the pharmacological effects obtained from the tests and the application of the pharmaceutical product in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases. The Guidelines note that pharmacological study results should be presented in a quantified manner, and pharmacological
Read More
June 19, 2026
For the first time, Thailand’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has published a consolidated list identifying all substances that have successfully passed its novel food safety evaluation process. The list is a step forward in regulatory transparency, but it also highlights a feature of the Thai regime that food companies often overlook: each approval is tied exclusively to the company that applied for it. A substance’s appearance on the list does not give other companies the green light to use it. This article examines the structure of Thailand’s novel food approval framework, the implications of applicant exclusivity, and the strategic choices it requires of food companies looking to bring novel ingredients to the Thai market. Thai FDA Food Safety Evaluation Framework Notification No. 376 of the Ministry of Public Health requires novel food substances to undergo a food safety assessment, with an exemption only for novel foods manufactured exclusively for export. The framework also encompasses “foods that do not qualify as novel foods” but which present characteristics warranting a safety evaluation, such as differing quality standards, increased serving sizes, or applications in specific food categories, where such changes affect consumption levels, nutritional value, or consumer safety. The recently published list of foods that passed the safety evaluation by the Thai FDA is structured by substance category and identifies the approved company (domestic manufacturer or importer), country of origin, substance name and trade name, approved purpose of use, and date of the Thai FDA’s approval notification certificate. A notable feature of Thailand’s novel food regime is that the approval result is tied exclusively to the company that submitted the application. Publication of the consolidated list does not constitute a general authorization to use the approved substances. The Thai FDA’s approval certificate specifies the approved conditions of use and the requirements
Read More