You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 28, 2015

Animal Feed Control: An Update on Thailand’s Legislation

Subscribe to Updates
Informed Counsel

Thailand’s roadmap of food safety, which was approved in 2004, aims to promote the Kingdom as the “kitchen of the world.” Animal feed, i.e., food given to farm animals, plays a major role in the food safety regime—it is part of the stages of food production, dubbed “farm-to-table,” and is an integral component in the overarching food chain. Animal feed must be as safe as meat for human consumption, and therefore registration, inspection, and control of animal feed are vigorously regulated by the regulatory authorities.

The Department of Livestock Development (DLD), Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives (MoAC), is the main authority responsible for putting in place a system for the management and control of animal feed. With the tremendous growth in the animal feed business, a new government unit, the Division of Animal Feed and Veterinary Products Control, was established within the DLD on September 26, 2013. This unit is responsible for the control of animal feed and hazardous substances for use in livestock production, as stipulated in the Animal Feed Quality Control Act and the Hazardous Substance Act, respectively.

Due to the rapid evolution of technology, as well as innovation in animal feed and husbandry, animal feed businesses in Thailand have expanded significantly. Much like the changes in food safety and technology, the law controlling animal feed in Thailand has evolved over time. Animal feed was previously regulated under the Animal Feed Quality Control Act B.E. 2506 (1963 Act). The 1963 Act was replaced with the Animal Feed Quality Control Act B.E. 2525 (1983 Act). Then, in 1999, there was an amendment of the Act. And very recently, the Animal Feed Quality Control Act B.E. 2558 (2015 Act) was announced in the Royal Gazette, which came into force on March 5, 2015.

Under the 2015 Act, “specific control animal feed”  must be registered prior to domestically manufacturing or importing animal feed into the Kingdom of Thailand. This term was not defined under the previous Act. The term is very broad in meaning, as it covers feed that has an impact on socioeconomic problems, feed that will probably harm animals, or feed that will have an effect on consumers of meat.

In the future, the MoAC minister will announce the type, quality standard, conditions, and requirements for registration of such animal feed. The types of animal feed that currently require registration include premix, milk products for animals, feed supplements, feed mixed with veterinary drugs, and more.

Veterinary drugs, on the other hand, are regulated by the Thai Food and Drug Administration. Animal drugs must be registered, following the Drug Act B.E. 2510 (1967), as amended. While a drug product license can be transferred from one juristic person to another, an animal feed registration license cannot be transferred. In addition, if the registered animal feed has not been manufactured or imported for two years, the MoAC minister has the power to revoke the registration license of such animal feed. These are the important precautions that animal feed companies should keep in mind.

The 2015 Act allows officers to inspect premises for the importation or manufacturing of animal feed during the daytime, in cases where unlawful action is suspected. Officers may sample the animal feed in a sufficient quantity for further analysis and testing. Under the 2015 Act, officers are also empowered to issue a requisition letter to call persons to provide testimony or submit documents for further consideration. In addition, the 2015 Act also includes additional provisions regarding the issuance of quality assurance certificates by the DLD and the termination of business.

The 2015 Act is a good sign that the responsible authorities are taking measures to preserve the wellbeing of animals and ensure food safety. Those in the animal feed business should closely monitor animal-feed-related ministerial regulations, which will likely be issued in the near future. It is expected that the 2015 Act will improve the registration and surveillance of animal feed, and ultimately, will ensure greater safety for meat consumers.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Industries

Life Sciences

Practices

Regulatory Affairs

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

March 2, 2021
The cannabis plant has fascinated many civilizations, societies, and individuals through the centuries with its unique properties, and many have learned how to benefit from these, finding a variety of therapeutic and industrial uses of the plant that, in turn, enhanced domestic economies worldwide. In Thailand, cannabis plants and their derivatives have been used since ancient times as treatment for many diseases, and the plant forms a key ingredient in many Thai traditional medicinal remedies. However, over the past few decades, cannabis usage was seen to change in a way that became incrementally more abusive, resulting in outright prohibition in almost all countries. Thailand was no exception, and in 1979 the Thai government officially enacted the Narcotics Act forbidding the use of cannabis and listing cannabis plants and their derivatives—most notably marijuana (cannabis with psychoactive properties) and hemp (cannabis with limited or no psychoactive properties)—as category 5 narcotics (i.e., prohibited substances). Despite these restrictions, many Thais continued to use cannabis illegally, and some urged the government to legalize personal and commercial use of cannabis plants and their derivatives. Eventually, some in the Thai government agreed that it was time to consider steps toward legalization, As a result, the government has been taking action to delist cannabis plants from the list of prohibited narcotics since 2018, when a regulation allowed the cultivation of hemp for industrial and non-commercial purposes, such as household cooking and research and development. The next significant step came in February 2019, when the Narcotics Act (No. 7) was amended, legalizing medical marijuana within certain limitations. In national elections the following month, the Bhumjaithai political party, whose election campaign included a pledge to decriminalize and legalize cannabis plants, won substantial support in parts of the country and chose to join the coalition government, with the Bhumjaithai party
Read More
February 23, 2021
As many are already aware, following the change of government in Myanmar on February 1, 2021, a draft Cyber Security Law was proposed which attracted widespread criticism. However, less attention has been paid to significant amendments to two existing laws, some of which have a similar effect to parts of the draft Cyber Security Law. In other words, while the draft Cyber Security Law has not progressed further and is under public scrutiny, significant elements of it have found their way into law in Myanmar by other routes. Because these amendments are already law, it is very important that individuals and businesses in Myanmar understand their implications. Amendments to the Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens The Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens (2017), or the “Privacy Law,” was amended on February 13, 2021, less than two weeks after the military government came into power. These amendments chiefly address the power of the government to conduct searches, seizures, and arrests; to extend detention without judicial oversight; and to carry out broad surveillance and investigation activities that could intrude on individual privacy. The amendments accomplish this by suspending various sections of the Privacy Law for as long as the State Administration Council (the military body now governing Myanmar) is in power. The suspended sections include the following: Section 5: Search, seizure, and arrest without civilian observation The relevant part of Section 5 of the Privacy Law states, “The responsible authorities shall … when acting in accordance with existing law, not enter into a person’s residence or a room used as a residence, or a building, compound or building in a compound, for the purpose of search, seizure, or arrest, unless accompanied by minimum of two witnesses who should comprise Ward or Village Tract Administrators…”. The suspension
Read More