You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 25, 2015

Air Carrier Liability in Vietnam

Amendments to Vietnam’s Civil Aviation Law (2006) (Aviation Law) became effective on July 1, 2015. The Aviation Law and the amendments regulate air carrier liability in Vietnam. Vietnam is not a signatory to the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air, adopted in Montreal on May 28, 1999 (the Montreal Convention). However, the legal framework for liability under the Aviation Law is generally consistent with the Montreal Convention, creating protection for consumers and predictability for air operators and their insurers.

Liability for Bodily Injury or Death

Under the Aviation Law, an air carrier is liable for a passenger’s death or injury when the accident occurred on board the aircraft, or during embarkation or disembarkation. In the event of an accident, the carrier is strictly liable for damages of up to 100,000 Special Drawing Rights (SDR) (about USD 137,000) per passenger. The air carrier cannot limit its liability except where there is contributory negligence. Plaintiffs, however, cannot bring claims for losses over the maximum damage amount if the damage was not caused by the carrier or was due to a third party’s fault. The compensation amount will be converted into Vietnamese dong at the official exchange rate publicized at the time of payment by the State Bank of Vietnam.

The Aviation Law further requires the air carrier to promptly make advance payments to passengers or persons having the right to claim compensation in case of an accident in accordance with carriers’ rules of carriage. The law also states that these payments should not be construed as an admission of liability and can be offset against any subsequent damages paid by the air carrier. Importantly, the carrier cannot “contract out” of its liability with a passenger. Any such contracts are considered void.

Liability for Damage Caused by Flight Delays

An air carrier is also liable for damage caused by flight delays. To escape liability, the carrier must prove that its staff and agents took or were unable to take all measures to avoid the damage. The carrier’s liability for damage to passengers caused by flight delays is limited to SDR 4,150 (about USD 5,690) per passenger. For baggage-related damages caused by similar reasons, the carrier’s liability is limited to SDR 1,000 (about USD 1,370).

Liability for Passengers’ Baggage

An air carrier is liable for the full or partial loss of passengers’ baggage, as well as damage to the baggage. This applies to both checked and carry-on baggage. The level of compensation payable by the carrier is calculated subject to the following:

  1. As agreed by the parties but not exceeding the actual damage value.
  2. Based on the declared value upon receipt of the checked baggage at the destination. If the carrier can prove that the declared value is higher than the actual value, the compensation will be made based on the actual damage value.
  3. Based on the actual damage value for: (a) checked baggage with non-declared value; and (b) hand baggage. The carrier’s liability for damage in this case is limited to SDR 1,000 (about USD 1,370). If the passenger has declared the value of the checked baggage at the destination and paid an additional fee, the carrier must compensate based on the declared value. The carrier will not enjoy the limit on liability if the carrier and its staff and agents intentionally or recklessly committed acts causing damage and must have been aware of the damage.

Liability for Cargo Losses

An air carrier’s liability for cargo delays, destruction, loss, or damage is limited to SDR 17 (about USD 19) per kilogram. The carrier is only responsible during a certain time period. Liability attaches to the carrier when the liability event occurred from when the consignor delivered the cargo to the carrier, to when the carrier delivered the cargo to the recipient. The carrier is not liable during the time when the cargo is transported by sea, land, rail, or inland waterways outside an airport or airfield.

Time Limit for Filing an Action

The Aviation Law contains time limits and other requirements that must be complied with before initiating any court action. Before filing a lawsuit against an air carrier for cargo or baggage delays, destruction, loss, or damage, a written complaint must be sent to the carrier. The complaint must be sent within: (a) 7 days from the receiving date in case of loss (including partial loss) or destruction; (b) 14 days from the delivery date in case of cargo loss (including partial loss) or destruction; or (c) 21 days from the receiving date of cargo or baggage in case of delays. If the carrier does not reply to or satisfy the demands of the entitled parties within 30 days from the date the complaints are received, a plaintiff can file a lawsuit.

The time limit to file a court action for any type of damage is two years from the aircraft’s arrival date, or the date which the aircraft ought to have arrived, or the date in which the carriage was cancelled, whichever is later.

Jurisdiction and Arbitration

The Aviation Law applies to both Vietnamese and international airlines carrying out air carriage operations in Vietnam. For claims arising out of international carriage involving cargo, baggage, and other nonbodily injury incidents, Vietnamese courts have jurisdiction, at the plaintiff’s option, when the carrier has its main office in Vietnam; has a place of business where the carriage contract was concluded; or Vietnam was the destination of the cargo.

For passenger bodily injury or death claims arising out of international carriage, the Vietnamese court has jurisdiction when the passenger has his or her main residence in Vietnam at the time of the accident and the air carrier uses its own aircraft or another aircraft pursuant to a contract or the carrier’s head office is in Vietnam or uses another carrier’s Vietnam head office, with which it has a joint contract. For damage claims arising out of domestic carriage, the plaintiff can only initiate a lawsuit at a Vietnamese court after making a complaint with the airline.

Parties can also agree to arbitration for claims involving cargo or baggage losses in limited circumstances. The law is silent on bodily injury claims, but it is unlikely that a Vietnamese court would accept an arbitral award for such claims. Arbitration is allowed only in disputes arising from international carriage for cargo and when related to the carrier’s liability. Also, the arbitration must be held in Vietnam.

Conclusion

As Vietnam’s economy grows, the number of airline passengers will also increase. There are now 49 foreign and 4 local airlines operating in Vietnam. While this is good news for air carriers, it also means greater risk of liability. The Aviation Law gives predictability to air carriers and their insurers, as well as protection to passengers. This helps air travel in this fast-growing emerging market.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

May 8, 2021
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused the aviation industry to face arguably the most challenging time in its history. Airlines across the world, including in Southeast Asia, have been deeply affected by the prolonged and universal halt to international air travel. Domestic flights have provided some much-needed revenue to local carriers. But with multiple and unforeseen waves of new virus cases, lockdowns and other travel restrictions, and a public generally fearful of travelling, domestic flights have not been enough to make up for the massive shortfall in revenue lost from international air travel. Despite all the current gloom for the aviation industry, there may be light at the end of the tunnel as the world glimpses life after the pandemic. This is mainly down to vaccinations. With people confined to their homes for over a year in many Western countries, there is pent-up demand to travel. As those people are vaccinated, they will want to get out of their houses and fly somewhere. Moreover, household savings have increased for those fortunate enough to be working throughout the pandemic in their homes, and with few options to go out and spend. This combination of travel demand and increased disposable income is a strong combination for positive growth in the post-pandemic aviation industry. In the context of Vietnam, which to date has managed to minimize outbreaks from occurring in the country, from around the middle of September 2020 airlines announced to fly again and increase the frequency of many domestic flights. Airlines also sought to restore some international commercial routes to meet the needs of passengers, contribute to connecting trade, and maintaining production and business activities. However, despite domestic demand, true recovery and economic success can only occur when passengers can again travel internationally, both inbound and outbound. As such, the critical
April 19, 2021
Thailand has made significant changes to its statutory interest rate framework for the first time in almost a century. Since 1925, the statutory interest rate codified in Thailand’s Civil and Commercial Code (the CCC) has remained at 7.5% per year. But with Covid-19 having an unprecedented impact on the Thai economy, the Thai Government, via emergency decree, has reduced the statutory rate. While the decree is largely aimed at providing relief to hard-hit SMEs and individual debtors, the amendments have broader implications for doing business in Thailand. Main Changes The new interest rate revisions are contained within the Emergency Decree Amending the Civil and Commercial Code B.E. 2564 (2021) (the Emergency Decree), which was published in the Government Gazette on April 10, 2021 and came into effect on April 11, 2021. The Emergency Decree amends Sections 7 and 224 of the CCC, which stated the previous statutory interest rate of 7.5% per year. The Emergency Decree makes three major changes. The first involves a reduction of the statutory interest rate from 7.5% per year to 3% per year in Section 7. The new 3% annual rate is subject to review every three years by the Ministry of Finance. The interest rate is subject to further change later by a royal decree. The second change concerns money debts under Section 224 of the CCC. The previous version of Section 224 stated, among other things, that a money debt based on a default bears interest of 7.5% per year. Under the Emergency Decree, the new actual statutory default interest rate is the statutory interest rate stated in Section 7 with an additional rate of 2% per year. The result is a 5% annual statutory default interest rate. Since the statutory default interest rate is based in part on the Section 7
February 23, 2021
As many are already aware, following the change of government in Myanmar on February 1, 2021, a draft Cyber Security Law was proposed which attracted widespread criticism. However, less attention has been paid to significant amendments to two existing laws, some of which have a similar effect to parts of the draft Cyber Security Law. In other words, while the draft Cyber Security Law has not progressed further and is under public scrutiny, significant elements of it have found their way into law in Myanmar by other routes. Because these amendments are already law, it is very important that individuals and businesses in Myanmar understand their implications. Amendments to the Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens The Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens (2017), or the “Privacy Law,” was amended on February 13, 2021, less than two weeks after the military government came into power. These amendments chiefly address the power of the government to conduct searches, seizures, and arrests; to extend detention without judicial oversight; and to carry out broad surveillance and investigation activities that could intrude on individual privacy. The amendments accomplish this by suspending various sections of the Privacy Law for as long as the State Administration Council (the military body now governing Myanmar) is in power. The suspended sections include the following: Section 5: Search, seizure, and arrest without civilian observation The relevant part of Section 5 of the Privacy Law states, “The responsible authorities shall … when acting in accordance with existing law, not enter into a person’s residence or a room used as a residence, or a building, compound or building in a compound, for the purpose of search, seizure, or arrest, unless accompanied by minimum of two witnesses who should comprise Ward or Village Tract Administrators…”. The suspension
February 22, 2021
Following the recent imposition of sanctions on Myanmar individuals and companies by the US, the UK and Canada have now imposed new sanctions. As with the US sanctions, these new measures impact UK and Canadian citizens and companies, and non-UK and non-Canadian companies and citizens with interests in those jurisdictions. The EU has indicated that it is planning to issue similar sanctions in the near future. New UK Sanctions In addition to the 16 individuals already sanctioned by the UK government, on February 18, 2021, the UK government announced that three individuals have been sanctioned for serious human rights violations and are now subject to asset freezes and travel bans. The full list of Myanmar individuals and companies sanctioned by the UK is available on the website of the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation. Breaches of UK financial sanctions are criminal offences punishable in the UK by up to 7 years imprisonment and heavy fines. New Canadian Sanctions Also on February 18, timed to coincide with the UK sanctions, new Canadian sanctions were imposed on nine individuals. As with the UK, Canada already had a number of individuals in the Myanmar military on its sanctions list, and the new additions bring the total number of individuals sanctioned by Canada to 54. All assets of these individuals in Canada are now frozen, and they are banned from travelling to Canada. Canadian businesses or entities may not do business with any of the 54 individuals. Full details of the impact of the sanctions are available on the Government of Canada’s website, as is a database of the Myanmar individuals and companies subject to them. Breach of Canadian sanctions carries with it up to 5 years’ imprisonment in Canada and/or a large fine. Other Countries The EU is reportedly drawing up sanctions