Counterfeiters in Thailand often refill genuine packaging and containers with unauthorized products, thus passing off the goods as genuine commodities. This problem is widespread. Refilled goods don’t pass through regulatory standards or quality control and so they can have harmful effects on consumers.In Thailand, refilled products generally fall into two categories:products for consumption, such as fish sauce and liquor; andcommodities, such as shampoos, toner and ink cartridges, and lubricants.

Vietnam’s IP Law is fairly liberal on the rights to register marks. Under the law, any organization or individual has the right to register marks to be used for goods they produce or services they provide. In practice, except for collective marks or certification marks, which are strictly regulated, anyone (legal entities or individuals) can apply for a trademark or a service mark for any kind of goods or services, as the trademark office does not request any documents showing their legal status or intention of use at the time of filing.

In its plenary session of February 9 2015, the Indonesian House of Representatives declared that 37 key bills would be prioritized for deliberation in 2015. Much to the delight of IP stakeholders, Indonesia’s Trademark and Patent Bills were among the 37 prioritized bills set to be passed this year.The Trademark Bill is particularly significant, as it will include, among other things:

When the Thai government enacted the Private Investments in State Undertakings Act B.E. 2556 (2013) (PISUA)—a new law regulating public-private partnerships (PPPs) that was designed to streamline and clarify the PPP process and thereby boost private investment, especially in the infrastructure sector—measures were introduced to increase the effectiveness and transparency of the PPP process, something previously unseen in PISUA’s predecessor, the Private Participation in State Undertakings Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (PPSUA).

Foreign investors that enter into Thailand-related investment transactions should consider using Thai courts as their venue for resolving disputes. While cross-border agreements commonly name jurisdictions such as New York, England, Singapore, or Hong Kong as the litigation setting, this approach is impractical for Thailand transactions. Foreign judgments are not enforceable in the Kingdom, so a plaintiff would have to initiate a new lawsuit in Thailand to pursue a defendant’s Thai assets or otherwise enforce a contract.

As has been widely reported, the Finance Ministry has proposed a new property tax on land and building owners. However, Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha has decided to delay the new tax, citing concerns about weak economic growth and the bill’s impact on the poor.

The sixth edition of The Employment Law Review has been published by Law Business Research. The book includes 48 country-specific chapters that provide comprehensive overviews of labor and employment law. Tilleke & Gibbins authored the Vietnam chapter of the book, which covers the following subjects in detail:

There have recently been a number of troubling developments in tobacco and alcohol legislation and regulation in Thailand that encroach upon intellectual property (IP). Other highly regulated products, such as cosmetics, food products, and drugs, are also feeling a regulatory pinch. These regulations have impinged legitimately granted IP rights and to a greater extent, rights to property, to engage in competition, and to free speech.