You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 8, 2025

New Draft Regulatory Framework for Food Product Declaration and Registration in Vietnam

Subscribe to Updates

In response to persistent challenges in food safety management and recent high-profile incidents involving counterfeit supplemented foods, infant formula, and health supplements, the Ministry of Health of Vietnam is initiating comprehensive regulatory reforms. These reforms include proposed amendments to the Law on Food Safety and its implementing Decree No. 15/2018/ND-CP (Decree 15), introducing significant changes to the registration procedures for food products, especially supplemented food products and health supplements.

While awaiting public consultation and approval of the amended Law on Food Safety, the Ministry of Health is developing an interim mechanism, which includes a draft decree to replace Decree 15 and a draft resolution to address urgent issues until the amended law becomes effective, expected in July 2026.

To align with the new Law on Quality of Products and Goods, the draft resolution stipulates that the declaration and registration of food products will follow the following procedures:

  • Declaration of applied standards for food products, which is currently known as the “self-declaration” procedure, applies to processed packaged foods, food additives, food processing aids, containers or utensils that come into direct contact with food, packaging materials in direct contact with food, and micronutrients.
  • Granting of circulation numbers, which is the current “registration of product declaration” procedure, applies to specific categories of food including health supplements, medical nutrition foods, special dietary foods, nutritional products for children up to 36 months, and, especially, supplemented foods, which are currently subject to self-declaration but will be shifted to this registration procedure.

In addition, the following new procedure is introduced in the draft decree:

  • Registration of declaration of conformity, which applies to the same product category as in “declaration of applied standards” above, but is for products that are already subject to technical regulations covering both safety indicators and quality indicators.

Changes to the Food Product Declaration and Registration Procedures

Details of the procedures for declaration of applied standards and granting of circulation numbers are stipulated in the draft resolution, while details of the procedure for registration of declaration of conformity are stipulated in the draft decree. These procedures will see some key changes compared to the current regulations, as highlighted below:

  • Letter of authorization: A letter of authorization (LOA) from the manufacturer or product owner to the entity conducting the declaration of applied standard or registration is a new requirement applicable to both procedures. Information that must be included in the LOA is detailed in the draft resolution.
  • Quality criteria: It is newly required to test quality criteria in a Certificate of Analysis (COA), in addition to safety criteria, for both procedures. The COA will need to follow the format set out in the draft resolution.
  • Declaration of conformity with internal standards: In addition to the declaration of compliance with food safety requirements, both product declaration and registration procedures have a new requirement that the declaring or registering entity must confirm that the product complies with its internal standards. This conformity is substantiated by submitting the in-house specification along with a dossier detailing the development of the specification.
  • Timeline for declaration of applied standards: The draft resolution introduces a defined principal evaluation timeline of 21 days from the date of submission—an element not specified under current regulations. It also clarifies that entities may begin manufacturing and trading declared products once the declaration, including the entity name and product name, is published on the authority’s official website.
  • Required documents: The required documents applicable to products subject to the registration of product declaration procedure are much more stringent than in current practice. The registration dossier will cover two parts: (i) administrative and (ii) technical. More technical documents will be required for the technical part, such as a manufacturer’s certificate (GMP, HACCP, etc.), report on product research and development process, documentation on quality and safety standards, documentation of manufacturing process, long-term stability report, and other technical explanation (if necessary).
  • Timeline for registration of product declaration: The estimated principal approval timeline is specifically set as 90 days from the date of submission. Compared to the current regulation, the timeline for submitting a supplemental dossier will be reduced from 90 working days to 60 working days from the date of receiving an official notice of deficiency. Notably, instead of an unlimited number of revisions, the draft resolution only permits a one-time revision.
  • Exclusion of certain products from the registration of product declaration procedure: Certain food additives—including blended food additives with new functions, those not on the Ministry of Health’s permitted list, or those used for incorrect purposes—are no longer subject to the registration of product declaration procedure under the draft resolution. Neither the draft resolution nor the draft decree specify how these products should be registered, suggesting that future regulations on food additive management may address this gap.

Suspension of Product Declaration Registration

The draft resolution introduces a new provision allowing competent authorities to temporarily suspend the receipt and processing of product declaration dossiers from entities who have violated food safety regulations. Processing will resume once the violations are fully remedied and a compliance report is submitted.

Transitional Provision

Under the draft decree, for food products that are registered or self-declared before the effective date of the decree, product owners must complete the procedures for re-registering or re-declaring product standards in accordance with the draft resolution (after it is enacted), within the following timeframes:

  • 18 months from the effective date of the decree for products that already have a Certificate of Receipt for Product Declaration.
  • 6 months from the effective date of the decree for products that are self-declared.

After these deadlines, any previous product declaration documents or certificates will no longer be valid for production or importation. However, products with a certificate that were produced within 18 months of the decree’s effective date and products that were self-declared and produced within 6 months of the decree’s effective date may continue to be circulated until their expiration date, and the product owner remains fully responsible for those products.

The draft decree does not specify a transitional period for the supplemented food products that will be shifted from the self-declaration procedure to the registration of product declaration procedure.

The draft resolution and draft decree will be discussed and approved under the fast-track procedure. However, no expected effective date has been provided. It remains possible that further revisions to the draft decree may be introduced.

Impact for Businesses and Next Steps

Businesses will be required to prepare additional documentation for declaration and registration processes to comply with the new regulations once they are enacted. Stricter documentation will be required for products subject to registration of declaration procedure, especially for supplemented foods, which are shifted from self-declaration procedure to registration of product declaration procedure.

Businesses should review their product portfolios to determine applicable registration pathways, develop plans to update the declaration and registration dossiers, and monitor for further amendment, official issuance, and implementation guidance.

Related Professionals

Industries

Life Sciences

Practices

Regulatory Affairs

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 24, 2026
As food innovation continues to accelerate, manufacturers are increasingly introducing ingredients derived from new sources, produced using novel technologies, or lacking a significant history of human consumption. While these innovations create new opportunities for the food industry, they also raise important questions regarding consumer safety. For this reason, many jurisdictions, including Thailand, the European Union, Australia and New Zealand, Canada, and Singapore, require a premarket safety assessment for novel food ingredients before they can be placed on the market. The objective of this assessment is to ensure that each ingredient is safe for its intended use and level of consumption, does not present toxicological, allergenic, microbiological, or nutritional concerns, and will not mislead consumers. Scientific authorities typically evaluate the ingredient’s identity, manufacturing process, composition, specifications, anticipated dietary exposure, toxicological information, nutritional impact, and history of use before determining whether it can be marketed. Against this background, the Thai Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently took an important step toward improving regulatory transparency by publishing, for the first time, a consolidated public list of substances that have successfully completed the Thai FDA’s safety assessment process, including substances determined to be novel foods and those determined not to fall within the novel food category. The list identifies the approved substances, the corresponding manufacturers or importers, approval dates, and the approved conditions of use. Although the publication does not change the existing legal framework governing novel food approvals, it provides businesses with greater visibility into the Thai FDA’s regulatory precedents and the types of substances that have previously been accepted through the safety assessment process. The full announcement is available on the Thai FDA’s website. As the list is now publicly available, it also provides useful insight into the types of substances that have successfully completed the Thai FDA’s safety assessment process.
Read More
July 24, 2026
For businesses in Thailand’s regulated industries, the problem of “too many licenses” is one of the most familiar hurdles to getting a product to market. Take a simple example: importing the materials necessary to sell teriyaki chicken skewers. To legally do this, a business may need approvals from several different agencies—separate permits for the chicken (Department of Livestock Development), the dipping sauce (Thai FDA), the wooden skewers (Department of Forestry), and other ingredients, each under a different authority. This kind of overlap is often cited to argue for a “regulatory guillotine”—a systematic review to cut outdated or duplicative rules that slow investment and business activity. The Facilitation of Licensing and Public Service Consideration Act B.E. 2569 (2026) (Licensing Facilitation Act 2026) is Thailand’s most significant response yet to that concern. This article looks at the Facilitation Act 2026 through a life sciences and regulatory affairs lens—what it may mean for the manufacturers, importers, and distributors of food, drugs, medical devices, cosmetics, and similar products who routinely deal with several regulators to bring a single product to market. The Super License: One Approval Standing in for Many The reform with the clearest potential for regulated-product businesses is the law’s “super license” mechanism, referred to as a “main license” in the statute. Once a business obtains the main license for a regulated activity, it is automatically deemed to hold all related sublicenses issued by other agencies for that same activity, provided the activity has been designated as eligible in the Government Gazette. The Licensing Facilitation Act 2026 also creates a central application center, allowing applicants to submit a single application and pay all relevant fees at one point of contact, with the center routing the application to each agency through a shared information system. The potential benefits of this for businesses
Read More
July 13, 2026
Indonesia’s Halal Product Assurance Agency (BPJPH) has issued new regulations establishing clearer procedures for imposing administrative sanctions on businesses that violate halal product assurance requirements. BPJPH Regulation No. 2 of 2026 on the Imposition of Administrative Sanctions for Violations of Halal Product Assurance Implementation, issued on June 5, 2026, strengthens Indonesia’s halal compliance framework, as mandated under Law No. 33 of 2014 on Halal Product Assurance and Government Regulation No. 42 of 2024 on the Implementation of Halal Product Assurance. BPJPH Regulation No. 2/2026 also supports the upcoming mandatory halal compliance deadline of October 17, 2026, which will apply to a broad range of products and services, including imported food and beverages, slaughtering products and services, natural and quasi-drugs, health supplements, cosmetics, chemical and genetically engineered products, clothing and accessories, household goods, prayer equipment, stationery, and class A medical devices. Scope BPJPH is authorized to impose administrative sanctions for violations of halal product assurance requirements committed by businesses, halal inspection agencies (LPH), halal auditors, halal product process companion institutions (lembaga pendamping PPH), and halal product process companions (pendamping PPH). The head of BPJPH has authority to determine, cancel, or amend the imposition of administrative sanctions, including upon receipt of objections. This authority covers revocation of Halal Certificates (including foreign halal certificate registration numbers), withdrawal of goods from circulation, freezing of LPH operations, freezing of halal product process companion institutions, revocation of PPH companion institution registration numbers, revocation of halal auditor registration numbers, and revocation of LPH accreditation status. Administrative Sanctions Businesses may be subject to any of the following administrative sanctions: Written warning; Administrative fine; Revocation of the halal certificate, including revocation of foreign halal certificate registration numbers; and Withdrawal of goods from circulation. The regulation sets out the types of violations that may trigger these sanctions, with each
Read More
July 1, 2026
Obtaining marketing authorization is a fundamental requirement for bringing pharmaceutical products to the Thai market. Companies must navigate the Thai Food and Drug Administration’s registration procedures while also complying with post-approval pharmacovigilance obligations, licensing requirements for manufacturing and importation, data protection rules, and other regulatory requirements. This guide provides an overview of Thailand’s regulatory framework for pharmaceutical marketing authorization, including available registration pathways, review timelines, application fees, postmarketing surveillance obligations, licensing requirements, exemptions, data exclusivity, freedom of information, and parallel import considerations. It is intended as a practical reference for pharmaceutical companies, regulatory affairs professionals, and others involved in bringing medicinal products to the Thai market. Download the guide below for a concise overview of the current requirements and procedures governing pharmaceutical marketing authorization in Thailand.
Read More