You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

July 11, 2023

Indonesia’s First Draft of Omnibus Health Law Shows Promise

Enacted in 2009, Indonesia’s current Law on Health (Law No. 36/2009) is due for a refresh. The government realized that the law has not maintained its relevance when it comes to health trends such as digital health, which refers to the provision of health services online (also commonly known as telemedicine). While regulations and policy blueprints, such as Ministry of Health (MOH) Regulation No. 46/2017 concerning National E-Health Strategies, have addressed these shifting trends, Indonesia’s main health legislation has proved inadequate in this regard.

For this reason, the government began making plans for an update to the law, and the first draft Omnibus Health Law was published in March 2023. The law addresses digital health and other important issues in today’s health landscape, and it seeks to promote the use of locally made health supplies. The draft Omnibus Health Law represents a notable step forward, but in its attempt to govern and regulate all aspects of health, there are also some issues in the draft that may overlap with some existing government regulations, such as provisions on Halal certification, compulsory licensing of patents, and addictive substances.

This article outlines some of the draft law’s key aspects as well as some potential issues.

Digital Health

In addressing the growing health trend of telemedicine, the draft law confirms, reinforces, and fills gaps left by Indonesia’s three main regulations concerning telemedicine. namely, MOHR No. 20/2019 concerning Telemedicine, MOHR No. 24/2022 concerning Medical Records, and Medical Council Regulation No. 74/2020 concerning Telemedicine (MCR No. 74/2020).

One of these regulations, MOH Regulation No. 20/2019, allows health service facilities to provide telemedicine services to other health service facilities. This covers telemedicine services related to radiology, electrocardiography, ultrasonography, and telemedicine consultancy services—including those that reflect developments in science and technology. This is the only regulation concerning telemedicine services that will not be revoked once the pandemic status is revoked. It will also remain in effect with further implementing regulations (i.e., government regulations) if MOH Regulation No. 20/2019 does not conflict with them.

Another of the telemedicine regulations, Medical Council Regulation No. 74/2020 regulates telemedicine services between Health Service Facilities and patients directly. However, this regulation only applies during the COVID-19 pandemic, meaning that once the pandemic status is revoked by the government there will be no regulation for telemedicine services between health service facilities and patients. This is the void filled by the draft Omnibus Health Law 2023, which states that health service facilities can provide telemedicine services directly to patients, in accordance with an implementing regulation issued in the future.

The draft Omnibus Health Law does not have any differences with the third existing telemedicine regulation, MOH Regulation No. 24/2022 on Medical Records. According to both the regulation and the draft law, health care personnel must be the ones to generate medical records. Health service facilities are also responsible for the security, integrity, confidentiality, and availability of the data in medical records.

The draft law also requires health system information providers to integrate their information systems with the MOH digital system. This integration will enable healthcare personnel, patients, and related parties to access up-to-date and relevant information.

Promotion of Domestic Health Supplies

The draft Omnibus Health Law also promotes the use of health technology originating in Indonesia (referred to in Indonesian as produk dalam negeri). Under the draft, the government is responsible for ensuring the availability, equity, and affordability of health supplies—especially essential drugs (as listed by the government) and drugs used in nationwide programs. The government’s procurement of these health supplies must prioritize domestic products, and generic drugs with international nonproprietary names marketed in Indonesia can only be produced by local pharmaceutical companies.

The draft Omnibus Health Law appears to exclude access to some innovative drugs. While the government is understandably eager to promote locally produced drugs, it is still necessary to import some innovative drugs when the drug cannot be produced locally or the volume of local production is insufficient.

Halal Certification

The draft Omnibus Health Law states that pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and household health supplies must be safe, effective, beneficial, halal, of good quality, and affordable. It further specifies that these items must meet the halal requirements laid out in Indonesian law.

This contrasts with the current Law on Health (Law No. 36/2009), which does not mention the term “halal.” Indonesia’s halal requirements are stipulated in Law No. 33/2014 on Halal Product Assurance and its implementing regulations issued by the Halal Product Assurance Organizing Body. To avoid any confusion and ambiguity on halal certification requirements, the Omnibus Health Law should align with Law No. 33/2014 and its implementing regulations, particularly regarding products that are exempted from obtaining halal certification.

Patent Compulsory Licensing

In regard to compulsory licensing of patents, the draft law states that to ensure the availability and affordability of patent-protected drugs, interventions can be carried out through patent implementation by the central government or through compulsory licensing.

One consideration here is that Indonesia’s Patent Law No. 13/2016 is also undergoing revision. The government should make sure to align the draft Omnibus Health Law with the Patent Law with regard to patent compulsory licensing to avoid confusion or a lack of clarity. In doing so, the government should also consider compulsory licensing of patents for imported pharmaceutical products that cannot be produced locally.

Safeguards on Addictive Substances

The draft Omnibus Health Law states that the production, distribution, and use of addictive substances should not disturb or endanger the health of individuals, families, communities, and the environment. “Addictive substances” include all materials or products that are addictive in nature and whose use can have detrimental effects on individuals or the community at large. These can include:

  • narcotics;
  • psychotropics;
  • alcoholic beverages;
  • tobacco products; and
  • other processed products of addictive substances.

Narcotics and psychotropics are not identified as addictive substances in Health Law No. 36/2009, but they are illegal substances in that their production, distribution, and consumption are prohibited and subject to criminal sanctions. The Omnibus Health Law should remove narcotics and psychotropics from this provision of addictive substances because they are illegal substances that are regulated under Law No. 35/2009 on Narcotics and Law No. 5/2007 on Psychotropics.

Next Steps

Once this draft Omnibus Health Law is issued by the government, the implementing regulations for this law will likely be discussed in the legislature. However, there not yet been any indication from the government regarding when draft Omnibus Health Law could be passed into law.

Based on the first draft that has been published, we can see that the Omnibus Health Law in Indonesia will address key issues in the health sector, particularly in the areas of digital health, domestic health supplies, and compulsory licensing. However, further revisions and alignment with existing laws and regulations will be necessary to ensure clarity and avoid conflicts.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 10, 2026
On June 17, 2026, Indonesia’s National Agency of Drug and Food Control (BPOM) issued BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 on Nutritional Information on Processed Food Labels. The new regulation, which revokes three previous nutrition labeling regulations, introduces several notable changes affecting food and beverage manufacturers, importers, and distributors. These changes range from updated nutrient reference values and serving-size requirements to the introduction of the Nutri-Level front-of-pack labeling system for certain beverage products. Businesses operating in Indonesia should carefully review these developments and assess their products’ compliance with the new requirements during the transition period. Implementation of the Nutri-Level Labeling System To implement the recently issued decree on Nutri-Level labeling, BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 stipulates the requirements to implement the Nutri-Level labeling system on the front-of-pack. Under the new framework, ready-to-drink beverages, powdered beverages, and liquid or solid concentrates are required to display Nutri-Level labeling on the front label of their packaging. The Nutri-Level labeling system classifies products into color-coded levels A through D based on their sugar, sodium, and total fat content. The applicable Nutri-Level is determined based on the lowest level measured in the assessment of sugar, sodium, and total fat content. For products classified as level C or D, the Nutri-Level label must be accompanied by information on the relevant sugar, sodium, and total fat content per 100 ml of the ready-to-consume product. Products classified as level A or B may either display only the Nutri-Level designation or display the Nutri-Level together with the relevant nutritional information per 100 ml. Minimum Vitamin and Mineral Content Required for Declaration BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 introduces a stricter threshold for the declaration of vitamins and minerals in the nutritional value information section (ING). Vitamins or minerals may only be declared if they are present at a
August 10, 2026
The drug registration process in Vietnam will be simplified, particularly for foreign applicants, following the recent issuance by Vietnam’s Ministry of Health (MOH) of a new circular that is expected to reduce administrative hurdles. Circular No. 32/2026/TT-BYT on the registration of drugs and medicinal ingredients (Circular 32) was issued on July 29, 2026, and will take effect on October 1, 2026, replacing Circular No. 12/2025/TT-BYT. Key provisions of the new circular are discussed below. Five-Year Data Exclusivity and Five-Month Public Disclosure Framework Circular 32 updates data protection guidelines by explicitly referencing Article 128 of the amended Intellectual Property Law, which sets out that new drugs supported by clinical trial data submitted for the first time will be granted a five-year data exclusivity period from the date of the initial marketing authorization (MA) approval. Subsequent applications that rely on the originator’s protected data will not be eligible for approval from the date of submission of the originator’s registration dossier until five years after the first MA is granted. Furthermore, in accordance with the new regulations, the regulatory authority must publicly disclose information on subsequent applications five months before the granting of MA, providing originator companies with an opportunity to exercise and enforce their intellectual property rights. Simplified Requirements for Foreign Legal Documents Circular 32 expands the circumstances under which legal documents issued by foreign authorities are exempt from consular legalization and authenticity verification requirements. Specifically, such documents may be exempt if the Drug Administration of Vietnam (DAV) is able to verify their authenticity directly through official electronic means, including written confirmation or email correspondence sent directly to the MOH by the competent foreign authority, or publicly accessible English-language databases maintained by recognized foreign regulatory authorities. In addition, the new circular permits the submission of electronic notarized copies of legal documents
July 24, 2026
As food innovation continues to accelerate, manufacturers are increasingly introducing ingredients derived from new sources, produced using novel technologies, or lacking a significant history of human consumption. While these innovations create new opportunities for the food industry, they also raise important questions regarding consumer safety. For this reason, many jurisdictions, including Thailand, the European Union, Australia and New Zealand, Canada, and Singapore, require a premarket safety assessment for novel food ingredients before they can be placed on the market. The objective of this assessment is to ensure that each ingredient is safe for its intended use and level of consumption, does not present toxicological, allergenic, microbiological, or nutritional concerns, and will not mislead consumers. Scientific authorities typically evaluate the ingredient’s identity, manufacturing process, composition, specifications, anticipated dietary exposure, toxicological information, nutritional impact, and history of use before determining whether it can be marketed. Against this background, the Thai Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently took an important step toward improving regulatory transparency by publishing, for the first time, a consolidated public list of substances that have successfully completed the Thai FDA’s safety assessment process, including substances determined to be novel foods and those determined not to fall within the novel food category. The list identifies the approved substances, the corresponding manufacturers or importers, approval dates, and the approved conditions of use. Although the publication does not change the existing legal framework governing novel food approvals, it provides businesses with greater visibility into the Thai FDA’s regulatory precedents and the types of substances that have previously been accepted through the safety assessment process. The full announcement is available on the Thai FDA’s website. As the list is now publicly available, it also provides useful insight into the types of substances that have successfully completed the Thai FDA’s safety assessment process.
July 24, 2026
For businesses in Thailand’s regulated industries, the problem of “too many licenses” is one of the most familiar hurdles to getting a product to market. Take a simple example: importing the materials necessary to sell teriyaki chicken skewers. To legally do this, a business may need approvals from several different agencies—separate permits for the chicken (Department of Livestock Development), the dipping sauce (Thai FDA), the wooden skewers (Department of Forestry), and other ingredients, each under a different authority. This kind of overlap is often cited to argue for a “regulatory guillotine”—a systematic review to cut outdated or duplicative rules that slow investment and business activity. The Facilitation of Licensing and Public Service Consideration Act B.E. 2569 (2026) (Licensing Facilitation Act 2026) is Thailand’s most significant response yet to that concern. This article looks at the Facilitation Act 2026 through a life sciences and regulatory affairs lens—what it may mean for the manufacturers, importers, and distributors of food, drugs, medical devices, cosmetics, and similar products who routinely deal with several regulators to bring a single product to market. The Super License: One Approval Standing in for Many The reform with the clearest potential for regulated-product businesses is the law’s “super license” mechanism, referred to as a “main license” in the statute. Once a business obtains the main license for a regulated activity, it is automatically deemed to hold all related sublicenses issued by other agencies for that same activity, provided the activity has been designated as eligible in the Government Gazette. The Licensing Facilitation Act 2026 also creates a central application center, allowing applicants to submit a single application and pay all relevant fees at one point of contact, with the center routing the application to each agency through a shared information system. The potential benefits of this for businesses