You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

July 11, 2023

Indonesia’s First Draft of Omnibus Health Law Shows Promise

Subscribe to Updates

Enacted in 2009, Indonesia’s current Law on Health (Law No. 36/2009) is due for a refresh. The government realized that the law has not maintained its relevance when it comes to health trends such as digital health, which refers to the provision of health services online (also commonly known as telemedicine). While regulations and policy blueprints, such as Ministry of Health (MOH) Regulation No. 46/2017 concerning National E-Health Strategies, have addressed these shifting trends, Indonesia’s main health legislation has proved inadequate in this regard.

For this reason, the government began making plans for an update to the law, and the first draft Omnibus Health Law was published in March 2023. The law addresses digital health and other important issues in today’s health landscape, and it seeks to promote the use of locally made health supplies. The draft Omnibus Health Law represents a notable step forward, but in its attempt to govern and regulate all aspects of health, there are also some issues in the draft that may overlap with some existing government regulations, such as provisions on Halal certification, compulsory licensing of patents, and addictive substances.

This article outlines some of the draft law’s key aspects as well as some potential issues.

Digital Health

In addressing the growing health trend of telemedicine, the draft law confirms, reinforces, and fills gaps left by Indonesia’s three main regulations concerning telemedicine. namely, MOHR No. 20/2019 concerning Telemedicine, MOHR No. 24/2022 concerning Medical Records, and Medical Council Regulation No. 74/2020 concerning Telemedicine (MCR No. 74/2020).

One of these regulations, MOH Regulation No. 20/2019, allows health service facilities to provide telemedicine services to other health service facilities. This covers telemedicine services related to radiology, electrocardiography, ultrasonography, and telemedicine consultancy services—including those that reflect developments in science and technology. This is the only regulation concerning telemedicine services that will not be revoked once the pandemic status is revoked. It will also remain in effect with further implementing regulations (i.e., government regulations) if MOH Regulation No. 20/2019 does not conflict with them.

Another of the telemedicine regulations, Medical Council Regulation No. 74/2020 regulates telemedicine services between Health Service Facilities and patients directly. However, this regulation only applies during the COVID-19 pandemic, meaning that once the pandemic status is revoked by the government there will be no regulation for telemedicine services between health service facilities and patients. This is the void filled by the draft Omnibus Health Law 2023, which states that health service facilities can provide telemedicine services directly to patients, in accordance with an implementing regulation issued in the future.

The draft Omnibus Health Law does not have any differences with the third existing telemedicine regulation, MOH Regulation No. 24/2022 on Medical Records. According to both the regulation and the draft law, health care personnel must be the ones to generate medical records. Health service facilities are also responsible for the security, integrity, confidentiality, and availability of the data in medical records.

The draft law also requires health system information providers to integrate their information systems with the MOH digital system. This integration will enable healthcare personnel, patients, and related parties to access up-to-date and relevant information.

Promotion of Domestic Health Supplies

The draft Omnibus Health Law also promotes the use of health technology originating in Indonesia (referred to in Indonesian as produk dalam negeri). Under the draft, the government is responsible for ensuring the availability, equity, and affordability of health supplies—especially essential drugs (as listed by the government) and drugs used in nationwide programs. The government’s procurement of these health supplies must prioritize domestic products, and generic drugs with international nonproprietary names marketed in Indonesia can only be produced by local pharmaceutical companies.

The draft Omnibus Health Law appears to exclude access to some innovative drugs. While the government is understandably eager to promote locally produced drugs, it is still necessary to import some innovative drugs when the drug cannot be produced locally or the volume of local production is insufficient.

Halal Certification

The draft Omnibus Health Law states that pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and household health supplies must be safe, effective, beneficial, halal, of good quality, and affordable. It further specifies that these items must meet the halal requirements laid out in Indonesian law.

This contrasts with the current Law on Health (Law No. 36/2009), which does not mention the term “halal.” Indonesia’s halal requirements are stipulated in Law No. 33/2014 on Halal Product Assurance and its implementing regulations issued by the Halal Product Assurance Organizing Body. To avoid any confusion and ambiguity on halal certification requirements, the Omnibus Health Law should align with Law No. 33/2014 and its implementing regulations, particularly regarding products that are exempted from obtaining halal certification.

Patent Compulsory Licensing

In regard to compulsory licensing of patents, the draft law states that to ensure the availability and affordability of patent-protected drugs, interventions can be carried out through patent implementation by the central government or through compulsory licensing.

One consideration here is that Indonesia’s Patent Law No. 13/2016 is also undergoing revision. The government should make sure to align the draft Omnibus Health Law with the Patent Law with regard to patent compulsory licensing to avoid confusion or a lack of clarity. In doing so, the government should also consider compulsory licensing of patents for imported pharmaceutical products that cannot be produced locally.

Safeguards on Addictive Substances

The draft Omnibus Health Law states that the production, distribution, and use of addictive substances should not disturb or endanger the health of individuals, families, communities, and the environment. “Addictive substances” include all materials or products that are addictive in nature and whose use can have detrimental effects on individuals or the community at large. These can include:

  • narcotics;
  • psychotropics;
  • alcoholic beverages;
  • tobacco products; and
  • other processed products of addictive substances.

Narcotics and psychotropics are not identified as addictive substances in Health Law No. 36/2009, but they are illegal substances in that their production, distribution, and consumption are prohibited and subject to criminal sanctions. The Omnibus Health Law should remove narcotics and psychotropics from this provision of addictive substances because they are illegal substances that are regulated under Law No. 35/2009 on Narcotics and Law No. 5/2007 on Psychotropics.

Next Steps

Once this draft Omnibus Health Law is issued by the government, the implementing regulations for this law will likely be discussed in the legislature. However, there not yet been any indication from the government regarding when draft Omnibus Health Law could be passed into law.

Based on the first draft that has been published, we can see that the Omnibus Health Law in Indonesia will address key issues in the health sector, particularly in the areas of digital health, domestic health supplies, and compulsory licensing. However, further revisions and alignment with existing laws and regulations will be necessary to ensure clarity and avoid conflicts.

Related Professionals

Industries

Life Sciences

Practices

Regulatory Affairs

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 13, 2026
Indonesia’s Halal Product Assurance Agency (BPJPH) has issued new regulations establishing clearer procedures for imposing administrative sanctions on businesses that violate halal product assurance requirements. BPJPH Regulation No. 2 of 2026 on the Imposition of Administrative Sanctions for Violations of Halal Product Assurance Implementation, issued on June 5, 2026, strengthens Indonesia’s halal compliance framework, as mandated under Law No. 33 of 2014 on Halal Product Assurance and Government Regulation No. 42 of 2024 on the Implementation of Halal Product Assurance. BPJPH Regulation No. 2/2026 also supports the upcoming mandatory halal compliance deadline of October 17, 2026, which will apply to a broad range of products and services, including imported food and beverages, slaughtering products and services, natural and quasi-drugs, health supplements, cosmetics, chemical and genetically engineered products, clothing and accessories, household goods, prayer equipment, stationery, and class A medical devices. Scope BPJPH is authorized to impose administrative sanctions for violations of halal product assurance requirements committed by businesses, halal inspection agencies (LPH), halal auditors, halal product process companion institutions (lembaga pendamping PPH), and halal product process companions (pendamping PPH). The head of BPJPH has authority to determine, cancel, or amend the imposition of administrative sanctions, including upon receipt of objections. This authority covers revocation of Halal Certificates (including foreign halal certificate registration numbers), withdrawal of goods from circulation, freezing of LPH operations, freezing of halal product process companion institutions, revocation of PPH companion institution registration numbers, revocation of halal auditor registration numbers, and revocation of LPH accreditation status. Administrative Sanctions Businesses may be subject to any of the following administrative sanctions: Written warning; Administrative fine; Revocation of the halal certificate, including revocation of foreign halal certificate registration numbers; and Withdrawal of goods from circulation. The regulation sets out the types of violations that may trigger these sanctions, with each
Read More
July 1, 2026
Obtaining marketing authorization is a fundamental requirement for bringing pharmaceutical products to the Thai market. Companies must navigate the Thai Food and Drug Administration’s registration procedures while also complying with post-approval pharmacovigilance obligations, licensing requirements for manufacturing and importation, data protection rules, and other regulatory requirements. This guide provides an overview of Thailand’s regulatory framework for pharmaceutical marketing authorization, including available registration pathways, review timelines, application fees, postmarketing surveillance obligations, licensing requirements, exemptions, data exclusivity, freedom of information, and parallel import considerations. It is intended as a practical reference for pharmaceutical companies, regulatory affairs professionals, and others involved in bringing medicinal products to the Thai market. Download the guide below for a concise overview of the current requirements and procedures governing pharmaceutical marketing authorization in Thailand.
Read More
June 24, 2026
Patent enablement requirements are provided under Article 102 of Vietnam’s Law on Intellectual Property (IP Law). In particular, a patent specification must “fully and clearly disclose the nature of the invention to such an extent that, based on the specification, a person having ordinary skill in the relevant art can implement the invention.” In pharmaceutical and biotechnology patents, this requirement is more complicated and subject to more rigorous assessment. The Patent Examination Guidelines (Guidelines) of the Intellectual Property Office of Vietnam (IP Office) were amended in March 2026 to introduce Annexes III and IV for the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors, in which Annex III provides detailed guidelines on the assessment of specification requirements. These amendments were made under a project for strengthening capacity in industrial property examination between the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and the IP Office. Annex III provides detailed instructions on how examiners assess enablement in a pharmaceutical or biotechnology application, and offers examples of acceptable and unacceptable descriptions with regard to the enablement aspect. Enablement Requirements in Pharma and Biotech Patents Article 12.7 of Circular 10/2026/TT-BKHCN (Circular 10) adds to the requirements of Article 102 of the IP Law that the description must demonstrate the novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability of the technical solution. For pharmaceutical composition subject matters, Article 12.9 of Circular 10 sets out that the description must present the results of clinical trials and/or the pharmacological effects of the claimed pharmaceutical composition, and must include at least the following information: Substance/mixture used. Testing method (system) employed. Information on the test results. Correlation between the pharmacological effects obtained from the tests and the application of the pharmaceutical product in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases. The Guidelines note that pharmacological study results should be presented in a quantified manner, and pharmacological
Read More
June 19, 2026
For the first time, Thailand’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has published a consolidated list identifying all substances that have successfully passed its novel food safety evaluation process. The list is a step forward in regulatory transparency, but it also highlights a feature of the Thai regime that food companies often overlook: each approval is tied exclusively to the company that applied for it. A substance’s appearance on the list does not give other companies the green light to use it. This article examines the structure of Thailand’s novel food approval framework, the implications of applicant exclusivity, and the strategic choices it requires of food companies looking to bring novel ingredients to the Thai market. Thai FDA Food Safety Evaluation Framework Notification No. 376 of the Ministry of Public Health requires novel food substances to undergo a food safety assessment, with an exemption only for novel foods manufactured exclusively for export. The framework also encompasses “foods that do not qualify as novel foods” but which present characteristics warranting a safety evaluation, such as differing quality standards, increased serving sizes, or applications in specific food categories, where such changes affect consumption levels, nutritional value, or consumer safety. The recently published list of foods that passed the safety evaluation by the Thai FDA is structured by substance category and identifies the approved company (domestic manufacturer or importer), country of origin, substance name and trade name, approved purpose of use, and date of the Thai FDA’s approval notification certificate. A notable feature of Thailand’s novel food regime is that the approval result is tied exclusively to the company that submitted the application. Publication of the consolidated list does not constitute a general authorization to use the approved substances. The Thai FDA’s approval certificate specifies the approved conditions of use and the requirements
Read More