You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

December 13, 2013

Real Estate Investment Trusts in Thailand

Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

The evolution of real property financing in Thailand—from primarily bank loans to rigid property funds to the proposed real estate investment trusts (REITs)—reflects the liberalisation of the Thai market, the need for alternative funding options, and the need for the country to maintain its regional competitiveness.

The Capital Market Supervisory Board under the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued regulations last year governing the issuance and offering of REITs in Thailand. The regulations took effect on Jan 1 this year.

Development of REITs: In the past, Thailand’s commercial real estate market was funded primarily by bank loans, secondary offerings and initial public offerings, and to a limited extent, private equity. Previous attempts to broaden financing options through the Property Fund for Public Offering (PFPO) channel proved to be ineffectual and unpopular due to its many restrictions.

One glaring absence from the list of financing options is the REIT—long prized in the United States for its flexibility and deduction of shareholder dividends from taxable corporate income. The lack of the REIT financing option in Thailand became all the more apparent when demand for commercial and residential real estate projects increased (due to very low interest rates) during the recovery of the property sector from 2003 onward.

Recognising the limitations of PFPOs, the SEC approved the new regulatory framework for establishing REITs in 2010 and has since followed up by issuing the regulations now in effect.

REIT regulations: The new REIT regulations are expected to provide a modernised vehicle for financing real estate investments, while also providing the flexibility that has made the funds popular at the international level. Additionally, REITs will likely replace existing PFPOs altogether. Establishing a new PFPO or increasing registered capital in an existing one has not been possible during the one-year period following the issuance of REIT regulations.

Converting an existing property fund to a REIT, however, will be possible. The grace period for the existing property funds to raise funds and borrow for investment expansion is effective until the end of 2013, but as the launch of the REITs seems to have run behind schedule, the deadline is likely to be extended.

The REIT regulations contemplate a trust fund structure (not a juristic structure as in existing property funds), whereby the trustee will have the legal right over the fund in terms of ownership and/or properties. Trust certificates will be listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand. Thus, when forming and operating a REIT, one will need to take into account existing SEC rules regarding, for example, investment in properties, corporate governance, and management restrictions. REIT managers (which can be companies) will manage the REITs, for which they will be required to hold licences issued by the SEC.

Other features of the REIT regulations will ease the limitations seen in the old property fund rules, including the following:

  • A REIT can leverage up to 35% of its net asset value (NAV) of assets and up to 60% of its NAV for credit rating of investment grade, whereas the current property fund regulations allow only for leveraging 10% of the NAV.
  • The holding restriction for affiliated companies will be increased to 50% of the total trust certificates sold, up from one-third under the PFPO regulations.
  • REITs will be permitted to invest in a broad spectrum of real property types, and barred only from investing in immoral or illegal businesses, while a PFPO is permitted to invest only in certain types of real estate projects.The SEC and the Revenue Department are now finalising the tax structure for REITs.

High hopes for Thailand’s REITs: The hope is that the new REIT option will attract foreign investment to fuel Thailand’s property fund market while maintaining the country’s credit ratings. The creation of the REIT will provide another means for financing real estate, thereby reducing the need to rely primarily on Thai banks as a source of long-term capital. Finally, large institutional investors seeking real estate exposure will be able to purchase a diversified product in line with their risk appetite.

With the right blend of tax incentives, strong oversight, and a flexible investment framework, Thailand may begin to see growth rates in REITs nearing the levels seen in other parts of Asia such as Japan, South Korea, and Singapore.

REITs are expected to drive continued growth in the Thai real estate market and, at the very least, the REIT system is a significant upgrade from the PFPO system, representing an important step in the evolution of Thailand’s capital market and financing system.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 3, 2026
Thailand will keep its reduced government fees for property sale and mortgage registration in place for another year. Two Ministry of Interior notifications, issued following a cabinet resolution on June 30, 2026, and published in the Government Gazette on July 1, 2026, extend the previously reduced fee levels through June 30, 2027. The reduced registration fees apply to the sale and mortgage of the same property types covered in prior versions of the scheme: detached houses, semidetached houses, row houses, commercial buildings, land transferred together with such buildings, and condominium units. To be eligible for the reduced fees, the purchase price, the officially assessed value, and the mortgage amount must each not exceed THB 7 million, and the buyer must be a Thai individual. The reduced registration fees for eligible sales and mortgages are calculated as follows: Sale: 0.01% of the official assessed value (reduced from standard rate of 2%) Mortgage: 0.01% of the mortgage amount (reduced from standard rate of 1%) The reduced mortgage registration fee applies only if the mortgage is registered at the same time as the sale of the property.
April 30, 2026
Thailand’s Long-Term Resident (LTR) Visa regime offers an attractive immigration pathway for qualifying foreign nationals, providing a 10-year renewable permission to stay in Thailand. Following amendments under Board of Investment (BOI) Announcement No. Por. 3/2568 dated February 4, 2025, the regime now more explicitly accommodates property investment as a qualifying vehicle—a development of particular relevance to foreign nationals already considering real estate acquisitions in Thailand. The LTR Visa is available to several categories of applicants, including wealthy global citizens with global assets of at least USD 1 million, and wealthy pensioners aged 50 or older with an annual pension or fixed income of at least USD 40,000. Property as a Qualifying Investment For both categories, property investment is recognized as one of three eligible investment types alongside Thai government bonds (with at least five years remaining to maturity) and direct investments in Thai companies or approved venture capital or private equity vehicles. The minimum qualifying property investment is USD 500,000 for wealthy global citizens and USD 250,000 for wealthy pensioners. Eligible property types include freehold condominiums, buildings, or villas, as well as leasehold properties with a remaining lease term of at least 10 years. Health Coverage Requirement Beyond the investment threshold, applicants must demonstrate adequate health coverage. This requirement can be satisfied through a health insurance policy covering at least USD 50,000 in Thai medical expenses with at least 10 months of remaining coverage, evidence of social security benefits covering Thai medical costs, or a bank deposit of at least USD 100,000 retained for 12 months. Practical Considerations For foreign nationals already considering property acquisitions in prime residential markets—where investment values commonly meet or exceed the USD 500,000 threshold—the visa pathway effectively transforms a real estate purchase into a dual-purpose investment, combining asset ownership with long-term residence rights that
April 7, 2026
Real estate law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins provided the chapter on Vietnam for Practical Law’s Commercial Real Estate Global Guide 2026, a comparative jurisdictional guide in Q&A format giving a high-level overview of real estate investment structures, restrictions on foreign ownership, and other important issues of real estate law. The main topics include the following: Real estate investment Title to real estate Sale of real estate Real estate tax Real estate finance Real estate leases Planning and development controls To read the Vietnam chapter, please visit the Practical Law website and enroll in the free Practical Law trial to gain full access.
February 25, 2026
In December 2025, the National Assembly of Vietnam enacted a new Law on Construction, replacing the 2014 Law on Construction as amended in 2020. The 2025 Law on Construction will, in principle, take effect on July 1, 2026, subject to certain exceptions. Among its notable reforms, one development has attracted particular attention from both legal practitioners and market participants: the introduction of a statutory framework governing predetermined damages, commonly referred to as “liquidated damages.” This marks the first time liquidated damages have been expressly recognized at the level of primary legislation in Vietnam. While liquidated damages clauses have long been a common feature of construction contracts in practice, their legal enforceability has historically been subject to uncertainty. Although the new provision appears to represent a positive step toward greater legal clarity, it remains an open question whether it is sufficient, on its own, to provide a solid legal basis for the enforceability of liquidated damages clauses in construction disputes in Vietnam. What’s New? Article 86.2 of the 2025 Law on Construction provides (emphasis added): “Compensation for damages shall be determined on the basis of actual damages [or] predetermined damages corresponding to obligations under the construction contracts that are breached [and] the extent of such breaches.” This provision is significant in that it expressly recognizes predetermined damages, or liquidated damages, as a lawful basis for determining compensation for damage. However, the new law does not define “predetermined damages.” The absence of a statutory definition creates potential ambiguity as to the scope and nature of this concept and may give rise to disputes over how—and whether—a particular contractual clause qualifies as predetermined damages for the purposes of Article 86.2. Further, Article 86.2 qualifies the application of predetermined damages by requiring that such damages correspond to the obligations not fulfilled and the