You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 26, 2016

Product Labeling in Laos: New Regulations Require Local Language on Packaging

Informed Counsel

The Lao government has recently stepped up its efforts to raise public awareness of health issues and the quality of products sold in the market. The impetus behind the government’s actions is largely attributable to one main factor—in Laos, most products still do not have labeling in the Lao language to provide consumers with information about the product, despite this being a requirement. In the past, the government generally turned a blind eye to this shortcoming in consumer protection, but this is now set to change.

Regulatory Framework

The Department of Internal Trade, Ministry of Industry and Commerce, recently issued Announcement 1285,  restating the requirement to include labels in the Lao language on products. The Announcement also granted all business operators involved in the manufacturing, importing, wholesaling, distributing, and retailing of goods an extension, until August 29, 2016, to bring their labeling in line with the requisite regulations.

The Announcement follows Ordinance 2501/MoIC DDT concerning Product Labeling in the Lao Language, which the Ministry of Industry and Commerce introduced on December 16, 2015. The Ordinance entered into force this year on January 8, followed on March 11 by the Department of Internal Trade issuing Recommendation 0281/MoIC, which restated much of the Ordinance and provided additional information on how it should be implemented by affected business operators.

The main reason for the Announcement and the Recommendation, which restate the Ordinance, is that almost no changes were made in practice after the Ordinance entered into force. Unfortunately, the duties and responsibilities of the administration were not adequately clarified under the Ordinance, meaning that it could not be properly implemented. The private sector was also largely unaware of the Ordinance, and even those who were aware had generally not yet taken action to adhere to the product labeling requirements.

Purpose of the Ordinance

The Ordinance aims to help consumers gain a better understanding of the benefits and qualities of products before purchasing and using them. This helps consumers  avoid purchasing low-quality or expired products, which could adversely affect their health, property, or the environment. In addition, under the Ordinance, domestic manufacturers and importers are encouraged to label their products in the Lao language prior to distribution. And the Ordinance also attempts to clarify the duties and responsibilities of the administration.

The Ordinance, rephrasing the Law on Consumer Protection 02/NA of 2010, also sets out the duties and responsibilities of local administrators in administering and monitoring product labels in the Lao language, and it includes product labeling obligations for manufacturers, importers, and distributors. It implores them to use product labels in the Lao language, particularly for products that could potentially endanger the life, health, and safety of consumers.

Product Labeling Requirements

Under the Ordinance,  product labels must comply with Article 19 of the Law on Consumer Protection, which requires information on product labels regarding the type of goods; trademark registered by the manufacturer and the trademark used in trade by the importer in Laos; location of manufacture, the importer’s trading address in Laos, and the country of origin of the manufacturer, when this is not Laos; and price, amount, quality, weight and net weight, components and component percentage, directions for use, warnings, date of manufacture, and the expiration date.

The Recommendation of March 11 leaves open the possibility of adding more information requirements in the future. In line with Article 19 of the Law on Consumer Protection, descriptive product information must be accurate, and it must not exaggerate any benefits or qualities.

Penalties

The Law on Consumer Protection stipulates that any business operator supplying goods that are not labeled or that contain incorrect information will have their business license suspended. The Ordinance, however, specifies that business operators who are found guilty of infringement for the first time will not have their business license suspended immediately.

The Ordinance provides different levels of sanctions for different types of operators, with retailers being subject to more lenient treatment than manufacturers, importers, wholesalers, or distributors. First-time violators receive a notification of the violation and a warning. When a violation is found, business operators have one month to bring their product labeling in line with the requisite regulations. A failure to do so can result in fines of LAK 500,000 to LAK 1 million (USD 62 to USD 124) for retailers, and LAK 5 million to LAK 7 million (USD 620 to USD 871) for manufacturers, importers, wholesalers, or distributors.

If business operators continue to fail to adhere to the labeling requirements after the first and second violations described above, retailers are liable to a fine of LAK 1 million to LAK 2 million (USD 124 to USD 248) and they risk having their unlabeled goods seized. Manufacturers, importers, wholesalers, and distributors that are found guilty of the same offense are liable to even more severe penalties ranging from LAK 7 million to LAK 9 million (USD 871 to USD 1120) and the possibility of having their business license suspended for as long as the infringement continues.

Products Exempted from the Ordinance

The Ordinance does not apply to certain types of goods, and it also takes into account the final purpose of goods. Therefore, certain products in the Ordinance are exempted from labeling requirements, including goods temporarily imported for subsequent export, goods temporarily imported for exhibition before being exported back to the original country, and goods in transit; gifts and souvenirs; fresh food and condiments without packaging directly sold to consumers; and raw materials without packaging imported for manufacturing in an industrial factory or for construction.

For products that are imported before August 29, the number of products without a Lao language label to be sold in the Lao market needs to be reported to the administration, to allow them to be “distributable” in the country.

Despite these limited exemptions, the Ordinance and its related regulations provide for far-reaching requirements for all businesses in the consumer goods sector. Businesses should take action immediately to comply with the new requirements, while closely monitoring the practical enforcement by local authorities.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 9, 2026
On August 5, 2026, the Consumer Case Division of Thailand’s Civil Court rendered a judgment in a case involving a beauty clinic that advertised acne scar treatments using claims that the clinic was operated by a specialist physician and that the treatment, allegedly involving stem cell technology, could permanently remove acne scars. The plaintiff brought a claim against both the physician-owner and the clinic company, alleging that the advertisements were false and induced her to purchase the treatment. The court found that the clinic was liable for the false representations and that the physician-owner, as both the authorized director of the company and the medical practitioner who provided treatment, was jointly responsible. Although the plaintiff could not fully prove all damages claimed, the court awarded compensation of THB 20,000, together with interest. While the judgment arose from a consumer protection dispute, it serves as a valuable reminder that medical facility advertisements in Thailand are regulated and may expose clinics and healthcare providers not only to regulatory enforcement but also to civil liability from patients who rely on misleading promotional claims. Regulatory Framework Governing Medical Facility Advertisements Medical facility advertising in Thailand is governed by the Medical Facility Act B.E. 2541 (1998), as amended by the Medical Facility Act (No. 4) B.E. 2559 (2016). The principal secondary legislation is the Department of Health Service Support (DoHSS) Notification Re: Rules, Procedures, Conditions, and Fees for an Advertisement or Publication Concerning a Medical Facility, which came into force on November 25, 2019. Under this notification, “advertising” includes any act, by any means, that causes members of the public to see, hear, or otherwise become aware of a message, sound, or image for the commercial benefit of a medical facility. This broad definition covers not only traditional media but also clinic websites, social
September 9, 2026
On June 30, 2026, Indonesia’s National Agency of Drug and Food Control (BPOM) issued BPOM Regulation No. 11 of 2026 on Food Packaging, which expands the list of approved food-contact substances and recognizes a broader range of permissible functions for those substances. The new regulation, which revokes BPOM Regulation No. 20 of 2019, reflects developments in packaging technology and materials science. Although the new regulation provides more advantages to business actors by adding more food contact substances to the approved list for use in food packaging, there are more stringent rules and restrictions for testing. One of the most significant changes is a comprehensive migration-testing framework that sets out requirements for packaging materials, testing conditions, food simulants, and specific migration limits. Overall and Specific Migration Under BPOM Regulation No. 20 of 2019, migration requirements were primarily set out within the lists of approved food-contact substances and packaging materials. BPOM Regulation No. 11 of 2026 instead expressly requires packaging materials that come into direct contact with food to meet both overall and specific migration limits. These are defined as follows: Overall migration: The total quantity of all substances that migrate from the packaging, regardless of whether the substances are hazardous or nonhazardous to health. Specific migration: The quantity of a particular identified substance known to be hazardous to health that migrates from the packaging. Stricter Limits on Heavy Metals The overall migration limit for plastic packaging remains unchanged under both regulations at 60 mg/kg or 10 mg/dm². However, the new regulation introduces significant changes to the regulation of heavy metals. Under the 2019 regulation, four heavy metals—lead, cadmium, chromium VI, and mercury—were subject to a single combined limit of 1 mg/kg. The 2026 regulation, however, requires each heavy metal to meet its own individual specific migration limit, adds arsenic as
September 7, 2026
Indonesia’s Constitutional Court (Mahkamah Konstitusi) has reinstated a key provision limiting pharmaceutical patent protection, signaling a renewed commitment to balancing patent rights with public access to medicines. In its ruling to Case No. 255/PUU-XXIII/2025, the court partially granted a petition for judicial review of Law No. 65 of 2024, which had amended the country’s Patent Law, and ordered the restoration of a provision that had excluded certain pharmaceutical inventions from patentability. The decision took effect immediately upon its pronouncement at the court’s plenary session on August 28, 2026. Background The petition challenged the removal of article 4(f) from Law No. 13 of 2016 concerning Patents (Patent Law), as amended by Law No. 65 of 2024. Article 4(f) had excluded from patentability certain inventions relating to new uses of known substances. The petitioners argued that removing this provision would open the door to patent protection for second medical use inventions and facilitate patent evergreening—practices that can extend exclusivity periods, delay generic market entry, and reduce public access to affordable medicines. The petitioners included several patient advocacy and public-interest organizations: the Indonesian Dialysis Patients Community Association, the Indonesian Association of Drug Abuse Victims (PKNI), the Indonesian Pulmonary Hypertension Foundation (YHPI), the Rekat Peduli Indonesia Foundation, and the Indonesian Positive Women’s Association (IPPI), along with the Indonesia for Global Justice Association and four individual petitioners. The petitioners also challenged the constitutionality of the phrase “interested party” in article 70(1) of the Patent Law, arguing that it should be construed expressly to clarify who has standing to appeal a decision to grant a patent before the Board of Patent Appeal, and to allow a broader range of parties—such as patent holders, licensees, consumer organizations, prosecutors, aggrieved third parties, and others who may suffer direct or indirect harm from the grant of a patent—to
September 4, 2026
Blind boxes and collectibles have become increasingly popular, driven by the excitement of not knowing which character or design will be revealed until the package is opened. While most visible in the art toy market, the same concept is also used in the food industry. Confectionery, snacks, and other food products are sometimes sold with toys, character figures, cards, or other collectibles. A package might, for example, contain one of ten possible characters, with consumers knowing that an item is included but not which one they will receive. Some collections may also feature rare or “secret” items. For food businesses, however, adding a randomized toy or collectible involves more than a marketing decision. The food, the nonfood item, and the randomized mechanism may each raise different regulatory considerations in Thailand. Thai FDA Requirements for Nonfood Objects Packaged with Food The main food regulatory consideration is Ministry of Public Health Notification No. 310 B.E. 2551 (2008), which regulates food packaged together with things or objects that are not food. Under Notification No. 310, certain nonfood objects may be packaged together with food where they fall within specified exceptions, including objects that serve the following purposes: Maintaining the quality or standard of the food, such as a desiccant or oxygen absorber; Serving as a seasoning or as part of food preparation, such as chili powder sachets or seasoning sachets contained in instant noodle packages; or Functioning as an eating or food-preparation utensil, such as a spoon or fork included with instant noodles. Other nonfood objects that do not fall within these categories generally should not be placed inside the food container together with the food. Where a toy, collectible, or other nonfood object is intended to be sold together with a food product, businesses should therefore carefully consider the nature of