You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 21, 2020

Thailand Officially Promulgates and Clarifies Previously Announced Tax Relief Measures

The Thai government’s various COVID-19-related tax relief measures—most of which were approved by the cabinet in March of this year—have now been formally promulgated and clarified in a series of royal decrees and notifications.

On July 12, 2020, Royal Decrees Nos. 707, 708, and 709 Issued under the Revenue Code Governing Exemption from Revenue Tax B.E. 2563 (2020) were published in the Government Gazette. On July 29, the RD further released notifications to clarify some of the measures granted under Decree No. 709. The tax relief measures, which are mostly aimed at easing financial challenges for small and medium enterprises (SMEs), are summarized below.

Increased Tax Deductibility for SMEs’ Soft Loan Interest

Royal Decree No. 707 allows eligible SMEs that have paid interest on a low-interest “soft loan” to be exempted from corporate income tax for income equal to 50% of the amount of interest paid under the soft loan scheme. The loan interest must be incurred between April and December 2020, according to criteria, methods, and conditions to be announced by the director general of the Revenue Department. To be eligible, SMEs must, in the twelve-month accounting period ending on or before September 30, 2019, have a total income of no more than THB 500 million (approximately USD 15.9 million) and a maximum of 200 employees.

Increased Tax Deductibility for SMEs’ Salary Costs

Royal Decree No. 708 allows eligible SMEs to be exempted from corporate income tax for income equal to 200% of the salary costs paid to qualifying employees between April and July 2020. Qualifying employees must be registered under the social security system (Social Security Act B.E. 2533 (1990), section 33), and their wages must not exceed THB 15,000 (approximately USD 475) each per month, according to criteria, methods, and conditions to be prescribed by the director general of the Revenue Department. To be eligible for this deduction, SMEs must meet all of the following criteria:

  1. Total income of THB 500 million (approximately USD 15.9 million) or less, and 200 or fewer employees, in the twelve-month accounting period that ended on or before September 30, 2019.
  2. The number of qualifying employees between April and July 2020 must not be less than the number of qualifying employees as of March 2020, unless there is a justifiable reason (to be prescribed by the director general of the Revenue Department).
  3. No application may have been made for corporate income tax exemption on wage expenses, under other royal decrees.
  4. All other criteria, methods, and conditions prescribed by the director general of the Revenue Department must be complied with. Failure to comply could result in revocation of tax relief and forced repayment of the amount of income tax exempted, plus penalties.

Tax Exemption for Debt Restructuring

Royal Decree No. 709 provides tax relief to stimulate debt restructuring as follows:

  • For debtors and creditors (of financial institutions and others), exemption from income tax, VAT, specific business tax, and stamp duty imposed on transfers of assets, sale of goods, or provision of services, and any instrument executed in relation to restructuring of qualifying debts;
  • For debtors of non-financial-institution creditors, exemption from income tax on the amount of qualifying debts forgiven; and
  • For debtors (of both financial institutions and others), exemption from income tax, VAT, specific business tax, and stamp duty imposed on transfers of immoveable property used as collateral for qualifying debts to a third party, and any instrument executed in relation to the same, on the condition that the proceeds from sale be used to settle the qualifying debts. The exemption is capped at the amount of outstanding debt or the amount of guaranteed liabilities.

The transfer of assets and immovable property, provision of services, related instrument execution, and debt forgiveness must take place between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021. Qualifying debts are those under a debt restructuring plan that comply with the scheme implemented by the Bank of Thailand (BOT), which include:

  • debts classified as substandard, doubtful, doubtful of loss, or loss according to the BOT’s regulations on asset classification and provisioning of financial institutions; and
  • debts that are classified as doubtful of loss for which provision has been set up against 100 percent and which have been written off from the account but have not been reverted back (to the account).

Creditors and debtors must mutually prepare a letter certifying that the debts qualify under the BOT scheme. If there is a transfer of immovable property collateral to third party, creditors and debtors must mutually prepare another letter together with the transferee to certify that the proceeds from the transfer will be used to repay the debt owed to the creditor. Both letters must be in the format prescribed by the Revenue Department, and must be submitted to the land official before registration at the land office (if applicable) and submitted to the area revenue office where the debtor operates its business, or where the immovable property is situated.

Under Royal Decree No. 709, “other creditors” refers to non-financial institutions engaging in credit card issuance, personal loans under supervision, nano- or pico-finance under supervision, or—if the company is listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand—hire-purchase or leasing. “Other creditors” also covers any other creditors that enter into an agreement with a financial-institution creditor for involvement in the debt restructuring.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 20, 2026
As part of its membership in Lex Mundi, Tilleke & Gibbins has released the latest edition of its Guide to Doing Business in Thailand, providing an overview of the legal, regulatory, and commercial considerations for companies establishing or expanding operations in Thailand. The 2026 edition offers practical insight into the country’s business environment, investment framework, and operational requirements. The guide covers a wide range of topics relevant to foreign and domestic investors, including: Investment incentives and promotion schemes Financial facilities and banking regulations Exchange controls and money transfers Import and export regulations Business structures and incorporation options Requirements for establishing a business Operational and compliance considerations Business cessation and insolvency procedures Employment and labor laws Taxation Immigration and visa requirements Prepared by Tilleke & Gibbins lawyers across multiple practice areas, the publication outlines key aspects of doing business in Thailand, including foreign investment restrictions, regulatory compliance obligations, corporate structures, employment requirements, and recent legal and economic developments affecting investors. The publication forms part of Lex Mundi’s Country Guides series, a global collection of jurisdiction-specific reference materials prepared by member firms around the world. Together, these guides help companies evaluate opportunities, compare regulatory environments, and plan international business activities across multiple markets. The full Guide to Doing Business in Thailand 2026 is available through the button below.
August 6, 2026
Every month, VAT-registered businesses in Thailand calculate their output and input VAT and file a return to pay the net amount due or claim a refund. Yet a common and costly dispute arises when a business that has paid input VAT to its supplier—and done everything asked of it—later finds that input VAT rejected on the grounds that the tax invoice was issued by “a person not entitled to issue tax invoices.” In these cases, a buyer may have confirmed the supplier’s VAT registration on the Revenue Department’s website, paid through the banking system, received a complete tax invoice, and kept full payment and inventory records. Even so, if the Revenue Department later determines that the supplier did not genuinely make the sale or collected the VAT without remitting it, the department can disallow the input VAT and assess additional tax, surcharge, and penalty—often more than a year after the transaction. A new article from tax and dispute resolution specialists at Tilleke & Gibbins in Bangkok examines how the Revenue Department and the courts approach these disputes, including two recent Supreme Court (Tax Division) decisions confirming that the taxpayer bears the burden of proving a supplier genuinely sold and delivered the goods and received payment. It considers why the VAT registration system offers no legal safe harbor, why the evidentiary burden falls hardest on online and cross-border transactions where buyers and sellers never meet, and how the Revenue Department’s own digital infrastructure could detect non-remitting suppliers at the source rather than shifting the loss to good-faith buyers. The article also sets out practical guidance: how to build a comprehensive “know-your-supplier” file at the time of a transaction, the procedural steps and strict deadlines for challenging a VAT assessment, and why dispute readiness belongs alongside tax planning at the center
December 12, 2025
Similar to other types of corporate disputes, tax-related conflicts often begin with an earnest attempt to resolve matters outside the courtroom. The prospect of engaging in tax litigation can be daunting, given the potential strain on commercial relationships, the legal expenses, and the uncertainty surrounding its resolution. However, there are instances when tax litigation becomes the sole avenue for seeking redress. For individuals and entities contemplating the pursuit of tax-related legal remedies, the Thai legal system offers an accessible, impartial, and equitable platform for dispute resolution. Tilleke & Gibbins’ latest update to Tax Litigation in Thailand provides an outline for navigating tax-related disputes within the Thai legal framework. It aims to equip readers with a fundamental understanding of procedures and practices within the Thai tax litigation landscape. The full guide is available through the button below.
October 30, 2025
Thailand has introduced a comprehensive overhaul of its tax litigation procedures that will significantly impact how tax disputes are handled. The Regulations for Tax Cases B.E. 2568 (2025) take effect on November 24, 2025, and repeal the prior B.E. 2544 (2001) regulations in full. These regulations support the implementation of the Act on the Establishment of the Tax Court and Tax Case Procedure (No. 3) B.E. 2568 (2025), which expands the Tax Court’s jurisdiction to certain criminal tax matters. Published in the Government Gazette on October 14, 2025, the regulations have been reorganized into three parts covering civil cases, criminal cases, and forms, and are designed to accelerate proceedings, tighten evidentiary discipline, and modernize court operations. Structural Reform and Scope The prior regime governed only civil tax disputes. Under the new framework, the regulations introduce a dedicated chapter for criminal cases alongside updated civil procedures, as the Tax Court now has express authority to adjudicate specified criminal tax offenses. Select mechanisms applied in civil case proceedings, such as electronic communication, recording testimony, and appointing experts, also apply to criminal proceedings mutatis mutandis where they do not conflict with criminal procedure. Civil Cases: Evidence Submission, Deadlines, and Scheduling Parties must submit, together with the witness list, originals of all documentary evidence, media, or electronic data (such as files, USB drives, or CDs), and all physical evidence in the party’s possession. Failure to submit any original within the deadline (see below) results in a loss of the right to adduce that item at trial, subject only to narrow exceptions where submission is impossible due to force majeure or where receipt of the evidence is indispensable to the interests of justice. The practical impact is that parties are now obligated to assemble and verify all original documents and data at the very