You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 14, 2018

Thailand Issues New Royal Decrees to Regulate Cryptocurrency and Digital Tokens

On Sunday, May 13, two Royal Decrees were published in the Thai Government Gazette, addressing matters relevant to cryptocurrencies and digital tokens. These Royal Decrees clarify some longstanding questions about initial coin offerings (ICOs) and related matters.

One of the Royal Decrees sets out the framework for offering, trading, brokering, and exchanging digital currencies and digital tokens, whilst the other deals with some key tax issues.

The first Royal Decree—named the Royal Decree on Digital Asset Business—differentiates between cryptocurrency on the one hand and digital tokens on the other. It also defines “digital asset business” to include operation of a digital asset trading center, operation of a digital asset brokerage, and operation of a digital asset dealer, whilst also leaving room for the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to designate additional categories of business to be regulated.

As expected, the Minister of Finance was granted the authority to administer the Royal Decree, with authority also granted to the SEC to address various relevant matters. Engagement in digital asset business now requires a license to be granted by the Ministry of Finance, on the recommendation of the SEC.

In terms of the offering of digital tokens, the Royal Decree takes an approach analogous to that of securities under the Securities and Exchange Act. Digital tokens must be offered for sale only according to conditions prescribed by the SEC, and only after the prospectus has become effective. Further, they must only be offered through a service provider operating a digital token offering system approved by the SEC. Even after approval is granted, the SEC has the authority to take action in the case of false, misleading, or incomplete information, etc.

The Royal Decree also sets out qualifications for those engaging in digital asset business, those offering digital tokens or operating a digital token offering system, and the respective directors and executives of each such business. There are also provisions to prevent unfair trading. Digital asset traders are now subject to requirements on segregation of customer assets, and there are provisions to protect investors in the event of possible insolvency of a digital asset trader.

A number of criminal penalties are provided for breach of certain provisions of the Royal Decree, which, depending on the offense, can be as high as up to two years in prison and/or a fine equal to double the value of the tokens (minimum fine of THB 500,000). Some offenses also attract daily fines of up to THB 10,000, and some offenses specify fines without reference to the value of the tokens, as high as THB 2,000,000, as well as imprisonment for up to ten years. The court can also order reimbursement of the amount received from committing the offense, prohibition of transacting in digital assets for up to five years, prohibition of an individual acting as a director or executive of a digital assets business for up to ten years, and reimbursement of the SEC’s expenses incurred in conducting an investigation. Civil penalties are also contemplated for some offenses.

Those business operators which are already engaging in digital assets business are required to apply for a license under the Royal Decree within 90 days after the Royal Decree becomes effective (i.e. by August 11, 2018). Once the application has been filed, such business operator is permitted to continue to operate until ordered to cease. Similarly, with respect to digital tokens issued prior to the date of the Royal Decree, the issuer must apply to the SEC for approval, in accordance with SEC regulations.

The other Royal Decree addresses key tax issues. In essence, it amends the section of the Revenue Code setting out categories of assessable income, as well as a section of the Revenue Code providing withholding obligations. It specifies that any share of profit or similar benefits obtained by holding or possession of digital tokens, as well as the benefits derived from the transfer of cryptocurrency or digital tokens, that exceeds the amount of investment, is regarded as assessable income. It imposes a requirement to withhold 15% on payment of such income.

If you would like more information on the new Royal Decrees, or about regulatory requirements applicable to cryptocurrencies, digital tokens, and the operation of digital asset businesses in Thailand in general, please contact David Duncan at [email protected] or Kitti Thaisomboon at [email protected].

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 17, 2026
Thailand’s Office of the Consumer Protection Board (OCPB) has released for public comment a draft bill to amend the Consumer Protection Act B.E. 2522 (1979), the country’s foundational consumer protection legislation. The draft amendment aims to modernize the nearly five-decade-old framework to address the rapid growth of digital commerce, online advertising, influencer marketing, and new business models. The public consultation period is open until October 10, 2026. Expanded Definitions Covering Digital Commerce The draft significantly broadens several core definitions to capture modern commercial activities: “Consumer” is expanded to include natural persons and nonprofit juristic persons who purchase or receive services, including those solicited by businesses and end users who do not directly pay for the goods or services. “Business operator” now explicitly covers advertising business operators and hired advertising persons, such as influencers and content creators. “Advertising media” is expanded to include digital platforms, social media, and social media user accounts. “Label” now encompasses electronic labels—symbols, codes, or other electronic formats displaying product information. Influencer and Advertising Disclosure Requirements In addition to these expanded definitions, “hired advertising person for selling goods or services” is a new definition covering influencers, content creators, live streamers, affiliate marketers, and virtual online media operators who receive monetary compensation or other benefits for advertising goods or services. Hired advertising persons—including influencers and content creators—must disclose to consumers that content is advertising and reveal their relationship with the business owner. Disclosure is required when the business owner employs the advertiser, pays or provides other benefits for the advertisement, or provides free or discounted products or services. These requirements apply where consumers would not otherwise know that the business has a connection to the person presenting the content. Labeling Requirements for Importers The draft introduces a clearer labeling obligation for importers of label-controlled goods, who must
September 11, 2026
Thailand’s National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission (NBTC) has published a new five-year master plan that will bring significant regulatory changes to the broadcasting and digital media sectors, including formal licensing requirements for internet-based audiovisual services. The Master Plan for Broadcasting and Television, 3rd Edition (B.E. 2569–2573/2026–2030) was published in the Government Gazette on September 1, 2026, and will affect OTT platforms, internet-based audiovisual service providers, and traditional broadcasters. Licensing Reform The NBTC will develop new licensing frameworks ahead of existing digital television license expirations, which are slated to occur between 2028 and 2030. This creates both uncertainty and opportunity for incumbents and new market entrants. New licensing criteria will also be developed for audiovisual services delivered over the internet, meaning previously unregulated internet-based providers may face licensing, fee, and content obligations for the first time. The plan also calls for a new law to govern converged communications services. OTT Regulation and Content Oversight The plan explicitly acknowledges and aims to lessen the regulatory asymmetry between traditional broadcasters—which are subject to licensing, fees, and content regulation—and internet-based services that currently face fewer obligations. The NBTC intends to develop regulatory frameworks to bring internet-based audiovisual services, including OTT platforms, streaming services, and user-generated content platforms, under content, consumer protection, and licensing requirements. Consumer Protection and Digital Rights The NBTC will strengthen its oversight of broadcasting, television, and telecommunications operators to ensure compliance with consumer protection and personal data protection requirements. This includes updating relevant notifications and orders and more strictly enforcing rules against practices that unfairly exploit consumers. These measures may layer NBTC-specific requirements on top of Thailand’s existing Personal Data Protection Act obligations. Stricter enforcement against practices that exploit consumers is a priority, with particular scrutiny on advertising practices. The NBTC will modernize complaint resolution processes, meaning service providers should
September 7, 2026
On September 4, 2026, Thailand’s prime minister convened the first meeting of the Data Center Business Policy Committee. The committee endorsed a draft policy framework for the data center industry and tasked four subcommittees with developing the standards that would sit beneath it, shifting away from fragmented, agency-by-agency approvals toward a unified national strategy aiming to maximize economic value while managing environmental and infrastructure concerns. Proposed Scope and Pillars of the National Data Center Policy Framework The proposed framework would cover all types of data centers, including internal or captive facilities operated within a company or its affiliates, rather than only commercial third-party providers. If adopted in this form, companies running private data centers purely for internal purposes would also become subject to regulatory oversight. Minimum safety and operational standards would be established, with uniform enforcement across all categories. The committee endorsed a draft policy framework with four key pillars: Industrial classification: Data centers exceeding 2 MW would be classified as industrial operations, which may require factory licenses and environmental impact assessments under the Factory Act. Resource pricing: Utility rates would be structured to reflect both direct and indirect costs, supporting green energy and green data center standards. Centralized screening: A centralized review would evaluate project suitability and resource allocation. Operators may be required to submit proposals through periodic “pitching” rounds, where projects are competitively assessed on their potential economic and strategic benefits to Thailand. Digital ecosystem: The framework would prioritize data sovereignty, tax incentives, and conditions promoting domestic digital businesses, AI, and cloud infrastructure. Multidimensional Evaluation Criteria and Subcommittees Four subcommittees will be established to develop standards responsible for the following dimensions: Economic: Criteria for assessing the economic viability of data center projects, for use in prioritizing data centers based on infrastructure readiness, demand type (including AI factories),
September 4, 2026
Foreign business restrictions on telecommunications, treasury center businesses, and intragroup support services were eased when Thailand published the Ministerial Regulation Prescribing Service Businesses Not Requiring Permission for Foreign Business Operations (No. 5) B.E. 2569 (2026) in the Government Gazette on August 28, 2026. The ministerial regulation expands the categories of service businesses that foreign investors may operate without a foreign business license (FBL) under the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542 (1999) (FBA). Of particular relevance to the telecommunications, fintech, and technology sectors, the ministerial regulation exempts: Type 1 telecommunications licensees, which do not have their own networks; Treasury center businesses operated in accordance with Thailand’s exchange control regulations; and Certain intragroup administrative, human resources, and information technology management services. Telecommunications Services Foreign-owned businesses providing telecommunications services under a type 1 telecommunications license may now operate without obtaining an FBL. This may streamline market entry for qualifying telecommunications and digital infrastructure businesses. The exemption applies only to the FBA licensing requirement. Operators must continue to comply with applicable requirements under the Telecommunications Business Act and the regulations of the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission, and the change does not affect foreign ownership restrictions applicable to type 2 or type 3 telecommunications businesses. Treasury Center Businesses The ministerial regulation also exempts qualifying treasury center businesses from the FBL requirement. This may facilitate centralized treasury functions in Thailand, including liquidity management, foreign exchange management, and intragroup funding arrangements. Treasury center operations remain subject to applicable requirements of the Bank of Thailand and other competent authorities. Intragroup Administrative, HR, and IT Services Certain administrative, human resources, and information technology management services provided between affiliated entities are also exempt, provided the relevant entities satisfy prescribed ownership or management criteria. The exemption is available where the service provider and recipient are related through specified ownership