You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 26, 2015

Licensing Reform on the Way in Thailand

Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

In Franz Kafka’s novel The Castle, the protagonist tries in vain to get in touch with a mysterious group of administrators who run a small village from a castle. The character is challenged to learn the constantly changing ways and customs of the castle’s imposing bureaucracy.

Governments the world over employ vast armies of bureaucrats to administer official business, which includes everything from granting marriage licenses to approving multibillion-dollar investment projects. Thailand is no exception. But a new law called the Licensing Facilitation Act is aimed at making the bureaucracy easier to navigate and help Thailand’s business competitiveness.

As its name implies, the Act seeks to make it easier for businesses and individuals to obtain official licenses and approvals from government agencies. To that end, it promotes two overarching principles: greater transparency and less administrative discretion.

Indeed, as with the bureaucracies of other countries, the licensing process within Thai government agencies is often opaque. The time required to obtain a license is also uncertain, and officials can arbitrarily seem to change their minds about what paperwork is needed.

All of this makes doing business more difficult—and increases opportunities for corruption, as exasperated applicants will do whatever it takes to get their license.

The Licensing Facilitation Act, which goes into effect on July 21, takes aim at these problems. It requires licensing authorities to prepare a “licensing manual.” The manual must contain all the rules, procedures, and conditions to obtain a license as well as when the license must be issued.

If a license application is complete according to the manual, an official cannot ask for more documents. In other words, the manual should bring welcome predictability to the license application process.

What is more, license applications can be submitted electronically instead of by paper if allowed by the manual. This can save applicants significant time and expense.

If the application has a defect or does not fulfill the requirements stated in the manual, the official must ask the applicant to remedy the application immediately. If this is not possible, the official must make a record of the defect and the period of time needed to fix it.

Importantly, the official must make a decision on the license as per the timeline in the manual. If the deadline is not complied with, the official must explain the delay to the applicant and the Public Sector Development Commission, a government body under the Prime Minister’s Office, every seven days until a decision is made.

If the official fails to explain the delay, he or she can be liable for damages. The law does not state how damages would be calculated or to whom the official would be liable.

Another key feature of the Act is the creation of a One Stop Service Centre. The cabinet has the authority to establish such a center to receive all applications under the laws related to licensing. The One Stop Service Centre would be its own government agency, with branch offices under different ministries and different provinces.

The One Stop Service Centre would accept applications, inform applicants of licensing rules, send applications to the relevant agency, and give recommendations to the cabinet on improving licensing rules and application requirements. It can greatly ease the burden on applicants, as people would not be required to visit various agencies to obtain multiple licenses needed for an investment project.

The Licensing Facilitation Act also contains oversight mechanisms—for example, if a licensing official does not grant a license due to dishonesty or negligence, the relevant authority can bring disciplinary action against that official. Further, the Public Sector Development Commission can inspect whether the licensing officials’ work flow and period of time for granting the license stated in the manual are compliant with “good governance” rules. These rules are not specifically defined in the Act.

Additionally, licensing authorities must review the laws that empower them to grant licenses every five years. The authorities must submit reports of their review to the cabinet for consideration.

The Licensing Facilitation Act applies to almost all government licensing procedures, with a few notable exceptions. Courts are exempt, as are natural resource and environmentally related licensing. Military licenses are also generally exempt from the law.

The Act has the potential to make obtaining official licenses and approvals much easier. And reducing officials’ discretion in the licensing process will help to stop opportunities for corruption. Successful implementation would not only enhance Thailand’s investment environment but also improve overall governance. A more transparent and less Kafkaesque bureaucracy would be a boon for Thailand.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 15, 2026
On July 8, 2026, Thailand enacted a new law significantly expanding the framework for government service delivery and licensing facilitation. The Facilitation of Licensing and Public Services Consideration Act B.E. 2569 (2026) (Facilitation Act 2026) replaces and expands the framework of governmental services under the Facilitation of Official Licensing Consideration Act B.E. 2558 (2015) (Facilitation Act 2015) and broadens its scope to cover public services, administrative processes, and public benefits. The Facilitation Act 2026 aims to modernize government services by promoting e-filing, reducing administrative burdens and repeated document requests, and improving predictability. For businesses, this should ease compliance and shorten approval timelines, subject to implementing regulations and agency readiness. Public Services Facilitation Scope The Facilitation Act 2015 applied mainly to permissions, registrations, and notifications required before conducting activities that require licenses, certificates, permits, approvals, or registrations. The Facilitation Act 2026 broadens this framework to include public services and other benefits, such as welfare, subsidies, and grants, provided to Thai citizens, expanding government agencies’ responsibilities beyond licensing facilitation into a wider administrative-service framework. It also introduces a broader definition of “government agency” to include central, regional, and local government bodies, state enterprises, public organizations, and other state entities. Licensing Changes The Facilitation Act 2026 introduces a “super license” (termed a “main license” under the act) that exempts the holder from obtaining multiple related or ancillary licenses issued by different government agencies. Obtaining a super license deems the licensee to have automatically obtained the related “sublicenses” required to conduct the relevant activities. The cabinet will designate eligible activities by royal decree. The act also introduces an expedited licensing option, allowing applicants to pay an additional fee to fast-track their applications in urgent cases. Expedited processing must not interfere with standard application timelines. The criteria, procedures, conditions, and fees for expedited licensing
July 14, 2026
Tilleke & Gibbins has contributed the Thailand and Vietnam chapters to Investigations in Southeast Asia, a comprehensive guide published by Drew Network Asia (DNA). The resource provides a practical overview of anticorruption laws, corporate investigations, and compliance frameworks across six key Southeast Asian jurisdictions. Designed for in-house counsel, compliance officers, and risk management professionals, the guide offers actionable insights for navigating complex cross-border regulatory challenges and establishing effective, regionally coordinated compliance and investigation strategies. The guide begins with a regional perspective on enforcement trends and cross-border cooperation initiatives. Jurisdiction-specific chapters follow a standardized structure—covering primary corruption offenses, enforcement authorities, corporate liability, investigation procedures and dawn raids, whistleblower protections, and recommended compliance measures. In addition to country-by-country analysis, the publication highlights best practices for conducting internal investigations, managing digital evidence, and handling parallel proceedings involving multiple regional or international regulators. The guide serves as a practical reference for organizations operating in Southeast Asia. Because legal and regulatory risks depend on specific industry sectors and operational contexts, readers seeking tailored advice are encouraged to contact the authors listed in each chapter. The full guide is available for download through the button below or directly from the DNA website.
July 10, 2026
Vietnam has taken a significant step in regulating its e-commerce sector with the issuance of a new decree guiding the country’s recently enacted Law on E-Commerce. Decree No. 248/2026/ND-CP, issued on June 30, 2026, and taking effect the following day, addresses mandatory platform policies, registration requirements for offshore platforms, additional obligations on platform operators, and market access conditions for foreign investors. Mandatory Policy Contents The decree sets out detailed guidance on the required contents of various platform policies, covering pricing, payment, display priority, livestream sales, delivery, returns, method of service provision, and service termination and refunds. Clarification of Obligations for Platform Operators The decree provides clarification of the obligations applicable to platform operators. Notably, intermediary e-commerce platform operators with online ordering functions must: Collect specific information to implement electronic identity verification of sellers; Cooperate with regulators by reporting online through the state e-commerce management system and by blocking, suspending, or removing content upon request of a competent authority; Maintain a mechanism to store contract data, including price, product or service information, and parties’ information, for at least three years from the date of contract conclusion; and If qualifying as a “large digital platform” under consumer protection law, maintain an online system for receiving and handling complaints and requests, and comply with enhanced content-removal requirements. Registration Requirements for Offshore Platforms Offshore e-commerce platforms, whether direct-sales, intermediary, social-network-based, or integrated, that conduct e-commerce activity in Vietnam must register with the Ministry of Industry and Trade if the platform: Allows Vietnamese-language selection; Uses a “.vn” domain; or Reaches 100,000 or more transactions with Vietnam-based buyers within a calendar year. Notably, the registration requirement now captures not only traditional intermediary platforms, but also direct-sales platforms. Foreign Investment Conditions Foreign investors holding a controlling interest in an intermediary e-commerce platform, a social media platform
June 23, 2026
Thailand’s Board of Investment (BOI) has significantly revised its post-approval compliance framework for projects that receive investment promotion incentives, replacing the previous semiannual reporting system for project progress with a new quarterly reporting regime. The initial report is due by July 30, 2026, covering the second-quarter reporting period of April to June 2026. The new requirements—implemented through BOI Announcement No. 8/2569 and Office of the BOI Notification No. Por. 8/2569, both of which became effective on March 30, 2026—apply both to newly promoted projects and to existing promoted projects that remain in the implementation stage. Background Under the previous reporting framework, BOI-promoted companies that had not yet commenced full operations were generally required to submit reports on project progress to the BOI twice a year (February and July) through the BOI’s e-Monitoring system. By adopting a quarterly reporting regime, the BOI seeks to strengthen monitoring and evaluation of investment progress and project implementation. Reporting Requirements Under the new regulations, BOI-promoted companies must submit project progress reports on a quarterly basis during the implementation phase of a promoted project. The reporting periods and submission deadlines are: Q1 (January–March): April 30 Q2 (April–June): July 30 Q3 (July–September): October 30 Q4 (October–December): January 30 of the following year The quarterly reporting obligation runs from the date the BOI promotion certificate is issued until the BOI grants approval for commencement of full operations. For newly promoted projects, no quarterly report is required for the quarter in which the BOI promotion certificate is issued—the first reporting obligation arises in the immediately following reporting period. All project progress reports must be submitted electronically through the BOI’s e-Monitoring system. The existing annual reporting requirement also remains in effect, requiring promoted companies to submit an annual operating results report through the e-Monitoring system by July 31 of