The Trade Competition Act (TCA) seeks to maintain a fair and open market by prohibiting business operators from exerting unfair influence through monopoly, exclusivity, price fixing, quantity fixing, tying/bundling, etc. If any two business operators act together to effect such conduct, they may be liable for violating the TCA, which carries a prison term of up to three years and/or a fine of up to THB 6 million per violation.

During times of economic crisis, many employers seek to terminate employees. In doing so, however, employers need to be mindful of the correct procedures and they must ensure that severance and other benefits are paid to employees. Otherwise, they face the risk of claims being filed by the employees in the Labor Court. This article looks at the employer’s obligation to provide severance, remuneration, and compensation, as well as exceptions to the requirements.

Under Thai law, a distributorship agreement is generally considered to be a type of sales agreement whereby a seller sells products to a distributor and the distributor resells the products for his own account and at his own risk to his customers. Unless the parties agree otherwise, this type of agreement is governed principally by the general principles of contract and sales provisions under the Thai Civil and Commercial Code. Does a supplier need to enter into a distributorship agreement?

Intellectual property rights have become increasingly valuable assets for many companies and often are critical to a company’s competitive capability. Therefore, it has become crucial for companies to secure ownership in IP assets created by employees in the course of their employment. In spite of this, many companies have overlooked this issue and failed to ensure that necessary agreements are put in place and that employees are properly informed of their rights and obligations with respect to IP assets created while working at the company and after termination of their employment.

This article describes the enforcement campaign being pursued by SKF in an attempt to rid the Thai market of counterfeit bearings, which pose a serious risk to consumer safety.

By examining a major seizure of counterfeit Casio and Citizen products, this article offers insight into a new method being used by infringers to attempt to circumvent customs procedures.

This article provides a brief update on the filing of applications under the Protection of Geographical Indications Act.

Members of the Tilleke & Gibbins IP enforcement team have recently con­ducted several training sessions for police and customs officials in differ­ent cities, at ports of entry, and at border cross­ings. The training focused on methods of identifying and differen­tiating between genuine and counter­feit goods and also reiterated the importance of coop­eration between government authorities and brand owners in the suppression of coun­terfeiting in Thailand. This article describes the training sessions and the benefits they yield for IP rights owners.