You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 8, 2021

What Companies Need to Know About Vietnam’s New Regulations on Sexual Harassment

Subscribe to Updates

In Vietnam, sexual harassment in the workplace has long been a taboo and undiscussed topic. Few employers have comprehensive policies on sexual harassment, or provide trainings to their employees. Nevertheless, sexual harassment is undeniably present in Vietnam, and represents a major obstacle to women’s equality in the workplace and to their rise to leadership positions.

Vietnam has recognized the need to take action against sexual harassment, and has recently issued comprehensive regulations addressing the handling of complaints, remedies for victims, and disciplinary action against perpetrators. In light of these changes, businesses would be well advised to update their human resources policies, provide regular training to their employees, and carefully consider company-hosted social events.

The New Regulations

The Labor Code 2012, which was replaced at the beginning of 2021 by the new Labor Code 2019, simply prohibited sexual harassment, without including any specific obligations on the part of employers. In fact, employers faced difficulties in disciplining workers committing sexual harassment under the former Labor Code, as it was almost impossible to dismiss an employee for this offense. In order to dismiss an employee, the act of misconduct had to either be listed as a ground for dismissal under the Labor Code or listed in the employer’s Internal Labor Regulations (ILRs), which are the working rules of the employer. In addition to listing the act of misconduct in the ILRs, the employer also had to demonstrate that the misconduct caused damage beyond the monetary threshold set out in its ILRs in order to justify dismissal. Sexual harassment had not been included within the listed grounds for dismissal in the Labor Code 2012, and few employers could demonstrate that the sexual harassment had caused tangible financial damage. Thus, even where employers wished to take action against sexual harassment, they were often frustrated.

The new Labor Code 2019, in contrast, sets out detailed regulations on sexual harassment and adds sexual harassment as a listed ground of dismissal. The Labor Code 2019 defines sexual harassment in the workplace broadly, as “…an act of a sexual nature of any person against another person in the workplace that is unwanted or unapproved by the latter. ‘Workplace’ means any location where an employee is actually working under agreement with or as assigned by the employer.”

This definition is expanded upon in Decree No. 145/2020/ND-CP dated December 12, 2020 (Decree 145), which specifies that sexual harassment “…may occur in the form of a request, demand, suggestion, threat, or use of force to have sex in exchange for any work-related interests” but also includes acts that are not done on a quid pro quo basis. Sexual acts that “…create an insecure and uncomfortable work environment and affect the mental and physical health, performance, or life of the harassed person” are also included. Decree 145 also clarifies that sexual harassment includes physical, verbal and non-verbal acts (such as body language or the display of sexually explicit material or photos).

The definition of “workplace” is very broad under the new legislation. It includes the following: social activities, conferences, training sessions, business trips, meals, phone conversations, communications through electronic media, transportation provided by the employer for the employee’s commute to and from work, or any location agreed or assigned by the employer.

New Obligations for Employers

Employers are now obligated to formulate detailed regulations on sexual harassment that must be included within their ILRs. These regulations must include the following contents:

  • A prohibition of sexual harassment;
  • Detailed and specific descriptions of behavior that would be considered sexual harassment;
  • Detailed instructions on responding to sexual harassment complaints, including the assignment of responsibilities, timelines, and procedures for filing and settling complaints;
  • Disciplinary action applicable to perpetrators of sexual harassment and those who make false accusations, which may vary depending upon the nature and seriousness of the offense; and,
  • Compensation for victims and remedial measures.

These regulations must ensure that complaints are handled in a quick and timely manner that protects the privacy, dignity, honor and safety of the victims as well as the accused. Employers, together with employee representative organizations (i.e., trade unions), are required to ensure employees are aware of the company’s sexual harassment regulations.

As mentioned, Vietnam has now added sexual harassment as a listed ground for dismissal under the Labor Code 2019. This means that employers may now dismiss employees for committing an act of sexual harassment in the workplace without the necessity to prove the act resulted in financial damages. It should be noted, however, that an employer may apply a less severe form of disciplinary action (i.e., written reprimand, delay of salary increase for six months, or demotion) for sexual harassment, if warranted by the circumstances.

What This Means for Businesses

Businesses that fail to act appropriately to prevent sexual harassment face significant risks. Mishandling a sexual harassment complaint may lead to litigation in court or sanctions from the Labor Inspectorate at the local (provincial or city) Department of Labor, Invalids and Social Affairs (DOLISA). Employees who make a sexual harassment complaint, but are unsatisfied with how the employer has dealt with it, may either initiate a lawsuit or make a formal complaint to the employer. If the employee first makes the formal complaint to the employer, but is still unsatisfied with how the employer has addressed it, he or she may then appeal to the Labor Inspectorate at the DOLISA. At any stage of this process, the employee is entitled to bring a lawsuit in court. Thus, a poorly handled sexual harassment complaint may result in the Labor Inspectorate of the DOLISA issuing administrative fines, or an order of damages from court after a lawsuit.

Employers are liable for the acts of their employees when they are performing duties on behalf of the employer. Thus, employers may face liability for acts of sexual harassment carried out by their employees in the workplace, and be required to compensate victims for damages. Victims of sexual harassment may claim damages arising from monetary losses based on the denial of employment-related benefits due to sexual harassment, such as the denial of a promotion due to the victim’s refusal to comply with the sexual harasser’s requests. In addition, if an employee has suffered from mental health-related issues because of sexual harassment, the employer may be required to compensate the victim for the loss of salary due to sick leave days or associated medical costs. Under the Civil Code, the employer would have the right to seek reimbursement from the employee at fault for such damages, but this additional step would be difficult and costly to undertake and its chances of success would be questionable.

We have informally learned that the DOLISAs have added compliance with sexual harassment regulations to their list of items to be verified in labor inspections of companies. Thus, companies failing to put in place the new required legal measures will face administrative fines. The amount of the administrative fines is uncertain at the time of writing, as a new decree on administrative fines for labor violations addressing the new contents of the Labor Code 2019 has not yet been issued.

A bigger concern than financial damages and administrative penalties is the potential damage to the employer’s reputation resulting from its failure to appropriately address sexual harassment. The “Me Too” movement has demonstrated that the public views sexual harassment as an important issue and is not willing to tolerate a dismissive corporate attitude towards sexual harassment. If a business deals inappropriately with a sexual harassment complaint, the victim could post on social media as well as contact other media sources, resulting in the business losing customers and public trust.

What Steps Need to Be Taken?

Businesses must now take an active and vocal approach to dealing with sexual harassment in the workplace. Sexual harassment is no longer a taboo topic, and employers must ensure they are prepared to deal with this problem.

In order to comply with these new legal changes, businesses must (i) amend their ILRs; (ii) train their staff on the company’s sexual harassment regulations; and (iii) consider other ways to mitigate the employer’s risk of facing a sexual harassment claim:

1. Amendment of ILRs

Employers must amend and update their ILRs to include clear regulations on sexual harassment. We recommend beginning this process right away, as amending ILRs normally takes several months as it requires consultation with the employees’ representative organization and registration of the amended ILRs with the labor authority. Typically, the labor authority requests changes to the first draft of ILRs, so the registration process can be lengthy.

2. Training

Employers, together with the employees’ representative organization, are required to disseminate the sexual harassment regulations. This should be done through regular trainings informing employees of the contents of the regulations with a special focus on behaviors which are deemed “acceptable” and “unacceptable” within the workplace. By setting clear lines at the outset, businesses can avoid situations where employees have different subjective views of what constitutes appropriate conduct, resulting in sexual harassment complaints.

These trainings can also open the lines of communication between the employees themselves, so that when an incident arises, in some cases employees may be able to settle the situation themselves rather than escalating the issue to management or human resources.

3. Considering the company’s risk

The tone from the top is incredibly important in modeling correct behavior for the workplace, and creating the right atmosphere at work. The managing director of the company and upper management should make clear verbal and written statements that sexual harassment is not tolerated within the company.

Businesses should ensure that all managers understand the sexual harassment regulations and model positive behavior for other employees. When promoting individuals to managerial positions, businesses should consider whether this person could effectively handle sexual harassment complaints and model appropriate behavior. Moreover, managers should receive special and additional training as they will likely deal with complaints at the outset.

Businesses will also need to take special care when organizing work parties or retreats. Work-related social activities are explicitly included within the definition of “workplace,” so employers could face liability for the actions of their employees in these situations. As work parties and retreats often involve alcohol, this can create a high-risk situation. Company retreats in Vietnam also often involve a gala performance, so employers should ensure these performances do not include content that could be deemed to be of a sexual nature and create an uncomfortable environment for other employees.

Related Professionals

Practices

Employment

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Vientiane have contributed the Laos chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Laos chapter was prepared by associates Naiyane Xaechao and Sayphin Singsouvong. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Laos chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Cambodia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
Read More
January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Phnom Penh have contributed the Cambodia chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Cambodia chapter was authored by Jay Cohen, partner and director of Tilleke & Gibbins’ Phnom Penh office, and Chanvisal Lok, associate. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Cambodia chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
Read More
January 14, 2026
Employers operating in Thailand can enforce post-employment noncompete covenants, but success depends on precise drafting and strong evidentiary support. Thai courts will uphold restraints that protect legitimate employer interests and are fair and reasonable in duration, geographic reach, and substantive scope. Overbroad covenants, however, draw judicial skepticism and may fail unless they are drafted in severable, defensible components tied to the employee’s actual role. This article synthesizes recent trends in Thai case practice, explains how Thai courts assess reasonableness in employment restraints, and provides a practical litigation-focused framework for drafting enforceable covenants, preparing evidence, and pursuing relief through the Labor Court. The Legal Framework and Its Practical Implications Thai courts evaluate noncompete covenants under general principles of contract enforceability and public policy, with particular focus on whether a restraint is necessary to protect a legitimate employer interest and proportionate to that objective. In employment matters, this analysis is shaped by the employee-protective tenor of Thai labor law and by the Labor Court’s equitable discretion in determining appropriate remedies. The practical takeaway is that standardized or broadly drafted covenants rarely survive scrutiny. Courts look for a demonstrable nexus between the employee’s actual exposure to confidential information, trade secrets, or customer relationships and the scope of the restraint. Where that nexus is weak or the restraint operates as a blanket prohibition, courts are inclined to decline enforcement or limit relief to a narrowly tailored prohibition. The employer interests most commonly recognized as legitimate in Thai practice include the protection of trade secrets, confidential business information, and goodwill tied to identifiable customer segments or territories. Courts are more likely to enforce restraints where employers can clearly document what information is at risk, why particular customer relationships matter, and how the employee was involved with those assets. Judges also look closely at the
Read More
December 19, 2025
On December 12, 2025, Thailand’s Ministry of Labor published a ministerial regulation prescribing the minimum and maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions. The regulation, which takes effect on January 1, 2026, sets a flat minimum base wage of THB 1,650 per month and a phased increase of the maximum base wage over the following six years, as outlined in the table below. Impact on Social Security Benefits Not only will monthly contributions increase as a result of the adjustment to the maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions, but the maximum benefits available to insured persons will also be enhanced, as shown in the next table. Employer Obligations From January 1, 2026, employers must correctly withhold wages and remit social security contributions for both the employer’s and employees’ portions in compliance with the revised thresholds. Failure to comply may expose employers to penalties under the Social Security Act B.E. 2533 (1990). Employers should ensure that payroll systems are updated as necessary to reflect these changes to the wage ceiling used for social security contribution calculations.
Read More