You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 2, 2020

What Cambodia’s New Law on Electronic Commerce Means for Business

Informed Counsel

On November 2, 2019, Cambodia enacted the Law on Electronic Commerce (“E-commerce Law”). This development makes Cambodia the last member of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)—one of the world’s fastest-growing internet markets—to adopt a domestic e-commerce law. The E-commerce Law addresses electronic communications, signatures, records, and evidence, and serves to clarify the legal environment for e-commerce in Cambodia.

In the last decade, Cambodia has experienced rapid development in the financial technology sector, and financial services and products have become more accessible to Cambodians. This financial inclusion, coupled with the availability of smart devices connected to the internet, enables local e-commerce startups and encourages foreign e-commerce businesses to enter the market. To strengthen trust and security in the online realm, Cambodia’s E-commerce Law regulates the activities of e-commerce service providers and intermediaries. The law also imposes consumer protection obligations, including data protection and cybersecurity obligations, on all e-commerce businesses. 

The E-commerce Law aims to regulate domestic and cross-border activities in Cambodia. All commercial and civil acts, documents, and transactions executed via an electronic system are subject to the E-commerce Law unless they are related to powers of attorney, wills and successions, or real estate.

The E-Commerce Law will take effect in May 2020. During the six-month gap between the law’s passage and its implementation, companies should familiarize themselves with the new obligations under the law, while government agencies are expected to issue regulations to clarify and implement the law. 

Electronic Communications   

The provisions on electronic communications that are found in a portion of Cambodia’s E-commerce Law primarily derive from two influential works of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL); the 1996 Model Law on Electronic Commerce (MLEC) and the 2005 United Nations Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts (the “Electronic Communications Convention” or ECC).

Cambodia’s E-commerce Law explicitly recognizes the validity, legal effect, admissibility, and enforceability of electronic communications and reconfirms that contracts can be made electronically. Furthermore, electronic communications may satisfy requirements imposed by outdated  laws (e.g., “written,” “signed,” or “original” documents), if they fulfill certain conditions set out in the law.

The E-commerce Law generally considers an electronic communication to be sent when it leaves the originator’s information system and to be received when it becomes capable of being retrieved by the addressee. The places of business of the originator and addressee, respectively, are considered as the locations where an electronic communication is dispatched and received.   

It should be noted that Cambodia’s E-commerce Law does not include comprehensive provisions on matters related to the attribution of electronic communications and acknowledgment of receipt, as suggested by the MLEC. For example, the MLEC clarifies that if an originator states that an email is conditional on receipt of its acknowledgment, that email would not be considered as sent until the originator receives the acknowledgment. The Cambodian legislation contains no such clarification.

Electronic Signatures, Electronic Records, and Electronic Evidence

The E-commerce Law sets conditions for electronic signatures, including digital and biometric signatures, and electronic records to be deemed secure. By meeting these statutory qualifications, secure electronic records are presumed to have not been altered, and secure electronic signatures are presumed to be of the signatories having the intent to sign.   

In late 2017, prior to the enactment of the E-commerce Law, Cambodia introduced a sub-decree on digital signatures. This regulation provides legal recognition to digital signatures with a digital signature certificate issued by a licensed digital signature certification authority. However, the sub-decree has not been implemented yet as no license has been issued to any digital signature certification authority. Cambodia is likely to start implementing the regulation at the same time as the E-commerce Law. It will be important to observe how these two legal instruments correspond with each other in practice.

Cambodia’s E-commerce Law, with certain provisions similar to the Model Law on Electronic Evidence by the Commonwealth of Nations, also supports the admissibility of electronic records as evidence in legal proceedings. The mere fact that evidence is an electronic record cannot be used as grounds to render the evidence inadmissible.

The E-commerce Law also establishes rules on the validity, integrity, and authenticity of electronic evidence. The validity of electronic evidence relies on the integrity of the electronic system that stores or records the data in question. The E-commerce Law determines circumstances in which an electronic record satisfies the element of integrity unless proven otherwise. The party introducing the evidence has the burden to prove its authenticity, and to do so the E-commerce Law allows that party to present the court with an authenticity certificate issued by, for example, a competent authority or a court-appointed expert.

E-commerce Service Providers and Intermediaries, and Electronic Payment Systems

E-commerce service providers and intermediaries are now required under the E-commerce Law to obtain operating licenses from the Ministry of Commerce (MOC) and the Ministry of Post and Telecommunications (MPTC). However, the definitions of e-commerce service providers and intermediaries are crafted broadly, and it is unclear whether these licensing requirements also capture offshore e-commerce service providers and intermediaries operating without any local presence or permanent establishment in Cambodia. Since the E-commerce Law states that exceptions to this licensing regime will be clarified in the future, we hope Cambodia will issue implementing regulations that address this ambiguity before the law is implemented in May 2020.

The E-commerce Law creates a safe harbor rule for e-commerce service providers and intermediaries whereby they are not liable for unlawful third-party content on their online platforms; however, they must comply with certain mandatory content removal procedures upon becoming aware of such content. Additionally, they are obligated to comply with an e-commerce code of conduct.

The E-commerce Law also reaffirms that e-commerce service providers and intermediaries are subject to tax laws and incentives, just like brick-and-mortar businesses.     

Payment service providers must also obtain authorization or a license from the National Bank of Cambodia (NBC) before commencing operations, such as operating a payment system, providing payment services, or issuing electronic payments. However, many existing banking and financial institutions in Cambodia have already been providing these payment services and have obtained necessary authorizations under various laws (e.g., the Prakas on Payment Service Providers and the Law on Banking and Financial Institutions). For that reason, it remains uncertain whether the E-commerce Law merely reiterates the existing licensing regime for payment service providers or establishes a new, separate one.

In addition, the E-commerce Law outlines situations where payment service providers must be liable for the damage caused to customers unless the damage is caused by force majeure or the customer’s own fault.

Consumer Protection and Data Protection

Besides obligations under the newly legislated Law on Consumer Protection, which are applicable to both online and offline businesses, the E-commerce Law imposes additional requirements to which e-commerce enterprises must adhere.

The E-commerce Law requires anyone selling goods or services using electronic communications, except insurance and security companies, to disclose information that is necessary for customers to decide whether to purchase the goods or services. The information must at least include names, addresses, contacts, costs of the products and services, and terms and conditions for payments, cancellation, refunds, and so on. Furthermore, it is strictly prohibited to send unsolicited communications without providing clear and straightforward opt-out instructions irrespective of the originator’s or recipient’s locations. 

Data protection rules that apply to all sectors have also been set out for the first time in the E-commerce Law. Any business that electronically stores personal information is now obligated to establish all necessary measures to ensure that the data are reasonably protected from loss or unauthorized access, use, alteration, leaks, or disclosures. In addition, a person who enters information inaccurately to an automated system that does not allow any modification has the right to correct or delete the inaccurate information.

The E-commerce Law is much-welcomed by consumers, and is a positive step for the country’s digital environment. In addition, the harmonization that it brings with other countries should encourage cross-border transactions and paperless interactions among businesses and between businesses and governmental bodies.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 11, 2026
On July 27, 2026, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) released a draft decree proposing amendments to Decree No. 52/2024/ND-CP dated May 15, 2024, on non-cash payments (Decree 52). The draft decree would amend 17 of Decree 52’s 38 articles, with several key changes directly affecting providers of intermediary payment service (IPS). The key proposed changes affecting IPS providers are outlined below. Streamlining IPS Licensing Procedures A central objective of the draft decree is to simplify regulatory procedures for IPS providers. Notably, it would significantly reduce IPS licensing documentation requirements by removing the need to submit enterprise registration certificates, investment registration certificates, and documents evidencing the qualifications of the legal representative and general director. Instead, the SBV would retrieve this information directly from national business registration and other specialized databases, requesting additional documents only where the relevant information cannot be verified electronically or is incomplete. The draft decree also removes the current limit of two rounds for dossier supplementation and shortens processing timelines for several IPS licensing procedures such as issuance, amendment, and reissuance of IPS licenses. The processing time for new IPS license applications would be thereby reduced from 90 to 60 working days. In addition, several continuing IPS business conditions would be removed. For example, IPS providers would no longer be required to maintain certain representations relating to corporate restructuring or the legality of contributed capital. Likewise, the IPS project plan (đề án) would become a one-time application document rather than an ongoing licensing condition. If retained in the final decree, this change could provide IPS providers with significantly greater flexibility to implement post-licensing technology upgrades, system integrations, and corporate restructuring transactions without needing to revisit the originally approved project plan. The draft decree also removes the requirement for the SBV to consult the Ministry of Public
August 10, 2026
Thailand has finalized its social media KYC (“know your customer”) rules under Notification of the Electronic Transactions Commission on Measures to Prevent Technological Crimes for Social Media Service Providers (No. 2), which was published in the Government Gazette on May 5, 2026, and will take effect on November 1, 2026. While an early draft of the notification proposed requiring social media platforms to arrange identification of every user account, the final notification is significantly more targeted, focusing on paid online advertising and advertiser identity verification. Though the regulatory initiative primarily aims to combat online fraud and technology-related crimes, it also has important consequences for intellectual property enforcement, because the verified platform records that will be generated under the new requirements can help IP rights holders to identify anonymous online infringers. Key Regulatory Mandates The notification requires social media service providers to verify the identity of advertisers before their paid advertisements are published and disseminated in Thailand through social media, regardless of whether the advertising fees come from the advertisers or third parties. Verification of an advertiser is valid for one year, after which verification would have to be performed again before the platform could publish additional paid advertisements from the advertiser. Permitted verification methods are specified under the notification. A platform may verify an advertiser by checking identity evidence and confirming the connection between the advertiser and that identity evidence, with the notification giving facial comparison against certain government-issued identity documents as an example. Alternatively, platforms may verify advertisers through a digital identity verification and authentication system with an identity-proofing assurance level not lower than the level prescribed by Thailand’s Electronic Transactions Commission. The notification further requires platforms to retain only the advertiser’s information necessary to identify the advertiser, beginning from the start of the advertising activity and for
August 10, 2026
On July 31, 2026, Thailand’s Big Data Institute (BDI) launched a public consultation on the principles of a proposed new data-sharing law, with comments accepted until August 31, 2026. If enacted, the law would establish Thailand’s first comprehensive framework for government and private-sector data sharing, creating a systematic, secure, and transparent regime to support analytics, policymaking, research, and innovation. Central Data-Sharing Platform The draft law establishes a central system for data sharing, managed by the BDI. Government agencies would be required to connect to the BDI’s Data Integration and Intelligence Platform (also referred to as D2), in accordance with the BDI’s rules and procedures. Five Dimensions of Data Sharing The draft law covers five key types of data sharing between government (G), businesses (B), and consumers (C): G2B: Private organizations may request government data specifically for research and development purposes. The BDI will assess the applicant’s data governance, security, and privacy capabilities whether such measures meet prescribed standards before forwarding the request to the relevant government agency within 90 days. Any dispute may be escalated to a newly established Data-Sharing Promotion Committee for final determination. G2G: Government agencies may request data from other agencies through the central system. The data-holding agency must respond within 90 days, taking legality, necessity, proportionality, public interest, and personal data protection into account. Disputes may be referred to the Data-Sharing Promotion Committee for adjudication. B2G: In emergency situations involving public safety, economic security, or disaster response, the Minister of Digital Economy and Society may require private entities to provide data through the central data-sharing system. Government agencies must specify the data requested, demonstrate its necessity and expected benefits, and request only data reasonably available to the data holder. Requests for personal data must be limited to the minimum amount necessary. B2C: Royal decrees may
August 10, 2026
Thailand’s Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee (PDPC) recently released draft guidance on records of processing activities (ROPA) for personal data controllers and processors under the Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562 (2019) (PDPA). The draft guidance, which was presented to the public on July 7, 2026, addresses both controller records of collection, use, and disclosure of personal data and processor records of processing activities carried out on behalf of controllers. If implemented, the guidance will significantly expand organizational expectations for ROPA preparation, maintenance, and use across all sectors. Key Takeaways The draft guidance contains several important implications for organizations subject to the PDPA: ROPA reframed as a core accountability tool. The guidance elevates ROPA from an administrative record to a central accountability mechanism, connecting controller duties with recordkeeping obligations. ROPA as a source for privacy notices and governance documents. ROPA should serve as the primary source for privacy notices and align with consent management, retention schedules, DPIAs, incident response plans, and vendor contracts. Expanded scope across all activities. ROPA must cover all processing activities across the organization—including security, finance, HR, and external contractors—with correct controller or processor classification for each. Ongoing maintenance and auditability. ROPA must be updated for any change to systems, purposes, or processors, reviewed at least annually, and maintained with version control and a designated owner. Enhanced vendor, processor, and cross-border transfer requirements. Organizations must document all processors, external recipients, and cross-border transfers, specifying purposes, access scope, and destination countries. Linkage with risk assessment, DPIAs, and LIAs. ROPA should assign risk levels to each activity and identify when data protection impact assessments (DPIAs) or legitimate interests assessments (LIAs) are required, functioning as a risk-management tool. ROPA and data breach readiness. Incomplete ROPA can delay breach response and notification. Organizations should map data flows, vendors,