You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 28, 2025

Vietnam’s New Regulations on Bank Guarantees Set to Take Effect

On October 25, 2024, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) issued Circular No. 49/2024/TT-NHNN (“Circular 49”) amending and supplementing certain provisions of Circular No. 11/2022/TT-NHNN dated September 30, 2022, on bank guarantees (“Circular 11”). However, shortly thereafter, the SBV replaced both Circular 11 and Circular 49 with Circular No. 61/2024/TT-NHNN (“Circular 61”) dated December 31, 2024, which incorporates most of the updates from Circular 49 while introducing further amendments to bank guarantee regulations to align with the 2024 Law on Credit Institutions and 2023 Law on Real Estate Business. Circular 61 has an effective date of April 1, 2025.

Below, we highlight some new regulations on bank guarantees under Circular 61, including those that were adopted from Circular 49.

Updated Definitions

Circular 61 broadens the definition of “customer” in bank guarantee relationships, introducing the possibility of a fourth party. Traditionally, a customer would request a credit institution to guarantee its obligations. Under the revised framework, a customer may also request the credit institution to issue a guarantee for another party, such as a parent company requesting a guarantee for its subsidiary. This change establishes a broader scope of parties involved in a bank guarantee relationship, which now includes the customer, the guarantor, the guaranteed party, and the beneficiary.

Circular 61 also updates the definitions of “bank guarantee”, “cross-guarantee”, and “guaranteed party” to align with the term “bank guarantee” as defined in the 2024 Law on Credit Institutions. This includes requirements on mandatory debt acknowledgement.

Bank Guarantees for Sale of Off-Plan Housing

Circular 61, in alignment with Circular 49, the Law on Credit Institutions, and the Law on Real Estate Business, allows foreign bank branches and commercial banks (the “Guarantor”) to guarantee off-plan housing with a detailed procedure.

The guarantee agreement between the Guarantor and the real estate project investor will be effective from the time of signing until the guarantee obligations for all guarantee letters issued to the home purchasers are terminated in accordance with applicable law (e.g., when the real estate project investor fulfills its commitment to hand over the property as stipulated in the off-plan housing purchase/rent-to-own contract), and all obligations of the real estate project investor to the Guarantor under the guarantee agreement have been fully satisfied, unless the parties mutually agree to terminate the guarantee agreement prior to its expiration.

Guarantee agreements that were signed and became effective prior to the effective date of Circular 61 (April 1, 2025) will remain in effect and continue to be implemented in accordance with the terms of the agreements, provided they comply with the applicable legal regulations in force at the time of signing, until the guarantee obligation is fulfilled. However, any amendments or additions to these agreements may only be made if the revised or supplementary content complies with the provisions of Circular 61.

Electronic Guarantee Activities

Circular 61 amends and supplements the minimum requirements for credit institutions and foreign bank branches when developing measures, forms, and technologies to implement electronic guarantee operations. These requirements include, among others, applying appropriate electronic transaction confirmation methods for customers when conducting electronic transactions during the electronic guarantee process; ensuring proper storage and preservation of documents, information, and customer identification data throughout the electronic guarantee process; and clearly defining the specific roles and responsibilities of individuals and departments involved in building, setting up, and operating the information system for credit assessment and decision-making in the electronic guarantee process.

Other New Points

Credit institutions and foreign bank branches are allowed to agree with related parties to use a foreign language for guarantee transactions conducted through the SWIFT system.

Credit institutions and foreign bank branches are required to publicly disclose their guarantee fees.

A foreign bank branch is prohibited from issuing a guarantee in foreign currency for a non-resident institutional client unless the beneficiary is a resident.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 2, 2021
On March 3, 2021, two new types of license became available to operators of securities businesses in Thailand, following the enactment of an amendment to the ministerial regulation regarding securities business licensing in Thailand, which was announced by the Ministry of Finance four months prior. While existing license types are broader, and subject to high-level conditions and compliance levels, the two new licenses are more specific and may be more suitable and cost-effective for operators whose activities are limited to a narrower scope of securities business. The details of the two new license types—the Type E Securities Business License and the Private Fund Management License—are as follows: Type E Securities Business License A Type E Securities Business License covers the following business activities: Equity brokerage Equity dealing Equity underwriting Investment advisory service Securities borrowing and lending Operators eligible to apply for a Type E License include: securities companies; commercial banks; life insurance companies; special-purpose financial institutions; and, Thai incorporated companies. Private Fund Management License Previously, business operators who only intended to conduct private fund management business had to apply for a Type C license—a broad category of license covering mutual fund management, private fund management, brokerage for investment units or trust certificates, and so on. The new Private Fund Management License provides a more targeted alternative to the Type C license, which is subject to higher license fees and more comprehensive compliance requirements. New applicants for a securities business license may now specify one of the additional license types when applying to the Ministry of Finance through the SEC. Holders of existing securities business licenses can also apply to change to one of the new license types.
March 2, 2021
Background On May 8, 2020, the Lao Ministry of Justice published the Decree on Consumer Protection regarding Financial Services No. 225/GOV, dated April 6, 2020, in its online Official Gazette. The decree was drafted by the Bank of the Lao PDR (BOL), which is the central bank in Laos. In addition to supplementing the country’s guidelines on commercial banks’ obligations to their customers, the new decree bolsters the country’s consumer protection regulatory regime under its primary relevant piece of legislation, the Law on Consumer Protection No. 02/NA, dated June 30, 2010. Scope of Application The decree was drafted to elaborate on Article 57 of the Law on Commercial Banks No. 56/NA, dated December 7, 2018, which requires commercial banks to devise clear procedures for receiving and resolving consumer complaints. Besides its application to commercial banks as defined by the law, the decree also applies to a wide range of service providers, including microfinance institutions (deposit-taking or otherwise), deposit and savings cooperatives, leasing companies, pawnshops, and providers proposing other types of financial services under the supervision of the BOL (referred to collectively as “service providers”). Likewise, the decree addresses a spectrum of financial services, including: Monetary deposits and issuance of deposit certificates; Provision of credit; Card services; Hire-purchase and leasing; Mortgages; Payment services; Buying and selling currencies; and, Other services authorized by the BOL, which covers all types of banking services in Laos. Fee Restrictions and Disclosure Requirements for Financial Services The decree requires service providers to set a written policy determining the appropriateness of the selected product, official fee, service fee, representation fee, interests rate, and other fees, in accordance with the relevant law and regulations (if any), and to document the justification for the price of each product. Service providers are also required to advise consumers on financial
February 23, 2021
As many are already aware, following the change of government in Myanmar on February 1, 2021, a draft Cyber Security Law was proposed which attracted widespread criticism. However, less attention has been paid to significant amendments to two existing laws, some of which have a similar effect to parts of the draft Cyber Security Law. In other words, while the draft Cyber Security Law has not progressed further and is under public scrutiny, significant elements of it have found their way into law in Myanmar by other routes. Because these amendments are already law, it is very important that individuals and businesses in Myanmar understand their implications. Amendments to the Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens The Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens (2017), or the “Privacy Law,” was amended on February 13, 2021, less than two weeks after the military government came into power. These amendments chiefly address the power of the government to conduct searches, seizures, and arrests; to extend detention without judicial oversight; and to carry out broad surveillance and investigation activities that could intrude on individual privacy. The amendments accomplish this by suspending various sections of the Privacy Law for as long as the State Administration Council (the military body now governing Myanmar) is in power. The suspended sections include the following: Section 5: Search, seizure, and arrest without civilian observation The relevant part of Section 5 of the Privacy Law states, “The responsible authorities shall … when acting in accordance with existing law, not enter into a person’s residence or a room used as a residence, or a building, compound or building in a compound, for the purpose of search, seizure, or arrest, unless accompanied by minimum of two witnesses who should comprise Ward or Village Tract Administrators…”. The suspension
February 22, 2021
Following the recent imposition of sanctions on Myanmar individuals and companies by the US, the UK and Canada have now imposed new sanctions. As with the US sanctions, these new measures impact UK and Canadian citizens and companies, and non-UK and non-Canadian companies and citizens with interests in those jurisdictions. The EU has indicated that it is planning to issue similar sanctions in the near future. New UK Sanctions In addition to the 16 individuals already sanctioned by the UK government, on February 18, 2021, the UK government announced that three individuals have been sanctioned for serious human rights violations and are now subject to asset freezes and travel bans. The full list of Myanmar individuals and companies sanctioned by the UK is available on the website of the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation. Breaches of UK financial sanctions are criminal offences punishable in the UK by up to 7 years imprisonment and heavy fines. New Canadian Sanctions Also on February 18, timed to coincide with the UK sanctions, new Canadian sanctions were imposed on nine individuals. As with the UK, Canada already had a number of individuals in the Myanmar military on its sanctions list, and the new additions bring the total number of individuals sanctioned by Canada to 54. All assets of these individuals in Canada are now frozen, and they are banned from travelling to Canada. Canadian businesses or entities may not do business with any of the 54 individuals. Full details of the impact of the sanctions are available on the Government of Canada’s website, as is a database of the Myanmar individuals and companies subject to them. Breach of Canadian sanctions carries with it up to 5 years’ imprisonment in Canada and/or a large fine. Other Countries The EU is reportedly drawing up sanctions