You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 26, 2016

Vietnam’s New Penal Code: Employers Face Increased Criminal Liability for Unlawful Dismissals

Subscribe to Updates
Tilleke & Gibbins

Under Vietnam’s new Penal Code No. 100/2015/QH13 (“new code”) coming into force on July 1, 2016, the dismissal of an employee will become more challenging because managers of companies will be exposed to greater risks of criminal liability than under the existing Penal Code No. 15/1999/QH10 as amended by Law No. 37/2009/QH12 (“old code”). This criminal liability would be imposed in addition to any civil liability that might be imposed under Vietnamese labor laws.

Specifically, under Article 128 of the old code, a person can incur criminal liability for unlawfully forcing laborers to leave their employment which causes “serious consequences,” whereas under Article 162 of the new code, the elements of the offense have been reworded to: “(a) unlawful dismissal of an employee, or (b) the use of force or threats to cause an employee to resign if such acts result in hardship for that employee or his/her family, or causes a strike.” In addition, under both laws, the acts must be carried out for “self-seeking purposes or private benefit,” though there has been no elaboration as to how this element might be met.

No detailed guidance was ever issued on the meaning of “unlawfully force laborers to leave their employment” or “serious consequences” under Article 128 the old code. Both terms were probably detrimental to the application of the law because the language, at face value, is vague. To our best knowledge, no one has ever been prosecuted under Article 128. Unlawful dismissals (wrongful termination) in an employment setting have only ended with civil liability.

By comparison, the language of Article 162 of the new code appears to be more precise and utilitarian. For example, if “unlawful dismissal” element can be fulfilled by non-compliance with existing labor laws, as is likely to be the case, there is a large body of existing law that sets out the legal grounds for dismissal and the procedures that must be followed. Hence, there is enough legal guidance to be able to determine if an unlawful dismissal has taken place. As a practical matter under the new code, an investigation into criminal liability might be triggered by the determination of civil liability under an unlawful dismissal case.

In addition to potentially greater exposure to criminal liability, there are enhanced penalties if liability is found. The criminal liability under the old code includes warning, non-custodial reform for up to one year, or imprisonment for a period of three months to one year. Under the new code, the warning is no longer an option and is replaced by a monetary fine from VND 10 million to VND 100 million (approximately USD 450 to USD 4,500). The other potential penalties (non-custodial reform for up to one year or imprisonment for a period of three months to one year) remain unchanged.

Moreover, there are enhanced penalties for aggravating circumstances under the new code that did not exist under the old code. Under the new code, where two or more employees are unlawfully dismissed or forced to resign; or the employee is a female employee who the offender knows is pregnant, or who is raising a child under 12 months of age; or the unlawful dismissal or forced resignation results in the suicide of the dismissed or resigned employee, the offender will be subject to a monetary fine of VND 100 million to VND 200 million (approximately USD 4,500 to USD 9,000) or imprisonment for a period of one to three years. In addition, the offender may also be banned from holding certain positions for a period from one to five years.

Under Vietnamese labor laws, normally only the legal representative of an organization has the authority to dismiss its employees. Hence, legal representatives will be especially vulnerable to liability under this new law.

Related Professionals

Practices

Employment

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 3, 2023
Most employers know that terminating employees for poor job performance is not easy. But it is actually legally possible—if employers have the right approach and take specific precautionary measures. However, failing to take these precautions can mean that an employer is either stuck with an incompetent employee or on the losing end of a lawsuit for unfair termination. This article will lay out some essential considerations for employers in Thailand regarding termination of employment for poor performance. First, understand that “poor work performance” is a lack of performance or ability, or an inability to work with other employees. It does not constitute a violation of work rules or regulations. In some cases, however, an employee’s failure to act in accordance with lawful instructions or commands of the employer, resulting in poor work performance, could also be considered a violation of work rules or regulations. This may be the case if the work rules or regulations clearly state that an employee must strictly comply with the employer’s instructions or commands. Second, an employer can, in fact, terminate an employee due to poor work performance. For example, this may be possible in the following scenarios: Records show that an employee’s work performance has fallen below the employer’s required standards, and the employee has not tried to improve his or her work performance for three consecutive years. In addition, it does not appear that the employer was biased when giving ratings or scores for the employee’s work performance. The job description of the employee includes coordination with employees in other departments, but the employee has not been able to do so. Therefore, the employee was reassigned to a new job function, but the employee still did not improve. This suggests that the employee has a lack of interpersonal skills and is not
Read More
March 23, 2023
On March 19, 2023, Thailand’s new work-from-home (WFH) legislation amending the Labour Protection Act (No. 8) B.E. 2566 (2023) was published in the Government Gazette. It will come into effect on April 18, 2023. The amendment aims to enhance employee protections to accord with current global standards, provide alternative working arrangements for employers and employees, increase workforce efficiency, and strengthen employees’ job security and a better quality of life. As we detailed previously, the new WFH legislation allows employers and employees to reach agreements that permit employees to work remotely. Since there are no accompanying criminal punishments relating to this new provision, and the legislation incorporates the term “may agree,” it appears that this WFH provision is not mandatory but is primarily intended to facilitate and encourage remote working agreements between employers and employees. For more details on the WFH legislation, or on any aspect of employment law in Thailand, please contact Tilleke & Gibbins at [email protected].
Read More
February 24, 2023
Many companies have moved to Southeast Asia to benefit from the advantages of this vibrant and diverse market. The region is already a manufacturing hub for a multitude of industries—computer and automotive products in Thailand, textiles in Cambodia, and footwear and electrical goods in Vietnam, to name a few—and an increasing number of companies worldwide are reconfiguring their supply chains to include regional suppliers. A key challenge is keeping up to date with employment law trends in these jurisdictions to ensure compliance with local regulations—and avoid costly, time-consuming business interruption. Here we outline trends and recent regulatory developments in Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam, and consider what they mean for employers. Cambodia The Ministry of Labour and Vocational Training (MLVT) is likely to pursue a more proactive enforcement strategy in 2023. Last May, the MLVT announced companies would be required to submit a twice yearly self-declaration on labour compliance through a new online system. The self-declaration form requires companies to confirm and upload evidence of compliance, and the MLVT online system—through which the ministry can easily determine if a company is compliant –generates a report that lists all fines. Companies should comply with the self-declaration requirement and carefully review the form to understand what fines will apply for non-compliance. On 1 October 2022, regulations relating to the National Social Security Fund (NSSF) pension system came into effect, and employers and employees began making NSSF pension contributions. Over the next five years, total compulsory pension contributions will amount to 4% of an employee’s wage, half of which is paid by the employer and half deducted from the employee’s salary. The contribution wage is capped at KHR 1.2m (USD 300). Employers are currently required to pay a relatively small amount (KHR 24,000, or around USD 6). This will increase to 10.75% over
Read More
January 19, 2023
The Thai parliament has passed the so-called Work from Home Bill—formally known as Labour Protection Act (No. 8) B.E. 2566 (2023)—which amends the country’s Labour Protection Act (LPA) to reflect current circumstances. The accompanying legislative remark states that the proposed amendments to the LPA will provide additional options for work arrangements between employers and employees, upgrade the level of labor protection, increase work stability, and improve quality of life for employees in Thailand. The legislation adds a single section to the LPA providing that an employer and an employee “may agree in the employment contract” that the employee is allowed “to bring work . . . to perform at home or at the residence of the employee or anywhere that the employee can work remotely through information technology, if the nature of the work permits.” The provision further provides that employers are responsible for ensuring that remote work agreements are in writing, either physically or electronically, and may include the following details: Period of the agreement; Normal working hours, rest periods, and overtime work; Criteria for overtime work, holiday work, and various types of leave; Scope of work and control or supervision by the employer; and Responsibility for arranging supplies and equipment, including necessary costs relating to the work. The amended LPA gives employees who work from home the right to refuse contact from the employer or the supervisor beyond working hours. In addition, employers must treat remote employees equally to on-premise employees. The most notable question surrounding this legislation is whether employers must allow employees to work remotely. The phrase “may agree” suggests that employers do not have to agree to allow an employee to work remotely. Another important aspect of the amendment is that there is no criminal punishment attached to it, which suggests that the legislation
Read More