You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 31, 2026

Vietnam’s New Law on Vocational Education Expands Access and Governance to Attract Broader Investment

Subscribe to Updates

On December 10, 2025, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopted Law on Vocational Education No. 124/2025/QH15, which took effect on January 1, 2026, replacing Law on Vocational Education No. 74/2014/QH13 of 2014. The new law broadens the categories of institutions eligible to deliver vocational training, introduces vocational upper secondary schools, and shifts governance structures for private institutions from ownership-representative boards of management to stakeholder-based school councils. These reforms aim to diversify training providers, align programs with labor market needs, and create a more flexible, open vocational education ecosystem, offering expanded opportunities for foreign and domestic investors, universities, and enterprises.

Some highlights of the new Law on Vocational Education are presented below.

Expansion of Vocational Training Levels and Programs

In addition to elementary, intermediate, and college—the three levels of vocational training program set out under the 2014 Law on Vocational Education—the new law expands the structure by introducing two new levels:

  • Vocational high school training programs are placed between elementary and intermediate levels, and are aimed at combining upper secondary education with vocational training, expanding options for learners after graduating from the lower secondary level.
  • Other vocational training programs are not specified in detail under the new law, but aim to equip learners with the capability to perform and handle one or several simple tasks of an occupation.

Expansion of Vocational Education Providers

The new law reclassifies and extends vocational education providers by classifying them into two distinct categories:

  • Vocational education institutions, which include colleges, intermediate schools, and vocational high schools.
  • Establishments participating in vocational education activities, which include vocational education centers, vocational-continuing education centers, continuing education centers, other centers with vocational education functions, enterprises, cooperatives, and higher education institutions.

Vocational education providers may provide one vocational training level only, or several/all levels, depending on the type of provider.

The new law notably allows higher education institutions to leverage their existing facilities and resources to participate more actively in vocational education. In particular, higher education institutions in the fields of arts, sports, teacher education, and strategic technology may offer several levels of vocational training programs in the same fields.

New Governance Structure for Private Institutions

The new law replaces the board of management (board of directors) previously required in private vocational education institutions with a “school council” functioning as a stakeholder-representative governance body. The school council will operate through collective decision‑making by majority vote and includes a broader and more inclusive membership, but does not include state authority stakeholders as the former board of management did. Specifically, the school council comprises representatives of investors, institutional leadership, lecturers and teachers, learners, educational experts and scientists, educational managers, and related enterprises. This inclusive governance structure aims to balance stakeholder interests and enhance transparency.

Existing boards of management recognized before January 1, 2026, may continue to operate until investors elect or appoint the new school council, but the transition must be completed by January 1, 2027.

Introduction of Training Locations

The new law introduces “training locations” for vocational education institutions for the first time, which include (i) headquarters, (ii) branch campuses, and (iii) the newly recognized “other training locations,” which, unlike headquarters and branch campuses, do not perform governance and management functions. Instead, they are defined as places where all or part of a training program is delivered, under the management of the vocational education institution, and in compliance with prescribed quality‑assurance conditions. These include premises owned by or lawfully used by the institution, venues for joint training programs, and sites for practical training.

This change marks a significant shift, providing a more comprehensive and accurate reflection of where a vocational education institution may conduct training, and facilitates the more efficient utilization of available societal resources for educational activities that can be shared or jointly utilized—such as sports fields or practical training sites—while enabling institutions to deliver training programs in a more flexible and effective manner.

Investment and Cooperation Opportunities

The new law encourages synergy and collaboration between vocational education institutions and relevant stakeholders, including other educational institutions, state agencies, research institutes, enterprises, socio-professional organizations, and partners within Vietnam as well as worldwide, to strengthen cooperation and training collaboration in the vocational education system.

Cooperation models include training, applied research, transfer of technology, innovation, practical training, and internships, as well as the development of training programs and learning models. Training collaboration includes implementation of training programs and establishment of faculties, centers, or specialized training units.

Increase of Reinvestment Ratio in Private Institutions

All private vocational education institutions must retain at least 25 percent of any annual profit from education, training, research, and technology transfer for reinvestment in the development of the institution and social responsibility. This change is expected to affect the business strategies of private vocational education institutions.

Outlook

The changes under the new law are expected to accelerate the diversification and modernization of Vietnam’s vocational training system as well as attract broader investment in this sector. At the same time, the new law also expects greater responsibility and contributions from private vocational education institutions in serving the public interest by increasing the required reinvestment ratio.

As more detailed regulations and guidelines are expected to be issued by the government in the near future, investors and stakeholders in the vocational education sector should closely monitor these developments to ensure compliance and to seize emerging investment and business opportunities.

This article was prepared with the assistance of Tilleke & Gibbins intern Nhu Quynh Ngo.

Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Employment

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 22, 2026
A new decree in Vietnam brings significant implementation clarity to the country’s existing extended producer responsibility (EPR) legal framework. An EPR mechanism was first codified in Vietnam in the 2020 Law on Environmental Protection amid ongoing challenges surrounding the collection and treatment of product and packaging waste. The mechanism was progressively detailed through Decree No. 08/2022/ND‑CP and its successive amendments, but the regulatory framework remained insufficiently developed, notably in terms of support mechanisms for waste collection, recycling, and treatment. The newly launched regulations in Decree No. 110/2026/ND-CP (Decree 110), issued on April 1, 2026, and taking effect on May 25, 2026, stipulate fully and clearly the responsibility of manufacturers and importers to recycle products and packaging and to treat waste. Some key provisions of Decree 110 for manufacturers, importers, and related stakeholders are presented below. Subjects of EPR The Law on Environmental Protection assigns responsibility to manufacturers and importers for product and packaging recycling (under Article 54) or waste collection and treatment (under Article 55), depending on the type of products and packaging they produce or import. Decree 110 elaborates on these EPR provisions by specifying the responsible entities and listing out the types of products and packaging subject to recycling and waste treatment responsibilities. Decree 110 clarifies the responsible entities in special cases, such as when products under the same brand are made by multiple manufacturers, when there is a contract manufacturing or entrusted import relationship, and when the manufacturer or importer is part of a corporate group. Notably, exemptions may be applied in some scenarios, such as for manufacturers and importers of products and packaging exclusively for export, temporary import and re-export, or research and testing purposes, as well as for entities with annual revenue from related products not exceeding VND 30 billion. Recycling Responsibilities Decree 110
Read More
April 15, 2026
On March 31, 2026, Vietnam’s government issued Decree 102/2026/ND-CP (Decree 102), which amends Decree 75/2019/ND-CP on administrative sanctions for competition law violations (Decree 75). Effective from May 20, 2026, the new decree introduces a number of significant changes aimed at strengthening enforcement, revising penalty structures, and broadening the range of remedial measures, primarily for violations related to economic concentration. Revised Penalties for Economic Concentration Violations Decree 102 significantly revises the penalties for violations related to economic concentration. Failure to notify an economic concentration; implementing an economic concentration before clearance Under the new framework, Articles 14 and 15 of Decree 75 have been amended to impose a range of monetary fines, rather than relying solely on percentage‑based penalties as under the previous regime, for violations involving the failure to notify an economic concentration or the implementation of an economic concentration prior to clearance. The fines range from VND 500 million to VND 1 billion for each enterprise participating in a concentration with combined assets, revenues, or purchase value below VND 3,000 billion in the preceding fiscal year, capped at 5% of the violating enterprise’s total turnover in the relevant market. For concentrations meeting or exceeding the VND 3,000 billion threshold across those same metrics, the fines increase to VND 1 billion to VND 2 billion per enterprise, also subject to the 5% cap. These differentiated thresholds allow penalties to better reflect the size of the transaction and its potential competitive impact. Non-compliance with conditional approvals Enterprises that do not implement or only partially implement the conditions specified in a conditional economic concentration approval decision face fines ranging from 1% to 3% of total turnover in the relevant market during the fiscal year preceding the violation. Decree 102 also adds a new remedial measure requiring enterprises to fully implement all conditions
Read More
March 31, 2026
Against the backdrop of Vietnam’s rapid economic and technological transformation and its ambition to build a knowledge-driven economy, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopted Law on Higher Education No. 125/2025/QH15 on December 10, 2025, The new law took effect on January 1, 2026, replacing Law on Higher Education No. 08/2012/QH13 of 2012 and its subsequent amendments after more than a decade of implementation. The new law reflects a significant policy shift toward enhancing the institutional autonomy of higher education institutions (“HEIs”)—universities and other university-level institutions. By granting broader autonomy, Vietnam aims to enable HEIs to operate more proactively, better respond to market needs, and improve the quality and efficiency of education and research activities. Comprehensive Institutional Autonomy in HEIs The new law marks a significant shift by granting HEIs comprehensive autonomy as a statutory right, within the bounds of the licensed scope of educational operation and the legal framework, rather than a conditional right as provided under the former law. Under the new law, HEIs are empowered to exercise autonomy over their academic expertise, training, scientific research, international cooperation, organizational structure, personnel, finance, and other higher education activities. The expansion of institutional autonomy is also accompanied by a correspondingly strengthened framework of institutional accountability. However, Vietnam maintains a certain degree of control and imposes restrictions on institutional autonomy in sensitive and strategically important areas. These controls and restrictions include limitations on training autonomy in the majors of teacher training, national defense, and security; and restrictions on financial and personnel management autonomy for HEIs under the administration of the Ministry of National Defense and the Ministry of Public Security. New Model for Curriculum Development The new law removes the concept of “opening a training major” and focuses regulation on how training programs are developed and delivered. Under the previous regime,
Read More
March 31, 2026
Thailand’s Department of Business Development (DBD) has issued a regulation imposing additional requirements for amending a company’s directors and signatory power to designate a foreign national as an authorized signatory of the company. This measure, effective April 1, 2026, has been introduced in response to the widespread use of Thai nationals as nominees to conduct business on behalf of foreigners, a practice considered to have an adverse impact on the country’s economic stability and security. The new measures are particularly concerned with changes to the authorized signatory structure of companies that originally had only Thai directors authorized to sign for and bind the company. Under the new rules, any amendment that results in a foreign national becoming an authorized signatory—whether solely or jointly—for such a company will be subject to additional verification. Directors signing an application to register such an amendment to the company’s authorized signatory structure are now also required to provide a statement confirming that all shareholders of the company have made genuine contributions and no Thai national has assisted with, supported, or participated in business activities in a nominee capacity. Implications Companies intending to appoint foreign directors as authorized signatories should be aware of the increased regulatory requirements and assessments. Additional documentation and confirmations may be required as part of the registration process.
Read More