You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 31, 2026

Vietnam’s New Law on Vocational Education Expands Access and Governance to Attract Broader Investment

Subscribe to Updates

On December 10, 2025, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopted Law on Vocational Education No. 124/2025/QH15, which took effect on January 1, 2026, replacing Law on Vocational Education No. 74/2014/QH13 of 2014. The new law broadens the categories of institutions eligible to deliver vocational training, introduces vocational upper secondary schools, and shifts governance structures for private institutions from ownership-representative boards of management to stakeholder-based school councils. These reforms aim to diversify training providers, align programs with labor market needs, and create a more flexible, open vocational education ecosystem, offering expanded opportunities for foreign and domestic investors, universities, and enterprises.

Some highlights of the new Law on Vocational Education are presented below.

Expansion of Vocational Training Levels and Programs

In addition to elementary, intermediate, and college—the three levels of vocational training program set out under the 2014 Law on Vocational Education—the new law expands the structure by introducing two new levels:

  • Vocational high school training programs are placed between elementary and intermediate levels, and are aimed at combining upper secondary education with vocational training, expanding options for learners after graduating from the lower secondary level.
  • Other vocational training programs are not specified in detail under the new law, but aim to equip learners with the capability to perform and handle one or several simple tasks of an occupation.

Expansion of Vocational Education Providers

The new law reclassifies and extends vocational education providers by classifying them into two distinct categories:

  • Vocational education institutions, which include colleges, intermediate schools, and vocational high schools.
  • Establishments participating in vocational education activities, which include vocational education centers, vocational-continuing education centers, continuing education centers, other centers with vocational education functions, enterprises, cooperatives, and higher education institutions.

Vocational education providers may provide one vocational training level only, or several/all levels, depending on the type of provider.

The new law notably allows higher education institutions to leverage their existing facilities and resources to participate more actively in vocational education. In particular, higher education institutions in the fields of arts, sports, teacher education, and strategic technology may offer several levels of vocational training programs in the same fields.

New Governance Structure for Private Institutions

The new law replaces the board of management (board of directors) previously required in private vocational education institutions with a “school council” functioning as a stakeholder-representative governance body. The school council will operate through collective decision‑making by majority vote and includes a broader and more inclusive membership, but does not include state authority stakeholders as the former board of management did. Specifically, the school council comprises representatives of investors, institutional leadership, lecturers and teachers, learners, educational experts and scientists, educational managers, and related enterprises. This inclusive governance structure aims to balance stakeholder interests and enhance transparency.

Existing boards of management recognized before January 1, 2026, may continue to operate until investors elect or appoint the new school council, but the transition must be completed by January 1, 2027.

Introduction of Training Locations

The new law introduces “training locations” for vocational education institutions for the first time, which include (i) headquarters, (ii) branch campuses, and (iii) the newly recognized “other training locations,” which, unlike headquarters and branch campuses, do not perform governance and management functions. Instead, they are defined as places where all or part of a training program is delivered, under the management of the vocational education institution, and in compliance with prescribed quality‑assurance conditions. These include premises owned by or lawfully used by the institution, venues for joint training programs, and sites for practical training.

This change marks a significant shift, providing a more comprehensive and accurate reflection of where a vocational education institution may conduct training, and facilitates the more efficient utilization of available societal resources for educational activities that can be shared or jointly utilized—such as sports fields or practical training sites—while enabling institutions to deliver training programs in a more flexible and effective manner.

Investment and Cooperation Opportunities

The new law encourages synergy and collaboration between vocational education institutions and relevant stakeholders, including other educational institutions, state agencies, research institutes, enterprises, socio-professional organizations, and partners within Vietnam as well as worldwide, to strengthen cooperation and training collaboration in the vocational education system.

Cooperation models include training, applied research, transfer of technology, innovation, practical training, and internships, as well as the development of training programs and learning models. Training collaboration includes implementation of training programs and establishment of faculties, centers, or specialized training units.

Increase of Reinvestment Ratio in Private Institutions

All private vocational education institutions must retain at least 25 percent of any annual profit from education, training, research, and technology transfer for reinvestment in the development of the institution and social responsibility. This change is expected to affect the business strategies of private vocational education institutions.

Outlook

The changes under the new law are expected to accelerate the diversification and modernization of Vietnam’s vocational training system as well as attract broader investment in this sector. At the same time, the new law also expects greater responsibility and contributions from private vocational education institutions in serving the public interest by increasing the required reinvestment ratio.

As more detailed regulations and guidelines are expected to be issued by the government in the near future, investors and stakeholders in the vocational education sector should closely monitor these developments to ensure compliance and to seize emerging investment and business opportunities.

This article was prepared with the assistance of Tilleke & Gibbins intern Nhu Quynh Ngo.

Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Employment

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 17, 2025
M&A specialists at Tilleke & Gibbins have contributed the Vietnam chapter to Private M&A 2025, a newly released guide from Lexology Panoramic. The publication provides practical insights into private mergers and acquisitions frameworks in jurisdictions worldwide. The Vietnam chapter addresses key aspects of private M&A transactions, including: Structure and process, legal regulation, and required consents Advisers, negotiation, and documentation Due diligence and disclosure obligations Pricing, consideration, and financing Conditions, preclosing covenants, and termination rights Representations, warranties, indemnities, and postclosing covenants Taxation of transfers Employees, pensions, and benefits Recent legal, regulatory, and market practice developments The chapter highlights how Vietnam’s legal framework governs private acquisitions and disposals, outlines typical transaction processes and structures, and provides guidance on common regulatory and practical considerations. It also notes recent trends, including increased scrutiny of merger control filings by the Vietnam Competition Commission and regulatory changes affecting M&A approvals. The full Vietnam chapter is available as a PDF through the button below. Readers can also gain 30 days of complimentary access to Private M&A 2025 and Lexology Panoramic’s full library of resources through this link.
Read More
September 10, 2025
Under Thai law, authorized directors stand as a company’s mind and will and, as such, may incur personal criminal liability for acts or omissions committed in the course of company business. When allegations surface, directors must be prepared for the practical reality that, before guilt or innocence is ever adjudicated, they could be deprived of liberty unless bail release is promptly achieved through the competent legal authority. When Bail Can Be Granted Two procedural moments trigger the need to consider bail. The first arises during the investigative phase, when a claim is lodged against a director with the competent law enforcement authorities. Upon receipt of a complaint, the assigned inquiry officer summons the director for questioning, compiles evidence, and ultimately forwards a prosecution or nonprosecution recommendation to the public prosecutor. Although the public prosecutor retains ultimate discretion to indict an accused director, the police or prosecutor may conclude that pretrial detention is necessary and may therefore apply to the court for an order to hold the director in court custody. The second moment occurs after a criminal case is filed directly with the court. This occurs once a court accepts a criminal case filed by a prosecutor against a director or, alternatively, when the court accepts a case filed by an individual for trial. For cases filed by individuals, the plaintiff presents prima facie evidence at the preliminary hearing, and the court will accept the complaint if it finds sufficient grounds, thereby conferring upon the director the status of a criminal defendant. Upon acceptance of the criminal case, the court then has the inherent authority to order custody pending trial unless the defendant secures bail release. Procedural Considerations Experienced litigants typically prepare bail security in advance and submit a bail petition at the earliest possible time. While there are
Read More
September 8, 2025
On September 1, 2025, Myanmar’s Directorate of Investment and Company Administration (DICA) issued Directive No. 106/2025 to remind all companies and organizations registered under the Myanmar Companies Law of their obligation to strictly comply with the DICA registrar’s orders, directives, and procedures. This directive highlights the importance of legal and procedural compliance in corporate filings, governance changes, and operational conduct. It also signals increased scrutiny over documentation submitted during annual returns, share transfers, and director appointments or resignations. Public companies will be subject to closer regulatory attention, and new company registrations will involve vetting of proposed directors to ensure prior compliance with applicable laws. Compliance The directive emphasizes the following points: Companies must ensure full compliance with the Myanmar Companies Law and all directives issued by the registrar. This includes the proper submission of annual returns and adherence to updated requirements for share transfers and changes in directors. Companies and organizations must comply with all applicable laws, rules, directives, and procedures issued by relevant ministries and departments. If any authority takes action due to noncompliance, the registrar may also take appropriate measures. Noncompliance may result in regulatory sanctions, including restrictions on future company participation and vetting under anti–money laundering and counter–terrorism financing protocols. Prospective directors of newly registered companies will be vetted to confirm no prior violations of applicable laws. Entities must respond promptly and accurately to document requests from the registrar, both during initial registration and in subsequent filings. Companies are strongly advised to review their internal compliance frameworks and ensure readiness to meet DICA’s documentation and procedural expectations. In particular, companies must respond promptly and accurately to document requests from the registrar, whether during initial registration or in subsequent filings. For more information on this DICA announcement, or on any aspect of corporate registration, or assistance with
Read More
September 2, 2025
Thailand’s Office of the Consumer Protection Board (OCPB) has initiated a sweeping regulatory review of licensed direct sale and direct marketing businesses in Thailand and is in the process of notifying business operators to submit their annual business report and financial statement to the OCPB as part of their postlicensing obligations. This move marks a significant escalation in the government’s efforts to enforce compliance and transparency in the sector, which has faced growing scrutiny in recent years. Key Regulatory Considerations All businesses holding a direct sales or direct marketing license are required to submit their audited financial statement along with their business operation report to the OCPB within 60 days from the end of their fiscal year (extendable for up to 30 days by request, if necessary). The OCPB is currently conducting license audits as part of its enforcement duties. The office aims to complete audits for at least 90% of the 2,983 registered businesses that have obtained their license since 2022. This includes a review of the business conduct of the license holder. New license applications are also under scrutiny. Applicants are currently being subjected to background checks, and the OCPB has signaled a more rigorous vetting process moving forward. Impact of Noncompliance Failure to comply with these reporting obligations may result in escalating enforcement actions, including: Official notice to rectify noncompliance within a specified timeframe. Revocation of business registration, if the operator fails to respond. Revocation of business registration could result in a five-year prohibition on reapplying for a direct sales or direct marketing license following the revocation. The OCPB has already initiated outreach efforts, including SMS and email notifications, and has hosted seminars to raise awareness of these obligations. These measures are part of a broader initiative to enhance transparency and consumer trust in the sector. Businesses operating in the direct selling and
Read More