You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 26, 2024

Vietnam’s New Law on Credit Institutions Introduces Key Changes to Banking Operations

Subscribe to Updates

Vietnam’s new Law on Credit Institutions No. 32/2024/QH15, passed by the National Assembly on January 18, 2024 (“New LCI”), will take effect on July 1, 2024 (except for some clauses regarding the transfer of collateral, which will take delayed effect on January 1, 2025). The New LCI will replace the current Law on Credit Institutions issued in 2010 and amended in 2017, and aims to strengthen banking operations and enhance transparency in this sector.

Some key changes to banking operations introduced by the New LCI are set out below.

Lowering Credit Limits

Article 136 of the New LCI stipulates a gradual reduction of credit limits available to bank clients, to help credit institutions diversify their credit portfolios and minimize overdue risks. There are more stringent requirements for certain persons related to the bank (e.g., managers, auditors, and shareholders) and exemptions for special cases (e.g., approval by the prime minister, entrusted loans).

Specifically, the total balance of credit extended by commercial banks, cooperative banks, foreign bank branches, people’s credit funds, and microfinance institutions to a single client or to a client and related persons of that client will be reduced in stages from the current 15% of the credit institution’s equity capital (vốn tự có) for a single client and 25% for a client and related persons, to 10% for a single client and 15% for a client and related persons by 2029.

For non-bank credit institutions (i.e., general and specialized finance companies), the total balance of credit extended to a single client must not exceed 15% (down from 25%) of its equity capital, and the total balance of credit extended to a single client and related persons must not exceed 25% (down from 50%) of its equity capital.

It is worth noting that the above credit limits do not apply to (1) cases of entrusted loans for which the entrusted credit institution or foreign bank branch does not bear risk, (2) cases where the borrower is another credit institution or foreign bank branch, or (3) cases where the prime minister approves a higher credit limit.

Restricting Bancassurance Activities

Article 15.5 of the New LCI strictly prohibits credit institutions, foreign bank branches, and their managers, executives, and employees from combining the purchase of non-obligatory insurance products with the provision of banking products and services in any form.

This is a new regulation in the New LCI that emphasizes the commitment of the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) in addressing the past problem of clients being forced to purchase insurance in order to be granted loans, thereby building client trust in both the banking and insurance sectors.

Recognizing Security Agent Services

Article 114.2(dd) of the New LCI explicitly regulates a new service to be provided by commercial banks, which is the provision of third-party security agent services to lenders who are international financial institutions, domestic and foreign credit institutions, and foreign bank branches.

This addresses a past issue in which local commercial banks were not allowed to be independent security agents, but would have to be a lender in a syndicated loan to act as a security agent for the other lenders, which could expose the bank to more risk. Under the New LCI, the local bank is no longer required to be a co-lender in a syndicated loan to act as the security agent for foreign lenders.

Further details on how banks can provide such security agent services may be provided by the SBV in the future.

Disposal of Real Estate Collateral

To facilitate debt recovery, Article 200 of the New LCI grants credit institutions, foreign bank branches, debt management companies, and asset management companies the right to transfer all or part of real estate projects that are secured assets to recover debts in accordance with the provisions of the Law on Real Estate Business and other relevant laws, without applying the conditions normally applicable to the transferor.

This regulation is expected to pave the way for banks to have more options to dispose of large projects mired in legal problems, thereby helping both the bank and the real estate enterprises to generate cash flow and reduce debt—this is especially true for banks with high real estate lending rates.

However, this regulation will only apply from January 1, 2025.

Outlook

Given the stringent requirements, the New LCI is anticipated to have a profound impact on banking operations in Vietnam, and will require changes from credit institutions to ensure their compliance status.

In addition, as the New LCI will take effect soon, a decree guiding the New LCI in detail should be in the final stages of adoption. Therefore, stakeholders are encouraged to stay informed and updated on further legal developments.

Related Professionals

Practices

Banking and Finance

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

February 9, 2026
When unauthorized credit card transactions occur, who bears responsibility—the cardholder or the issuing bank? In Thailand, a landmark 2025 ruling by the country’s Supreme Court has clarified this question, establishing a stricter standard for banks in fraud disputes and significantly strengthening consumer protections. The case centered on disputed charges where a customer claimed their credit card had been used without authorization. The bank sued to recover the amount, and both the court of first instance and the Court of Appeal ruled in favor of the bank. However, the Supreme Court overruled their judgments and decided that the customer did not need to pay for the unauthorized transactions, placing liability squarely on the bank. This ruling was based on three key findings, which are outlined below. Finding 1: Insufficient Expert Testimony In this case, the bank bore the burden of proving matters related to the credit card system’s manufacture, design, security, and operation, as required under the Consumer Case Procedure Act B.E. 2551 (2008). To meet this requirement, the bank presented testimony from two employees in its credit card department regarding ’security measures and issuance procedures. However, the Supreme Court found these witnesses unqualified as experts, as they did not present technical or academic evidence and did not possess specialized expertise in credit card technology. As a result, their testimony failed to establish that the bank’s credit card technology was sufficiently secure against fraudulent misuse. Finding 2: Contradictory Terms and Conditions The bank’s own credit card terms and conditions included a provision acknowledging that despite the card’s EMV security standards, cardholders must still exercise caution to prevent unauthorized access. The Supreme Court interpreted this clause as an explicit admission that credit card systems remain vulnerable to hacking and fraud, even with high-level security measures in place. This acknowledgment undermined the
Read More
February 4, 2026
On November 18, 2025, Vietnam’s Ministry of Finance released for public consultation a draft decree on administrative sanctions in the field of crypto assets and crypto asset markets (the “Draft Decree”), intended to implement Resolution No. 05/2025/NQ-CP dated September 9, 2025, on the pilot crypto asset market in Vietnam (“Resolution 05”). While Resolution 05 sets out who may participate and under what conditions, the Draft Decree addresses a more practical question for market participants, i.e., what happens if those conditions are not met. In doing so, the Draft Decree offers important insight into how Vietnamese regulators intend to supervise, discipline, and ultimately shape the crypto market during the pilot phase. Regulatory Scope and Overall Sanctions Architecture The Draft Decree applies to both domestic and foreign organizations and individuals engaging in crypto-related activities in Vietnam’s market. Covered entities include: (i) crypto asset issuers; (ii) crypto asset service providers, including trading platforms and market operators; (iii) Vietnamese and foreign investors participating in the pilot market; and (iv) other organizations involved in the offering, issuance, or provision of crypto-related services in Vietnam. The breadth of this scope is deliberate. It appears to reflect a regulatory view that cross-border structures, offshore platforms, and indirect participation may not necessarily insulate market actors from compliance obligations once they operate within the pilot framework. For the crypto industry, this may mark a shift from regulatory ambiguity toward a more explicit articulation of jurisdictional reach. At first glance, the Draft Decree’s monetary penalties appear restrained. The maximum fine per administrative violation is capped at VND 200 million (approx. USD 7,700) for organizations and VND 100 million (approx. USD 3,800) for individuals. However, focusing solely on fine levels risks missing the point. The Draft Decree also places great regulatory weight on supplementary sanctions and corrective measures, including: (i)
Read More
January 23, 2026
On December 31, 2025, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) issued Circular No. 72/2025/TT-NHNN (Circular 72), establishing a streamlined foreign exchange framework for Vietnam’s International Financial Center (IFC). Circular 72, which took effect on the same day, implements core provisions of Decree No. 329/2025/ND-CP and marks a fundamental shift from ex ante licensing to ex post supervision for IFC member enterprises and foreign investors. These changes are designed to accelerate capital flows, reduce compliance costs, and position Vietnam as a competitive regional financial hub by granting IFC members substantially greater autonomy in currency transactions, borrowing, lending, and investment activities. Key provisions for IFC members to note are discussed below. Use of Foreign Currency and Payments within the IFC Vietnam generally requires the use of Vietnamese dong for transactions within the country, with limited exceptions. This can be burdensome for foreign investors, who may be unfamiliar with all the foreign exchange rules they must comply with. Under the new regulation, IFC member enterprises and foreign investors gain the ability to transact, list prices, and settle obligations in foreign currency when dealing with other IFC members or offshore counterparties, avoiding currency risk and conversion friction. With respect to individuals and organizations located within Vietnam who are not IFC members, the use of foreign currency must continue to comply with general restrictions on foreign exchange usage within Vietnam. Dual-Track Account System for IFC Members The new regulation introduces a two-tier account structure that differentiates transactions by purpose and counterparty. IFC member enterprises must use a designated foreign currency capital account at an IFC member bank for four specified activities: Borrowing from offshore individuals and organizations Lending to offshore entities and domestic borrowers Outbound investing from the IFC Investing elsewhere in Vietnam from the IFC All other foreign exchange transactions—including operational receipts, vendor
Read More
January 22, 2026
On January 20, 2026, Vietnam’s Ministry of Finance (MOF) issued Decision No. 96/QD-BTC to formally launch pilot administrative procedures for licensing crypto asset trading market services in Vietnam. The decision took immediate effect and implements the government’s pilot crypto asset market program under Resolution No. 05/2025/NQ-CP. Notably, competent authorities have now begun accepting license applications, marking the first time Vietnam has operationalized a licensing pathway for crypto trading market operators. Administrative Procedures and Applications The decision stipulates procedures for (i) granting, (ii) adjusting, and (iii) revoking licenses to provide services for organizing crypto asset trading markets. It provides detailed, step-by-step guidance for each procedure, including dossier composition, internal review stages, coordination mechanisms, and statutory timelines. These procedures apply specifically to entities seeking to organize and operate crypto asset trading markets within Vietnam’s pilot regulatory framework. The MOF is the authority responsible for reviewing and deciding on the above procedures, with the State Securities Commission acting as the receiving, coordinating, and procedural focal point. For licensing applications, the MOF will coordinate with multiple authorities, including the State Bank of Vietnam and the Ministry of Public Security, particularly in relation to anti-money laundering, cybersecurity, system safety, and risk control requirements. Applications may be submitted in person, by post, or electronically via the National Public Service Portal or the administrative procedure information system, in line with applicable regulations. Statutory processing timelines vary depending on the specific procedure and stage involved. For applications to obtain a license to organize a crypto asset trading market, the process is conducted in multiple phases: The MOF will issue an initial written response within 20 working days from receipt of a complete and valid initial dossier, following which, upon submission of the full set of required documents, the MOF will complete substantive review and issue the license
Read More