You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 26, 2024

Vietnam’s New Law on Credit Institutions Introduces Key Changes to Banking Operations

Subscribe to Updates

Vietnam’s new Law on Credit Institutions No. 32/2024/QH15, passed by the National Assembly on January 18, 2024 (“New LCI”), will take effect on July 1, 2024 (except for some clauses regarding the transfer of collateral, which will take delayed effect on January 1, 2025). The New LCI will replace the current Law on Credit Institutions issued in 2010 and amended in 2017, and aims to strengthen banking operations and enhance transparency in this sector.

Some key changes to banking operations introduced by the New LCI are set out below.

Lowering Credit Limits

Article 136 of the New LCI stipulates a gradual reduction of credit limits available to bank clients, to help credit institutions diversify their credit portfolios and minimize overdue risks. There are more stringent requirements for certain persons related to the bank (e.g., managers, auditors, and shareholders) and exemptions for special cases (e.g., approval by the prime minister, entrusted loans).

Specifically, the total balance of credit extended by commercial banks, cooperative banks, foreign bank branches, people’s credit funds, and microfinance institutions to a single client or to a client and related persons of that client will be reduced in stages from the current 15% of the credit institution’s equity capital (vốn tự có) for a single client and 25% for a client and related persons, to 10% for a single client and 15% for a client and related persons by 2029.

For non-bank credit institutions (i.e., general and specialized finance companies), the total balance of credit extended to a single client must not exceed 15% (down from 25%) of its equity capital, and the total balance of credit extended to a single client and related persons must not exceed 25% (down from 50%) of its equity capital.

It is worth noting that the above credit limits do not apply to (1) cases of entrusted loans for which the entrusted credit institution or foreign bank branch does not bear risk, (2) cases where the borrower is another credit institution or foreign bank branch, or (3) cases where the prime minister approves a higher credit limit.

Restricting Bancassurance Activities

Article 15.5 of the New LCI strictly prohibits credit institutions, foreign bank branches, and their managers, executives, and employees from combining the purchase of non-obligatory insurance products with the provision of banking products and services in any form.

This is a new regulation in the New LCI that emphasizes the commitment of the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) in addressing the past problem of clients being forced to purchase insurance in order to be granted loans, thereby building client trust in both the banking and insurance sectors.

Recognizing Security Agent Services

Article 114.2(dd) of the New LCI explicitly regulates a new service to be provided by commercial banks, which is the provision of third-party security agent services to lenders who are international financial institutions, domestic and foreign credit institutions, and foreign bank branches.

This addresses a past issue in which local commercial banks were not allowed to be independent security agents, but would have to be a lender in a syndicated loan to act as a security agent for the other lenders, which could expose the bank to more risk. Under the New LCI, the local bank is no longer required to be a co-lender in a syndicated loan to act as the security agent for foreign lenders.

Further details on how banks can provide such security agent services may be provided by the SBV in the future.

Disposal of Real Estate Collateral

To facilitate debt recovery, Article 200 of the New LCI grants credit institutions, foreign bank branches, debt management companies, and asset management companies the right to transfer all or part of real estate projects that are secured assets to recover debts in accordance with the provisions of the Law on Real Estate Business and other relevant laws, without applying the conditions normally applicable to the transferor.

This regulation is expected to pave the way for banks to have more options to dispose of large projects mired in legal problems, thereby helping both the bank and the real estate enterprises to generate cash flow and reduce debt—this is especially true for banks with high real estate lending rates.

However, this regulation will only apply from January 1, 2025.

Outlook

Given the stringent requirements, the New LCI is anticipated to have a profound impact on banking operations in Vietnam, and will require changes from credit institutions to ensure their compliance status.

In addition, as the New LCI will take effect soon, a decree guiding the New LCI in detail should be in the final stages of adoption. Therefore, stakeholders are encouraged to stay informed and updated on further legal developments.

Related Professionals

Practices

Banking and Finance

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

May 30, 2024
A bank guarantee or bond is a powerful tool that provides contractual parties with security and assurance. Bank guarantees are commitments made by a bank (as a guarantor) on behalf of a customer (as an obligor) to a beneficiary to ensure that certain contractual obligations will be fulfilled. If the customer fails to comply with these obligations, the bank can compensate the beneficiary up to the amount specified in the bank guarantee. Bank guarantees are widely used in Thailand as a form of security and are common in construction agreements and government procurement contracts, among others. If the beneficiary (e.g., a project owner) concludes that the counterparty in the agreement (e.g., a contractor) has breached the underlying contract in some way, the beneficiary will demand payment from the bank pursuant to the guarantee. Collecting on a Guarantee and Preventing Payment In the context of construction and procurement agreements, there are two types of bank guarantees—conditional and unconditional. A conditional bank guarantee means that the project owner must satisfy certain agreed-upon conditions (e.g., provision of proof of the breach, proof of damages, or even consent from the contractor) to demand payment. An unconditional bank guarantee means that the bank must compensate the project owner for the demanded amount (up to the limit specified in the bank guarantee) without any conditions. When a project owner concludes that a contractor has breached the underlying contract (often for nonperformance or failure to comply with a representation or warranty), the project owner will demand payment from the bank holding the guarantee. Upon receiving such a demand, Thai banks will usually inform the contractor and ask if it has any objections. Even if the bank guarantee is unconditional, in practice, a bank may be reluctant to make payment if the contractor, as the bank’s customer,
Read More
May 9, 2024
As non-cash payments continue to surge in Vietnam, the requirement for strong security standards and a clear legislative framework for intermediary payment services (“IPS”) is becoming more and more critical. Recognizing this, the State Bank of Vietnam (“SBV”) has been working on a draft decree to supersede the outdated Decree No. 101/2012/ND-CP dated November 22, 2012, on non-cash payments (“Draft Non-Cash Payment Decree”), which will lay the groundwork for non-cash payments in general and the provision of IPS in particular. Building upon this, the SBV recently issued a draft circular to replace Circular No. 39/2014/TT-NHNN dated December 11, 2014, on IPS (“Circular 39”) (“Draft IPS Circular”), which will offer more detailed guidance on the provision of IPS in Vietnam on top of the Draft Non-Cash Payment Decree. The Draft IPS Circular will be applicable to (i) IPS providers; (ii) foreign organizations providing IPS in Vietnam; and (iii) organizations and individuals involved in the provision of IPS. Some key updates regarding the Draft IPS Circular are as follows: Scope of Application The Draft IPS Circular sets out further guidance for the provision of IPS as listed under the Draft Non-Cash Payment Decree, including: (i) electronic clearing services; (ii) electronic wallet (“e-wallet”) services; (iii) collection and payment support services; (iv) financial switching services; (v) international financial switching services; and (vi) electronic payment gateway services. Notably, the Draft IPS Circular has explicitly excluded from its scope of application the provision of accounts by goods/service providers to their customers solely for the purpose of payment within the systems of such providers (e.g., cards/coupons or service/transaction accounts of online game service providers, transportation service providers, or securities companies, etc.). Requirements on the Provision of IPS Electronic Clearing Services: The Draft IPS Circular introduces regulations to cover certain elements of electronic clearing services that have
Read More
March 27, 2024
The Bank of Thailand (BOT) has opened a public comment period on their consultation paper titled “Criteria for Supervising Virtual Banks” from March 19, 2024, to April 17, 2024. The consultation paper reveals that the BOT intends to apply traditional commercial bank supervisory standards to virtual banks. However, the BOT also explains that the wholly digital nature of the services offered by virtual banks necessitates additional regulatory supervision. Additional Supervisory Criteria for Virtual Banks Financial business group: If a virtual bank is within the same financial business group as other financial institutions, its parent company must structure the virtual bank to be under its own sole consolidated financial business group. After the virtual bank has undergone the “restricted phase” in its initial years of operation (see below), other financial institutions within the group are prohibited from extending credit to or engaging in transactions similar to lending activities with the virtual bank. Shareholding structure: If the increase in the financial institution system capital is higher than the actual capital injection resulting from the bank’s shareholding structure, the BOT aims to issue an additional regulation to supervise the capital of the virtual bank and financial institution system to prevent double counting. Operational risk: Virtual banks must not use a trademark or logo that bears resemblance to or implies association with other financial institutions or financial institution groups. Governance: Virtual banks must have at least one director and chief technology officer (CTO) with at least three years of experience in IT or digital service. Additionally, the CTO must work full-time for the virtual bank and may not be an employee of another legal entity. Restriction on related lending and related-party transactions: Virtual banks must obtain prior unanimous approval from their boards of directors before engaging in transactions with major shareholders or businesses
Read More
March 15, 2024
Vietnam’s fintech industry is booming, and the rapid emergence of tech startups and non-bank institutions offering innovative financial services has been outpacing existing regulations. This regulatory gap not only creates uncertainty for both innovators and consumers, but also poses a number of imminent risks in areas such as consumer protection, data privacy, cybersecurity, and anti-money laundering, among others. The State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) is stepping up to tackle these challenges by accelerating the promulgation of a long-awaited Fintech Sandbox Decree with the issuance of an updated draft (“Draft Fintech Sandbox Decree”) on March 4, 2024. The Draft Fintech Sandbox Decree establishes a controlled environment where fintech companies and financial institutions can test solutions that do not fall squarely within the parameters of existing regulations. The pilot activities will be limited in scope, scale, and duration, with a number of precautionary measures in place. The SBV will supervise this “sandbox” closely, effectively mitigating risks and gathering valuable data to inform future regulations. Who Can Participate in the Sandbox? Traditional financial institutions (credit institutions): Banks and other institutions licensed to provide financial services can participate in the sandbox to test new offerings or refine existing ones. Independent fintech companies: Startups and established companies specializing in fintech solutions can leverage the sandbox to pilot innovative ideas before seeking wider market adoption. Other relevant organizations involved in the pilot: Depending on the specific solution being tested, other entities may also be involved in the sandbox. Geographical scope: Limited to Vietnamese territory; cross-border testing is not allowed. Focusing on Three Solution Categories Earlier versions of the Draft Fintech Sandbox Decree included categories like blockchain technology and other innovative business models, but these were removed in the latest version. To allow the SBV to assess the associated risks and work on the solutions more
Read More