You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

February 27, 2013

Vietnam’s New Labor Code: Key Changes for Employers

Informed Counsel

After lengthy debates, negotiations, and several redrafts, the National Assembly of Vietnam finally passed the new Labor Code (10/2012/QH13) on June 18, 2012. The new Labor Code, which will take effect on May 1, 2013, will replace the current Labor Code of 1994 with the stated aim of improving the labor market and industrial relations in Vietnam. From an employer’s perspective, however, the new Code appears set to strengthen the position of employees and decrease management flexibility.

The new legislation introduces significant new developments relating to labor contracts, work hours, labor outsourcing, internal labor rules, and foreign employees, each of will be discussed separately below. In addition, the new Labor Code sets forth several changes to working conditions that are favorable to employees. Examples include:

  • Increasing the minimum salary level during probation from 70 percent to 85 percent of full salary
  • Adding an extra day to the Lunar New Year holiday, bringing the total number of public holidays in Vietnam (during which employees are entitled to fully paid leave) to ten
  • Increasing maternity leave from four months to six months

The new law also substantially amends already existing provisions, such as those regulating overtime work and collective labor agreements. This article will review the most important changes introduced by the new Labor Code and their expected impact on employers.

Labor Contracts

The new Labor Code introduces a number of important provisions with respect to procedures for entering into labor contracts and the contents of such contracts. When entering into labor contracts, the new Labor Code requires that contracts must be signed between the employer and the employee before the employment begins. This is to avoid a situation where local employers try to escape their statutory obligations to pay insurance, etc., and deprive workers of their statutory rights and benefits. The new Labor Code also prohibits employers from keeping employees’ original identification cards and qualifications when signing and performing labor contracts. Moreover, an employer may not require an employee to pay cash or provide any assets to guarantee performance under the labor contract.

Concerning the contents of a labor contract, the new Labor Code allows an employer to require an employee whose work is related to business or technological secrets to enter into a separate agreement on confidentiality and nondisclosure of those secrets. The confidentiality agreement may contain a clause on compensation consequences in case of breach of contract. In practice, this means that an employer and employee may formally enter into a confidentiality agreement under which, in case of breach, the employee may be liable to pay damages. This is an important new protection granted to employers under the new legislation.

The new Labor Code also adds a new notice period with respect to termination of definite-term labor contracts (i.e., labor contracts with a fixed term of 12 to 36 months): the employer must inform the employee of the termination at least 15 days before the expiry date of the contract. The law also clarifies the consequences of an employer failing to comply with the new notice period.

Invalid Labor Contracts

The new Labor Code introduces four circumstances under which labor contracts will be deemed invalid:

  • When the entire contents of the contract are inconsistent with labor laws
  • When the job subject to the contract is prohibited by law
  • When the contract contains an agreement that prohibits or obstructs the employee from forming or joining a trade union
  • When the signatories to the contract lack signing power

The Code further prescribes how to deal with invalid labor contracts. When the contract is deemed invalid due to illegal contents or the job being prohibited by law (under the first three points above), the rights and obligations of the parties will be settled in accordance with the law. In a case where a signatory lacks the authority to sign, the state administrative body for labor will guide the parties to re-sign the contract. The Code states that the government will provide detailed guidance on the implementation of this provision.

Work Hours

According to the new Labor Code, working hours can be determined on a daily or weekly basis; if on a weekly basis, the normal working hours may not exceed 10 hours in one day and may not exceed 48 hours in one week. With respect to overtime, employees are not allowed to work more than 50 percent of the official working hours in a day (in cases where weekly working hours are applied, the total time of normal work and overtime work may not exceed 12 hours in one day), 30 hours in a month, or 200 hours in a year.

Labor Outsourcing Services

The new Labor Code introduces an entirely new section on labor outsourcing. This is good news for foreign-invested companies in the manufacturing and construction sectors, given that such work often requires seasonal workers and/or limited-time workers during certain periods.

However, the new Code imposes fairly extensive restrictions on labor outsourcing. Most notably, the sublessor (defined as “an enterprise licensed to conduct labor outsourcing”) must pay salary to a sublet employee at least equal to the salary that the subleasing employer pays its employees who have the same professional qualifications and are doing the same job or a job of the same value. Labor outsourcing is permitted only for certain types of jobs and the term may not exceed 12 months. Further, the labor outsourcing enterprise must, in addition to paying a deposit, be licensed for labor outsourcing activities. The government will regulate licensing of labor outsourcing activities, deposit payments, and the list of jobs for which labor may be outsourced.

A labor outsourcing agreement must contain the following information:

  • Place and type of work
  • Term of outsourcing
  • Work and rest time and labor safety conditions for the employees
  • The respective rights and obligations of each party toward the sublet employees

Importantly, a labor outsource agreement may not contain any provisions that are less favorable to employees than those in the labor contract which the labor outsourcing enterprise signed with the employee.

Internal Labor Rules

New grounds for dismissal of employees will be introduced under the new law. These grounds include gambling, deliberate violence causing injury, use of drugs at the workplace, and disclosure of business and technological secrets. These rules must all be accounted for in the employer’s internal labor rules (ILRs), a written list of company regulations registered with the local labor authority. The registration of ILRs is already required under the Labor Code of 1994 for all employers with ten or more employees.

Under the current Labor Code of 1994, a person who breaches the ILRs can be transferred to another position with a lower wage for a maximum period of six months. However, the new Labor Code abolishes this disciplinary measure. Other previously existing disciplinary measures—including reprimand, deferral of wage increase, removal from office, or dismissal—remain intact in the new Labor Code.

The new Code increases the statute of limitations for dealing with a breach of labor discipline from three months to six months from the date the breach occurs. In special cases, including breaches directly related to finance, property, or disclosure of technological or business secrets, the statute of limitations is extended from six months to twelve months from the day of breach.

Finally, the new Code requires that the application dossier for registration of ILRs be supplemented with a statement of opinion obtained from the organization representing the labor collective at the grassroots level. Thus, obtaining the opinion of the employees’ representative will be a required task in obtaining approval for the ILRs.

Foreign Employees

The new Labor Code supplements Decree 46/2011/ND-CP, which restricts the management and employment of foreign employees. The new Code reduces the maximum term of a work permit for foreign employees from three years to two years. As before, domestic employers are only permitted to recruit foreign employees for jobs as managers, executives, experts, and technicians, provided that Vietnamese employees are not able to satisfy the production and business requirements. However, now foreign employers may only recruit foreign citizens to work in Vietnam upon explaining their needs to employ the foreign workers and receiving prior approval in writing from the competent state authority.

Implementing Regulations

The new Labor Code will indeed have a significant effect on the Vietnamese labor market in the coming years. However, there are still uncertainties with respect to its interpretation and application on a number of concerns. These will hopefully be clarified in the approximately 20 guiding Decrees and Circulars expected to be issued in the upcoming months.

This being said, the full extent to which the new Labor Code strengthens the position of employees and decreases employer flexibility remains to be seen. Based on the information currently available, the Code will grant some new and important rights to employers, such as the ability to protect confidential information and the option of labor outsourcing. But these points notwithstanding, the bulk of the changes that are being introduced seem to lean largely in favor of the employees. Employers will need to closely monitor the implementing regulations in order to assess how these new provisions will impact their labor-management structures and strategies.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

June 4, 2026
On May 19, 2026, the Cabinet of the Royal Thai Government approved, in principle, revisions to Thailand’s visa exemption scheme and visa on arrival (VOA) program, as proposed by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Tourism and Sports. The revisions represent a tightening of Thailand’s immigration framework and will affect a broad range of short-term visitors. Background On July 15, 2024, Thailand expanded its visa exemption scheme by increasing the permitted period of visa-exempt stay from 30 days to 60 days in order to promote tourism, support the country’s post-pandemic economic recovery, and facilitate international travel. Under this revised scheme, passport holders from 93 countries and territories (an increase from the previous 57 countries and territories) have been permitted to enter Thailand without a visa and remain in the country for up to 60 days per entry for purposes including tourism, business engagements, urgent work, and ad hoc assignments. In addition, eligible visitors may apply at the Thai Immigration Bureau for a further 30-day extension of stay. Key Changes The proposed revisions would revoke the current 60-day exemption and reinstate the previous stay period, thereby reducing the maximum permitted stay for eligible travelers to 30 days per entry. In addition, the number of countries and territories eligible under the 30-day visa-exemption scheme is expected to be reduced to 54. The scope of the VOA scheme would likewise be significantly narrowed, with the number of eligible countries reduced from 31 countries to just four (Azerbaijan, Belarus, Serbia, and India). Further, Thailand is expected to introduce a new 15-day visa exemption category for nationals of Seychelles, the Maldives, and Mauritius. The revised framework would also limit each country or territory to a single visa exemption privilege in order to simplify Thailand’s immigration framework and reduce overlapping immigration privileges.
April 29, 2026
Vietnam’s education sector is entering a new regulatory era. On December 10, 2025, the National Assembly adopted a series of new and amended laws in the field of education, including the 2025 Law on Vocational Education, the 2025 Law on Higher Education, and the amended Law on Education No. 123/2025/QH15 (Amended Law on Education). These laws together took effect on January 1, 2026, marking a significant reform of Vietnam’s legal framework governing the education sector. The legislative package introduces a new lawmaking approach under which foundational and principle-based provisions are codified in the Amended Law on Education, while the Law on Higher Education and the Law on Vocational Education serve as specialized statutes providing supplementary, sector-specific regulatory detail tailored to their respective subsectors. The Amended Law on Education fundamentally restructures how educational institutions are established, governed, and licensed, with direct implications for private investors, foreign-invested entities, and education service providers operating in Vietnam. Below are several highlights of the key changes under the amended law, especially in the private sector, that stakeholders should understand: Change in the National Education System In addition to primary education, lower secondary (junior high school) education is now compulsory in Vietnam. Accordingly, diplomas are no longer awarded upon completion of lower secondary school but only for upper education levels. The national education system is also expanded through the introduction of vocational high school as a new level of vocational education. Such reform creates additional learning pathways that not only enable learners to pursue both further education and participate in the labor market, but also better align education and training with socioeconomic development needs. New Hurdle for Joint Investors: Mandatory Corporate Entity Requirement Where two or more investors jointly establish an education institution, the investors are no longer permitted to directly establish such an institution.
March 31, 2026
Against the backdrop of Vietnam’s rapid economic and technological transformation and its ambition to build a knowledge-driven economy, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopted Law on Higher Education No. 125/2025/QH15 on December 10, 2025, The new law took effect on January 1, 2026, replacing Law on Higher Education No. 08/2012/QH13 of 2012 and its subsequent amendments after more than a decade of implementation. The new law reflects a significant policy shift toward enhancing the institutional autonomy of higher education institutions (“HEIs”)—universities and other university-level institutions. By granting broader autonomy, Vietnam aims to enable HEIs to operate more proactively, better respond to market needs, and improve the quality and efficiency of education and research activities. Comprehensive Institutional Autonomy in HEIs The new law marks a significant shift by granting HEIs comprehensive autonomy as a statutory right, within the bounds of the licensed scope of educational operation and the legal framework, rather than a conditional right as provided under the former law. Under the new law, HEIs are empowered to exercise autonomy over their academic expertise, training, scientific research, international cooperation, organizational structure, personnel, finance, and other higher education activities. The expansion of institutional autonomy is also accompanied by a correspondingly strengthened framework of institutional accountability. However, Vietnam maintains a certain degree of control and imposes restrictions on institutional autonomy in sensitive and strategically important areas. These controls and restrictions include limitations on training autonomy in the majors of teacher training, national defense, and security; and restrictions on financial and personnel management autonomy for HEIs under the administration of the Ministry of National Defense and the Ministry of Public Security. New Model for Curriculum Development The new law removes the concept of “opening a training major” and focuses regulation on how training programs are developed and delivered. Under the previous regime,
March 31, 2026
On December 10, 2025, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopted Law on Vocational Education No. 124/2025/QH15, which took effect on January 1, 2026, replacing Law on Vocational Education No. 74/2014/QH13 of 2014. The new law broadens the categories of institutions eligible to deliver vocational training, introduces vocational upper secondary schools, and shifts governance structures for private institutions from ownership-representative boards of management to stakeholder-based school councils. These reforms aim to diversify training providers, align programs with labor market needs, and create a more flexible, open vocational education ecosystem, offering expanded opportunities for foreign and domestic investors, universities, and enterprises. Some highlights of the new Law on Vocational Education are presented below. Expansion of Vocational Training Levels and Programs In addition to elementary, intermediate, and college—the three levels of vocational training program set out under the 2014 Law on Vocational Education—the new law expands the structure by introducing two new levels: Vocational high school training programs are placed between elementary and intermediate levels, and are aimed at combining upper secondary education with vocational training, expanding options for learners after graduating from the lower secondary level. Other vocational training programs are not specified in detail under the new law, but aim to equip learners with the capability to perform and handle one or several simple tasks of an occupation. Expansion of Vocational Education Providers The new law reclassifies and extends vocational education providers by classifying them into two distinct categories: Vocational education institutions, which include colleges, intermediate schools, and vocational high schools. Establishments participating in vocational education activities, which include vocational education centers, vocational-continuing education centers, continuing education centers, other centers with vocational education functions, enterprises, cooperatives, and higher education institutions. Vocational education providers may provide one vocational training level only, or several/all levels, depending on the type of provider. The