You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 10, 2026

Vietnam’s New Drug Registration Regulations to Reduce Administrative Burden

The drug registration process in Vietnam will be simplified, particularly for foreign applicants, following the recent issuance by Vietnam’s Ministry of Health (MOH) of a new circular that is expected to reduce administrative hurdles. Circular No. 32/2026/TT-BYT on the registration of drugs and medicinal ingredients (Circular 32) was issued on July 29, 2026, and will take effect on October 1, 2026, replacing Circular No. 12/2025/TT-BYT.

Key provisions of the new circular are discussed below.

Five-Year Data Exclusivity and Five-Month Public Disclosure Framework

Circular 32 updates data protection guidelines by explicitly referencing Article 128 of the amended Intellectual Property Law, which sets out that new drugs supported by clinical trial data submitted for the first time will be granted a five-year data exclusivity period from the date of the initial marketing authorization (MA) approval. Subsequent applications that rely on the originator’s protected data will not be eligible for approval from the date of submission of the originator’s registration dossier until five years after the first MA is granted.

Furthermore, in accordance with the new regulations, the regulatory authority must publicly disclose information on subsequent applications five months before the granting of MA, providing originator companies with an opportunity to exercise and enforce their intellectual property rights.

Simplified Requirements for Foreign Legal Documents

Circular 32 expands the circumstances under which legal documents issued by foreign authorities are exempt from consular legalization and authenticity verification requirements. Specifically, such documents may be exempt if the Drug Administration of Vietnam (DAV) is able to verify their authenticity directly through official electronic means, including written confirmation or email correspondence sent directly to the MOH by the competent foreign authority, or publicly accessible English-language databases maintained by recognized foreign regulatory authorities.

In addition, the new circular permits the submission of electronic notarized copies of legal documents in registration dossiers as an alternative to hard-copy notarized documents.

Detailed Regulations on CEPs

Circular 32 provides more detailed requirements regarding the submission of electronic CEPs (“certification of suitability to the monographs of the European Pharmacopoeia”) within quality dossiers.

  • For CEPs issued prior to September 1, 2023: The CEP must bear the official stamp/confirmation of the finished product manufacturer or applicant, and the CEP authorization section must explicitly list the authorized applicant or manufacturer.
  • For CEPs issued from September 1, 2023, onward: A valid electronic CEP bearing an EDQM (European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare) digital signature, accompanied by an authorization letter must be submitted.

Applicants must also provide the results of a self-search conducted in the EDQM database, including mandatory information such as name of medicinal ingredient, CEP holder information, monograph number, and validity status.

Flexibility and Deferral of CPP Submissions

For new drugs and certain specified cases, applicants may postpone submission of a Certificate of Pharmaceutical Product (CPP) at the time of initial dossier filing by providing a written justification explaining its absence. However, the CPP must be submitted no later than the second round of dossier supplementation in order for the application to remain eligible for MA approval.

Exemption from Legal Documents for Pharmaceutical Ingredients with Granted MA

Where a finished product uses pharmaceutical ingredients that have already been granted MA in Vietnam, and strictly complies with the approved information (including ingredient name, manufacturer, specifications, and source), applicants are exempt from submitting legal documents demonstrating GMP compliance for ingredient manufacturers.

The applicant only needs to submit two certificates of analysis (COAs) for the ingredient—one issued by the ingredient manufacturer and one issued by the finished product manufacturer.

Detailed Implementation Rules for Post-Approval Variations

Under Circular 32, minor variations requiring notification (MiV-N) may be implemented immediately upon receipt of the notification dossier by the DAV or, at the latest, within 12 months from the date of public disclosure of the variation.

For imported drugs and medicinal ingredients, products may continue to be imported and circulated until their expiry date, provided they were dispatched from the port of export before the mandatory implementation deadline.

New Re-examination Pathway

Upon receiving an official refusal decision for a new registration, renewal, or variation application, applicants will have one month to submit a written explanation requesting reconsideration. If the explanation is accepted by the Advisory Council for granting MA or designated experts, the application may be approved directly without requiring the applicant to prepare and submit a completely new dossier. This new re-examination mechanism is expected to reduce the administrative burden, shorten approval timelines, and improve overall regulatory efficiency.

Next Steps

Pharmaceutical companies should review the new provisions for any potential impacts on current and future registration strategies to ensure timely compliance ahead of the circular’s effective date of October 1, 2026.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

March 2, 2021
The cannabis plant has fascinated many civilizations, societies, and individuals through the centuries with its unique properties, and many have learned how to benefit from these, finding a variety of therapeutic and industrial uses of the plant that, in turn, enhanced domestic economies worldwide. In Thailand, cannabis plants and their derivatives have been used since ancient times as treatment for many diseases, and the plant forms a key ingredient in many Thai traditional medicinal remedies. However, over the past few decades, cannabis usage was seen to change in a way that became incrementally more abusive, resulting in outright prohibition in almost all countries. Thailand was no exception, and in 1979 the Thai government officially enacted the Narcotics Act forbidding the use of cannabis and listing cannabis plants and their derivatives—most notably marijuana (cannabis with psychoactive properties) and hemp (cannabis with limited or no psychoactive properties)—as category 5 narcotics (i.e., prohibited substances). Despite these restrictions, many Thais continued to use cannabis illegally, and some urged the government to legalize personal and commercial use of cannabis plants and their derivatives. Eventually, some in the Thai government agreed that it was time to consider steps toward legalization, As a result, the government has been taking action to delist cannabis plants from the list of prohibited narcotics since 2018, when a regulation allowed the cultivation of hemp for industrial and non-commercial purposes, such as household cooking and research and development. The next significant step came in February 2019, when the Narcotics Act (No. 7) was amended, legalizing medical marijuana within certain limitations. In national elections the following month, the Bhumjaithai political party, whose election campaign included a pledge to decriminalize and legalize cannabis plants, won substantial support in parts of the country and chose to join the coalition government, with the Bhumjaithai party
February 23, 2021
As many are already aware, following the change of government in Myanmar on February 1, 2021, a draft Cyber Security Law was proposed which attracted widespread criticism. However, less attention has been paid to significant amendments to two existing laws, some of which have a similar effect to parts of the draft Cyber Security Law. In other words, while the draft Cyber Security Law has not progressed further and is under public scrutiny, significant elements of it have found their way into law in Myanmar by other routes. Because these amendments are already law, it is very important that individuals and businesses in Myanmar understand their implications. Amendments to the Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens The Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens (2017), or the “Privacy Law,” was amended on February 13, 2021, less than two weeks after the military government came into power. These amendments chiefly address the power of the government to conduct searches, seizures, and arrests; to extend detention without judicial oversight; and to carry out broad surveillance and investigation activities that could intrude on individual privacy. The amendments accomplish this by suspending various sections of the Privacy Law for as long as the State Administration Council (the military body now governing Myanmar) is in power. The suspended sections include the following: Section 5: Search, seizure, and arrest without civilian observation The relevant part of Section 5 of the Privacy Law states, “The responsible authorities shall … when acting in accordance with existing law, not enter into a person’s residence or a room used as a residence, or a building, compound or building in a compound, for the purpose of search, seizure, or arrest, unless accompanied by minimum of two witnesses who should comprise Ward or Village Tract Administrators…”. The suspension
February 22, 2021
Following the recent imposition of sanctions on Myanmar individuals and companies by the US, the UK and Canada have now imposed new sanctions. As with the US sanctions, these new measures impact UK and Canadian citizens and companies, and non-UK and non-Canadian companies and citizens with interests in those jurisdictions. The EU has indicated that it is planning to issue similar sanctions in the near future. New UK Sanctions In addition to the 16 individuals already sanctioned by the UK government, on February 18, 2021, the UK government announced that three individuals have been sanctioned for serious human rights violations and are now subject to asset freezes and travel bans. The full list of Myanmar individuals and companies sanctioned by the UK is available on the website of the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation. Breaches of UK financial sanctions are criminal offences punishable in the UK by up to 7 years imprisonment and heavy fines. New Canadian Sanctions Also on February 18, timed to coincide with the UK sanctions, new Canadian sanctions were imposed on nine individuals. As with the UK, Canada already had a number of individuals in the Myanmar military on its sanctions list, and the new additions bring the total number of individuals sanctioned by Canada to 54. All assets of these individuals in Canada are now frozen, and they are banned from travelling to Canada. Canadian businesses or entities may not do business with any of the 54 individuals. Full details of the impact of the sanctions are available on the Government of Canada’s website, as is a database of the Myanmar individuals and companies subject to them. Breach of Canadian sanctions carries with it up to 5 years’ imprisonment in Canada and/or a large fine. Other Countries The EU is reportedly drawing up sanctions