You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 10, 2026

Vietnam’s New Drug Registration Regulations to Reduce Administrative Burden

The drug registration process in Vietnam will be simplified, particularly for foreign applicants, following the recent issuance by Vietnam’s Ministry of Health (MOH) of a new circular that is expected to reduce administrative hurdles. Circular No. 32/2026/TT-BYT on the registration of drugs and medicinal ingredients (Circular 32) was issued on July 29, 2026, and will take effect on October 1, 2026, replacing Circular No. 12/2025/TT-BYT.

Key provisions of the new circular are discussed below.

Five-Year Data Exclusivity and Five-Month Public Disclosure Framework

Circular 32 updates data protection guidelines by explicitly referencing Article 128 of the amended Intellectual Property Law, which sets out that new drugs supported by clinical trial data submitted for the first time will be granted a five-year data exclusivity period from the date of the initial marketing authorization (MA) approval. Subsequent applications that rely on the originator’s protected data will not be eligible for approval from the date of submission of the originator’s registration dossier until five years after the first MA is granted.

Furthermore, in accordance with the new regulations, the regulatory authority must publicly disclose information on subsequent applications five months before the granting of MA, providing originator companies with an opportunity to exercise and enforce their intellectual property rights.

Simplified Requirements for Foreign Legal Documents

Circular 32 expands the circumstances under which legal documents issued by foreign authorities are exempt from consular legalization and authenticity verification requirements. Specifically, such documents may be exempt if the Drug Administration of Vietnam (DAV) is able to verify their authenticity directly through official electronic means, including written confirmation or email correspondence sent directly to the MOH by the competent foreign authority, or publicly accessible English-language databases maintained by recognized foreign regulatory authorities.

In addition, the new circular permits the submission of electronic notarized copies of legal documents in registration dossiers as an alternative to hard-copy notarized documents.

Detailed Regulations on CEPs

Circular 32 provides more detailed requirements regarding the submission of electronic CEPs (“certification of suitability to the monographs of the European Pharmacopoeia”) within quality dossiers.

  • For CEPs issued prior to September 1, 2023: The CEP must bear the official stamp/confirmation of the finished product manufacturer or applicant, and the CEP authorization section must explicitly list the authorized applicant or manufacturer.
  • For CEPs issued from September 1, 2023, onward: A valid electronic CEP bearing an EDQM (European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare) digital signature, accompanied by an authorization letter must be submitted.

Applicants must also provide the results of a self-search conducted in the EDQM database, including mandatory information such as name of medicinal ingredient, CEP holder information, monograph number, and validity status.

Flexibility and Deferral of CPP Submissions

For new drugs and certain specified cases, applicants may postpone submission of a Certificate of Pharmaceutical Product (CPP) at the time of initial dossier filing by providing a written justification explaining its absence. However, the CPP must be submitted no later than the second round of dossier supplementation in order for the application to remain eligible for MA approval.

Exemption from Legal Documents for Pharmaceutical Ingredients with Granted MA

Where a finished product uses pharmaceutical ingredients that have already been granted MA in Vietnam, and strictly complies with the approved information (including ingredient name, manufacturer, specifications, and source), applicants are exempt from submitting legal documents demonstrating GMP compliance for ingredient manufacturers.

The applicant only needs to submit two certificates of analysis (COAs) for the ingredient—one issued by the ingredient manufacturer and one issued by the finished product manufacturer.

Detailed Implementation Rules for Post-Approval Variations

Under Circular 32, minor variations requiring notification (MiV-N) may be implemented immediately upon receipt of the notification dossier by the DAV or, at the latest, within 12 months from the date of public disclosure of the variation.

For imported drugs and medicinal ingredients, products may continue to be imported and circulated until their expiry date, provided they were dispatched from the port of export before the mandatory implementation deadline.

New Re-examination Pathway

Upon receiving an official refusal decision for a new registration, renewal, or variation application, applicants will have one month to submit a written explanation requesting reconsideration. If the explanation is accepted by the Advisory Council for granting MA or designated experts, the application may be approved directly without requiring the applicant to prepare and submit a completely new dossier. This new re-examination mechanism is expected to reduce the administrative burden, shorten approval timelines, and improve overall regulatory efficiency.

Next Steps

Pharmaceutical companies should review the new provisions for any potential impacts on current and future registration strategies to ensure timely compliance ahead of the circular’s effective date of October 1, 2026.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

December 30, 2025
The Intellectual Property Office of Vietnam (IP Office), with support from the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), is drafting additional annexes to its Guidelines for Patent Examination, focusing on the examination of patent applications in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors. The new annexes are expected to be officially issued in early 2026 as Annexes III and IV, following the successful issuance in 2023 of Annexes I and II addressing computer program-related inventions. The IP Office recently organized a seminar to gather feedback on the draft annexes from intellectual property representatives, academic institutions, research institutes, and other interested parties, emphasizing its intention to receive further constructive opinions to refine the guidelines for pharmaceuticals and biotechnology. Why These Guidelines Matter Patent examination in Vietnam has traditionally relied on the Guidelines for Patent Examination issued under Decision No. 487/QD-SHTT (2010), recently supplemented by Annexes I and II. While these documents provide a solid foundation, they do not fully address practical challenges in examining pharmaceutical and biotech inventions, particularly issues related to clarity, sufficiency of disclosure, enablement, features of function and utility, combination therapies, and inventions involving artificial intelligence (AI) applications in these fields. Annexes III and IV aim to close these gaps by introducing structured principles and illustrative examples. Guidance on Patent Specification Requirements Annex III provides detailed guidance on the requirements for patent specifications in pharmaceuticals and biotechnology, covering two main parts: Part A addresses sufficiency of disclosure, clarity of specifications, and consistency between claims and descriptions. Part B covers inventions related to Markush-type compounds, claims containing exclusion statements (disclaimers), and additional experimental data submitted during examination. The Guidelines outline specific disclosure requirements for subject matters such as compounds, formulations, pharmaceutical compositions, genes, polypeptides, proteins, vectors, transgenic organisms, modified organisms, and hybrid cells. Annex III emphasizes that disclaimers are not accepted
November 25, 2025
Food safety incidents can emerge without warning, requiring businesses to act swiftly to protect consumers and comply with regulatory obligations. Across Southeast Asia, Thailand, Vietnam, and Indonesia have each developed comprehensive food recall frameworks designed to ensure rapid removal of unsafe products from the market while holding businesses accountable for compliance failures. While these three jurisdictions share common objectives—protecting public health and ensuring food safety—each has crafted distinct regulatory approaches reflecting their unique administrative structures, enforcement priorities, and legal traditions. Understanding these differences is essential for food businesses operating in the region, as recall procedures, timelines, reporting requirements, and penalties vary significantly across borders. This guide, available through the button below, examines the food recall regulations in Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam, providing practical guidance on legal requirements, procedural steps, and compliance obligations in each market.
October 15, 2025
The Indonesian Food and Drug Administration (BPOM) has introduced more stringent oversight of health supplements containing probiotics with new guidelines that require clinical trials for certain products and expanded documentation standards. BPOM Regulation No. 17 of 2025 replaces the previous 2021 regulation and establishes a comprehensive framework for evaluating probiotic strains used in health supplements. Assessment Requirements The new regulation expands the scope of assessment to include not only categorization and documentation but also technical procedures, strain classification, and clinical trial requirements. Unlike the previous regulation, which provided general guidance, the updated framework creates a comprehensive system for evaluating both registered probiotic strains and new or combined strains. Manufacturers must now submit supporting documentation covering strain identification and functional characterization, safety, efficacy, and product quality. The previous regulation required documentation only on safety, efficacy, and quality. Clinical Trials One of the most significant changes is the requirement for clinical trials conducted in Indonesia for applications that include benefit claims other than maintaining digestive health, or where there are modifications to benefit claims. The regulation specifies that phase 1 trials must demonstrate safety, while phase 2 trials must validate efficacy using statistically valid methods such as double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled studies). In addition, phase 3 and phase 4 trials may be required, and postmarket surveillance data must be submitted. Technical Assessment Framework Annex 4, a newly introduced section, establishes technical procedures for assessing health supplements containing probiotics in Indonesia. This comprehensive framework outlines criteria for evaluating new probiotic strains, including strain identification, functional characterization, safety, efficacy, and product quality. The annex introduces a clear classification of claims for health supplement products containing probiotics: General claims(e.g., maintaining digestive health). Functional claims(e.g., normal biological function or activity in the body). Risk reduction claims(e.g., lowering disease risk). The regulation restricts use of the term