You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 15, 2013

Vietnam’s New Draft Regulations on Online Games

IPBA Journal

Vietnam is considered to be an attractive market for online gaming in Asia. With more than 13 million gamers, Vietnam is becoming a popular destination for investors in the online gaming industry. For gaming clients (games installed on computers and played on online) only, the expected market value for 2012 is VND 5.6 trillion (approximately US$269 million).

However, a complete legal framework for online gaming in Vietnam is still in the drafting process. The Vietnamese Government is currently working on the final draft of the Decree on the Management, Supply and Use of Internet Services and Information Content on Networks (Draft Decree) for official issuance. At the time of writing this article, the implementation date of the new regulations remains unclear. Nevertheless, once it is launched, it will have a significant impact on the online gaming business in Vietnam.

Managing More Games

Currently, only internet-based games that have interaction among the players, or between the players and the servers of the gaming providers, are governed under the online gaming regulations. Other types of games that have no interactions among the players or between the players and the supplier’s server, such as downloaded games, are not included in the regulations. As a consequence, downloaded games are not managed as tightly as online games.

However, downloadable games which are played without any interaction also fall under the governance of the Draft Decree, along with other types of online games and are collectively called “electronic games on networks.” Specifically, electronic games here include: (i) games that players would play concurrently via the server system of the gaming providers; (ii) games with interaction between the players and the provider’s servers; (iii) games with interactions among the players but without interactions with the provider’s servers; and (iv) downloadable games without interactions of the players and the provider’s servers. This changes the traditional thought that only online games are under licensing requirements. The definition of electronic games also provides more specifics on the devices that gamers use for playing games, which include any terminal devices such as computers and mobile phones. This makes the coverage of electronic games much more comprehensive and will help enterprises avoid confusion in classifying whether their games are covered by the Draft Decree.

More Permits Required

The Draft Decree retains the same requirement that enterprises entitled to supply games must be established in Vietnam. Furthermore, a new type of permit requirement was added to the draft. Accordingly, any enterprises intending to provide electronic games on networks must obtain a license from the Ministry of Information and Communications (MIC). The Draft Decree also requires the licensed enterprises to apply for amendment of the license whenever they add a new game to category (i) above (i.e., games concurrently played among the players and the games provider’s server). As a result, an enterprise in the gaming industry may have to apply to amend its license many times after the first time. As for the remaining games, the enterprise must register with MIC to launch a new game.

The enterprise must also apply for amendment of the license if there is any change to the name of the enterprise, name of the game, or place for locating the enterprise’s server, or if the enterprise ceases or suspends supplying the licensed games within six months of the licensing date. A license for provision of electronic games on networks has a maximum term of 10 years. This maximum term includes the term for extension of the license. If the license has a term of 10 years as its first license, any extension of such license will be no more than one year. No cash deposit or fee for issuing the license is mentioned under the Draft Decree.

Virtual “Goods”

Similar to many other jurisdictions around the world, virtual items are not recognized as assets under Vietnamese laws. Currently, under the Joint Circular No 60/2006/TTLT-BVHTT-BBCVT-BCA on Online Game Management (Circular 60), virtual items are prohibited from being created for profit-earning purposes.

The Draft Decree does not provide such explicit prohibition like Circular 60. It stipulates that virtual items, as well as bonus points, are not allowed to “be exchanged into money or assets in any form.” It seems clear under this regulation that gamers are not allowed to convert virtual items into money or any kind of real property. However, it is not expressly provided whether gaming providers are also prevented from creating such virtual “goods” for selling to gamers. The question may be clarified in the official version of the Decree or further confirmation under a circular.

If the Draft Decree is issued with the intention to prohibit enterprises from creating virtual “goods” in games for commercial purposes (as provided by the current law), there are many games that may not be activated in Vietnam due to this barrier. In fact, the online gaming industry is developing rapidly and many games are offering virtual items to gamers as a type of goods. Purchases of such virtual “goods” in certain games are conditions for participating in the games.

Despite these prevailing and draft regulations, a number of cases have arisen in practice where gamers sell and purchase virtual “goods” and then have disputes with each other. In the future, where players have to pay a huge amount of money for a virtual item, or in a situation where thousands of players ask for the real value of the virtual items, it would not only be an issue on legal paper, but would become a major social issue. A legal consequence of a civil transaction which contradicts laws such as a “commercial transaction” of virtual “goods” may not be recognized and settled by the relevant authorities and court.

Payment for Online Games

Gamers often use credit cards (e.g., Visa, MasterCard), debit cards, or electronic banking to buy hours for playing games, or to buy games (and to buy virtual items in a number of games). However, in Vietnam, many gamers are youths or students. Most of them are not able to earn money and rarely use international payment cards, internet banking, or debit cards. Rather, they often use cash to buy certain types of payment cards, such as game cards or calling cards to make game account payments.

It would be more convenient for a gaming provider to directly collect the payment and provide a payment facility for the gamers, especially for gaming providers that issue a virtual currency for use in their games (e.g., for buying virtual items in a game). These virtual currencies can be converted from real money paid by the gamers.

However, in Vietnam, while the laws are silent on the subject of issuance of a virtual currency, the granting of licenses to conduct payment services is very limited for organizations that are not banks, like a gaming provider. To date, only nine non-banking organizations have been licensed to provide intermediate payment services. Several of these enterprises are companies operating in the information technology area. A license to a non-banking organization is considered by the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) on a case-by-case basis only. Practically speaking, possible reasons for the SBV to limit foreign non-banking organizations in providing payment services may be to control the potential risks, such as international gambling on the internet or money laundering.

A new draft on non-cash payment provides stricter conditions for non-banking organizations to be able to provide these types of services. Further conditions are proposed under this new draft. Specifically, the organization must have a minimum of VND 50 billion in charter capital and sufficient financial capacity to establish engineering equipment systems, and maintain operations which are appropriate for the scale of service provision. With these conditions, it seems the SBV tends to limit enterprises in a completely different industry, (e.g., the games industry), from conducting payment services.

Gamers and Internet Cafes

For fear of an increase in crimes due to the possible impaired physical and mental health of gamers, gamers will have to register their personal information each time in order to be able to play and they will be limited to a maximum of three hours per game. Gaming providers and internet cafes are not allowed to provide gaming services between 10 pm and 8 am. Internet cafes are not permitted to serve customers in school uniforms between 8 am and 5 pm. These facilities must verify and save personal information of gamers, including name, age, permanent address, and an identity card number or passport. Gaming content including violent or sexual acts, brutal fighting, or bleeding is strictly prohibited.

Internet use is now a major part of people’s daily lives. Online gaming, as a form of entertainment, has become very popular, especially among the youth in society. While people expect to have varied forms of entertainment made available to them, this must be balanced with mechanisms in place to prevent gaming addiction, as well as other negative consequences arising from online gaming. Enterprises operating in the gaming industry are concerned about tighter restrictions which could be burdensome. Meanwhile, enterprises may be influenced while waiting for the Decree to be issued (e.g., because there is a limitation on granting new licenses to gaming providers). The Decree, therefore, is greatly anticipated by gamers as well as relevant enterprises.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 11, 2026
Thailand’s National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission (NBTC) has published a new five-year master plan that will bring significant regulatory changes to the broadcasting and digital media sectors, including formal licensing requirements for internet-based audiovisual services. The Master Plan for Broadcasting and Television, 3rd Edition (B.E. 2569–2573/2026–2030) was published in the Government Gazette on September 1, 2026, and will affect OTT platforms, internet-based audiovisual service providers, and traditional broadcasters. Licensing Reform The NBTC will develop new licensing frameworks ahead of existing digital television license expirations, which are slated to occur between 2028 and 2030. This creates both uncertainty and opportunity for incumbents and new market entrants. New licensing criteria will also be developed for audiovisual services delivered over the internet, meaning previously unregulated internet-based providers may face licensing, fee, and content obligations for the first time. The plan also calls for a new law to govern converged communications services. OTT Regulation and Content Oversight The plan explicitly acknowledges and aims to lessen the regulatory asymmetry between traditional broadcasters—which are subject to licensing, fees, and content regulation—and internet-based services that currently face fewer obligations. The NBTC intends to develop regulatory frameworks to bring internet-based audiovisual services, including OTT platforms, streaming services, and user-generated content platforms, under content, consumer protection, and licensing requirements. Consumer Protection and Digital Rights The NBTC will strengthen its oversight of broadcasting, television, and telecommunications operators to ensure compliance with consumer protection and personal data protection requirements. This includes updating relevant notifications and orders and more strictly enforcing rules against practices that unfairly exploit consumers. These measures may layer NBTC-specific requirements on top of Thailand’s existing Personal Data Protection Act obligations. Stricter enforcement against practices that exploit consumers is a priority, with particular scrutiny on advertising practices. The NBTC will modernize complaint resolution processes, meaning service providers should
September 7, 2026
On September 4, 2026, Thailand’s prime minister convened the first meeting of the Data Center Business Policy Committee. The committee endorsed a draft policy framework for the data center industry and tasked four subcommittees with developing the standards that would sit beneath it, shifting away from fragmented, agency-by-agency approvals toward a unified national strategy aiming to maximize economic value while managing environmental and infrastructure concerns. Proposed Scope and Pillars of the National Data Center Policy Framework The proposed framework would cover all types of data centers, including internal or captive facilities operated within a company or its affiliates, rather than only commercial third-party providers. If adopted in this form, companies running private data centers purely for internal purposes would also become subject to regulatory oversight. Minimum safety and operational standards would be established, with uniform enforcement across all categories. The committee endorsed a draft policy framework with four key pillars: Industrial classification: Data centers exceeding 2 MW would be classified as industrial operations, which may require factory licenses and environmental impact assessments under the Factory Act. Resource pricing: Utility rates would be structured to reflect both direct and indirect costs, supporting green energy and green data center standards. Centralized screening: A centralized review would evaluate project suitability and resource allocation. Operators may be required to submit proposals through periodic “pitching” rounds, where projects are competitively assessed on their potential economic and strategic benefits to Thailand. Digital ecosystem: The framework would prioritize data sovereignty, tax incentives, and conditions promoting domestic digital businesses, AI, and cloud infrastructure. Multidimensional Evaluation Criteria and Subcommittees Four subcommittees will be established to develop standards responsible for the following dimensions: Economic: Criteria for assessing the economic viability of data center projects, for use in prioritizing data centers based on infrastructure readiness, demand type (including AI factories),
September 4, 2026
Foreign business restrictions on telecommunications, treasury center businesses, and intragroup support services were eased when Thailand published the Ministerial Regulation Prescribing Service Businesses Not Requiring Permission for Foreign Business Operations (No. 5) B.E. 2569 (2026) in the Government Gazette on August 28, 2026. The ministerial regulation expands the categories of service businesses that foreign investors may operate without a foreign business license (FBL) under the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542 (1999) (FBA). Of particular relevance to the telecommunications, fintech, and technology sectors, the ministerial regulation exempts: Type 1 telecommunications licensees, which do not have their own networks; Treasury center businesses operated in accordance with Thailand’s exchange control regulations; and Certain intragroup administrative, human resources, and information technology management services. Telecommunications Services Foreign-owned businesses providing telecommunications services under a type 1 telecommunications license may now operate without obtaining an FBL. This may streamline market entry for qualifying telecommunications and digital infrastructure businesses. The exemption applies only to the FBA licensing requirement. Operators must continue to comply with applicable requirements under the Telecommunications Business Act and the regulations of the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission, and the change does not affect foreign ownership restrictions applicable to type 2 or type 3 telecommunications businesses. Treasury Center Businesses The ministerial regulation also exempts qualifying treasury center businesses from the FBL requirement. This may facilitate centralized treasury functions in Thailand, including liquidity management, foreign exchange management, and intragroup funding arrangements. Treasury center operations remain subject to applicable requirements of the Bank of Thailand and other competent authorities. Intragroup Administrative, HR, and IT Services Certain administrative, human resources, and information technology management services provided between affiliated entities are also exempt, provided the relevant entities satisfy prescribed ownership or management criteria. The exemption is available where the service provider and recipient are related through specified ownership
September 2, 2026
Thailand and China have a longstanding and significant trade relationship, which increasingly extends to e-commerce and digitally enabled supply chains. While these channels create new opportunities for businesses to reach consumers across borders, their growth also brings greater exposure to intellectual property (IP) infringement across jurisdictions and online platforms. Effective cooperation between the two countries’ enforcement authorities has therefore become increasingly important. To strengthen cooperation in this area, Thailand and China signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) on IP enforcement in Beijing on July 20, 2026, during the Thai prime minister’s official visit to China. Officially titled “Memorandum of Understanding Between the State Administration for Market Regulation of the People’s Republic of China and the Ministry of Commerce of the Kingdom of Thailand on Cooperation in the Field of Intellectual Property Enforcement,” the MOU forms part of a broader bilateral agenda covering industrial and supply chains, participation by micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs), cooperation associated with the ASEAN–China Free Trade Area 3.0, and progress on the registration of Thai geographical indications in China. The MOU establishes a bilateral framework for cooperation and coordination in five broad areas: Strengthening dialogue in IP enforcement; Enhancing information sharing; Facilitating the enforcement of IP rights in cases arising in the parties’ domestic markets and on online platforms, in accordance with their respective domestic laws; Promoting cooperation in IP enforcement training and human resource development; and Undertaking other cooperation activities agreed upon by both sides. The Department of Intellectual Property (DIP) will serve as the principal coordinating agency for Thailand, while the Bureau of Law Enforcement and Inspection in China’s State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) will serve in that role for China. The framework is particularly relevant to the growth of e-commerce, as it covers infringement in the domestic markets and on