You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 29, 2026

Vietnam’s Education Sector Overhaul: Key Changes Under the Amended Law on Education

Subscribe to Updates

Vietnam’s education sector is entering a new regulatory era. On December 10, 2025, the National Assembly adopted a series of new and amended laws in the field of education, including the 2025 Law on Vocational Education, the 2025 Law on Higher Education, and the amended Law on Education No. 123/2025/QH15 (Amended Law on Education). These laws together took effect on January 1, 2026, marking a significant reform of Vietnam’s legal framework governing the education sector.

The legislative package introduces a new lawmaking approach under which foundational and principle-based provisions are codified in the Amended Law on Education, while the Law on Higher Education and the Law on Vocational Education serve as specialized statutes providing supplementary, sector-specific regulatory detail tailored to their respective subsectors.

The Amended Law on Education fundamentally restructures how educational institutions are established, governed, and licensed, with direct implications for private investors, foreign-invested entities, and education service providers operating in Vietnam. Below are several highlights of the key changes under the amended law, especially in the private sector, that stakeholders should understand:

Change in the National Education System

In addition to primary education, lower secondary (junior high school) education is now compulsory in Vietnam. Accordingly, diplomas are no longer awarded upon completion of lower secondary school but only for upper education levels.

The national education system is also expanded through the introduction of vocational high school as a new level of vocational education. Such reform creates additional learning pathways that not only enable learners to pursue both further education and participate in the labor market, but also better align education and training with socioeconomic development needs.

New Hurdle for Joint Investors: Mandatory Corporate Entity Requirement

Where two or more investors jointly establish an education institution, the investors are no longer permitted to directly establish such an institution. Instead, they must first establish an economic organization (e.g., a company established under the Investment Law and Enterprise Law)  and let such economic organization establish the education institution.

In practice, this means that joint investors wishing to establish a private school would now need to first incorporate a company in Vietnam before applying for the school establishment licenses and operation permits. This additional procedural step may increase lead times and costs for new education projects. A single investor, however, retains the option of either forming an economic organization or directly establishing the institution.

School Councils Removed from Public Institution Governance

Under the Amended Law on Education, the school council is no longer part of the governance structure of public educational institutions. However, it continues to exist as a governing body in private educational institutions.

Delegation of Licensing Authority

The prime minister is no longer responsible for licensing the establishment of educational institutions. Instead, the licensing authority has been delegated to specialized authorities within the government (including the Ministry of Education and Training (MOET), the Ministry of National Defense, and the Ministry of Public Security) and local governments (including People’s Committees at the provincial and ward levels). In addition, the former licensing authority of the prime minister in granting establishment decisions to higher education institutions is now delegated to the MOET.

Moreover, as part of Vietnam’s broader administrative reform restructuring local government from a three-tier system to a two-tier system (abolishing the district level), certain licensing functions previously handled at the district level have shifted to ward-level People’s Committees. The licensing authority for granting educational permission to educational institutions will be further regulated in detail by the government.

Recognition of Educational Support Personnel

The Amended Law on Education formally recognizes “educational support personnel” in educational institutions,  defined as individuals holding professional or technical positions that are not classified as teachers, as well as operational support positions and other roles consistent with the organizational structure of the educational institution.

At higher education institutions, educational support personnel additionally include three specific categories:

  • Teaching assistants, who serve in a preparatory position for lecturers and support lecturers in teaching activities;
  • Researchers, who carry out scientific research, technology development, and innovation activities, and support lecturers and students in practical training, laboratory work, and other research activities;
  • Teaching support personnel, who assist lecturers in practical training, laboratory work, and other professional activities.

Other personnel in education activities include vocational trainers, who provide teaching and practical training at enterprises or cooperatives for the implementation of vocational education programs

Notably, these new classifications may affect how institutions calculate staffing ratios for accreditation purposes and could have labor and employment implications for personnel contracts—particularly regarding benefits, allowances, and compliance with workforce planning requirements.

Outlook

The Amended Law on Education reflects the government’s continued efforts to modernize the governance framework of the education sector and streamline regulatory procedures to enhance flexibility in the establishment and operation of educational institutions.

For the private education sector, these developments may create greater opportunities for investment and cooperation, particularly a more diversified education system. The introduction of vocational high schools and the recognition of educational support personnel may also contribute to improving the quality and responsiveness of education services.

Investors and education providers should closely monitor forthcoming implementing regulations, to ensure full implementation and compliance with the new and amended laws in the fields of education.

Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Employment

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

October 31, 2025
On September 29, 2025, Thailand’s Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee (PDPC Office) published its Regulations on the Review and Certification of Binding Corporate Rules B.E. 2568 (2025) (the Regulations). The Regulations provide clarity on the PDPC Office’s approach to reviewing and certifying binding corporate rules (BCRs) under Section 29 of the Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562 (2019) (PDPA), and aim to facilitate international data transfers within a group of undertakings or enterprises (a “corporate group”). In conjunction with this development, the PDPC Office also approved BCRs for two companies operating in Thailand on September 30, 2025. This milestone represents the first concrete progress since the PDPC’s Notification on Criteria for the Protection of Personal Data Sent or Transferred to a Foreign Country pursuant to Section 29 of the PDPA B.E. 2566 (2023) came into effect in March 2024. Some key features of the Regulations are set out below. Categorization of BCRs BCRs are classified into two types: (1) BCRs for Controllers (BCR-C) and (2) BCRs for Processors (BCR-P). The category must be clearly specified when submitting the BCRs to the PDPC Office. Documentation Requirement The applicant must prepare and submit the application (a standard template may be provided by the PDPC Office in the future) along with supporting documents for review and certification in the Thai language. If the supporting documents are in a foreign language, a certified Thai translation should be provided. The translation must be notarized by a notary public or qualified person. Supporting documents may include, among others, a binding instrument such as an intra-group agreement, or a list of entities subject to the BCRs. Expedited Process Requirement Organizations with existing BCR approvals under the EU or UK GDPR, or from countries announced by the PDPC under Section 28, may apply through an
Read More
October 30, 2025
Recent events at a Thai listed company, where a proposal to remove the director was not successful, amid claims that a competitor was attempting to gain control of the company, illustrate how disputes over corporate control can unfold differently at the board level and shareholder level. At the board level, removing directors of a listed company mid-term to gain corporate control is not an easy task under Thai law, as it requires a higher threshold than appointing a new director, which typically only requires a simple majority vote in a listed company. At the shareholder level, Thailand’s tender offer and competition regimes add complexity where different shareholder groups act in concert to remove opposing board representatives or otherwise influence control. In this article, we will explore why the attempted removal of a director may fail, and how the tender offer regime may apply. Key Issues at a Glance Shareholder groups may seek to convene meetings to propose changes to board composition or company authority. Such proposals can be delayed or complicated by regulatory requirements and the need for additional disclosures. Regulatory authorities and minority shareholders may raise concerns when major shareholders coordinate to influence board control, especially if such actions could trigger tender offer or merger control obligations. Companies often respond by seeking further information on shareholder relationships and potential conflicts before proceeding. Why the Director Removal Failed Under Section 76 of the Public Limited Companies Act B.E. 2535 (as amended), the early removal of a director requires two conditions to be satisfied at the same meeting of shareholders: Headcount test: At least 75% of shareholders attending and entitled to vote must vote in favor. If multiple shareholders appoint the same person as proxy, each proxy is counted as a separate head for the purpose of the headcount test,
Read More
October 29, 2025
On September 15, 2025, Thailand’s Senate approved a draft amendment to the Labor Protection Act (LPA), which is currently awaiting publication in the Government Gazette. The amendment, which will take effect 30 days after publication, extends labor protections to certain service contractors working for state entities, enhances maternity and spousal support leave, and updates employer reporting obligations. Expanded Protections for State-Contracted Service Providers The amendment adds a section to the LPA that extends core labor protections to individuals engaged by government bodies under service contracts. This provision covers workers hired by central, regional, and local government agencies; state enterprises governed by the State Enterprise Labor Relations Act; public organizations; and other state agencies when these entities retain individuals under service procurement contracts (or similar arrangements) and exercise supervision, direction, and control over their work. In such cases, the hiring agencies must provide terms no less favorable than those required under the LPA for remuneration, weekly holidays, traditional holidays, annual leave, sick leave, maternity leave, working days and hours, and rest periods. Ministerial regulations will establish specific criteria for implementation. Disputes regarding rights and duties under this provision will fall under Labor Court jurisdiction. This change aligns the treatment of controlled service contractors with that of regular employees, addressing a longstanding coverage gap in the public sector. Enhanced Maternity Leave and New Caregiving Provisions The amendment includes a maternity leave entitlement of up to 120 days per pregnancy (an increase from the previous 98 days), unless otherwise prescribed by royal decree, and also introduces a new postnatal caregiving leave for mothers in complex medical situations who have used their childbirth leave, granting up to 15 additional days to care for children who are at risk of complications, have abnormalities, or have disabilities. This supplemental leave requires support from a medical
Read More
October 24, 2025
On October 22, 2025, the Thai government posted a directive not to grant gambling licenses for gambling involving poker nationwide to crack down on illegal gambling activities. The directive was issued by Thailand’s Ministry of Interior to align with government policies to prevent the legalization of all types of gambling businesses, including poker as a sporting activity. This will result in the revocation of poker activities as sport and institute a strict ban on such activities nationwide. Businesses should note the new government’s strict approach toward gambling activities as the legal situation regarding gambling in the country continues to draw close attention.
Read More