You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

January 22, 2025

Vietnam’s Draft Resolution on Financial Centers: Implications for Fintech and Banking

Subscribe to Updates

Tasked with implementing the Politburo’s policy outlined in Notice No. 47-TB/TW dated November 15, 2024, the prime minister of Vietnam issued Decision No. 1718/QD-TTg on December 31, 2024, appointing himself as the head of a steering committee dedicated to the establishment of an international financial center in Ho Chi Minh City and a regional financial center in Da Nang by 2025. The Ministry of Planning and Investment has subsequently drafted an outline for the National Assembly’s Resolution on the Establishment of Regional and International Financial Centers in Vietnam (“Draft Resolution”).

This Draft Resolution introduces two key policy groups: (i) policies governing the quantity, location, structure, organization, functions, and responsibilities of the financial centers; and (ii) policies applicable to various areas and matters within the financial centers.

Notably, under the Draft Resolution, fintech has been identified as a key sector, with a specific focus on the implementation of a “controlled sandbox” policy for business models involving virtual assets and cryptocurrencies. Under this framework, transactions related to virtual assets and cryptocurrencies will be permitted from July 1, 2026, subject to licensing, management, impact assessment, and risk oversight by the financial centers’ Management and Operations Committee.

Scope of Application and Key Principles

The Draft Resolution applies to a wide range of stakeholders, including investors, regulatory agencies, organizations, and individuals involved in the establishment, organization, and operation of regional and international financial centers in Vietnam. These financial centers will have clearly defined geographical boundaries and specific locations, which will be further specified and detailed by the People’s Committees of Ho Chi Minh City and Da Nang.

Companies successfully registered as members of these financial centers will benefit from special investor-friendly policy principles, which may differ from the general legal and regulatory framework applicable in other parts of Vietnam.

Most notably, the state will implement mechanisms and policies to encourage capital inflows, facilitate the adoption of advanced technology and modern management practices, and promote infrastructure development within the financial centers. The management agencies of the financial centers will apply specialized administrative procedures to meet investors’ needs in accordance with international standards and best practices. Additionally, where provisions of the Draft Resolution differ from existing laws, resolutions, or ordinances, the provisions of the Draft Resolution will prevail.

Policy Framework for Establishment and Governance of Financial Centers

The Draft Resolution outlines the framework for the establishment and governance of financial centers in Vietnam, which will include a comprehensive international financial center in Ho Chi Minh City and a regional-scale financial center in Da Nang. To ensure effective management and operations, the financial centers will be overseen by dedicated agencies, including a (i) management and operations committee, (ii) financial supervision committee, and (iii) international arbitration center.

The management and operations committee will be responsible for the overall administration and strategic oversight of the financial center. Its organizational structure will consist of a board of directors and several key departments, including strategic management, financial management, operations supervision, and management coordination.

The financial supervision committee will focus on ensuring compliance with international financial standards and regulations, fostering a transparent and integrity-driven environment. This committee will also comprise a board of directors supported by specialized departments, such as audit, legal, welfare, risk management, and governance and human resources.

Additionally, each financial center will host an international arbitration center, which will facilitate the resolution of disputes arising from investment and business activities within the financial ecosystem.

Specific Policies for Financial Centers

The Draft Resolution also sets forth specific policies that will govern key areas within the financial centers. These policies cover the membership registration system; currency, banking, and foreign exchange management; fintech; capital markets; personal and corporate income tax; immigration and residency; human resource training and development; labor, employment, and social security; strategic investments; land use and infrastructure development; and trade and business regulations. Furthermore, policies related to dispute resolution mechanisms for investment and business activities are also included.

A significant feature of the Draft Resolution is the introduction of a controlled sandbox policy for fintech enterprises, particularly those engaged in virtual assets and cryptocurrency-related business models. Under this framework, transactions involving virtual assets and cryptocurrencies will be clearly permitted within the financial centers starting from July 1, 2026. These transactions will be subject to licensing, regulatory oversight, impact assessment, and risk management measures administered by the Management and Operations Committee. Additionally, issues concerning anti-money laundering measures related to crypto assets and cryptocurrencies; the issuance, ownership, and trading of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and utility tokens; and regulatory measures for crypto-asset mining activities (to limit risks to energy security and the environment) will be further regulated by the government.

In the domain of currency, banking, and foreign exchange management, the Draft Resolution proposes policies that reflect international best practices and address the practical needs of the financial centers. These policies include (i) anti-money laundering regulations, including those related to crypto assets; (ii) allowing financial transactions within the centers in both VND and freely convertible foreign currencies; and (iii) procedures and processes for priority areas in the financial centers for some traditional products in commercial banking activities.

The Draft Resolution also provides a streamlined regulatory framework for establishing and managing the operations of foreign credit institutions within the financial centers. Notably, banks and credit institutions headquartered in the centers will not be subject to foreign ownership restrictions or investment conditions when providing financial services within the centers or across borders. In addition, to align with international financial standards, the implementation of Basel III regulations is scheduled to commence on January 1, 2026. Furthermore, a digital banking model will be introduced, enabling commercial banks to offer advanced digital services within the financial centers from the same date.

Outlook

By establishing a structured regulatory framework, the forthcoming resolution aims to attract investment, drive financial innovation, and position Vietnam as a competitive player in the global financial landscape. A key highlight of the resolution is its focus on the fintech sector, particularly through initiatives such as the controlled sandbox for virtual assets and cryptocurrencies. This demonstrates Vietnam’s commitment to advancing digital transformation in financial services, fostering opportunities for fintech enterprises, and driving innovation across the industry.

Related Professionals

Industries

Fintech

Technology

Practices

Banking and Finance

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 21, 2025
On August 18, 2025, Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), in collaboration with the Ministry of Finance, the Anti-Money Laundering Office, and the Ministry of Tourism and Sports, announced the launch of TouristDigiPay. The initiative, implemented under the SEC’s Regulatory Sandbox, allows foreign tourists to convert digital assets into Thai baht for use in everyday transactions in Thailand. Foreign tourists who opt to participate in TouristDigiPay must open two accounts once they are in Thailand: An account with a licensed digital asset operator to sell or exchange digital assets for Thai baht; and A tourist wallet account with a licensed e-money operator regulated by the Bank of Thailand. Funds from digital asset sales will be transferred into the tourist wallet, enabling tourists to make payments at participating merchants that accept e-money. Key Regulatory Requirements The TouristDigiPay project will operate for a period of up to 18 months, with the following conditions: Only licensed digital asset brokers, dealers, and exchanges integrated with licensed e-money operators are eligible to participate. Operators must implement anti-money laundering (AML) protocols that are proportionate to the assessed risk level. These include: Conducting know-your-customer and customer-due-diligence (KYC/CDD) checks on all users. For monthly transactions exceeding THB 50,000 per person, verifying the source of the digital assets and assessing AML risk using internationally recognized blockchain forensic tools or equivalent procedures. Suspending or rejecting services if digital assets are transferred from wallets flagged for AML concerns. Ensuring that conversion between digital assets and fiat includes safeguards such as matching account names and returning digital assets only to the original wallet. The following transaction limits apply to participants in the TouristDigiPay initiative: Payments to small vendors are capped at THB 50,000 per month. Payments to vendors who have completed the know-your-merchant (KYM) process are capped at THB 500,000 per
Read More
August 15, 2025
More than a decade after the issuance of Decree No. 52/2013/ND-CP (as amended by Decree No. 85/2021/ND-CP; collectively, “Decree 52”), Vietnam’s legal framework for e-commerce is under growing pressure to keep pace with the evolving digital economy. While Decree 52 has provided a foundational framework, it has shown certain limitations in keeping up with issues such as counterfeit goods, intellectual property enforcement, unqualified products, and emerging models like livestream selling and affiliate marketing. To address these regulatory gaps, the Ministry of Industry and Trade (MOIT) has released the 2025 Draft E-Commerce Law (“Draft Law”) for public consultation. The Draft Law is intended to supersede the current framework under Decree 52 and establish a more detailed and comprehensive legal foundation for the regulations of e-commerce activities in Vietnam. It is currently expected to be submitted to the National Assembly for review and potential adoption during its 10th session in October 2025. In this article, we discuss the Draft Law’s most significant updates and legal developments in comparison to existing regulations, and assess the practical challenges that businesses may face in preparing for implementation in the near future. Platform Classification: Toward a More Nuanced Framework Unlike Decree 52’s simpler structure, which broadly categorized platforms into either (i) websites selling goods and services or (ii) websites providing e-commerce services, the Draft Law introduces a more detailed framework that aims to classify platforms based on their technical functions and business models. Specifically, the Draft Law introduces a four-tier classification system for e-commerce platforms, consisting of: (i) Direct Business Platforms, (ii) Intermediary Platforms, (iii) Social Networks with E-Commerce Functions, and (iv) Multi-Service Integrated Platforms. This approach reflects an effort to more accurately capture the complexity of today’s e-commerce landscape, including hybrid platforms such as TikTok Shop. While this approach reflects the growing complexity of
Read More
August 6, 2025
Thailand’s Digital Government Development Agency (DGA) has released drafts of two pivotal documents to guide Thai government agencies in adopting cloud technology and classifying data for cloud usage. These draft guidelines, open for public hearing through August 12, 2025, are part of the national “Go Cloud First” policy, which aims to accelerate digital transformation, improve efficiency, and ensure robust data security across the public sector. The new standards will have significant implications for both government agencies and cloud service providers operating in Thailand. Highlights of the draft guidelines are presented below. Government Cloud Usage Guidelines Cloud-first transformation: All government agencies are directed to prioritize cloud solutions for new IT projects, in line with the cabinet’s “Go Cloud First” policy. Cloud model selection: Agencies must assess their needs and select the most appropriate cloud deployment model—public, private, hybrid, or community cloud—based on the sensitivity of the data and operational requirements. Service types: The guidelines provide criteria for choosing between Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), Platform as a Service (PaaS), and Software as a Service (SaaS), emphasizing the importance of using standard, non-customized services where possible. Cost management: Agencies are required to plan and separate cloud-related expenses, ensuring transparency and efficient budget allocation. Cloud migration: The guidelines outline the steps for migrating to the cloud and highlight the role of cloud service providers in facilitating the process, including supporting innovation and enabling smooth exit strategies. Procurement compliance: All cloud procurement must comply with public sector procurement laws and regulations. Only providers meeting government-mandated standards can be selected. Security and shared responsibility: The guidelines clarify the division of security responsibilities between cloud providers and government agencies. While providers manage infrastructure security, agencies remain responsible for data, application, and access controls. Legal framework: Agencies must comply with the Digital Government Administration Act, Cybersecurity
Read More
August 1, 2025
Thailand’s Personal Data Protection Committee (PDPC) announced to the press on August 1, 2025, that it had issued eight new administrative fines under Thailand’s Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562 (2019) (PDPA) in five cases of noncompliance by public and private entities. The enforcement actions reflect a growing commitment by the PDPC to penalize noncompliance across all sectors, regardless of organizational type or size. The total amount imposed to date was approximately THB 21.5 million (approx. USD 654,690), underscoring the financial risks tied to PDPA violations. The five cases—one involving a state agency and the remainder in the private sector—are summarized below. Case 1: State Agency Providing Online Services to the Public The order in this case stemmed from a cyberattack on a state agency’s web app, resulting in personal data of 200,000 data subjects being leaked to and sold on the dark web. The software developer was also found to have implemented no privacy by design, lacked an access control system, had no data breach prevention measures, and failed to conduct risk assessments or review existing security measures. Key noncompliance identified: Lack of appropriate security measures Weak password protection No risk assessment or ongoing review of security measures No data processing agreement with software developer that acted as data processor The state agency and the developer were each fined THB 153,120 (approx. USD 4,670). Case 2: Private Hospital This case involved a hospital that engaged an individual contractor to destroy patient medical record documents. However, the contractor stored the documents at their own premises, failed to follow the required destruction protocols, and ultimately used the medical records to wrap sweets, resulting in the leak of over 1,000 records during the destruction process. The contractor also failed to notify the hospital of the data breach. Although there was a
Read More