You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

January 22, 2025

Vietnam’s Draft Resolution on Financial Centers: Implications for Fintech and Banking

Subscribe to Updates

Tasked with implementing the Politburo’s policy outlined in Notice No. 47-TB/TW dated November 15, 2024, the prime minister of Vietnam issued Decision No. 1718/QD-TTg on December 31, 2024, appointing himself as the head of a steering committee dedicated to the establishment of an international financial center in Ho Chi Minh City and a regional financial center in Da Nang by 2025. The Ministry of Planning and Investment has subsequently drafted an outline for the National Assembly’s Resolution on the Establishment of Regional and International Financial Centers in Vietnam (“Draft Resolution”).

This Draft Resolution introduces two key policy groups: (i) policies governing the quantity, location, structure, organization, functions, and responsibilities of the financial centers; and (ii) policies applicable to various areas and matters within the financial centers.

Notably, under the Draft Resolution, fintech has been identified as a key sector, with a specific focus on the implementation of a “controlled sandbox” policy for business models involving virtual assets and cryptocurrencies. Under this framework, transactions related to virtual assets and cryptocurrencies will be permitted from July 1, 2026, subject to licensing, management, impact assessment, and risk oversight by the financial centers’ Management and Operations Committee.

Scope of Application and Key Principles

The Draft Resolution applies to a wide range of stakeholders, including investors, regulatory agencies, organizations, and individuals involved in the establishment, organization, and operation of regional and international financial centers in Vietnam. These financial centers will have clearly defined geographical boundaries and specific locations, which will be further specified and detailed by the People’s Committees of Ho Chi Minh City and Da Nang.

Companies successfully registered as members of these financial centers will benefit from special investor-friendly policy principles, which may differ from the general legal and regulatory framework applicable in other parts of Vietnam.

Most notably, the state will implement mechanisms and policies to encourage capital inflows, facilitate the adoption of advanced technology and modern management practices, and promote infrastructure development within the financial centers. The management agencies of the financial centers will apply specialized administrative procedures to meet investors’ needs in accordance with international standards and best practices. Additionally, where provisions of the Draft Resolution differ from existing laws, resolutions, or ordinances, the provisions of the Draft Resolution will prevail.

Policy Framework for Establishment and Governance of Financial Centers

The Draft Resolution outlines the framework for the establishment and governance of financial centers in Vietnam, which will include a comprehensive international financial center in Ho Chi Minh City and a regional-scale financial center in Da Nang. To ensure effective management and operations, the financial centers will be overseen by dedicated agencies, including a (i) management and operations committee, (ii) financial supervision committee, and (iii) international arbitration center.

The management and operations committee will be responsible for the overall administration and strategic oversight of the financial center. Its organizational structure will consist of a board of directors and several key departments, including strategic management, financial management, operations supervision, and management coordination.

The financial supervision committee will focus on ensuring compliance with international financial standards and regulations, fostering a transparent and integrity-driven environment. This committee will also comprise a board of directors supported by specialized departments, such as audit, legal, welfare, risk management, and governance and human resources.

Additionally, each financial center will host an international arbitration center, which will facilitate the resolution of disputes arising from investment and business activities within the financial ecosystem.

Specific Policies for Financial Centers

The Draft Resolution also sets forth specific policies that will govern key areas within the financial centers. These policies cover the membership registration system; currency, banking, and foreign exchange management; fintech; capital markets; personal and corporate income tax; immigration and residency; human resource training and development; labor, employment, and social security; strategic investments; land use and infrastructure development; and trade and business regulations. Furthermore, policies related to dispute resolution mechanisms for investment and business activities are also included.

A significant feature of the Draft Resolution is the introduction of a controlled sandbox policy for fintech enterprises, particularly those engaged in virtual assets and cryptocurrency-related business models. Under this framework, transactions involving virtual assets and cryptocurrencies will be clearly permitted within the financial centers starting from July 1, 2026. These transactions will be subject to licensing, regulatory oversight, impact assessment, and risk management measures administered by the Management and Operations Committee. Additionally, issues concerning anti-money laundering measures related to crypto assets and cryptocurrencies; the issuance, ownership, and trading of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and utility tokens; and regulatory measures for crypto-asset mining activities (to limit risks to energy security and the environment) will be further regulated by the government.

In the domain of currency, banking, and foreign exchange management, the Draft Resolution proposes policies that reflect international best practices and address the practical needs of the financial centers. These policies include (i) anti-money laundering regulations, including those related to crypto assets; (ii) allowing financial transactions within the centers in both VND and freely convertible foreign currencies; and (iii) procedures and processes for priority areas in the financial centers for some traditional products in commercial banking activities.

The Draft Resolution also provides a streamlined regulatory framework for establishing and managing the operations of foreign credit institutions within the financial centers. Notably, banks and credit institutions headquartered in the centers will not be subject to foreign ownership restrictions or investment conditions when providing financial services within the centers or across borders. In addition, to align with international financial standards, the implementation of Basel III regulations is scheduled to commence on January 1, 2026. Furthermore, a digital banking model will be introduced, enabling commercial banks to offer advanced digital services within the financial centers from the same date.

Outlook

By establishing a structured regulatory framework, the forthcoming resolution aims to attract investment, drive financial innovation, and position Vietnam as a competitive player in the global financial landscape. A key highlight of the resolution is its focus on the fintech sector, particularly through initiatives such as the controlled sandbox for virtual assets and cryptocurrencies. This demonstrates Vietnam’s commitment to advancing digital transformation in financial services, fostering opportunities for fintech enterprises, and driving innovation across the industry.

Related Professionals

Industries

Fintech

Technology

Practices

Banking and Finance

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

December 12, 2025
Tilleke & Gibbins has updated the Cambodia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters in Multilaw’s Global Data Protection Guide, which collects expert advice from Multilaw member firms in 90 jurisdictions around the world (including a Laos chapter, which is also authored by Tilleke & Gibbins). The guide provides answers to key issues concerning the fast-developing data protection and privacy laws around the world, and helps data protection officers and in-house counsel understand how the regulatory regime for data protection can affect their organizations in various jurisdictions. Each section of the guide identifies the main laws that govern data protection in that jurisdiction, and gives a detailed overview of the legal principles in place as well as the enforcement authorities responsible for overseeing compliance. The guide also covers issues related to data subject rights, data protection officers, impact assessments, data breach notification requirements, and cross border data transfers. The use of personal data in marketing is also considered, with specific information on electronic marketing rules, cookies, and marketing to businesses and consumers. Multilaw, of which Tilleke & Gibbins is a longtime member, is a global network of carefully selected independent law firms able to provide expert legal advice in complex environments around the globe. The full guide is available for free on the Multilaw website.
Read More
December 11, 2025
On December 10, 2025, the National Assembly of Vietnam passed a new Cybersecurity Law, which will take effect on July 1, 2026. The new Cybersecurity Law was developed based on the consolidation of the 2018 Cybersecurity Law and the 2015 Law on Network Information Security. While the final approved version of the new Cybersecurity Law has not yet been published, according to official reports, the following notable requirements are confirmed to be included: The new Cybersecurity Law dedicates a specific article to prohibited acts related to cybersecurity, under which it strictly prohibits posting or disseminating information online that propagandizes against the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. The law also prohibits, among other things, (i) the appropriation, trading, seizure, or intentional disclosure of information classified as state secrets, work secrets, business secrets, personal secrets, family secrets, and private life; (ii) intentionally eavesdropping, recording, or filming online conversations without authorization; and (iii) the use of artificial intelligence (AI) or new technologies to conduct prohibited acts. The Ministry of Public Security (MPS) has the authority to require enterprises providing telecommunications, internet, and online services, as well as system administrators, to remove information violating cybersecurity laws from systems under their management. The MPS is also assigned responsibility for ensuring information security in cyberspace and data security, establishing mechanisms for IP address identity management, verifying digital account registration information, and issuing warnings and sharing information on cybersecurity threats. Information systems are classified into five levels (similar to the 2015 Law on Network Information Security) based on the degree of harm to national security and social order if an incident occurs. The MPS is the lead agency assisting the government in state management of cybersecurity. The Ministry of National Defense is responsible for managing military information systems, and the Government Cipher Committee manages cryptographic and cipher
Read More
December 4, 2025
Thailand has expanded the circumstances under which state agencies may bypass competitive bidding procedures to address urgent security challenges. On November 28, 2025, Thailand’s Ministry of Finance published the Ministerial Regulation Determining Cases of Procurement by Specific Method (No. 6) B.E. 2568 in the Royal Gazette, introducing a new pathway for procuring supplies and services needed to address cyber and military threats that may affect the stability of government agencies or the nation. For technology vendors, cybersecurity firms, and defense contractors, this regulatory change creates immediate opportunities to engage directly with government buyers facing urgent security challenges. New Fast-Track Category for Security Threats The regulation amends Thailand’s Public Procurement and Supplies Management Act B.E. 2560 (2017) to add a new category of procurement that qualifies for the “specific method”—a noncompetitive, direct selection process. Previously, agencies could use this expedited method only in limited circumstances, such as emergencies, cases with proprietary technology requirements, or national security operations. The new provision explicitly covers procurement of supplies related to preventing or resolving cyber or military threats that could impact the stability of a state agency or the country. This addition recognizes the urgent nature of modern security challenges, where competitive bidding timelines may leave agencies vulnerable during critical threat windows. State agencies dealing with active cyberattacks, preparing defensive measures against anticipated threats, or responding to military security concerns can now move directly to negotiate with qualified vendors rather than conducting lengthy public tender processes. Vendor Considerations Vendors offering cybersecurity solutions now have a regulatory avenue to work directly with government clients when stability concerns are present. These solutions include threat detection systems, anti-ransomware tools, incident response services, firewalls, and security consulting. Similarly, defense contractors providing military equipment or specialized security supplies can pursue direct engagement channels where traditional procurement methods would create
Read More
December 3, 2025
Thailand’s Civil Court has issued a regulation targeting the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the preparation of pleadings and other documents submitted to the court. Effective November 17, 2025, the regulation aligns with September 2025 guidance from the president of the Supreme Court, and aims to safeguard accuracy, transparency, and public confidence in civil adjudication. The regulation applies to all parties submitting pleadings or any documents to the Civil Court that are prepared using AI tools or contain AI-generated content. It subjects AI used for these purposes to strict requirements on verification, disclosure, and accountability. Core Obligations The regulation imposes four principal obligations: Lawyers who use AI remain subject to duties of honesty, responsibility to the court, professional standards, and legal ethics, including the duty to assess the appropriateness of the AI tool for the work. Parties and lawyers must verify the accuracy and completeness of all facts, legal provisions, and citations in AI-generated content before submission. Parties and lawyers must disclose to the court any AI-generated content by clearly marking the beginning and end of the AI-generated portion with prescribed statements (see below). Additionally, a certification confirming the use of AI must be provided at the end of the pleading or document, stating that AI was used for certain portions and that the party has reviewed and certifies the accuracy of factual and legal content. Parties and lawyers bear the same full legal and ethical responsibility for AI-generated content as they do for personally authored documents; they cannot evade responsibility or avoid liability by citing AI-related errors. Likewise, parties must ensure that any AI-generated content is truthful, accurate, and unbiased. Prescribed Disclosure Language Each instance of AI-generated content must be preceded by the statement “[The following content was prepared using artificial intelligence]” and must end with “[End
Read More