You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

January 22, 2025

Vietnam’s Draft Resolution on Financial Centers: Implications for Fintech and Banking

Subscribe to Updates

Tasked with implementing the Politburo’s policy outlined in Notice No. 47-TB/TW dated November 15, 2024, the prime minister of Vietnam issued Decision No. 1718/QD-TTg on December 31, 2024, appointing himself as the head of a steering committee dedicated to the establishment of an international financial center in Ho Chi Minh City and a regional financial center in Da Nang by 2025. The Ministry of Planning and Investment has subsequently drafted an outline for the National Assembly’s Resolution on the Establishment of Regional and International Financial Centers in Vietnam (“Draft Resolution”).

This Draft Resolution introduces two key policy groups: (i) policies governing the quantity, location, structure, organization, functions, and responsibilities of the financial centers; and (ii) policies applicable to various areas and matters within the financial centers.

Notably, under the Draft Resolution, fintech has been identified as a key sector, with a specific focus on the implementation of a “controlled sandbox” policy for business models involving virtual assets and cryptocurrencies. Under this framework, transactions related to virtual assets and cryptocurrencies will be permitted from July 1, 2026, subject to licensing, management, impact assessment, and risk oversight by the financial centers’ Management and Operations Committee.

Scope of Application and Key Principles

The Draft Resolution applies to a wide range of stakeholders, including investors, regulatory agencies, organizations, and individuals involved in the establishment, organization, and operation of regional and international financial centers in Vietnam. These financial centers will have clearly defined geographical boundaries and specific locations, which will be further specified and detailed by the People’s Committees of Ho Chi Minh City and Da Nang.

Companies successfully registered as members of these financial centers will benefit from special investor-friendly policy principles, which may differ from the general legal and regulatory framework applicable in other parts of Vietnam.

Most notably, the state will implement mechanisms and policies to encourage capital inflows, facilitate the adoption of advanced technology and modern management practices, and promote infrastructure development within the financial centers. The management agencies of the financial centers will apply specialized administrative procedures to meet investors’ needs in accordance with international standards and best practices. Additionally, where provisions of the Draft Resolution differ from existing laws, resolutions, or ordinances, the provisions of the Draft Resolution will prevail.

Policy Framework for Establishment and Governance of Financial Centers

The Draft Resolution outlines the framework for the establishment and governance of financial centers in Vietnam, which will include a comprehensive international financial center in Ho Chi Minh City and a regional-scale financial center in Da Nang. To ensure effective management and operations, the financial centers will be overseen by dedicated agencies, including a (i) management and operations committee, (ii) financial supervision committee, and (iii) international arbitration center.

The management and operations committee will be responsible for the overall administration and strategic oversight of the financial center. Its organizational structure will consist of a board of directors and several key departments, including strategic management, financial management, operations supervision, and management coordination.

The financial supervision committee will focus on ensuring compliance with international financial standards and regulations, fostering a transparent and integrity-driven environment. This committee will also comprise a board of directors supported by specialized departments, such as audit, legal, welfare, risk management, and governance and human resources.

Additionally, each financial center will host an international arbitration center, which will facilitate the resolution of disputes arising from investment and business activities within the financial ecosystem.

Specific Policies for Financial Centers

The Draft Resolution also sets forth specific policies that will govern key areas within the financial centers. These policies cover the membership registration system; currency, banking, and foreign exchange management; fintech; capital markets; personal and corporate income tax; immigration and residency; human resource training and development; labor, employment, and social security; strategic investments; land use and infrastructure development; and trade and business regulations. Furthermore, policies related to dispute resolution mechanisms for investment and business activities are also included.

A significant feature of the Draft Resolution is the introduction of a controlled sandbox policy for fintech enterprises, particularly those engaged in virtual assets and cryptocurrency-related business models. Under this framework, transactions involving virtual assets and cryptocurrencies will be clearly permitted within the financial centers starting from July 1, 2026. These transactions will be subject to licensing, regulatory oversight, impact assessment, and risk management measures administered by the Management and Operations Committee. Additionally, issues concerning anti-money laundering measures related to crypto assets and cryptocurrencies; the issuance, ownership, and trading of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and utility tokens; and regulatory measures for crypto-asset mining activities (to limit risks to energy security and the environment) will be further regulated by the government.

In the domain of currency, banking, and foreign exchange management, the Draft Resolution proposes policies that reflect international best practices and address the practical needs of the financial centers. These policies include (i) anti-money laundering regulations, including those related to crypto assets; (ii) allowing financial transactions within the centers in both VND and freely convertible foreign currencies; and (iii) procedures and processes for priority areas in the financial centers for some traditional products in commercial banking activities.

The Draft Resolution also provides a streamlined regulatory framework for establishing and managing the operations of foreign credit institutions within the financial centers. Notably, banks and credit institutions headquartered in the centers will not be subject to foreign ownership restrictions or investment conditions when providing financial services within the centers or across borders. In addition, to align with international financial standards, the implementation of Basel III regulations is scheduled to commence on January 1, 2026. Furthermore, a digital banking model will be introduced, enabling commercial banks to offer advanced digital services within the financial centers from the same date.

Outlook

By establishing a structured regulatory framework, the forthcoming resolution aims to attract investment, drive financial innovation, and position Vietnam as a competitive player in the global financial landscape. A key highlight of the resolution is its focus on the fintech sector, particularly through initiatives such as the controlled sandbox for virtual assets and cryptocurrencies. This demonstrates Vietnam’s commitment to advancing digital transformation in financial services, fostering opportunities for fintech enterprises, and driving innovation across the industry.

Related Professionals

Industries

Fintech

Technology

Practices

Banking and Finance

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 27, 2026
Vietnam’s new E-Commerce Law, which took effect on 1 July 2026 along with its implementing Decree No. 248/2026/ND-CP (Decree 248), marks a significant development in the country’s approach to online intellectual property (IP) enforcement, reflecting a clear shift from a reactive model of intermediary liability to one that expects platforms to play a more active role in preventing infringement. From notice-and-takedown to platform responsibility The most significant change introduced by the E-Commerce Law is the transformation of the legal role of e-commerce platforms. The existing safe harbor provisions under the IP Law and the copyright notice-and-takedown regime established by Decree 17/2023/ND-CP (Decree 17) largely required intermediaries to act only after receiving notice of infringement. Once infringing content had been removed, the platform’s legal obligation was generally considered fulfilled. The new legislation adopts a fundamentally different approach. Article 17 of the E-Commerce Law requires intermediary platforms to screen information relating to goods and services before publication in order to prevent listings involving counterfeit or IP-infringing goods, and goods of unknown origin. Rather than relying exclusively on complaints from rights holders, platforms are now expected to implement preventive measures before infringing listings become publicly available. Decree 248 further requires platforms to update keyword filters based on recommendations issued by competent authorities. These filtering mechanisms are intended to prevent prohibited listings from appearing on the platform and represent a further move away from a purely complaint-driven enforcement model. The legislation also introduces Vietnam’s first statutory stay-down obligation. Under the E-Commerce Law and Decree 248, major digital platforms must maintain automated systems capable of reviewing, warning against, and removing unlawful listings while also implementing measures to prevent repeat violations, defined under Decree 248 as conduct that has previously been identified and handled by the platform, but continues to recur. This obligation addresses one
Read More
July 27, 2026
A new decree on penalties for violations related to the crypto asset market creates compliance risks for offshore crypto asset exchanges in Vietnam that do not hold, and practically cannot obtain, a Vietnamese license, and for Vietnamese users who continue to transact on those platforms. Decree No. 284/2026/ND-CP (Decree 284), issued by the government of Vietnam on July 16, 2026, formally establishes an administrative penalty framework for violations related to crypto assets and the crypto asset market. The decree takes effect on September 1, 2026, and will remain in force for the duration of the five-year pilot program under Resolution No. 05/2025/NQ-CP, which is scheduled to end in September 2030. Direct Penalties on Vietnamese Users The most immediate commercial risk to offshore platforms is that their Vietnamese users now face direct personal liability for using their exchanges. Vietnamese users who trade crypto assets outside of a Ministry of Finance-licensed service provider face fines of up to VND 50 million (approximately USD 1,900). Vietnamese users trading in crypto assets that are offered or issued to foreign users face higher penalties of up to VND 100 million (approximately USD 3,800). It is expected that Vietnamese users will be more willing to migrate away from offshore platforms now that there is a risk of real enforcement against them. Penalties on Unlicensed Service Providers Violations of providing crypto asset services or advertising crypto-related services without a license face fines of up to VND 200 million (approximately USD 7,700). Operating a crypto asset trading market without proper authorization falls within the same highest penalty bands. Organizations that violate issuance, provision, or disclosure rules may face fines of up to VND 200 million. Although the maximum administrative fine per violation is capped at VND 200 million for organizations and VND 100 million for individuals, these
Read More
July 21, 2026
Thailand’s Ministry of Digital Economy and Society (MDES) published a notification establishing an expedited court-ordered takedown mechanism for online content in cases of “urgent necessity.” The notification, which was issued on July 17, 2026, under the Computer Crime Act B.E. 2550 (2007), as amended, took effect the following day. It significantly expands the categories of content subject to rapid government-initiated removal. Content Categories Subject to Takedown The notification defines “urgent necessity” (section 20, paragraph 5, of the Computer Crime Act) as circumstances where any delay in suppressing computer data may impact national security, religion, the monarchy, good morals, social culture, or public order. In this regard, it establishes four broad categories of content: Computer Crime Act offenses. National security offenses. IP and other criminal offenses, where it is contrary to public order or good morals and a competent officer has requested its suppression. Content contrary to public order or good morals, a broad residual category encompassing 14 subcategories approved by the Computer Data Screening Committee. The fourth category is the most expansive. Its 14 subcategories include: Content defaming, mocking, satirizing, or devaluing the monarchy. Online gambling advertising or facilitation. Offering illegal firearms for sale. Offering baraku (hookah) products or e-cigarettes for sale. Offering cannabis inflorescences or processed cannabis products for sale. Advertising or soliciting prostitution. Content inciting violence, hatred, or social division. Unauthorized overseas employment advertising. Offering boiled kratom juice for sale. Online sale or advertising of alcoholic beverages. Content satirizing or degrading Buddhism. Money lending at interest rates exceeding legally prescribed limits. Advertising or disseminating information about surrogacy services. Forgery of documents, cards, or official documents. Enforcement Procedure In cases of urgent necessity, a competent official assigned by the MDES permanent secretary must file a petition with supporting evidence to the court with jurisdiction, requesting an order to
Read More
July 20, 2026
On July 16, 2026, Thailand’s Personal Data Protection Committee (PDPC) published a notification in the Government Gazette establishing detailed rules governing data subjects’ right of access under section 30 of the Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562 (2019) (PDPA). The notification will take effect 60 days after publication—mid-September 2026—giving data controllers a limited window to bring their processes into compliance. Scope The notification covers requests to access or obtain copies of personal data and requests for disclosure of the source of data collected without consent. Data subjects may exercise their rights directly or through authorized representatives. Key Requirements Important requirements set by the notification include the following: Required request channels. Controllers must provide at least two request channels: direct submission at the business location and registered mail. Electronic channels are optional but, if offered, may also be used for fulfilling requests. Request contents. Requests must be in writing or in electronic form and include the data subject’s name, the preferred access method, details of the data requested, and the requester’s signature. Controllers may request additional identifying information as needed. Identity and authority verification. Controllers may require official identity documents for verification. Authorized representatives must provide authorization documents and identity documents for both the data subject and the representative. Alternative verification methods (e.g., digital authentication) are permitted if they do not unreasonably obstruct data subjects’ rights. Review and response timelines. Controllers must review requests within 15 days. If the request is incomplete, the controller must notify the requester and allow at least 15 days to correct deficiencies. If not corrected, the request may be treated as abandoned. Once verified, controllers must fulfill requests within 30 days, extendable by another 30 days for large-volume or complex requests with notice to the requester. Methods for providing access or copies. Controllers may fulfill
Read More