You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 3, 2024

Vietnam’s Draft Law on Data Takes Shape

Vietnam’s Ministry of Public Security (MPS) recently published on its website a dossier of the Draft Law on Data (the “Draft Law”) for public feedback, initiating a consultation period from February 26 to March 26, 2024. The dossier comprises a Policy Impact Assessment Report and a Summary Report on the implementation of existing legal documents governing data. An outline of the Draft Law was later circulated to relevant organizations for their input and commentary.

The MPS drafted this legislation with several objectives, including bolstering national data infrastructure, advancing digital government while streamlining administrative procedures, fostering growth in the digital economy and building a digital society, and establishing a National Data Center. Comprising 65 articles across 6 chapters, the Draft Law is slated for implementation on January 1, 2026.

The Draft Law currently is very preliminary, resembling a framework document. It features numerous provisions akin to policy mandates, yet only presents introductory concepts without further elaboration.

Scope of Application

The Draft Law applies to agencies, organizations, and individuals involved in data activities in Vietnam. This scope of application appears excessively broad and ambiguous, without a clear definition of “data activities”, leaving uncertainty regarding the breadth of this term’s coverage.

Key Policy Groups

The Draft Law focuses on four key policy groups:

  1. 1. Regulations on development, processing, and management of data

This policy group focuses on matters relating to the collection, digitalization, and creation of data; assurance of data quality; data classification; data storage; data combination, adjustment, and updating; data strategy; data management; data sharing; provision of data to state agencies; data analysis and synthesis; data verification and authentication; data disclosure; access and retrieval of data; data encryption and decryption; data copying, transmission, and transfer; data revocation, deletion, and destruction; application of science and technology in data processing; identification and management of risks in data processing; the National Data Development Fund; data protection; and international cooperation on data.

Article 8 of the Draft Law provides seven classifications of data: shared data, private-use data, open data, static data, dynamic data, analytical and statistical data, and master data. However, it does not address personal data and its classification into basic and sensitive personal data as outlined in Decree No. 13/2023/ND-CP on Personal Data Protection (“PDPD”). Consequently, it remains unclear how personal data fits within these classifications.

Article 14 of the Draft Law requires organizations and individuals to provide and disclose information and data to state agencies when requested, according to the provisions of law. A broad provision such as this could pose challenges in its application and increase the risk of misuse and abuse of authority.

  1. Regulations on National General Database

This policy group focuses on matters relating to synchronizing all information and data from national databases and specialized databases to a to-be-created National General Database; processing, administration, and sharing of data of the National General Database; responsibility for providing information and data of state agencies, political organizations, socio-political organizations, and other individuals and organizations; the relationship between the National General Database and national databases, specialized databases, national public service portals, and other databases and information systems; synchronization of databases of businesses, organizations, and individuals that voluntarily provide or are required to provide data to the National General Database in case of emergency response; and fees for the use of information in the National General Database.

Article 30 of the Draft Law sets out the obligation of Vietnamese and foreign individuals, organizations, and businesses operating in Vietnam to promptly provide, share, synchronize, and update data to the National General Database for general purposes upon receiving a written request. Again, this very broad provision will pose difficulties and challenges for businesses in implementation.

  1. Regulations on National Data Center

This policy group focuses on matters relating to the position and role of the National Data Center; registration and provision of National Data Center infrastructure resources to serve database management activities; administration, operation, and use of National Data Center infrastructure resources; upgrading, maintaining, and repairing National Data Center infrastructure; allocation of capital sources to build, develop, upgrade and prioritize investment in modern equipment for the National Data Center; the use of data sharing and coordination platform of the National Data Center to serve data sharing between the National Data Center and agencies and organizations; data protection at the National Data Center; and ensuring operational resources of the National Data Center.

  1. Regulations on data products and services

“Data products and services” are defined as products and services related to data processing activities for commercial purposes. The Draft Law lists various types, including data products and services in e-transactions, telecommunications, network security, and network information security, which will adhere to the respective laws governing these domains; data products and services in other specialized sectors, which will be subject to corresponding specialized laws and regulations; and data products and services subject to the regulations of the Draft Law, which include data products and services in data intermediary activities, data analysis and synthesis, data trading floors, and electronic authentication of data not linked to an electronic identity.

Observations

In other countries, the majority of regulations on data tend to focus on a number of fundamental issues aiming at fostering the growth of digital governance, digital societies, and digital economies. These include safeguarding personal data; enhancing network security; ensuring consumer protection in e-transactions; establishing e-government regulations; implementing electronic/digital authentication for secure online transactions and interactions; managing cross-border data flow/transfer; regulating content and social networks; promoting open data policies to enable public access to government data for fostering innovation and economic development; instituting regulations for national databases or data centers to uphold system security, confidentiality, and data integrity, and establishing regulatory frameworks or guidelines for emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, blockchain, and the Internet of Things to ensure responsible and ethical development and usage.

In addition to its ongoing efforts to develop regulatory frameworks or guidelines for emerging technologies, Vietnam already has comprehensive legislation in place to address nearly all of these significant aspects of data regulations, which are covered by the PDPD, the Law on Cybersecurity, the Law on Network Information Security, the Law on Consumer Protection, the Law on E-Transactions, Decree No. 59/2022/ND-CP on electronic identification and authentication, and other legislative documents. Drafting a Law on Data that aligns with these current data regulations, including sector-specific regulations, presents a formidable task that demands meticulous attention to prevent duplication, overlap, inconsistency, and the imposition of additional burdens. It is thus essential for stakeholders to closely follow the drafting process and actively engage by providing feedback and comments on the Draft Law.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 20, 2026
Thailand has established a new cross-ministerial committee to oversee data center operations nationwide. On August 5, 2026, the Thai cabinet approved the Prime Minister’s Office Regulation on the Data Center Business Policy Committee, which was published in the Government Gazette on August 13, 2026, and is now in effect. The regulation reflects the government’s policy to elevate Thailand’s digital economy and promote investment in digital infrastructure and AI. The key features of the new committee are outlined below. Definition of “Data Center” Under the regulation, “data center” is defined as a building, premises, or structure that uses electronic equipment to provide services related to the collection, storage, processing, hosting, or transmission of data by electronic means to third parties that are not affiliates, as further determined by the Data Center Business Policy Committee. Committee Composition The committee will be chaired by a deputy prime minister designated by the prime minister, and will have three vice-chairs comprising the ministers of digital economy and society, interior, and energy. The committee also includes 12 ex-officio members: the permanent secretaries of finance, agriculture, natural resources, energy, interior, digital economy, industry, and commerce; the secretaries-general of the Board of Investment (BOI), Energy Regulatory Commission, National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission (NBTC), and National Water Resources Office; and the director of the Energy Policy and Planning Office. Up to three expert members may be appointed by the prime minister for two-year terms, renewable once. The secretary-general of the National Economic and Social Development Council (NESDC) serves as member and secretary, with up to two NESDC officials serving as assistant secretaries. Powers and Duties The committee is empowered to: Propose policies, standards, and operational frameworks for government agencies in approving, licensing, issuing investment promotion certificates, or providing services to data center operators in Thailand; Study, analyze, and
August 14, 2026
Thailand’s Office of the Insurance Commission (OIC) has issued guidelines clarifying the boundaries between permissible and prohibited activities for unlicensed individuals—including influencers, bloggers, and content creators—when communicating about insurance products on social media. The Good Practice Guidelines for Persons Not Licensed as Insurance Agents or Brokers Regarding the Dissemination of Insurance Content Through Digital Media B.E. 2569 (2026) took effect on July 24, 2026. Activities Requiring a License The guidelines reserve the following activities for licensed agents and brokers: Soliciting or facilitating insurance contracts. Providing personalized advice on product suitability. Recommending policy cancellation to purchase promoted products. Creating links that facilitate contract formation. Receiving performance-based compensation tied to policies or premiums generated. Importantly, boilerplate disclaimers such as “this is not a recommendation to buy insurance” will not shield individuals from liability if the OIC views the content as personalized advice or solicitation. Permitted Activities Unlicensed persons may present general educational content about insurance—such as explaining terminology, sharing industry statistics, reporting news, or sharing personal experiences—provided the content does not target specific individuals to purchase from specific companies. The guidelines also set out best practices for communication, including presenting information in a fair and balanced manner that covers both benefits and limitations, encouraging consumers to read policy terms and consult licensed professionals, verifying information from credible sources before dissemination, and exercising special care when the audience may include vulnerable groups such as persons aged 60 and older. Prohibited Practices Prohibited practices include fear-based marketing, creating artificial urgency, omitting material limitations, making exaggerated claims, falsely claiming professional credentials, using fake engagement mechanisms, and sharing false or misleading content. The guidelines also reinforce the prohibitions under section 83 of the Life Insurance Act B.E. 2535 and section 78 of the Non-Life Insurance Act B.E. 2535 against soliciting insurance contracts with foreign operators
August 11, 2026
On July 27, 2026, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) released a draft decree proposing amendments to Decree No. 52/2024/ND-CP dated May 15, 2024, on non-cash payments (Decree 52). The draft decree would amend 17 of Decree 52’s 38 articles, with several key changes directly affecting providers of intermediary payment service (IPS). The key proposed changes affecting IPS providers are outlined below. Streamlining IPS Licensing Procedures A central objective of the draft decree is to simplify regulatory procedures for IPS providers. Notably, it would significantly reduce IPS licensing documentation requirements by removing the need to submit enterprise registration certificates, investment registration certificates, and documents evidencing the qualifications of the legal representative and general director. Instead, the SBV would retrieve this information directly from national business registration and other specialized databases, requesting additional documents only where the relevant information cannot be verified electronically or is incomplete. The draft decree also removes the current limit of two rounds for dossier supplementation and shortens processing timelines for several IPS licensing procedures such as issuance, amendment, and reissuance of IPS licenses. The processing time for new IPS license applications would be thereby reduced from 90 to 60 working days. In addition, several continuing IPS business conditions would be removed. For example, IPS providers would no longer be required to maintain certain representations relating to corporate restructuring or the legality of contributed capital. Likewise, the IPS project plan (đề án) would become a one-time application document rather than an ongoing licensing condition. If retained in the final decree, this change could provide IPS providers with significantly greater flexibility to implement post-licensing technology upgrades, system integrations, and corporate restructuring transactions without needing to revisit the originally approved project plan. The draft decree also removes the requirement for the SBV to consult the Ministry of Public
August 10, 2026
Thailand has finalized its social media KYC (“know your customer”) rules under Notification of the Electronic Transactions Commission on Measures to Prevent Technological Crimes for Social Media Service Providers (No. 2), which was published in the Government Gazette on May 5, 2026, and will take effect on November 1, 2026. While an early draft of the notification proposed requiring social media platforms to arrange identification of every user account, the final notification is significantly more targeted, focusing on paid online advertising and advertiser identity verification. Though the regulatory initiative primarily aims to combat online fraud and technology-related crimes, it also has important consequences for intellectual property enforcement, because the verified platform records that will be generated under the new requirements can help IP rights holders to identify anonymous online infringers. Key Regulatory Mandates The notification requires social media service providers to verify the identity of advertisers before their paid advertisements are published and disseminated in Thailand through social media, regardless of whether the advertising fees come from the advertisers or third parties. Verification of an advertiser is valid for one year, after which verification would have to be performed again before the platform could publish additional paid advertisements from the advertiser. Permitted verification methods are specified under the notification. A platform may verify an advertiser by checking identity evidence and confirming the connection between the advertiser and that identity evidence, with the notification giving facial comparison against certain government-issued identity documents as an example. Alternatively, platforms may verify advertisers through a digital identity verification and authentication system with an identity-proofing assurance level not lower than the level prescribed by Thailand’s Electronic Transactions Commission. The notification further requires platforms to retain only the advertiser’s information necessary to identify the advertiser, beginning from the start of the advertising activity and for