You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 3, 2024

Vietnam’s Draft Law on Data Takes Shape

Vietnam’s Ministry of Public Security (MPS) recently published on its website a dossier of the Draft Law on Data (the “Draft Law”) for public feedback, initiating a consultation period from February 26 to March 26, 2024. The dossier comprises a Policy Impact Assessment Report and a Summary Report on the implementation of existing legal documents governing data. An outline of the Draft Law was later circulated to relevant organizations for their input and commentary.

The MPS drafted this legislation with several objectives, including bolstering national data infrastructure, advancing digital government while streamlining administrative procedures, fostering growth in the digital economy and building a digital society, and establishing a National Data Center. Comprising 65 articles across 6 chapters, the Draft Law is slated for implementation on January 1, 2026.

The Draft Law currently is very preliminary, resembling a framework document. It features numerous provisions akin to policy mandates, yet only presents introductory concepts without further elaboration.

Scope of Application

The Draft Law applies to agencies, organizations, and individuals involved in data activities in Vietnam. This scope of application appears excessively broad and ambiguous, without a clear definition of “data activities”, leaving uncertainty regarding the breadth of this term’s coverage.

Key Policy Groups

The Draft Law focuses on four key policy groups:

  1. 1. Regulations on development, processing, and management of data

This policy group focuses on matters relating to the collection, digitalization, and creation of data; assurance of data quality; data classification; data storage; data combination, adjustment, and updating; data strategy; data management; data sharing; provision of data to state agencies; data analysis and synthesis; data verification and authentication; data disclosure; access and retrieval of data; data encryption and decryption; data copying, transmission, and transfer; data revocation, deletion, and destruction; application of science and technology in data processing; identification and management of risks in data processing; the National Data Development Fund; data protection; and international cooperation on data.

Article 8 of the Draft Law provides seven classifications of data: shared data, private-use data, open data, static data, dynamic data, analytical and statistical data, and master data. However, it does not address personal data and its classification into basic and sensitive personal data as outlined in Decree No. 13/2023/ND-CP on Personal Data Protection (“PDPD”). Consequently, it remains unclear how personal data fits within these classifications.

Article 14 of the Draft Law requires organizations and individuals to provide and disclose information and data to state agencies when requested, according to the provisions of law. A broad provision such as this could pose challenges in its application and increase the risk of misuse and abuse of authority.

  1. Regulations on National General Database

This policy group focuses on matters relating to synchronizing all information and data from national databases and specialized databases to a to-be-created National General Database; processing, administration, and sharing of data of the National General Database; responsibility for providing information and data of state agencies, political organizations, socio-political organizations, and other individuals and organizations; the relationship between the National General Database and national databases, specialized databases, national public service portals, and other databases and information systems; synchronization of databases of businesses, organizations, and individuals that voluntarily provide or are required to provide data to the National General Database in case of emergency response; and fees for the use of information in the National General Database.

Article 30 of the Draft Law sets out the obligation of Vietnamese and foreign individuals, organizations, and businesses operating in Vietnam to promptly provide, share, synchronize, and update data to the National General Database for general purposes upon receiving a written request. Again, this very broad provision will pose difficulties and challenges for businesses in implementation.

  1. Regulations on National Data Center

This policy group focuses on matters relating to the position and role of the National Data Center; registration and provision of National Data Center infrastructure resources to serve database management activities; administration, operation, and use of National Data Center infrastructure resources; upgrading, maintaining, and repairing National Data Center infrastructure; allocation of capital sources to build, develop, upgrade and prioritize investment in modern equipment for the National Data Center; the use of data sharing and coordination platform of the National Data Center to serve data sharing between the National Data Center and agencies and organizations; data protection at the National Data Center; and ensuring operational resources of the National Data Center.

  1. Regulations on data products and services

“Data products and services” are defined as products and services related to data processing activities for commercial purposes. The Draft Law lists various types, including data products and services in e-transactions, telecommunications, network security, and network information security, which will adhere to the respective laws governing these domains; data products and services in other specialized sectors, which will be subject to corresponding specialized laws and regulations; and data products and services subject to the regulations of the Draft Law, which include data products and services in data intermediary activities, data analysis and synthesis, data trading floors, and electronic authentication of data not linked to an electronic identity.

Observations

In other countries, the majority of regulations on data tend to focus on a number of fundamental issues aiming at fostering the growth of digital governance, digital societies, and digital economies. These include safeguarding personal data; enhancing network security; ensuring consumer protection in e-transactions; establishing e-government regulations; implementing electronic/digital authentication for secure online transactions and interactions; managing cross-border data flow/transfer; regulating content and social networks; promoting open data policies to enable public access to government data for fostering innovation and economic development; instituting regulations for national databases or data centers to uphold system security, confidentiality, and data integrity, and establishing regulatory frameworks or guidelines for emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, blockchain, and the Internet of Things to ensure responsible and ethical development and usage.

In addition to its ongoing efforts to develop regulatory frameworks or guidelines for emerging technologies, Vietnam already has comprehensive legislation in place to address nearly all of these significant aspects of data regulations, which are covered by the PDPD, the Law on Cybersecurity, the Law on Network Information Security, the Law on Consumer Protection, the Law on E-Transactions, Decree No. 59/2022/ND-CP on electronic identification and authentication, and other legislative documents. Drafting a Law on Data that aligns with these current data regulations, including sector-specific regulations, presents a formidable task that demands meticulous attention to prevent duplication, overlap, inconsistency, and the imposition of additional burdens. It is thus essential for stakeholders to closely follow the drafting process and actively engage by providing feedback and comments on the Draft Law.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 4, 2026
Foreign business restrictions on telecommunications, treasury center businesses, and intragroup support services were eased when Thailand published the Ministerial Regulation Prescribing Service Businesses Not Requiring Permission for Foreign Business Operations (No. 5) B.E. 2569 (2026) in the Government Gazette on August 28, 2026. The ministerial regulation expands the categories of service businesses that foreign investors may operate without a foreign business license (FBL) under the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542 (1999) (FBA). Of particular relevance to the telecommunications, fintech, and technology sectors, the ministerial regulation exempts: Type 1 telecommunications licensees, which do not have their own networks; Treasury center businesses operated in accordance with Thailand’s exchange control regulations; and Certain intragroup administrative, human resources, and information technology management services. Telecommunications Services Foreign-owned businesses providing telecommunications services under a type 1 telecommunications license may now operate without obtaining an FBL. This may streamline market entry for qualifying telecommunications and digital infrastructure businesses. The exemption applies only to the FBA licensing requirement. Operators must continue to comply with applicable requirements under the Telecommunications Business Act and the regulations of the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission, and the change does not affect foreign ownership restrictions applicable to type 2 or type 3 telecommunications businesses. Treasury Center Businesses The ministerial regulation also exempts qualifying treasury center businesses from the FBL requirement. This may facilitate centralized treasury functions in Thailand, including liquidity management, foreign exchange management, and intragroup funding arrangements. Treasury center operations remain subject to applicable requirements of the Bank of Thailand and other competent authorities. Intragroup Administrative, HR, and IT Services Certain administrative, human resources, and information technology management services provided between affiliated entities are also exempt, provided the relevant entities satisfy prescribed ownership or management criteria. The exemption is available where the service provider and recipient are related through specified ownership
September 2, 2026
Thailand and China have a longstanding and significant trade relationship, which increasingly extends to e-commerce and digitally enabled supply chains. While these channels create new opportunities for businesses to reach consumers across borders, their growth also brings greater exposure to intellectual property (IP) infringement across jurisdictions and online platforms. Effective cooperation between the two countries’ enforcement authorities has therefore become increasingly important. To strengthen cooperation in this area, Thailand and China signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) on IP enforcement in Beijing on July 20, 2026, during the Thai prime minister’s official visit to China. Officially titled “Memorandum of Understanding Between the State Administration for Market Regulation of the People’s Republic of China and the Ministry of Commerce of the Kingdom of Thailand on Cooperation in the Field of Intellectual Property Enforcement,” the MOU forms part of a broader bilateral agenda covering industrial and supply chains, participation by micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs), cooperation associated with the ASEAN–China Free Trade Area 3.0, and progress on the registration of Thai geographical indications in China. The MOU establishes a bilateral framework for cooperation and coordination in five broad areas: Strengthening dialogue in IP enforcement; Enhancing information sharing; Facilitating the enforcement of IP rights in cases arising in the parties’ domestic markets and on online platforms, in accordance with their respective domestic laws; Promoting cooperation in IP enforcement training and human resource development; and Undertaking other cooperation activities agreed upon by both sides. The Department of Intellectual Property (DIP) will serve as the principal coordinating agency for Thailand, while the Bureau of Law Enforcement and Inspection in China’s State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) will serve in that role for China. The framework is particularly relevant to the growth of e-commerce, as it covers infringement in the domestic markets and on
August 25, 2026
Vietnam has enacted a new decree establishing administrative penalties for violations in the fields of cybersecurity and personal data protection. Decree No. 330/2026/NĐ-CP (Decree 330), issued and effective from August 19, 2026, provides a detailed sanctions framework for noncompliance with the Law on Personal Data Protection (including its implementing regulations under Decree 356/2025/ND-CP) and the Law on Cybersecurity, together with their guiding decrees. The issuance of Decree 330 signals that the practical grace period previously perceived by many businesses may be drawing to a close, with active regulatory enforcement in these areas expected to commence in earnest. Scope and Key Provisions Decree 330 has extraterritorial effect and applies to both onshore and offshore companies. For offshore companies, it applies to those that (1) provide telecommunications, internet, online-content, information-technology, cybersecurity, or cross-border services and (2) are involved in or related to the processing of personal data of Vietnamese citizens and certain other people of Vietnamese origin. Decree 330’s key provisions cover the following areas: Administrative penalties for violations relating to the protection of national security and public order in cyberspace, including the dissemination of unlawful, false, or unverified information. Sanctions for cyberattacks, unauthorized access, introduction of harmful code or programs, and failure to cooperate with specialized cybersecurity forces. Sanctions for personal data protection violations, such as consent, cross-border data transfers, impact assessments, breach notification, and data-subject rights, among others—with maximum fines of up to 5% of an organization’s preceding-year revenue for cross-border transfer violations, or up to VND 3 billion for other data-protection breaches. Personal Data Protection Penalties The key sanctions for personal data protection violations are as follows: Consent violations: Fines of up to VND 70 million (approx. USD 2,642), plus potential additional sanctions and remedial measures including irreversible deletion of personal data collected without consent and confiscation of
August 25, 2026
Thailand’s Electronic Transactions Development Agency (ETDA) is studying potential new regulatory measures for digital platform services that could significantly expand the country’s digital platform governance framework. The ETDA has already conducted one public consultation session on the proposed measures and will hold additional sessions on August 25 and September 2, 2026, covering five types of platform services under the Royal Decree on Digital Platform Services B.E. 2565 (2022). The measures under study are preliminary and may be changed based on consultation outcomes. Foundational Measures Applicable to All Platform Types Seven baseline obligations would apply across all digital platform categories: Transparency reports. Platforms must prepare and publish statistical reports on platform governance activities, including the number of content items removed or restricted and appeal outcomes, in a comparable format. Notice and action mechanism. Platforms must establish minimum standards for channels to report potentially illegal content or goods, conduct case-by-case review, provide explanations when content is removed or restricted, and maintain an internal appeals channel. Rights over automated decision-making. Users significantly affected by automated decisions are granted rights to request an explanation, request human review, and contest the decision. Service level agreements (SLAs). Platforms must publish minimum standards for response times, processing timelines, progress notifications, and remedies for incidents on the platform. Labeling of AI-generated content. Content generated or modified by AI must carry visible labels and machine-readable metadata, with exceptions for creative works that disclose AI use in a nonmisleading manner. Prohibition of dark patterns. User interface designs that deceive, coerce, or distort user decision-making are prohibited, including hiding critical information, creating false urgency, or making service cancellation unreasonably difficult. Business user fairness. Platforms must meet minimum standards for the treatment of sellers, workers, and content creators, including advance notice of term changes, explanation of account suspensions or visibility reductions,