You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 25, 2025

Vietnam’s Draft Decrees on Establishment of and Trading in International Financial Centers

Subscribe to Updates

To implement the recently issued Resolution on International Financial Centers in Vietnam (“IFC Resolution”), which is set to take effect on September 1, 2025 (see our previous article), the government of Vietnam is making every effort to formulate and issue guiding decrees—up to eight in total—before the effective date of the resolution. These decrees will establish key principles, define the rights and obligations of stakeholders, and outline permissible business activities within the IFCs, and serve as a foundation for the legal framework of the IFCs.

Below are highlights of two draft decrees that have been released for public consultation.

Draft Decree on IFC Establishment

  • Ho Chi Minh City: The IFC in Ho Chi Minh City will focus on capital markets integrated with asset management services, fund management, insurance, financial products and financial derivatives; banking systems and money market products; fintech and financial innovation through sandbox mechanisms; specialized exchanges and new trading platforms; commodity markets, commodity and commodity derivatives exchanges linked to domestic and international physical commodity markets; and regional supply chain services, logistics hubs, maritime transport, and seaport infrastructure.
  • Da Nang: The IFC in Da Nang will mainly develop green finance and commercial finance for SMEs and innovative enterprises, non-resident organizations and individuals (i.e., offshore financial services); cross-border trade activities linked to free trade zones, high-tech zones, new economic zones, and industrial zones; pilot control mechanisms for emerging models, such as digital assets, cryptocurrencies, and digital payments and transfers; new exchanges and trading platforms; investment funds, remittance funds, and small and medium fund management companies; startups in financial solutions for consumer services, tourism, e-commerce, logistics, and services within free trade zones; and related support, advisory, development, and legal services.
  • Incentives: The People’s Committees of Ho Chi Minh City and Da Nang will need to decide on their list of incentivized sectors and incentive policies.
  • Dedicated agencies: The People’s Committees of Ho Chi Minh City and Da Nang will establish an executive agency and a supervisory agency, which will have certain duties, such as assessing IFC membership applications and operating the IFCs with a one-stop shop function for administrative procedures.
  • IFC membership: The decree will either specify conditions for membership (i.e., decided by the government) or delegate the executive agency to specify conditions for membership. In either case, members of one IFC are jointly recognized at both IFCs in Ho Chi Minh City and Da Nang.
  • Dispute resolution: The establishment of specialized dispute settlement bodies (i.e., a specialized court and an international arbitration center under the IFCs) will be governed by other relevant specialized laws and regulations, such as the Law on the Organization of People’s Courts and regulations of the government on international arbitration centers.

Draft Decree on Policies for Import-Export, Distribution of Goods and Services, Commodity Exchange, and Operation of Mercantile Exchange within IFCs

  • Trading platforms and exchanges: IFC members, subject to satisfaction of statutory conditions and requirements on financial capacity, technology infrastructure, personnel and data privacy, can establish trading platforms and exchanges within the IFCs in commodity and commodity derivatives, carbon credits, cultural and artistic products, precious metals, green financial products, specialized trading platforms, and new forms of trading platforms tailored to evolving development demands.
  • Mercantile exchange: A separate mercantile exchange will be established within the IFCs to organize the commodity and commodity derivatives market in the IFCs. The mercantile exchange will also organize and operate the commodity exchange in the IFCs.
  • Import and export: A special customs regime in the IFCs will be applied to streamline administrative procedures, enhance efficiency, and align with international best practices, such as automated and expedited clearance mechanisms, on-the-spot import and export, bonded warehouses, and container freight stations.
  • Distribution: Traders that are established and operated in the IFCs are permitted to engage in the following distribution activities and distribution supporting services:
    • Distribution activities: Goods trading (including wholesale, retail, export, import); commercial agency; franchising; and other lawful commercial activities, serving internal trade needs of the IFCs or connecting with external markets. Some state management measures in trading are also relaxed for the IFCs, such as the removal of requirements in preparing the Economic Needs Test dossier, obtaining a separate investment in-principle approval, and franchise notification.
    • Distribution supporting services: Logistics, warehousing, storage, and transportation; insurance, banking, and electronic payment services; legal, accounting, and auditing services; and digital services and platforms for sales and supply chain management.

Outlook

These draft decrees demonstrate the government’s delegation of responsibility to ministries and local authorities for completing a comprehensive regulatory framework, while ensuring timely adaptation to the financial market development and fluctuations. To ensure the full and effective operation of the IFCs, continued development and issuance of relevant local laws and regulations, as well as detailed guidelines by the ministries and local authorities, will be essential.

Related Professionals

Industries

Fintech

Practices

Banking and Finance

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

May 25, 2026
Thailand published new rules on May 1, 2026, establishing clear procedures for how the Anti-Money Laundering Office (AMLO) handles digital assets seized during criminal and money laundering investigations. Taking effect the following day, the Regulation of the Anti-Money Laundering Board on the Custody and Management of Seized or Frozen Assets (No. 3) B.E. 2569 applies to digital asset businesses, cryptocurrency holders, and anyone subject to asset seizure under Thailand’s anti-money laundering laws. For the first time, authorities now have a detailed roadmap for transferring seized digital property from private or foreign control into secure state custody. Digital asset businesses holding customer assets under investigation must be prepared to comply with these rules compelling repatriation of such assets in enforcement actions. Expanded Definition of Digital Assets The regulation defines digital assets to include not only those covered by Thailand’s existing digital asset business law but also any other property that can be stored using the same methods as digital assets. This broad formulation means the custody rules will apply to emerging blockchain-based assets and tokenized property that may not yet fall within the statutory definition of a digital asset business, giving authorities flexibility as the technology evolves. Mandatory Transfer to Domestic Custody When digital assets are held with service providers outside Thailand, AMLO will first attempt to transfer them to an account the office maintains with a licensed domestic digital asset business operator. If the domestic operator does not support that particular asset, the office will instead move the assets to its own cold wallet (offline, internet-isolated storage system). If neither option is feasible, the seizing official will report the situation to the Anti-Money Laundering Committee for alternative instructions. A similar hierarchy governs assets held in an accused party’s private wallet or by any third party that is not a
Read More
April 23, 2026
Vietnam has progressively positioned blockchain as a strategic technology within its broader digital transformation agenda over the past decade. From early policy orientations to more recent legislative developments, the regulatory approach has gradually shifted from high-level recognition to more concrete legal integration. Against this backdrop, a new draft decree regulating activities relating to product and goods identification, authentication, and traceability (the “Draft Decree”) marks a notable turning point. Rather than merely referencing blockchain as a policy priority, the Draft Decree incorporates blockchain directly into a nationwide regulatory system, positioning it as part of the underlying infrastructure for data governance and public administration in relation to the management, verification, and traceability of product-related data. Evolution of Vietnam’s Blockchain Legal Framework: The Draft Decree in Context Vietnam’s blockchain legal framework has developed in several distinct phases. The first phase, beginning around 2019, was characterized by high-level policy recognition in several resolutions of the Party Central Committee. Particularly, blockchain was identified as part of the broader category of digital technologies critical to industrial modernization and participation in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. These resolutions did not regulate blockchain directly, but established its strategic importance at the national level. The second phase (2023 to 2025) saw the introduction of national strategies and technology policies that more explicitly recognized blockchain as a priority technology. Those policies collectively signaled a clear policy commitment to developing blockchain infrastructure and applications. However, these instruments remained largely at a policy-level and did not establish binding regulatory frameworks. The third phase (from 2025) involves the gradual integration of blockchain into sectoral legislation. Laws such as the Law on Digital Technology Industry (2025), the Law on Personal Data Protection (2025), and the Law on Science, Technology, and Innovation (2025) have introduced concepts such as digital assets, crypto assets, and even specific
Read More
March 5, 2026
Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a criminal complaint against a licensed digital asset broker, its overseas trading platform, and its executives for allegedly operating an unlicensed digital asset exchange targeting Thai customers. The case marks an escalation in the SEC’s enforcement efforts against unlicensed offshore platforms that attempt to serve Thai users through local licensed entities. Criminal Complaint On February 20, 2026, the SEC filed a criminal complaint with the Economic Crime Suppression Division against a local licensed digital asset broker, its overseas global trading platform, and its executives. The SEC alleges that the parties violated the Digital Asset Business Emergency Decree B.E. 2561 (2018) by cooperatively operating a digital asset exchange business on a cross-border basis since 2023 without the required SEC license. According to the SEC, the local broker promoted the overseas platform’s services to the public through Thai-language posts on social media channels, with services available exclusively to customers residing in Thailand. Access to the global platform was provided through the local broker’s website and mobile application. Customers who registered for the local broker’s services were automatically granted access to the global platform without having to undergo a separate identity verification process. The SEC also found that the local broker provided back-office system support services to the global platform. The SEC considers these activities to constitute joint operation of an unlicensed digital asset exchange. The former executives of the local broker are being held liable as the responsible persons during the relevant period. The SEC emphasized that the complaint initiates the criminal process, and the decision to prosecute or convict the accused parties will ultimately be made by law enforcement authorities and the criminal courts. Platform Blocking The SEC has also coordinated with the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society to block public
Read More
February 27, 2026
The Bank of Thailand (BOT) has officially implemented a new regulatory framework supervising systemically important retail payment systems (SIRPS), effective February 21, 2026, with PromptPay being the first payment system designated as a SIRPS. Under this new set of regulations, the BOT may designate payment systems under the Payment Systems Act B.E. 2560 (2017) as SIRPSs based on quantitative and qualitative assessments. Once a system is designated as a SIRPS, the operator becomes subject to expanded supervisory obligations beyond the general requirements of the Payment Systems Act. Enhanced Supervisory Requirements SIRPS operators must comply with a heightened supervisory regime across three key areas, outlined below. 1. Governance SIRPS operators must maintain robust and transparent governance structures, including: Balanced board composition, with at least one-third of the board comprising independent directors who represent stakeholders in the system (such as payment service providers, consumers, and experts). Independent directors may serve for no more than two consecutive terms. Subcommittees to assist the board in overseeing compliance, policy implementation, and operational strategy. Clear separation between executives responsible for risk and information security and those overseeing day-to-day business operations. Risk Management and System SecuritySIRPS operators must implement comprehensive risk management frameworks, including: Clear service agreements between the SIRPS operator and its direct participants (payment service providers who connect directly to the SIRPS), defining roles and responsibilities among stakeholders. These agreements must include obligations for direct SIRPS participants to supervise any indirect participants they onboard to ensure compliance with service agreements and business rules. A business continuity plan covering both IT and non-IT aspects, with annual review. The SIRPS must target service availability comparable to international payment infrastructures, including the ability to recover operations within two hours of a disruption and to maintain scalable operational capacity. Tools and controls to monitor and manage material or
Read More