You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 25, 2025

Vietnam’s Digital Tech Industry Law: Building the Future of AI, Chips, and Digital Assets

Subscribe to Updates

Artificial intelligence (AI), semiconductors, and digital assets are considered critical drivers of Vietnam’s future economic growth and are fundamental to the nation’s digital transformation targets. These sectors form the core of Vietnam’s strategy to build a robust, globally competitive digital economy. This strategic direction gained substantial momentum with the issuance of the Law on Digital Technology Industry (DTI Law) on June 14, 2025.

The DTI Law was designed to attract investment, stimulate innovation, cultivate high-quality human resources, and ensure the responsible, secure, and sustainable growth of digital technologies like AI and digital assets, harmonizing Vietnam’s digital industry with international standards while safeguarding public interests and national security.

Several key provisions of the DTI Law took effect on July 1, 2025, and the law will become fully effective on January 1, 2026. The government is delegated to provide further necessary guidelines and details for implementation of the law.

Artificial Intelligence (AI): Principle-Driven and Risk-Based Regulations

Under the DTI Law, there are seven core principles guiding the development, provision, and use of AI which are applicable to AI developers, providers and deployers. These principles favor values-based governance over purely technical prescriptions, and include the following:

  • Taking a human-centered approach that upholds ethical values, inclusivity, flexibility, equality, and non-discrimination.
  • Ensuring transparency, accountability, and explainability, with AI systems remaining under human control.
  • Maintaining cybersecurity and system safety.
  • Adherence to data protection and privacy regulations.
  • Having the ability to control AI algorithms and models.
  • Effective risk management throughout the entire lifecycle of AI systems.
  • Compliance with consumer protection laws and other relevant legal frameworks.

AI system management follows a risk-based approach, with the law categorizing systems into high-risk, high-impact, and other groups. High-risk AI systems are those that, in certain applications, may pose significant threats or harm to individuals or the public interest while high-impact systems are designed for multi-purpose use, involving a large user base, extensive parameters, and massive data processing capabilities.

Both high-risk and high-impact systems are subject to stringent regulatory requirements, including technical requirements, transparency in data storage and disclosure, data governance, monitoring and inspection, cybersecurity, and other applicable obligations. Enterprises developing or deploying such systems should therefore begin mapping their AI inventories and preparing documented risk assessments to accelerate future compliance.

AI systems that directly interact with humans must clearly notify their users of their AI aspects. Additionally, digital technology products generated by AI, if listed in the official list issued by the Minister of Science and Technology, must carry identifiable markers detectable by either users or machines.

Semiconductors: Building a Competitive and Vertically Integrated Ecosystem

Vietnam’s semiconductor industry development is guided by four key principles:

  • Focusing on breakthrough semiconductor chip development across sectors, closely linked to the global semiconductor ecosystem (research, design, manufacturing, packaging, testing).
  • Aligning semiconductor development with the electronics industry, with a focus on specialized electronic devices in various sectors.
  • Ensuring sufficient and high-quality human resources for the semiconductor industry.
  • Promoting foreign investment and mobilizing both domestic and international resources to master semiconductor chip technology, design, and production.

The government will establish a semiconductor development strategy based on these four principles and aligned with Vietnam’s socio-economic strategies and management needs. Enterprises are encouraged to closely follow up the country’s semiconductor development strategy to identify potential opportunities for its benefits.

Digital Assets: Legally Recognized for the First Time

For the first time in Vietnamese legislation, the DTI Law recognizes digital assets as property expressed in data form and created, issued, stored, or transferred through digital technologies. The law further classifies them into: (i) virtual assets (excluding securities, digital fiat currency, and other regulated financial assets); (ii) crypto assets (excluding securities, digital fiat currency, and other regulated financial assets), and (iii) other digital assets.

The management of digital assets encompasses several aspects, including establishing and transferring ownership; regulating rights and obligations of involved parties; ensuring cybersecurity, preventing money laundering and terrorist financing; inspection and enforcement; and conditions for businesses providing services crypto asset services.

Incentives for AI and Semiconductor Industries

Vietnam’s DTI Law offers a robust package of investment incentives for projects in AI system development, AI data centers, and semiconductor chip R&D and production, including design, packaging, and testing. These projects are classified as specially prioritized investment sectors and benefit from preferential treatment in areas such as taxation, land use rights, and access to other legal benefits. The government may also provide direct financial support for infrastructure, equipment, and factory construction through local development budgets. Enterprises in these sectors are eligible for customs-related advantages to facilitate import and export activities.

Innovative startups in AI and semiconductors are similarly prioritized, qualifying for incentives under investment, tax, and land laws, and may receive direct funding for workforce training, talent acquisition, R&D, pilot production, consulting, and technology upgrades. The law introduces additional special mechanisms for the semiconductor industry, extending incentives to projects producing materials, machinery, and components that directly support chip manufacturing. Importation of used equipment for semiconductor production is allowed if it meets technical criteria set by the Ministry of Science and Technology, with enterprises required to self-certify compliance. Finally, the law provides targeted support for businesses participating in the semiconductor supply chain, further strengthening Vietnam’s position as a competitive hub for digital technology investment.

Outlook

Although the DTI Law mainly provides a framework and policy-oriented provisions, with specific regulations still needing to be set out in future decrees and circulars, it is essential for businesses to stay ahead of emerging policy trends and regulatory directions shaping the development of Vietnam’s strategic digital technology sectors. Understanding these directions can help businesses seize investment opportunities and gain a first-mover advantage in the fast-evolving digital technology industry. Companies are also encouraged to closely monitor forthcoming guiding regulations under the DTI Law to ensure compliance and fully capitalize on investment incentives and support when rolling out their products and services in the Vietnamese market.

Related Professionals

Industries

Technology

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

March 6, 2026
Thailand’s Legislation Consideration Committee of the Ministry of Interior has ruled that in-game loot boxes in online games do not constitute gambling under the Gambling Act B.E. 2478 (1935). This first-of-its-kind ruling provides useful guidance for online game operators and digital entertainment companies operating in Thailand. Background The ruling came in response to an inquiry concerning an online role-playing game operator that launched a campaign featuring a loot box mechanism. The mechanism allowed players to purchase a token in exchange for the opportunity to receive a virtual loot box containing randomized in-game items. The key features of this were as follows: The items received were digital, noncash items usable only within the game. The items could not be exchanged, redeemed, or converted into cash with the game operator. Items may differ in rarity but remain purely virtual. The central question was whether paying money to obtain randomized in-game items constituted a risk-based activity involving the chance to receive money or property of monetary value, which would constitute gambling under the Gambling Act. Committee Ruling The committee reached the following conclusions regarding the characteristics of the game’s loot-box mechanism: No cash or monetary equivalent: Players did not receive cash or property that could be exchanged for cash. The in-game items were merely usage rights within the online game ecosystem. No real-world monetary valuation: There was no determination of item value in real currency, and no mechanism for redeeming or converting items into money with the game operator. Any off-platform trading of in-game items between players is irrelevant to online game operators, as any value arising from such transactions is determined by the market rather than by the operators themselves. Service fee characterization: Payments made by players purchasing in-game loot boxes constituted fees for online game services. Accordingly, the committee concluded
Read More
March 5, 2026
Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a criminal complaint against a licensed digital asset broker, its overseas trading platform, and its executives for allegedly operating an unlicensed digital asset exchange targeting Thai customers. The case marks an escalation in the SEC’s enforcement efforts against unlicensed offshore platforms that attempt to serve Thai users through local licensed entities. Criminal Complaint On February 20, 2026, the SEC filed a criminal complaint with the Economic Crime Suppression Division against a local licensed digital asset broker, its overseas global trading platform, and its executives. The SEC alleges that the parties violated the Digital Asset Business Emergency Decree B.E. 2561 (2018) by cooperatively operating a digital asset exchange business on a cross-border basis since 2023 without the required SEC license. According to the SEC, the local broker promoted the overseas platform’s services to the public through Thai-language posts on social media channels, with services available exclusively to customers residing in Thailand. Access to the global platform was provided through the local broker’s website and mobile application. Customers who registered for the local broker’s services were automatically granted access to the global platform without having to undergo a separate identity verification process. The SEC also found that the local broker provided back-office system support services to the global platform. The SEC considers these activities to constitute joint operation of an unlicensed digital asset exchange. The former executives of the local broker are being held liable as the responsible persons during the relevant period. The SEC emphasized that the complaint initiates the criminal process, and the decision to prosecute or convict the accused parties will ultimately be made by law enforcement authorities and the criminal courts. Platform Blocking The SEC has also coordinated with the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society to block public
Read More
February 27, 2026
The Bank of Thailand (BOT) has officially implemented a new regulatory framework supervising systemically important retail payment systems (SIRPS), effective February 21, 2026, with PromptPay being the first payment system designated as a SIRPS. Under this new set of regulations, the BOT may designate payment systems under the Payment Systems Act B.E. 2560 (2017) as SIRPSs based on quantitative and qualitative assessments. Once a system is designated as a SIRPS, the operator becomes subject to expanded supervisory obligations beyond the general requirements of the Payment Systems Act. Enhanced Supervisory Requirements SIRPS operators must comply with a heightened supervisory regime across three key areas, outlined below. 1. Governance SIRPS operators must maintain robust and transparent governance structures, including: Balanced board composition, with at least one-third of the board comprising independent directors who represent stakeholders in the system (such as payment service providers, consumers, and experts). Independent directors may serve for no more than two consecutive terms. Subcommittees to assist the board in overseeing compliance, policy implementation, and operational strategy. Clear separation between executives responsible for risk and information security and those overseeing day-to-day business operations. Risk Management and System SecuritySIRPS operators must implement comprehensive risk management frameworks, including: Clear service agreements between the SIRPS operator and its direct participants (payment service providers who connect directly to the SIRPS), defining roles and responsibilities among stakeholders. These agreements must include obligations for direct SIRPS participants to supervise any indirect participants they onboard to ensure compliance with service agreements and business rules. A business continuity plan covering both IT and non-IT aspects, with annual review. The SIRPS must target service availability comparable to international payment infrastructures, including the ability to recover operations within two hours of a disruption and to maintain scalable operational capacity. Tools and controls to monitor and manage material or
Read More
February 26, 2026
Thailand is preparing to offer new tools for intellectual property enforcement as the Electronic Transactions Development Agency (ETDA) recently released for public consultation a draft notification requiring social media platforms to verify user identities and conduct know-your-customer (KYC) checks on advertisers. The draft Notification of the Electronic Transactions Commission on Measures to Prevent Technological Crimes for Social Media Service Providers, which is to be issued under the Emergency Decree on Measures for the Prevention and Suppression of Technological Crimes B.E. 2566 (2023), as amended in 2025, primarily aims to combat online fraud and technology-related crimes. However, its new obligations also provide IP owners with valuable tools to identify anonymous infringers. Key Regulatory Mandates The draft notification imposes several verification requirements on social media platforms operating in Thailand. These requirements also strengthen IP rights holders’ ability to identify anonymous infringers, as platforms must: Verify user identities through registered phone numbers and link all accounts to verifiable identities. Conduct KYC checks on advertisers, including individuals, companies, and any third-party payers. Perform heightened identity checks for high-risk or repeat offenders before publishing advertisements. Promptly remove content flagged by the Anti-Technology Crime Division and prescreen advertisements for prohibited or high-risk content. How IP Owners Can Use This Notification for Enforcement The phone number–based verification requirement enables IP owners to work more effectively with enforcement authorities in tracing individuals or entities responsible for infringing content. The comprehensive advertiser KYC obligations, including mandatory disclosure of third-party payment sources, create a clear audit trail even when bad actors attempt to obscure their identity through intermediaries or shell accounts. This traceability is essential for pursuing damages and dismantling organized counterfeit operations. The ETDA is now considering adjustments to the draft notification after receiving comments during the public consultation period, which ended on February 2, 2026. Following finalization
Read More