You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 18, 2020

Vietnam’s Decree 24 Provides Further Guidance on Alcohol Consumption, Advertising, and Trading

Subscribe to Updates

On February 24, 2020, the government of Vietnam issued Decree No. 24/2020/ND-CP (“Decree 24”) providing detailed guidance on the 2019 Law on Prevention and Control of Harmful Effects of Alcoholic Beverages (the “Law on Alcoholic Beverages”), which took effect on January 1, 2020. Among other things, Decree 24 provides further guidance about the restrictions on consumption, advertising, and trading of alcoholic beverages. Below is a summary of these provisions:

Consumption of alcoholic beverages

Under the Law on Alcoholic Beverages and Decree 24, it is prohibited to consume alcoholic beverages at the locations below:

  1. Healthcare facilities;
  2. Educational institutions during teaching, learning and working hours;
  3. Daycare and recreational centers and facilities for minors (persons under the age of 18);
  4. Detoxification centers, compulsory educational institutions, reform schools, prisons, and other detention facilities;
  5. Social protection centers;
  6. Workplaces of state authorities, political organizations, socio-political organizations, socio-political-professional organizations and public service providers during working hours, except in places that are licensed to sell alcoholic beverages;
  7. Parks, except for restaurants within the park grounds which were licensed to sell alcoholic beverages before the effective date of Decree 24;
  8. Bus stations; and
  9. Cinemas, theatres, cultural establishments, and sports facilities during the time that activities/events are taking place in accordance with the primary uses of those facilities, except in cases of culinary and cultural festivals using alcoholic beverages.

Locations 7-9 were newly added by Decree 24.

Decree 24 additionally restricts the depiction of alcohol consumption in movies, TV shows, or theatrical works. For example, actors cannot be shown consuming alcoholic beverages in the prohibited areas mentioned above, and they cannot praise the success of alcoholic beverage companies. Depictions of alcohol consumption will also be a factor in classifying films by age-appropriate audience.

Advertising and trading of alcoholic beverages

Under the Law on Alcoholic Beverages, advertising of beverages with 15% alcohol content or higher is prohibited, while advertising of beverages with under 15% alcohol content (including beer) is restricted. Decree 24 provides further guidance on the restrictions as follows:

  • Advertising or trading of alcoholic beverages using electronic platforms, including social media, must apply necessary measures to ensure that minors cannot access the advertisements and are not able to purchase the alcoholic beverages.
  • Advertisements of alcoholic beverages must declare, visually or aurally, one of the following warning contents: “Drinking alcoholic beverages can cause traffic accidents,” “Drinking alcoholic beverages can affect fetal health,” or “Persons under the age of 18 are not allowed to drink alcoholic beverages.”
  • For alcoholic beverages with under 5.5% alcohol content, advertising by audiovisual means must not be conducted right before, during, or right after programs for children or during the time from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. under the Law on Alcoholic Beverages, except in the case of live broadcasts of sporting events from foreign countries. Decree 24 adds to this exception by permitting advertising from event sponsors during the live broadcasts of regional, continental or world sporting events held in Vietnam.
  • Outdoor advertisements of alcoholic beverages with under 5.5% alcohol content must satisfy national technical standards on size and minimum distance from restricted areas (200 meters from general educational and recreational establishments for minors, and 100 meters from vocational training establishments and universities, except for signboards of outlets trading in alcoholic beverages).

It is worth noting that the final two points above do not mean that the advertising of alcoholic beverages with under 5.5% alcohol content is more strictly regulated than for alcoholic beverages with higher alcohol content. Under the Law on Alcoholic Beverages, alcoholic beverages with 5.5% alcohol content or higher are already subject to stricter regulations in these areas.

Implementation

Decree 24 took effect on the date of issuance, February 24, 2020. Any advertising or trading activities conducted or implemented after this date must meet the above conditions. Activities and advertisements violating the above provisions that were conducted or produced before this date may continue to be carried out until June 30, 2020, or until the expiry of the advertising contract; such advertising contracts may not be renewed after expiry.

For more information on Decree 24, please contact us at [email protected].

Related Professionals

Industries

Life Sciences

Technology

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Regulatory Affairs

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 20, 2026
On July 16, 2026, Thailand’s Personal Data Protection Committee (PDPC) published a notification in the Government Gazette establishing detailed rules governing data subjects’ right of access under section 30 of the Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562 (2019) (PDPA). The notification will take effect 60 days after publication—mid-September 2026—giving data controllers a limited window to bring their processes into compliance. Scope The notification covers requests to access or obtain copies of personal data and requests for disclosure of the source of data collected without consent. Data subjects may exercise their rights directly or through authorized representatives. Key Requirements Important requirements set by the notification include the following: Required request channels. Controllers must provide at least two request channels: direct submission at the business location and registered mail. Electronic channels are optional but, if offered, may also be used for fulfilling requests. Request contents. Requests must be in writing or in electronic form and include the data subject’s name, the preferred access method, details of the data requested, and the requester’s signature. Controllers may request additional identifying information as needed. Identity and authority verification. Controllers may require official identity documents for verification. Authorized representatives must provide authorization documents and identity documents for both the data subject and the representative. Alternative verification methods (e.g., digital authentication) are permitted if they do not unreasonably obstruct data subjects’ rights. Review and response timelines. Controllers must review requests within 15 days. If the request is incomplete, the controller must notify the requester and allow at least 15 days to correct deficiencies. If not corrected, the request may be treated as abandoned. Once verified, controllers must fulfill requests within 30 days, extendable by another 30 days for large-volume or complex requests with notice to the requester. Methods for providing access or copies. Controllers may fulfill
Read More
July 16, 2026
Thailand’s Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee (PDPC) published a series of draft guidance documents for public consultation on July 7, 2026. Issued under the Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562 (2019) (PDPA), the drafts address a range of compliance issues and offer insight into the regulator’s current enforcement priorities. This article examines two of those drafts: one on lawful bases for processing personal data, and another on marketing and direct marketing. Together, they reflect the Office of the PDPC’s evolving expectations on lawful-basis selection, accountability, and the use of personal data in marketing. Organizations operating in Thailand should assess the practical implications now, before the guidance is finalized. Lawful Bases: A Structured Selection Process The draft guidance on lawful bases introduces a systematic five-step process for selecting an appropriate lawful basis for each processing activity. Organizations are expected to: Identify the processing activity involved. Assess the appropriate lawful basis. Evaluate whether the data is necessary for the processing. Conduct a legitimate interest assessment (LIA) where applicable. Ensure transparency through privacy notices. The guidance provides practical explanations and examples for each lawful basis under section 24 of the PDPA—including archiving, research, statistics, vital interests, contractual necessity, legal obligation, public task, legitimate interests, and consent—as well as the bases applicable to sensitive personal data under section 26. The aim is to promote more consistent and accurate lawful-basis selection across public- and private-sector organizations. A recurring theme throughout the guidance is that organizations should select the lawful basis that most accurately reflects the actual purpose and circumstances of the processing activity. The guidance cautions against treating consent as a default or catch-all basis where another lawful basis is more appropriate. For processing based on legitimate interests, organizations should conduct and document an LIA. Processing involving sensitive personal data may require
Read More
July 14, 2026
Thailand’s National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission (NBTC) has published guidelines establishing a risk-based framework for the responsible use of artificial intelligence by telecom licensees. Released on July 2, 2026, the Guidelines on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Telecommunications Services address governance structures, ethical principles, lifecycle management, and consumer protection obligations. Scope and Legal Context The nonbinding guidelines apply to holders of telecom business licenses under Thailand’s telecom licensing laws, but only with respect to the use of AI in providing licensed telecom services. Entities without such licenses are not directly subject to the guidelines, though they may be affected as third-party AI solution providers to licensees. The guidelines supplement and should be read alongside existing laws, including the Cybersecurity Act, the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA), the Computer Crime Act, and the NBTC Notification regarding Measures to Protect Telecommunications Service Users’ Rights Regarding Personal Data, Privacy Rights, and Freedom of Telecommunications, as well as forthcoming AI governance legislation being drafted by the ETDA. AI Governance Structure Licensees are expected to establish committees, working groups, or designated officers at both policy and operational levels to set strategic direction for AI use, formulate governance policies and tools, and oversee risk management. Roles, responsibilities, and accountability should be clearly defined for all personnel across every stage of the AI lifecycle—including for third-party AI solution providers and outsourced service providers, whose obligations should be explicitly documented in service agreements. Core Principles The guidelines identify six core principles that licensees should adhere to when deploying AI: Compliance with laws, ethics, and international standards: AI should respect privacy, dignity, and human rights, and content filtering for inputs and outputs should be considered. For example, the AI should not be designed and developed to be used in generating false information, supporting illegal activities, or causing
Read More
July 13, 2026
Indonesia’s Halal Product Assurance Agency (BPJPH) has issued new regulations establishing clearer procedures for imposing administrative sanctions on businesses that violate halal product assurance requirements. BPJPH Regulation No. 2 of 2026 on the Imposition of Administrative Sanctions for Violations of Halal Product Assurance Implementation, issued on June 5, 2026, strengthens Indonesia’s halal compliance framework, as mandated under Law No. 33 of 2014 on Halal Product Assurance and Government Regulation No. 42 of 2024 on the Implementation of Halal Product Assurance. BPJPH Regulation No. 2/2026 also supports the upcoming mandatory halal compliance deadline of October 17, 2026, which will apply to a broad range of products and services, including imported food and beverages, slaughtering products and services, natural and quasi-drugs, health supplements, cosmetics, chemical and genetically engineered products, clothing and accessories, household goods, prayer equipment, stationery, and class A medical devices. Scope BPJPH is authorized to impose administrative sanctions for violations of halal product assurance requirements committed by businesses, halal inspection agencies (LPH), halal auditors, halal product process companion institutions (lembaga pendamping PPH), and halal product process companions (pendamping PPH). The head of BPJPH has authority to determine, cancel, or amend the imposition of administrative sanctions, including upon receipt of objections. This authority covers revocation of Halal Certificates (including foreign halal certificate registration numbers), withdrawal of goods from circulation, freezing of LPH operations, freezing of halal product process companion institutions, revocation of PPH companion institution registration numbers, revocation of halal auditor registration numbers, and revocation of LPH accreditation status. Administrative Sanctions Businesses may be subject to any of the following administrative sanctions: Written warning; Administrative fine; Revocation of the halal certificate, including revocation of foreign halal certificate registration numbers; and Withdrawal of goods from circulation. The regulation sets out the types of violations that may trigger these sanctions, with each
Read More