You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 18, 2020

Vietnam’s Decree 24 Provides Further Guidance on Alcohol Consumption, Advertising, and Trading

Subscribe to Updates

On February 24, 2020, the government of Vietnam issued Decree No. 24/2020/ND-CP (“Decree 24”) providing detailed guidance on the 2019 Law on Prevention and Control of Harmful Effects of Alcoholic Beverages (the “Law on Alcoholic Beverages”), which took effect on January 1, 2020. Among other things, Decree 24 provides further guidance about the restrictions on consumption, advertising, and trading of alcoholic beverages. Below is a summary of these provisions:

Consumption of alcoholic beverages

Under the Law on Alcoholic Beverages and Decree 24, it is prohibited to consume alcoholic beverages at the locations below:

  1. Healthcare facilities;
  2. Educational institutions during teaching, learning and working hours;
  3. Daycare and recreational centers and facilities for minors (persons under the age of 18);
  4. Detoxification centers, compulsory educational institutions, reform schools, prisons, and other detention facilities;
  5. Social protection centers;
  6. Workplaces of state authorities, political organizations, socio-political organizations, socio-political-professional organizations and public service providers during working hours, except in places that are licensed to sell alcoholic beverages;
  7. Parks, except for restaurants within the park grounds which were licensed to sell alcoholic beverages before the effective date of Decree 24;
  8. Bus stations; and
  9. Cinemas, theatres, cultural establishments, and sports facilities during the time that activities/events are taking place in accordance with the primary uses of those facilities, except in cases of culinary and cultural festivals using alcoholic beverages.

Locations 7-9 were newly added by Decree 24.

Decree 24 additionally restricts the depiction of alcohol consumption in movies, TV shows, or theatrical works. For example, actors cannot be shown consuming alcoholic beverages in the prohibited areas mentioned above, and they cannot praise the success of alcoholic beverage companies. Depictions of alcohol consumption will also be a factor in classifying films by age-appropriate audience.

Advertising and trading of alcoholic beverages

Under the Law on Alcoholic Beverages, advertising of beverages with 15% alcohol content or higher is prohibited, while advertising of beverages with under 15% alcohol content (including beer) is restricted. Decree 24 provides further guidance on the restrictions as follows:

  • Advertising or trading of alcoholic beverages using electronic platforms, including social media, must apply necessary measures to ensure that minors cannot access the advertisements and are not able to purchase the alcoholic beverages.
  • Advertisements of alcoholic beverages must declare, visually or aurally, one of the following warning contents: “Drinking alcoholic beverages can cause traffic accidents,” “Drinking alcoholic beverages can affect fetal health,” or “Persons under the age of 18 are not allowed to drink alcoholic beverages.”
  • For alcoholic beverages with under 5.5% alcohol content, advertising by audiovisual means must not be conducted right before, during, or right after programs for children or during the time from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. under the Law on Alcoholic Beverages, except in the case of live broadcasts of sporting events from foreign countries. Decree 24 adds to this exception by permitting advertising from event sponsors during the live broadcasts of regional, continental or world sporting events held in Vietnam.
  • Outdoor advertisements of alcoholic beverages with under 5.5% alcohol content must satisfy national technical standards on size and minimum distance from restricted areas (200 meters from general educational and recreational establishments for minors, and 100 meters from vocational training establishments and universities, except for signboards of outlets trading in alcoholic beverages).

It is worth noting that the final two points above do not mean that the advertising of alcoholic beverages with under 5.5% alcohol content is more strictly regulated than for alcoholic beverages with higher alcohol content. Under the Law on Alcoholic Beverages, alcoholic beverages with 5.5% alcohol content or higher are already subject to stricter regulations in these areas.

Implementation

Decree 24 took effect on the date of issuance, February 24, 2020. Any advertising or trading activities conducted or implemented after this date must meet the above conditions. Activities and advertisements violating the above provisions that were conducted or produced before this date may continue to be carried out until June 30, 2020, or until the expiry of the advertising contract; such advertising contracts may not be renewed after expiry.

For more information on Decree 24, please contact us at [email protected].

Related Professionals

Industries

Life Sciences

Technology

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Regulatory Affairs

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 4, 2026
Thailand’s Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562 (2019) (PDPA) could soon see some important changes, as a draft bill to amend the PDPA has been introduced in the House of Representatives. The draft amendment is currently in the public consultation phase, with comments accepted from July 16 to August 15, 2026. If enacted in its current form, the amendment would make three key changes: expanding the government exemption to cover anticorruption operations, introducing a statutory definition of “government agency,” and restructuring the lawful bases for personal data processing to align with international standards. Background The PDPA has encountered several enforcement challenges since its implementation, including three core problems identified by the bill’s sponsors: (1) the current exemptions for government agencies do not cover anticorruption and misconduct-prevention operations; (2) the PDPA lacks a clear statutory definition of “government agency,” causing legal uncertainty as to which entities are covered; and (3) the existing framework for lawful bases of data processing does not align with international standards—particularly the multiple-lawful-bases system in the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)—making compliance inflexible for both government and private sector entities. Expanded Government Exemption The current PDPA exempts government agencies performing duties related to national security (including fiscal security), public safety, anti-money laundering, forensic science, and cybersecurity. The proposed amendment adds “prevention and suppression of corruption and misconduct” to this list of exempted functions. This would allow anticorruption bodies—most notably the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC), which is identified as a directly affected party—to collect, use, and disclose personal data without being subject to PDPA requirements when carrying out their duties. New Statutory Definition of “Government Agency” Notably, while the current PDPA use the term “government agency” in several provisions, the term is not comprehensively defined, creating potential uncertainty as to its scope. The draft bill therefore
Read More
August 3, 2026
On July 23, 2026, the Bank of Thailand (BOT) released for public comment its draft Notification on Digital Channel Security, which would significantly expand the scope and stringency of Thailand’s existing mobile banking security framework. If finalized in its current form, the draft notification would extend mandatory security requirements to credit card providers and credit providers, cover internet banking in addition to mobile applications, phase out SMS one-time passwords (OTPs) for transaction authentication, and introduce biometric verification requirements for high-value transactions. The public comment period is open through August 24, 2026. Background The BOT’s existing Mobile Banking Security Notification, issued in 2024, sets minimum security standards for financial institutions, specialized financial institutions (SFIs), and e-money providers, significantly reducing “money-draining app” fraud. However, fraudsters have since shifted to nonbank providers and internet banking channels, prompting the BOT to propose broader security requirements. Expanded Scope of Regulated Entities and Channels The existing Mobile Banking Security Notification covers only financial institutions, SFIs, and e-money providers offering mobile banking services. The draft expands coverage in two key areas: entities and channels. On the entity side, it adds credit card providers and credit providers that offer fund transfers to third parties at other financial service providers or that provide cash withdrawal services to individual retail customers. On the channel side, it broadens coverage to include internet banking in addition to mobile banking. Strengthened Customer Authentication The draft introduces enhanced authentication requirements in three areas: Service enrollment and device changes. Providers must implement rigorous identity verification, notify customers of enrollment results through out-of-band communication channels, and adopt risk-mitigation measures such as cooling-off periods and temporary transaction limits. Transaction-level authentication. Providers must use two-factor authentication for fund transfers, cardless ATM withdrawals, and transaction limit increases. Secure authentication factors. Key requirements include the following: “What-you-know” factors must
Read More
July 28, 2026
Data protection officers (DPOs) have become a fixture of Thailand’s privacy compliance landscape since the Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562 (2019) (PDPA) took full effect and the Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee (PDPC) began requiring certain organizations to appoint them. On July 7, 2026, the Office of the PDPC presented draft guidance on DPOs as part of a public consultation on a series of draft personal data protection manuals and recommendations. The draft offers the clearest indication yet of how the regulator expects the DPO role to work in practice, addressing recurring implementation issues under the PDPA—including when an organization must appoint a DPO, how the DPO should operate independently, how to manage conflicts of interest, and how data subjects and regulators should be able to contact the DPO. Because it remains in draft, organizations have an opportunity to weigh the practical implications now before the guidance is finalized. When a DPO Must Be Appointed The draft guidance clarifies the triggers for mandatory DPO appointment, including: Regular and systematic monitoring of personal data or systems on a large scale, such as tracking, analyzing, or predicting behavior, attitudes, or individual characteristics. Core activities involving large-scale processing of sensitive personal data, such as health data, biometric data, or criminal records. Certain foreign-organization representative arrangements. Public-sector coverage under relevant notifications identifying government entities that must appoint a DPO. Processing involving 100,000 or more data subjects may be considered large-scale. The guidance also contemplates voluntary DPO appointment for organizations that wish to raise their privacy governance standards, and such organizations should still comply with the standards applicable to DPOs under the law. Independence and Reporting Lines The draft guidance identifies lack of DPO independence as a core risk because an ineffective or constrained DPO may be unable to raise deficiencies
Read More
July 27, 2026
Vietnam’s new E-Commerce Law, which took effect on 1 July 2026 along with its implementing Decree No. 248/2026/ND-CP (Decree 248), marks a significant development in the country’s approach to online intellectual property (IP) enforcement, reflecting a clear shift from a reactive model of intermediary liability to one that expects platforms to play a more active role in preventing infringement. From notice-and-takedown to platform responsibility The most significant change introduced by the E-Commerce Law is the transformation of the legal role of e-commerce platforms. The existing safe harbor provisions under the IP Law and the copyright notice-and-takedown regime established by Decree 17/2023/ND-CP (Decree 17) largely required intermediaries to act only after receiving notice of infringement. Once infringing content had been removed, the platform’s legal obligation was generally considered fulfilled. The new legislation adopts a fundamentally different approach. Article 17 of the E-Commerce Law requires intermediary platforms to screen information relating to goods and services before publication in order to prevent listings involving counterfeit or IP-infringing goods, and goods of unknown origin. Rather than relying exclusively on complaints from rights holders, platforms are now expected to implement preventive measures before infringing listings become publicly available. Decree 248 further requires platforms to update keyword filters based on recommendations issued by competent authorities. These filtering mechanisms are intended to prevent prohibited listings from appearing on the platform and represent a further move away from a purely complaint-driven enforcement model. The legislation also introduces Vietnam’s first statutory stay-down obligation. Under the E-Commerce Law and Decree 248, major digital platforms must maintain automated systems capable of reviewing, warning against, and removing unlawful listings while also implementing measures to prevent repeat violations, defined under Decree 248 as conduct that has previously been identified and handled by the platform, but continues to recur. This obligation addresses one
Read More