You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 19, 2022

Vietnam Updates Regulations on Organization and Operation of Private Schools

Subscribe to Updates

On December 30, 2021, Vietnam’s Ministry of Education and Training issued Circular No. 40/2021/TT-BGDDT promulgating the Regulations on Organization and Operation of Private Primary Schools, Secondary Schools, High Schools, and Multi-level Schools (Circular 40), which took effect on February 14, 2022, replacing Circular No. 13/2011/TT-BGDDT.

Circular 40 sets forth provisions for the organization and operation of private primary and secondary schools, including regulations on school organization and management; teachers, administrators, staff, and students; facilities, finances and assets; inspection, examination, and accreditation of education quality, rewards, and handling of violations.

School Board

Circular 40 has replaced the term “Board of Management” of the school, which had previously caused much confusion and misunderstanding under Circular 13, with the term “School Board.” Similarly, to avoid any confusion and inconsistency, Circular 40 also has removed regulations on “members’ councils,” which would typically be subject to the laws on enterprises, but are not under the regulations on schools.

The provisions related to the School Board, summarized below, are the most significant changes introduced by Circular 40.

Establishment and Composition

Circular 40 affirms that the School Board of a private high school is the governing body of the school.

The members of the School Board of a private school comprise representatives of the investors and members within and outside the school who are elected or decided upon by a meeting of the investors, and recognized by the competent authority (e.g., chairperson of the district or provincial People’s Committee, depending on the level of the school). Any changes to the members of the School Board must be submitted annually to the competent authority for recognition.

The term of the School Board is five years. In a new requirement under Circular 40, the School Board must have an odd number of members, with at least five and no more than 15 people.

Rights and Obligations

Under Article 7.4 of Circular 40, the School Board has the following rights and obligations:

  • To decide on the school’s strategy, vision, and development plan, to submit to the investor’s or owner’s meeting for approval.
  • To decide on the regulations on the organization and operation of the school, to submit to the investor’s or owner’s meeting for approval.
  • To approve the plan on organizational structure and issues related to the organization and personnel of the school on the basis of the proposal of the principal; to recommend the addition or dismissal of members of the School Board; to propose the recognition or dismissal of the principal or vice-principal of the school, to submit to the investor’s or owner’s meeting for approval and to submit to the competent authority for consideration and decision on recognition.
  • To approve the school’s educational plan; to supervise enrollment activities and the organization and implementation of activities according to the school’s educational plan.
  • To supervise the implementation of resolutions of the School Board, the management of the school’s finances and properties, and the implementation of the democratic regulations in the school’s activities.

 School Board Meetings

Under Article 7.5 of Circular 40, meetings of the School Board are regulated as follows:

  • Regular meetings must be held at least three times per year.
  • A meeting is recognized as valid when at least three-quarters of the members, including the president, are in attendance.
  • In necessary cases, at the request of the principal or more than half of the members, the president may convene an unscheduled meeting to resolve issues arising in the school. The School Board may meet by way of a written consultation. The School Board can invite representatives of other parties (who are not members) to attend School Board meetings when necessary.
  • A resolution of the School Board is adopted and takes effect when it is agreed upon by at least two-thirds of the members present. School Board resolutions are publicly announced throughout the school.

The threshold rates for requesting unscheduled meetings and the threshold votes for passing a School Board resolution are new provisions under Circular 40.

Other Provisions

Except for the new concept of the School Board, the organizational structure of a private school under Circular 40 remains similar to the previous organizational structure under Circular 13. The conditions and qualifications for the principal, vice-principal, teachers, administrators, staff, students, facilities, finances and assets of a private school also do not have material changes in comparison to previous regulations under Circular 13.

There are, however, some changes to the provisions for the principal. The term of office of the principal is five years under Circular 13. Circular 40 further states that the term of office of a foreign principal will be in accordance with the term of his/her work permit and will not exceed five years. Circular 40 also provides that a person cannot concurrently serve as the principal of more than one private school.

Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 10, 2025
Tilleke & Gibbins’ project finance team in Vietnam has contributed the Vietnam chapter to the 2025 edition of The Legal 500’s Project Finance guide. As part of The Legal 500’s Country Comparative Guides series, this publication provides businesses and investors with crucial information about the legal and regulatory aspects of project finance across jurisdictions worldwide. The Q&A-format chapters deliver detailed insights into the legal regimes governing an array of project finance topics, including: Ownership structures and corporate governance; Security interests, regimes, and enforcement; Regulatory requirements and consents; Foreign exchange considerations; Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues; Public-private partnerships; Foreign judgments; Tax considerations; Common funding structures; and Insurance law principles. Tilleke & Gibbins also prepared the Thailand chapter for this edition. The Vietnam chapter is available as a PDF via the button below, with the full guide freely accessible on The Legal 500 website.
Read More
January 8, 2025
Thailand’s Board of Investment (BOI) has issued regulations revising its criteria for certain foreign companies that receive promotional privileges to own land under limited circumstances. The revised allowance is detailed in the Notification of the Board of Investment No. 16/2567 Re: Criteria for Permitting Foreign Juristic Persons Receiving Investment Promotion to Hold Land Ownership for Office and Residence, which was published in the Government Gazette on December 9, 2024, after having been officially issued on November 1, 2024. The notification was made in conjunction with the subordinate Notification of the Office of the Board of Investment No. Por. 8/2567 Re: Criteria and Conditions for Permitting Foreign Juristic Persons Receiving Investment Promotion to Own Land for Office and Residence for Operational-Level Workers to Operate Business Granted Investment Promotion, dated November 4, 2024. Under the new BOI notification and subordinate notification, foreign juristic persons that receive promotional privileges from the BOI, with paid-up registered capital of at least THB 50 million, are eligible to own land for office use or residential purposes, subject to certain criteria and conditions: Office use. Land used for this purpose must be for an office of the relevant BOI-promoted business, with an area limit of 5 rai (8,000 square meters). Residential use. Land used for this purpose must be for the residences of operational-level workers (i.e., unskilled laborers), with an area limit of 20 rai (32,000 square meters). In addition, there must be common facilities (e.g., parking, first-aid room, kitchen, and other amenities, as approved by the BOI). The land must be located within 10 kilometers of the place of business operation, and the number of rooms must be consistent with the number of workers. For more information on this notification, or on any aspect of property law in Thailand, please contact Chaiwat Keratisuthisathorn at  [email protected],
Read More
January 3, 2025
Thailand has adopted the OECD’s global minimum tax framework through the Emergency Decree on Top-Up Tax B.E. 2567 (2024). Published in the Government Gazette on December 26, 2024, this legislation implements a 15% global minimum effective tax rate for large multinational enterprise (MNE) groups. The emergency decree took effect on January 1, 2025. The emergency decree was enacted through expedited procedures to implement “pillar two” of the OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) 2.0 project’s Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE) Rules. This swift implementation ensures Thailand can collect relevant tax revenues and prevents potential revenue losses from MNEs that might otherwise shift profits to jurisdictions with lower tax rates or to countries that have already implemented similar top-up tax legislation. Key aspects of Thailand’s implementation of the global minimum tax through the emergency decree are described below. Top-Up Tax The emergency decree introduces a dual mechanism for collecting additional top-up tax from MNEs whose effective tax rate falls below 15%. The first mechanism is a domestic top-up tax that targets MNEs operating within Thailand when their local effective tax rate is lower than 15%. The second mechanism is the income inclusion rule, which determines when a company’s foreign income should be included in the parent (main) company’s taxable income. This rule applies to Thai-based entities—including ultimate parent entities (UPE), intermediate parent entities, and partially owned parent entities—that hold ownership stakes in low-tax foreign jurisdictions. Scope MNEs subject to Thailand’s implementation of the global minimum tax framework are defined in the emergency decree as those whose UPEs report consolidated revenue of at least EUR 750 million (approximately THB 28 billion) in at least two of the four accounting periods preceding the relevant fiscal year. Reporting and Payment In-scope MNEs must comply with specific reporting obligations to the Thai Revenue Department. The filing deadline is set
Read More
December 20, 2024
With intellectual property playing an ever-increasing role in economic development, the need to harness, promote, and protect ASEAN innovation remains urgent as integration progresses. Among its objectives, the ASEAN Economic Community aims to transform the region into a hub of innovation and competitiveness and ensure that the region remains an active participant in the international IP community. With ASEAN member states increasing IP generation and further committing to global IP regimes, the region is increasingly looking toward sophisticated IP ownership and holding structures. IP Holding Companies ASEAN-based companies continue to centralize ownership of their IP assets in offshore holding and licensing vehicles—an approach multinational companies headquartered elsewhere have been using for a number of years. IP-intensive companies look to locate their IP portfolios in low-tax jurisdictions with strong IP registration and protection laws. The company then licenses the IP to operating companies in the group or to third-party licensees, franchisees, agents, distributors, and other partners in return for royalties or license fees. These special-purpose vehicles are typically referred to as IP holding companies. IP holding companies are popular because they can help corporations minimize tax, gain tax benefits or concessions, protect IP from bankruptcy or other claims against the parent company, and focus management attention on the IP portfolio as an income generator. Tax and IP Holding Companies Tax is the primary reason most companies park their IP in separate IP holding vehicles. Sometimes, companies choose to establish their IP holding company in a no-tax, low-tax, or preferred-tax jurisdiction close to their home country. The selected jurisdiction should also be a country with a large and well-established tax treaty network. Double taxation treaties are key considerations in jurisdiction shopping. If the IP assets need to be pledged as security for future borrowings or if they are to be included
Read More