You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 19, 2022

Vietnam Updates Regulations on Organization and Operation of Private Schools

Subscribe to Updates

On December 30, 2021, Vietnam’s Ministry of Education and Training issued Circular No. 40/2021/TT-BGDDT promulgating the Regulations on Organization and Operation of Private Primary Schools, Secondary Schools, High Schools, and Multi-level Schools (Circular 40), which took effect on February 14, 2022, replacing Circular No. 13/2011/TT-BGDDT.

Circular 40 sets forth provisions for the organization and operation of private primary and secondary schools, including regulations on school organization and management; teachers, administrators, staff, and students; facilities, finances and assets; inspection, examination, and accreditation of education quality, rewards, and handling of violations.

School Board

Circular 40 has replaced the term “Board of Management” of the school, which had previously caused much confusion and misunderstanding under Circular 13, with the term “School Board.” Similarly, to avoid any confusion and inconsistency, Circular 40 also has removed regulations on “members’ councils,” which would typically be subject to the laws on enterprises, but are not under the regulations on schools.

The provisions related to the School Board, summarized below, are the most significant changes introduced by Circular 40.

Establishment and Composition

Circular 40 affirms that the School Board of a private high school is the governing body of the school.

The members of the School Board of a private school comprise representatives of the investors and members within and outside the school who are elected or decided upon by a meeting of the investors, and recognized by the competent authority (e.g., chairperson of the district or provincial People’s Committee, depending on the level of the school). Any changes to the members of the School Board must be submitted annually to the competent authority for recognition.

The term of the School Board is five years. In a new requirement under Circular 40, the School Board must have an odd number of members, with at least five and no more than 15 people.

Rights and Obligations

Under Article 7.4 of Circular 40, the School Board has the following rights and obligations:

  • To decide on the school’s strategy, vision, and development plan, to submit to the investor’s or owner’s meeting for approval.
  • To decide on the regulations on the organization and operation of the school, to submit to the investor’s or owner’s meeting for approval.
  • To approve the plan on organizational structure and issues related to the organization and personnel of the school on the basis of the proposal of the principal; to recommend the addition or dismissal of members of the School Board; to propose the recognition or dismissal of the principal or vice-principal of the school, to submit to the investor’s or owner’s meeting for approval and to submit to the competent authority for consideration and decision on recognition.
  • To approve the school’s educational plan; to supervise enrollment activities and the organization and implementation of activities according to the school’s educational plan.
  • To supervise the implementation of resolutions of the School Board, the management of the school’s finances and properties, and the implementation of the democratic regulations in the school’s activities.

 School Board Meetings

Under Article 7.5 of Circular 40, meetings of the School Board are regulated as follows:

  • Regular meetings must be held at least three times per year.
  • A meeting is recognized as valid when at least three-quarters of the members, including the president, are in attendance.
  • In necessary cases, at the request of the principal or more than half of the members, the president may convene an unscheduled meeting to resolve issues arising in the school. The School Board may meet by way of a written consultation. The School Board can invite representatives of other parties (who are not members) to attend School Board meetings when necessary.
  • A resolution of the School Board is adopted and takes effect when it is agreed upon by at least two-thirds of the members present. School Board resolutions are publicly announced throughout the school.

The threshold rates for requesting unscheduled meetings and the threshold votes for passing a School Board resolution are new provisions under Circular 40.

Other Provisions

Except for the new concept of the School Board, the organizational structure of a private school under Circular 40 remains similar to the previous organizational structure under Circular 13. The conditions and qualifications for the principal, vice-principal, teachers, administrators, staff, students, facilities, finances and assets of a private school also do not have material changes in comparison to previous regulations under Circular 13.

There are, however, some changes to the provisions for the principal. The term of office of the principal is five years under Circular 13. Circular 40 further states that the term of office of a foreign principal will be in accordance with the term of his/her work permit and will not exceed five years. Circular 40 also provides that a person cannot concurrently serve as the principal of more than one private school.

Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

November 13, 2025
Tilleke & Gibbins has contributed the Thailand chapter to Franchise 2026, part of the International Comparative Legal Guides (ICLG) series published by Global Legal Group. This annual guide offers comparative analysis of franchise laws and regulations across jurisdictions worldwide, providing practical insights for businesses and legal practitioners operating in the global franchise sector. Each country chapter in the 12th edition follows a Q&A format covering key aspects of franchise law and operations, including: Relevant legislation and rules governing franchise transactions Business organization options for franchised operations Competition law considerations Protection of intellectual property and brands Liability issues and risk mitigation Governing law and dispute resolution Real estate matters Online trading regulations Termination requirements Joint employer risks and vicarious liability Currency controls and taxation Commercial agency considerations Good faith obligations and fair dealing requirements Ongoing relationship management Franchise renewal processes Franchise migration procedures Sustainability commitments Electronic signatures and document retention Current developments in the franchise sector The Thailand chapter, authored by Alan Adcock and Kasama Sriwatanakul, provides an in-depth overview of the legal landscape for franchising and franchising-related activities in Thailand. The complete Thailand chapter is available as a PDF below. The Thailand chapter—and the full Franchise 2026 guide—are also freely available on the ICLG website.
Read More
November 7, 2025
Thailand and the United States signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) titled “Cooperation to Diversify Global Critical Minerals Supply Chains and Promote Investments” on October 26, 2025, signaling a new strategic alignment aimed at developing Thailand’s mineral sector, particularly in rare earth elements (REEs). The MOU has implications for investments in technology, manufacturing, and other related sectors. This update outlines the key provisions of the MOU and the potential opportunities and legal navigating points for businesses. Objectives The primary driver of this agreement is the US initiative to diversify global supply chains for critical minerals and reduce reliance on current market leaders, particularly China. For Thailand, it represents a major opportunity to attract high-tech investment and develop its downstream processing industries. The cooperation is set to focus on five main areas: Technical knowledge: Exchange of technical expertise and international best practices to strengthen Thailand’s mining and processing sector. Joint cooperation: Establishing workshops, seminars, and scientific collaboration to boost innovation. Regulatory practice: Promoting good governance and streamlining regulatory and licensing procedures. Information sharing: Sharing data on potential projects and global market prices. Full-value chain: The MOU covers the entire mineral lifecycle, from exploration and extraction to processing, refining, and recycling. “First Opportunity to Invest” Clause The most debated provision within the MOU states that “participants expect to have the first opportunity to invest . . . in critical minerals assets that may be sold in Thailand.” Business implications: This clause is widely interpreted as granting US companies a first look or preferential access to investment opportunities in Thailand’s critical minerals sector. This could be a significant advantage for US-based or affiliated companies in mining, technology, and energy seeking to secure a foothold in a developing REE supply chain. Thai government position: Thai officials, including the prime minister, have publicly clarified
Read More
October 31, 2025
On September 29, 2025, Thailand’s Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee (PDPC Office) published its Regulations on the Review and Certification of Binding Corporate Rules B.E. 2568 (2025) (the Regulations). The Regulations provide clarity on the PDPC Office’s approach to reviewing and certifying binding corporate rules (BCRs) under Section 29 of the Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562 (2019) (PDPA), and aim to facilitate international data transfers within a group of undertakings or enterprises (a “corporate group”). In conjunction with this development, the PDPC Office also approved BCRs for two companies operating in Thailand on September 30, 2025. This milestone represents the first concrete progress since the PDPC’s Notification on Criteria for the Protection of Personal Data Sent or Transferred to a Foreign Country pursuant to Section 29 of the PDPA B.E. 2566 (2023) came into effect in March 2024. Some key features of the Regulations are set out below. Categorization of BCRs BCRs are classified into two types: (1) BCRs for Controllers (BCR-C) and (2) BCRs for Processors (BCR-P). The category must be clearly specified when submitting the BCRs to the PDPC Office. Documentation Requirement The applicant must prepare and submit the application (a standard template may be provided by the PDPC Office in the future) along with supporting documents for review and certification in the Thai language. If the supporting documents are in a foreign language, a certified Thai translation should be provided. The translation must be notarized by a notary public or qualified person. Supporting documents may include, among others, a binding instrument such as an intra-group agreement, or a list of entities subject to the BCRs. Expedited Process Requirement Organizations with existing BCR approvals under the EU or UK GDPR, or from countries announced by the PDPC under Section 28, may apply through an
Read More
October 30, 2025
Recent events at a Thai listed company, where a proposal to remove the director was not successful, amid claims that a competitor was attempting to gain control of the company, illustrate how disputes over corporate control can unfold differently at the board level and shareholder level. At the board level, removing directors of a listed company mid-term to gain corporate control is not an easy task under Thai law, as it requires a higher threshold than appointing a new director, which typically only requires a simple majority vote in a listed company. At the shareholder level, Thailand’s tender offer and competition regimes add complexity where different shareholder groups act in concert to remove opposing board representatives or otherwise influence control. In this article, we will explore why the attempted removal of a director may fail, and how the tender offer regime may apply. Key Issues at a Glance Shareholder groups may seek to convene meetings to propose changes to board composition or company authority. Such proposals can be delayed or complicated by regulatory requirements and the need for additional disclosures. Regulatory authorities and minority shareholders may raise concerns when major shareholders coordinate to influence board control, especially if such actions could trigger tender offer or merger control obligations. Companies often respond by seeking further information on shareholder relationships and potential conflicts before proceeding. Why the Director Removal Failed Under Section 76 of the Public Limited Companies Act B.E. 2535 (as amended), the early removal of a director requires two conditions to be satisfied at the same meeting of shareholders: Headcount test: At least 75% of shareholders attending and entitled to vote must vote in favor. If multiple shareholders appoint the same person as proxy, each proxy is counted as a separate head for the purpose of the headcount test,
Read More