You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 30, 2021

Vietnam Updates Draft Decree Regulating E-Identification and Authentication

Subscribe to Updates

In mid-2019, the Vietnamese government approved the drafting of a Decree Regulating E-Identification and Authentication (“Draft Decree”), one of many efforts aimed at advancing the government’s plan to promote application and development of information technology. Since then, the Ministry of Information and Communication (MIC) has been accepting public comments and has been revising the Draft Decree, with the latest version dated April 29, 2021.

Expected to be promulgated in August 2021, the Decree will be the first to provide a comprehensive legal basis for managing, providing and using e-identification and authentication services in online transactions. Some notable contents are presented below.

Four Levels of E-Identification

Under the latest Draft Decree, different forms of e-identification are classified into four levels, increasing in security and reliability:

  • Level 1: Receiving digital data provided by the registrant.
  • Level 2: The same as Level 1, together with checking directly or online the suitability of personal information provided by the registrant with copies of documents issued by the authority.
  • Level 3: The same as Level 2, together with collating digital data through direct check of citizen identification card, electronic connection with citizen identification card, or connection with the national database on population.
  • Level 4: The same as Level 3, together with the registrant’s appearance in person or online in real time.

Generally, an individual may be identified by multiple e-identities, which are valid for use in different types of online transactions. However, since these transactions vary in their requirements of the level of authentication, each e-identification is valid only in transactions that require the same or lower level of authentication.

Since Level 3 and 4 e-identities are authenticated through some form of direct identification (such as the registrant’s appearance, a direct check of citizen identification card, or electronic connection with citizen identification card), according to Article 5.2 of the Draft Decree, they are qualified to be used in online transactions that otherwise require a citizen identification document by law.

Once an individual has provided an e-identification that meets the authentication level set by the transacting organization, the latter may not demand further identifying information.

Regulations for E-Identification Service Providers

In general, the provision of e-identification and authentication services is carried out based on contractual agreements between the provider and the registrant and between the provider and the transacting organization, unless specified by any other law. The provider must meet general requirements for the storage and update of e-identities, provision and management of authentication tools, and suspension and retrieval of e-identities.

Since Level 3 and 4 e-identifications are more secure and their validity is more ubiquitous than those of Level 1 and 2, providers must satisfy several heightened conditions and requirements prescribed by law to obtain the license to provide Level 3 and 4 e-identification and authentication services. Meanwhile, providers of Level 1 and 2 e-identifications are not subject to any license, they must only comply with general requirements as listed above.

Conditions and requirements imposed by the Draft Decree to obtain the license for Level 3 and 4 provision include:

  • The enterprise must be established in accordance with Vietnamese laws and must be operating in Vietnam.
  • The legal representative of the enterprise must have Vietnamese citizenship and reside in Vietnam.
  • A deposit of VND 20 billion (approximately USD 871,600) must be made in a commercial bank operating in Vietnam.
  • Specific personnel and technical requirements, management procedure requirements, etc., must be satisfied.

Among these requirements, the most notable is the deposit of VND 20 billion as a risk management and compensation mechanism in the event that the provider violates any rules leading to suspension of their license. According to the MIC, this proposed amount is estimated based on an average of 1 to 5 million accounts charged at VND 50,000 a year by each provider. The deposit would prevent risks during the dissolution or suspension of operation of the provider, and ensure the secure and reliable transfer of the e-identifications to another provider.

Related Professionals

Industries

Technology

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

March 6, 2026
Thailand’s Legislation Consideration Committee of the Ministry of Interior has ruled that in-game loot boxes in online games do not constitute gambling under the Gambling Act B.E. 2478 (1935). This first-of-its-kind ruling provides useful guidance for online game operators and digital entertainment companies operating in Thailand. Background The ruling came in response to an inquiry concerning an online role-playing game operator that launched a campaign featuring a loot box mechanism. The mechanism allowed players to purchase a token in exchange for the opportunity to receive a virtual loot box containing randomized in-game items. The key features of this were as follows: The items received were digital, noncash items usable only within the game. The items could not be exchanged, redeemed, or converted into cash with the game operator. Items may differ in rarity but remain purely virtual. The central question was whether paying money to obtain randomized in-game items constituted a risk-based activity involving the chance to receive money or property of monetary value, which would constitute gambling under the Gambling Act. Committee Ruling The committee reached the following conclusions regarding the characteristics of the game’s loot-box mechanism: No cash or monetary equivalent: Players did not receive cash or property that could be exchanged for cash. The in-game items were merely usage rights within the online game ecosystem. No real-world monetary valuation: There was no determination of item value in real currency, and no mechanism for redeeming or converting items into money with the game operator. Any off-platform trading of in-game items between players is irrelevant to online game operators, as any value arising from such transactions is determined by the market rather than by the operators themselves. Service fee characterization: Payments made by players purchasing in-game loot boxes constituted fees for online game services. Accordingly, the committee concluded
Read More
March 5, 2026
Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a criminal complaint against a licensed digital asset broker, its overseas trading platform, and its executives for allegedly operating an unlicensed digital asset exchange targeting Thai customers. The case marks an escalation in the SEC’s enforcement efforts against unlicensed offshore platforms that attempt to serve Thai users through local licensed entities. Criminal Complaint On February 20, 2026, the SEC filed a criminal complaint with the Economic Crime Suppression Division against a local licensed digital asset broker, its overseas global trading platform, and its executives. The SEC alleges that the parties violated the Digital Asset Business Emergency Decree B.E. 2561 (2018) by cooperatively operating a digital asset exchange business on a cross-border basis since 2023 without the required SEC license. According to the SEC, the local broker promoted the overseas platform’s services to the public through Thai-language posts on social media channels, with services available exclusively to customers residing in Thailand. Access to the global platform was provided through the local broker’s website and mobile application. Customers who registered for the local broker’s services were automatically granted access to the global platform without having to undergo a separate identity verification process. The SEC also found that the local broker provided back-office system support services to the global platform. The SEC considers these activities to constitute joint operation of an unlicensed digital asset exchange. The former executives of the local broker are being held liable as the responsible persons during the relevant period. The SEC emphasized that the complaint initiates the criminal process, and the decision to prosecute or convict the accused parties will ultimately be made by law enforcement authorities and the criminal courts. Platform Blocking The SEC has also coordinated with the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society to block public
Read More
February 27, 2026
The Bank of Thailand (BOT) has officially implemented a new regulatory framework supervising systemically important retail payment systems (SIRPS), effective February 21, 2026, with PromptPay being the first payment system designated as a SIRPS. Under this new set of regulations, the BOT may designate payment systems under the Payment Systems Act B.E. 2560 (2017) as SIRPSs based on quantitative and qualitative assessments. Once a system is designated as a SIRPS, the operator becomes subject to expanded supervisory obligations beyond the general requirements of the Payment Systems Act. Enhanced Supervisory Requirements SIRPS operators must comply with a heightened supervisory regime across three key areas, outlined below. 1. Governance SIRPS operators must maintain robust and transparent governance structures, including: Balanced board composition, with at least one-third of the board comprising independent directors who represent stakeholders in the system (such as payment service providers, consumers, and experts). Independent directors may serve for no more than two consecutive terms. Subcommittees to assist the board in overseeing compliance, policy implementation, and operational strategy. Clear separation between executives responsible for risk and information security and those overseeing day-to-day business operations. Risk Management and System SecuritySIRPS operators must implement comprehensive risk management frameworks, including: Clear service agreements between the SIRPS operator and its direct participants (payment service providers who connect directly to the SIRPS), defining roles and responsibilities among stakeholders. These agreements must include obligations for direct SIRPS participants to supervise any indirect participants they onboard to ensure compliance with service agreements and business rules. A business continuity plan covering both IT and non-IT aspects, with annual review. The SIRPS must target service availability comparable to international payment infrastructures, including the ability to recover operations within two hours of a disruption and to maintain scalable operational capacity. Tools and controls to monitor and manage material or
Read More
February 26, 2026
Thailand is preparing to offer new tools for intellectual property enforcement as the Electronic Transactions Development Agency (ETDA) recently released for public consultation a draft notification requiring social media platforms to verify user identities and conduct know-your-customer (KYC) checks on advertisers. The draft Notification of the Electronic Transactions Commission on Measures to Prevent Technological Crimes for Social Media Service Providers, which is to be issued under the Emergency Decree on Measures for the Prevention and Suppression of Technological Crimes B.E. 2566 (2023), as amended in 2025, primarily aims to combat online fraud and technology-related crimes. However, its new obligations also provide IP owners with valuable tools to identify anonymous infringers. Key Regulatory Mandates The draft notification imposes several verification requirements on social media platforms operating in Thailand. These requirements also strengthen IP rights holders’ ability to identify anonymous infringers, as platforms must: Verify user identities through registered phone numbers and link all accounts to verifiable identities. Conduct KYC checks on advertisers, including individuals, companies, and any third-party payers. Perform heightened identity checks for high-risk or repeat offenders before publishing advertisements. Promptly remove content flagged by the Anti-Technology Crime Division and prescreen advertisements for prohibited or high-risk content. How IP Owners Can Use This Notification for Enforcement The phone number–based verification requirement enables IP owners to work more effectively with enforcement authorities in tracing individuals or entities responsible for infringing content. The comprehensive advertiser KYC obligations, including mandatory disclosure of third-party payment sources, create a clear audit trail even when bad actors attempt to obscure their identity through intermediaries or shell accounts. This traceability is essential for pursuing damages and dismantling organized counterfeit operations. The ETDA is now considering adjustments to the draft notification after receiving comments during the public consultation period, which ended on February 2, 2026. Following finalization
Read More