You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 27, 2020

Vietnam Strengthens Regulations Protecting Workers

On March 4, 2020, the Government of Vietnam issued Decree No. 28/2020/ND-CP Providing Regulations on Administrative Penalties in the Areas of Labor, Social Insurance, and Sending Vietnamese Workers Abroad for Working Under Contract (“Decree 28”). Decree 28 contains 57 articles geared toward protecting Vietnamese workers, including outsourced workers.

Decree 28 sets out a number of infractions which employers should be careful to avoid committing and which can result in severe penalties.

Article 4 of Decree 28 also sets out a list of 51 specific penalties that employers may be subject to. Among these, violators may be required to do the following:

  • Return personal papers of employees;
  • Turn over monies received from outsourcing employees;
  • Pay employees their full salaries;
  • Allow employees to return to their previous jobs;
  • Pay employees full severance allowance, job-loss allowance, plus interest on the unpaid amount;
  • Pay employees a sum of money corresponding to their social insurance contribution, health insurance premium, unemployment insurance premium and annual leave allowances.

Decree 28 provides for dozens of actions which could subject an employer to a penalty, including, among others:

  • Conducting outsourcing without a proper license;
  • Keeping/withholding the personal papers of an employee (such as ID card);
  • Acting as an employment agency or making false claims about a job;
  • Failing to announce results of recruitment in a timely manner;
  • Collecting money from applicants illegally;
  • Requiring workers to undergo more than one probation period for one job or undergo probation longer than permitted;
  • Having workers work overtime more than 12 hours in a day during holidays and weekends;
  • Failing to provide training in occupational safety and occupational hygiene for workers;
  • Not allowing female workers with children under 12 months of age to rest 60 minutes a day;
  • Oppressing or retaliating against workers that organize or take part in strikes;
  • Using the license for overseas manpower supply of another enterprise to send Vietnamese workers abroad;
  • Sending workers abroad without registering the manpower supply contract.

Decree No. 28 provides monetary fines that can be applicable to employers in the case of violations. Fines as high as VND 200 million (approximately USD 8,500) for organizational violators (companies) may apply for the most serious violations. In some cases, double fines may apply.

Decree 28 enters into effect on April 15, 2020, and will replace Decree No. 95 of 2013 and Decree No. 88 of 2015 on the same subject. For more details on how this may affect your company, please contact [email protected].

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Vientiane have contributed the Laos chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Laos chapter was prepared by associates Naiyane Xaechao and Sayphin Singsouvong. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Laos chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Cambodia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Phnom Penh have contributed the Cambodia chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Cambodia chapter was authored by Jay Cohen, partner and director of Tilleke & Gibbins’ Phnom Penh office, and Chanvisal Lok, associate. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Cambodia chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
January 14, 2026
Employers operating in Thailand can enforce post-employment noncompete covenants, but success depends on precise drafting and strong evidentiary support. Thai courts will uphold restraints that protect legitimate employer interests and are fair and reasonable in duration, geographic reach, and substantive scope. Overbroad covenants, however, draw judicial skepticism and may fail unless they are drafted in severable, defensible components tied to the employee’s actual role. This article synthesizes recent trends in Thai case practice, explains how Thai courts assess reasonableness in employment restraints, and provides a practical litigation-focused framework for drafting enforceable covenants, preparing evidence, and pursuing relief through the Labor Court. The Legal Framework and Its Practical Implications Thai courts evaluate noncompete covenants under general principles of contract enforceability and public policy, with particular focus on whether a restraint is necessary to protect a legitimate employer interest and proportionate to that objective. In employment matters, this analysis is shaped by the employee-protective tenor of Thai labor law and by the Labor Court’s equitable discretion in determining appropriate remedies. The practical takeaway is that standardized or broadly drafted covenants rarely survive scrutiny. Courts look for a demonstrable nexus between the employee’s actual exposure to confidential information, trade secrets, or customer relationships and the scope of the restraint. Where that nexus is weak or the restraint operates as a blanket prohibition, courts are inclined to decline enforcement or limit relief to a narrowly tailored prohibition. The employer interests most commonly recognized as legitimate in Thai practice include the protection of trade secrets, confidential business information, and goodwill tied to identifiable customer segments or territories. Courts are more likely to enforce restraints where employers can clearly document what information is at risk, why particular customer relationships matter, and how the employee was involved with those assets. Judges also look closely at the
December 19, 2025
On December 12, 2025, Thailand’s Ministry of Labor published a ministerial regulation prescribing the minimum and maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions. The regulation, which takes effect on January 1, 2026, sets a flat minimum base wage of THB 1,650 per month and a phased increase of the maximum base wage over the following six years, as outlined in the table below. Impact on Social Security Benefits Not only will monthly contributions increase as a result of the adjustment to the maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions, but the maximum benefits available to insured persons will also be enhanced, as shown in the next table. Employer Obligations From January 1, 2026, employers must correctly withhold wages and remit social security contributions for both the employer’s and employees’ portions in compliance with the revised thresholds. Failure to comply may expose employers to penalties under the Social Security Act B.E. 2533 (1990). Employers should ensure that payroll systems are updated as necessary to reflect these changes to the wage ceiling used for social security contribution calculations.