You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 16, 2020

Vietnam Offers Deferred Tax and Land Rental Payments in COVID-19 Epidemic

Subscribe to Updates

On April 8, 2020, the Government of Vietnam issued Decree No. 41/2020/ND-CP, which took effect on the same day, on deferral of payment of taxes and land rental (“Decree 41”). This is considered a relief measure for taxpayers amid the COVID-19 epidemic.

Decree 41 provides for extension of the deadline for tax payment for a number of taxpayers, including companies in many sectors, small and extra-small enterprises, and credit institutions providing supporting services for clients affected by the COVID-19 epidemic.

In detail, taxpayers in the following businesses are eligible for this incentive:

  1. Agriculture; forestry; aquaculture;
  2. Food production and processing; textiles; garment production; manufacture of leather and leather products; wood treatment and manufacture of products from wood, bamboo, rattan (except furniture); manufacture of products from straw and plaiting materials; manufacture of paper products; manufacture of rubber and plastic products; manufacture of products from other non-metallic minerals; metal production; mechanical working; metal treating and coating; manufacture of electronic products, computers, and optical products; manufacture of cars and other motor vehicles; manufacture of beds, wardrobes, desks, and chairs;
  3. Construction;
  4. Transport and warehousing; accommodation and dining services; education and training; healthcare and social assistance; real estate trading;
  5. Employment services; travel agencies, tourism services and auxiliary tourism services;
  6. Composing, arts, and entertainment; library, archive, and museum operations and other artistic activities; sports and amusement; cinemas; and
  7. Manufacture of prioritized ancillary industrial products or key mechanical products.

Additionally, enterprises that qualify as small or extra-small enterprises are also eligible for this incentive, including foreign-invested companies. In the trading and service area, small enterprises are defined as those with an annual average number of employees participating in social insurance not exceeding 50 people and having annual revenue not exceeding VND 100 billion (approx. USD 4,254,000) or total capital not exceeding VND 50 billion (approx. USD 2,127,000). Extra-small enterprises are those with an annual average number of employees participating in social insurance not exceeding 10 people and having annual revenue not exceeding VND 10 billion (approx. USD 425,400) or total capital not exceeding VND 3 billion (approx. USD 127,000).

The deferral is applicable to payments of value-added tax (except for value-added tax paid at the import stage), corporate income tax, personal income tax for households and individuals doing business, and land rental.

Regarding value-added tax (VAT), the deadline for payment of the VAT due for March, April, May and June of 2020 (for those filing VAT returns monthly) and for Quarters 1 and 2 of 2020 (for those filing VAT returns quarterly) is extended for five months. For instance, the VAT payment for March is now due on 20 September 2020 and the deadline for VAT of Quarter 1 of 2020 is 30 September 2020.

For corporate income tax (CIT), the amount of CIT as finalized in the 2019 annual statement and CIT declared in the first and second quarters of 2020 will be deferred for five months. If a taxpayer has already paid the CIT of 2019, it may offset the paid CIT against other unpaid taxes.

Regarding land rental, for land users that leased their land directly from the state with annual rental payments, the deadline for payment of the first installment of 2020 is extended to 31 October 2020. It is worth noting that this deferred payment policy does not seem to apply to land which is leased from developers of industrial or economic or processing zones (including state-owned developers). Decree 41 does not specifically mention this form of land lease while referring to the deferred payments to the local tax offices (which are applicable to cases where land is leased directly from the local authorities).

Taxpayers that wish to enjoy this incentive are required to submit a prescribed request form of deferral (as enclosed with Decree 41) together with their periodical tax returns.

If you have any questions or concerns, please reach out to us at [email protected] for our further assistance.

Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Real Estate

Tax

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

October 24, 2025
On October 22, 2025, the Thai government posted a directive not to grant gambling licenses for gambling involving poker nationwide to crack down on illegal gambling activities. The directive was issued by Thailand’s Ministry of Interior to align with government policies to prevent the legalization of all types of gambling businesses, including poker as a sporting activity. This will result in the revocation of poker activities as sport and institute a strict ban on such activities nationwide. Businesses should note the new government’s strict approach toward gambling activities as the legal situation regarding gambling in the country continues to draw close attention.
Read More
October 1, 2025
In September 2025, Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) accused a company listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET), including its current and former directors, of concealing material information in connection with its filing registration and draft prospectus. This recent enforcement action demonstrates the serious consequences of making false statements or appearing to conceal material information in IPO filings and ongoing disclosures. In addition to being subject to criminal penalties, such actions can impact the eligibility of directors and executives to serve and may cause lasting reputational damage. Key Legal Risks The Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (as amended) imposes strict liability for making false statements or concealing material information in IPO registration statements and draft prospectuses. In such cases, investors can claim for damages, and there are also criminal penalties, including imprisonment for up to five years and substantial fines, may apply to the company, its directors, and responsible officers. However, misstatements or omissions in IPO filings do not, by themselves, disqualify directors or executives from holding office, whether arising from an SEC accusation or even a final court judgment. In contrast, for ongoing disclosures after listing, such as financial statements, annual reports, and meeting notices, false or misleading statements or concealment of material information can result in not only criminal liability but also immediate disqualification of directors and executives. If the SEC accuses a listed company or its directors or executives of such misstatements or omissions, those directors or executives are immediately disqualified from their positions, even before a final court judgment. Director and Executive Qualifications Directors and executives must meet the SEC’s specified standards of trustworthiness, as set out in the relevant rules. The SEC clearly defines characteristics that are considered to demonstrate a lack of trustworthiness. For ongoing disclosures, being involved in
Read More
September 30, 2025
Vietnam’s higher education system is at a pivotal stage of reform, with the government taking decisive steps to strengthen its policy and regulatory framework. In response to obstacles encountered during the implementation of the Law on Higher Education, issued in 2012 and amended in 2018, the third draft of the amended Law on Higher Education (Draft Law) is scheduled for submission to the National Assembly in October 2025. The Draft Law reflects the state’s commitment to aligning the education sector with international standards while addressing persistent structural challenges. The Draft Law emphasizes clarifying institutional mandates, enhancing accountability, and modernizing governance models to enable higher education institutions to operate with greater autonomy and efficiency. Against this backdrop, we outline below several notable provisions of the third draft and their potential implications for higher education institutions (HEIs) in Vietnam. Applicable Entities In addition to HEIs as defined and covered under existing legislation, the Draft Law extends its scope of applicable entities. The current Law on Higher Education does not regulate training institutions under state agencies, the armed forces, or political and social organizations, nor does it provide specific provisions for institutions offering only postgraduate education. To address this, the Draft Law introduces the term “institutions with higher education activities,” expanding its scope to include: (a) academies and research institutes established by the prime minister, mandated to provide doctoral-level training; (b) educational institutions affiliated with state agencies, political organizations, socio-political organizations, and the people’s armed forces, authorized to offer higher education programs in their specialized fields; and (c) institutions established pursuant to international treaties or by decision of the prime minister, with authorization to deliver certain levels of higher education. The inclusion of “institutions with higher education activities” represents a significant development both legally and institutionally. In an increasingly diversified higher education
Read More
September 29, 2025
In September 2019, the government of Vietnam issued Decree No. 75/2019/ND-CP on Administrative Sanctions in the Field of Competition (Decree 75) to address the urgent need for clear sanctioning mechanisms following the implementation of the new Law on Competition in July 2019. However, after five years of enforcement, various gaps and inconsistencies have been exposed that hinder its application. These shortcomings have reduced the deterrent effect of the sanctioning regime, and created legal uncertainty for market participants. A recent case involving Duc Giang – Lao Cai Chemicals’ acquisition of another chemical company—one of the first cases of economic concentration violation to be sanctioned by the National Competition Commission (NCC) since the Law on Competition took effect—highlights the practical difficulties under Vietnam’s competition law enforcement regime. In this case, although the transaction exceeded the statutory notification thresholds of economic concentration set out in the law, the parties failed to submit the required notification. This violation resulted in the NCC imposing aggregate fines of VND 1,423,982,880 (approximately USD 54,770) on the companies in September 2024. On appeal, Duc Giang – Lao Cai Chemicals argued that the chairman of the NCC was legally entitled to issue a warning as the key punishment instead of a monetary penalty. However, the chairman rejected the appeal, citing Article 14 of Decree 75, under which the specific penalty and level for “failure to notify economic concentration” is a fine, not a warning. While the chairman of the NCC is generally empowered to impose penalties, a warning cannot be applied if the specific regulation for a particular violation does not provide for it as a sanction. This example shows the inadequacy and inconsistency of the regulations on penalties for violations of competition law, and underscores the need for an amendment of Decree 75 to resolve such conflicts
Read More