You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

December 6, 2018

Vietnam Issues Decree on Disclosure of Customer Financial Information

Informed Counsel

With Vietnam’s controversial new Law on Cybersecurity set to take effect on January 1, 2019, the protection of personal information has become a very hot topic for Vietnamese and foreign companies and organizations. In the banking sector, where customer information is particularly sensitive, confidentiality has always been a matter of crucial importance.   

In September, the government of Vietnam issued Decree No. 117/2018/ND-CP on confidentiality and  dis- closure of customer information of credit institutions and branches of foreign banks (Decree 117). Decree 117 took effect on November 1, 2018, replacing Decree No. 70/2000/ND-CP of 2000 on confidentiality, storage, and disclosure of information related to customer deposits (Decree 70). Below are some notable points of Decree 117.

Governing Scope    .

Decree 117 applies broadly to the confidentiality and disclosure of customer information of credit institutions and branches of foreign banks in Vietnam. However, some information is excluded from its purview, including customer information that is (i) classified as state secrets, (ii) provided to the State Bank of Vietnam, or (iii) used for anti-money laundering or anti-terrorism purposes.

Definition of Customer Information   

This is the first time that customer information of a credit institution or a branch of a foreign bank has been formally defined under Vietnamese legislation. Under Article 3 of Decree 117, such customer information is defined as information that is provided by the customer, or arises in the course of a customer requesting or a credit institution/bank providing banking products and services, comprising:

(1)    Personally identifiable information that contributes to identifying customers, whether individuals or organizations.

  • For individuals: Full name; specimen signature; electronic signature; date of birth; nationality; occupation; permanent residence, current residence, or place of residence abroad (for foreigners); telephone number; email address; ID card or passport number, date of issuance, and place of issuance; and other relevant information.
  • For organizations: Full name; abbreviated name; establishment license or decision; enterprise registration certificate or equivalent document; address of head office; telephone number; fax number; email address; personally identifiable information (as described above) of the legal representative of the organization; and other relevant information.

As in other Vietnamese data privacy regulations, “personally identifiable information” is defined very broadly, and the phrase “other relevant information” is problematic in that it seems to allow almost any information about the customer to be considered “personally identifiable information.”

(2)    Information on accounts, deposits, deposited assets, transactions, securing parties, and other relevant information. (Most of these terms are further defined/clarified in the same article.)

Requests from State Authorities

Competent state authorities—which have been expanded under Decree 117 to include state audit agencies, customs authorities, and tax authorities, among others— can request the disclosure of customer information from credit institutions and branches of foreign banks in order to perform their assigned functions and tasks, provided they comply with the following conditions:

  • Their request for customer information is in line with the purposes, contents, scope, and jurisdiction stipulated by law or as agreed by the customer, and they must bear responsibility for their requests.
  • They have supporting documents to prove the reasons for and objectives of such request, issued by the appropriate-level authority, and in conformity with relevant law, unless such request relates to a criminal proceeding or national security.
  • After obtaining the customer information, they must keep it confidential, use it in line with the purpose stated when requesting the information, and not disclose it to any third party without consent of the customer, except where permitted by law.

Although Decree 117 requires the authorities to maintain the confidentiality of the customer information they receive, enforcement will be a challenge in practice. By expanding the range of state authorities having the right to request customer information, without any corresponding requirements to improve oversight or secrecy, there is a greater risk of customer information being disclosed, intentionally or unintentionally.

Requests from Non-State Entities   

Under Article 11, credit institutions and branches of foreign banks may only disclose customer information to other non-state organizations or individuals in one of the following circumstances:

(1)    At the request of an entity specifically authorized to make such request in accordance with codes, laws, and resolutions issued by the National Assembly; or

(2)    Upon receiving the customer’s consent in writing or in another form as agreed with the customer.

In a notable change from Decree 70, Decree 117 does not allow credit institutions, without the prior consent of their customers, to share customer information with each other. Although this is in line with Vietnam’s general rules on data privacy, it may cause difficulties for credit institutions, as the exchange of customer information within the banking system is vital for evaluating and mitigating insolvency risks.

Other Provisions   

Decree 117 specifies the form for requesting disclosure of customer information, which applies to requests made by both state authorities and non-state entities, as well as the procedure and deadlines for financial institutions to carry out the information disclosure (10 working days for simple and readily available information, or 25 working days for complicated and not readily available information), except as otherwise regulated by the relevant laws.   

The new decree does not address whether financial institutions may provide access to, disclose, or transfer customer information to third parties located outside of Vietnam. These issues are covered by other legislation, such as the Law on Cybersecurity.

Outlook

Decree 117 aims to reduce the number of fraudulent transactions and mitigate the risk of outside parties appropriating the personal information and assets of banking customers. While these are worthy goals, the effectiveness and enforcement of Decree 117 remain to be seen.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 2, 2025
On June 27, 2025, Vietnam’s National Assembly adopted a Resolution on International Financial Centers in Vietnam (“IFC Resolution”), which is set to take effect September 1, 2025, putting forward major policy breakthroughs on multiple fronts. The IFC Resolution has the goal of turning Ho Chi Minh City and Da Nang into leading international financial centers with autonomy and tools to compete, thereby raising Vietnam’s position in the global financial network, in association with economic growth drivers. Below are some of the key points of the IFC Resolution, which has notable changes from previous drafts (see our articles on Vietnam’s Draft Resolution on Financial Centers: Implications for Fintech and Banking and Vietnam’s Emerging Regulatory Landscape for Blockchain and Cryptocurrency), including: The removal of the Central Supervisory Agency. The addition of a definition of international financial centers, which are specific geographic areas in Ho Chi Minh City and Da Nang with members entitled to special policies. The addition of a list of entities eligible for membership, and entitlement to the special policies. Major Policy Breakthroughs The IFC Resolution introduces specific policies in the following areas: Liberalization of foreign exchange control for members, including policies such as open foreign exchange use between members and exemption from foreign exchange control procedures for 100% foreign-owned members. Specialized licensing for members to establish and operate single-member limited liability banks and foreign bank branches with the ability to apply accounting standards, debt classification, risk provisions, and prudential ratios according to the owner’s policies. Creation of a capital market for innovative startups, including a crowdfunding mechanism or private placement mechanism through a licensed platform, and development of a green finance market with green certification. Creation of a regulatory sandbox for fintech technologies, products, services, and business models not yet prescribed by law, offering exemption from compliance with
June 30, 2025
On April 29, 2025, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) issued Circular No. 03/2025/TT-NHNN (Circular 03), which provides detailed guidance on the opening and use of Vietnamese dong (VND) accounts by non-resident foreign investors engaging in indirect investment activities in Vietnam. Circular 03, which took effect on June 16, 2025, amends Circular No. 06/2019/TT-NHNN of the SBV on the management of foreign exchange for foreign direct investment activities in Vietnam (Circular 06) and replaces Circular No. 05/2014/TT-NHNN of the SBV guiding the opening and use of indirect investment capital accounts for implementation of foreign indirect investment activities in Vietnam (Circular 05). Below are some of the key points of Circular 03. Change of Account Name Circular 03 renames “indirect investment capital account” to “indirect investment account” (IIA). This change aligns with the terminology used in other legislation, ensuring consistency across Vietnam’s legal framework governing foreign exchange and investment activities. Additionally, by removing the word “capital,” the new term better encompasses the full range of transactions that may be conducted through these accounts, such as share transfer and other forms of indirect investment-related activities. This helps prevent misinterpretation and facilitates compliance for foreign investors operating in Vietnam. Account Types Circular 03 clearly delineates account types and investor residency status as follows: For non-resident foreign investors: The opening and use of investment accounts in VND is for carrying out transactions related to indirect investment activities. For resident foreign investors: Credit and debit transactions are made through payment accounts in VND in accordance with relevant laws. Additional Permitted Uses of IIAs In addition to the cash inflows and outflows authorized under Circular 05, Circular 03 introduces more cash transactions that can be conducted via IIAs. These include: Receiving interest and other legal income when conducting stock purchase transactions that do not require
June 27, 2025
Tilleke & Gibbins has contributed the Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to Taking and Enforcing Collateral Security and Guarantees in Southeast Asia, a comparative guide developed by Drew Network Asia (DNA). The publication examines the legal frameworks governing collateral security and guarantees across seven Southeast Asian jurisdictions and is intended to assist financial institutions, corporate borrowers, and cross-border investors in evaluating secured lending options in the region. The guide provides a practical overview of key issues relevant to taking and enforcing security interests—covering, among other topics, the types of assets that may be secured, the formalities and registration requirements for creating security, and the rights and procedures available in enforcement scenarios. Each chapter follows a consistent question-and-answer format to allow readers to compare approaches across jurisdictions easily. While the guide offers a high-level survey of the region’s collateral and guarantee regimes, it also notes that country-specific developments and transaction-specific considerations may affect the applicable requirements. Readers seeking detailed advice are encouraged to consult the lawyers listed at the end of each jurisdictional chapter. The full guide is available for download using the button below or directly from the DNA website.
June 19, 2025
The Bank of Thailand (BOT) has released draft guidelines establishing principles for managing artificial intelligence (AI) risks in the financial sector. The draft guidelines provide a structured framework for the responsible adoption of AI technologies. Financial service providers will be able to use the guidelines as a reference to appropriately manage their risks in a manner that aligns with internationally recognized best practices. The BOT is accepting public comments on the draft guidelines until June 30, 2025. Scope and Application The draft guidelines apply to all financial service providers, including financial institutions and special financial institutions under the Financial Institution Business Act, as well as payment providers under the Payment Systems Act. These guidelines supplement existing BOT risk management guidelines covering IT risk management, third-party risk management, data governance, and market conduct. The guidelines define AI systems as systems that mimic human intelligence, including machine learning, deep learning, generative AI (such as large language models), and agentic AI. This definition specifically excludes rule-based automation systems like robotic process automation and condition matching. Key Risk Management Principles The guidelines lay out two main principles in managing AI risk. Governance: Financial service providers should define and establish clear roles and responsibilities for their personnel and AI system supervision structures to uphold FEAT (fairness, ethics, accountability, and transparency) principles as follows: Stakeholder roles and responsibilities. Financial service providers should define roles and responsibilities for boards and executives on AI risk oversight. Responsibilities include establishing an AI system usage policy, designating personnel responsible for AI risk management, and building awareness of AI-related risk within the organization. AI system usage policy. The AI system usage policy should be aligned with organizational objectives, regulatory requirements, and FEAT principles. These policies should be reviewed regularly to respond to technological advancements and evolving risk profiles. Risk management