You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

December 2, 2016

Vietnam: Enhanced Criminal Liability for Unlawful Dismissals Has Been Delayed

Taylor Vinters – International Employment Law Update

On June 29, 2016, the National Assembly of Vietnam passed a resolution to delay the implementation of Vietnam’s new Penal Code (“New Code”) allegedly due to the discovery of numerous errors contained within the New Code.

As a result of the resolution, enhanced criminal liability for unlawful dismissals under the New Code will not apply until an amended version of the New Code takes effect. Until then, the provisions of the current Penal Code (“Current Code”), containing less severe penalties, will continue to apply.

In Vietnam, criminal liability for unlawful dismissal can be imposed in addition to any civil liability the employer might face under local labor laws. Under the Current Code, a person can incur criminal liability for “unlawfully forcing an employee to leave his or her job, causing serious consequences,” whereas under the New Code, the elements of the offense have been reworded to include “the unlawful dismissal of an employee” or “the use of force or threats to cause an employee to resign,” if such an act “results in hardship for that employee or his/her family, or leads to a strike.”

No detailed guidance has been issued on the meaning of “serious consequences,” or what constitutes “unlawfully forcing,” under the Current Code. The language of the New Code, in comparison, appears to be somewhat clearer. For example, it is likely that the “unlawful dismissal” element can be fulfilled by noncompliance with existing labor laws which set out clear legal grounds for dismissal and the procedures that must be followed. Thus, although the meaning “hardship” remains vague, there appears to be enough legal guidance to be able to determine if an unlawful dismissal has taken place.

Penalties under the New Code include a monetary fine ranging from VND 10 million (approximately EUR 400) to VND 100 million (approximately EUR 4,000), a non-custodial sentence of up to one year, or a period of imprisonment of between three months and one year.

The penalties for aggravating circumstances, as defined in the New Code, include a monetary fine ranging from VND 100 million (approximately EUR 4,000) to VND 200 million (approximately EUR 8,000), a period of imprisonment of between one and three years, and a prohibition on individual offenders from holding certain positions for one to five years.

Comment

Employers should be aware that implementation of the New Code has been delayed and that the provisions of the Current Code continue to apply. Employers should also note (in addition to the provisions set out herein), that when the New Code comes into force, both legal representatives and general directors may incur enhanced penalties if they are liable for unlawful dismissal under the New Code.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 30, 2019
The draft Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) was approved by the National Legislative Assembly in February 2019, raising concern among business entities over the the need for increased diligence to ensure adherence to the provisions. Running a business often entails handling the personal data of employees, contractors, suppliers, customers, and others. Any personal data collected could be subject to the provisions of the PDPA, and as employee data falls under the PDPA, all businesses, should be prepare to deal with the impact of the PDPA.
April 3, 2019
Multinationals with affiliated companies in several locations routinely transfer employees of all levels between their affiliates and other offices, and it is increasingly common in smaller companies too. However, employers are often unclear on their rights and obligations when rotating or transferring employees—especially in Thailand where these are separate concepts treated differently by Thai labor law. This article will examine some common (and frequently litigated) issues of which employers should be aware regarding the rotation and transfer of employees.