You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

February 28, 2025

Unpacking Vietnam’s Decree 163: Key Implications for Telecom Service Providers

Subscribe to Updates

Vietnam’s Decree No. 163/2024/ND-CP (Decree 163), which has been in full effect since January 1, 2025, provides crucial guidance on the implementation of Vietnam’s 2023 Telecom Law. Decree 163 replaced Decree No. 25/2011/ND-CP dated April 6, 2011 (Decree 25), which guided the implementation of the previous 2009 Telecom Law, and introduces many notable changes to the regulations on telecom service provision. Some key changes that will impact businesses engaged in the telecom sector in Vietnam are detailed below.

1. Classification of Telecom Services

The classification of telecom services into “basic telecom services” and “value-added telecom services” has been retained, in alignment with Vietnam’s WTO commitments in the telecom sector. However, Decree 163 expands the scope of both categories, as follows:

  • Basic telecom services: “Transmission services for machine-to-machine (M2M) communication” and “leasing services of all or part of the telecom network” are added. “Image transmission services” is changed to “transmission services for radio and television.”
  • Value-added telecom services: “Data center services,” “cloud computing services,” and “basic telecom services over the internet” (also known as over-the-top (OTT) telecom services) are added.

2. M2M Communication Services

Since M2M communication services are classified as basic telecom services, without exception, they are subject to the same regulatory framework. Specifically:

  • Cross-border provision: M2M communication services provided across borders must be conducted through a commercial agreement with a Vietnamese telecom enterprise licensed to provide telecom services with an international communication scope.
  • Onshore provision: Onshore M2M communication services will require a telecom license.

3. New Telecom Services (Data Center, Cloud, and OTT Telecom Services)

The 2023 Telecom Law adopted a light-touch management approach for data center, cloud, and OTT telecom services by not requiring the same licensing as previously regulated value-added telecom services, but instead mandating registration or notification before service provision. Decree 163 offers clearer guidance on this approach, specifically:

  • Cloud and OTT telecom services: Both onshore and offshore providers are required to notify the Vietnam Telecommunications Authority (VNTA) under the Ministry of Information and Communications (MIC).
  • Data center services: Offshore providers of data center services only need to notify the VNTA while onshore providers must register with the VNTA.

The required dossiers for notification and registration must be prepared in Vietnamese, following prescribed forms, and can be submitted in person, via postal service, or through the national public service portal. For onshore enterprises providing both data center and cloud computing services, only a registration form needs to be submitted, with cloud service details included in the same form.

Decree 163 specifies a relatively short timeline of three working days for processing these dossiers.

Key Obligations for Service Providers

Enterprises providing these three new services, which can include 100% foreign-owned enterprises in Vietnam, must fulfill certain obligations in addition to registration or notification requirements. These key obligations include storing and managing user information, user verification, and various specific obligations of onshore and offshore providers.

Offshore data center and cloud computing service providers also have certain additional obligations, such as promptly taking necessary measures to block access to information as requested by competent authorities.

Further, Decree 163 imposes certain obligations when data center and/or cloud services are provided to state agencies to serve state activities, such as storing data of the state agencies using these services within Vietnam.

4. Satellite Telecom Services

Onshore service provision: Decree 163 retains the conditions for the establishment of public fixed satellite and mobile satellite telecom networks regarding the charter capital and telecom network deployment from the previous Decree 25, including the commitment to invest at least VND 100 billion in the telecom network within the first three years.

Cross-border service provision: For providing cross-border telecom services via fixed satellite networks or mobile satellite networks, among other conditions, offshore providers must enter into a commercial agreement with a Vietnamese telecom enterprise licensed to provide telecom services with an international communication scope.

5. Telecom Market Management

Decree 163 introduces criteria for identifying telecom service markets under state management, and establishes criteria for identifying telecom enterprises and groups of enterprises with dominant market positions in state-managed service markets, using quantifiable principles suitable for telecom business activities. The decree tends to impose certain obligations on the identified telecom enterprises and groups of enterprises to ensure fair competition in the market.

6. Telecom Infrastructure Management

The development of telecom infrastructure in Vietnam is one of the key focuses of Decree 163, which covers the following main aspects of telecom infrastructure management, among others:

  • Protecting telecom infrastructure: Telecom enterprises are responsible for ensuring the safety of telecom infrastructure, including preventing attacks and incidents, maintaining stability with backups, preventing prohibited activities, ensuring safety for equipment and staff, and adhering to relevant standards and technical regulations.
  • Ensuring network information security: Telecom enterprises must ensure network information security in their operations by, among other measures, protecting information systems and handling incidents at the request of the MIC.
  • Sharing of passive telecom infrastructure: Decree 163 stipulates the authority to resolve the sharing of passive telecom infrastructure in cases where telecom enterprises cannot reach an agreement (except for price issues). The resolution of disputes will be handled by either the local Department of Information and Communications or the MIC, depending on the location of the passive telecom technical infrastructure in question. If the parties cannot reach an agreement on the price for sharing passive telecommunications infrastructure, negotiations must be carried out in accordance with the provisions of the pricing laws.
  • Sharing of active telecom infrastructure: The sharing of active telecommunications infrastructure among telecom enterprises is based on the principle of encouraging sharing to save costs for telecom network deployment, while ensuring compliance with competition law and radio frequency law.

7. Management of Mobile Subscriber Information

Decree 163 dedicates a section to the management of mobile subscriber information, offering comprehensive regulations on the subject. These include methods for registering mobile subscriber information, required documents for registration, verification of subscriber details, the scope of subscriber information, service provision after registration, registration for prepaid subscribers, storage and usage of subscriber data, subscriber responsibilities, and telecom enterprises’ obligations in addressing subscribers with incorrect information.

Business Recommendations

The 2023 Telecom Law, as detailed by Decree 163, demonstrates the government’s clear intent to catch up to and regulate recent advancements, innovations, and emerging business models in the technology and telecom sectors. The following are some recommendations for businesses:

  • Adopt proactive compliance strategies: Ensure familiarity with classifications and specific regulatory obligations for telecom services. Especially, businesses operating in the areas of M2M communication, cloud computing, data center services, and OTT telecom services should update internal compliance systems to address new requirements in these areas to avoid potential non-compliance risks.
  • Leverage emerging opportunities: With the government’s goal of opening markets and attracting foreign investment through incentives that support digital transformation, businesses should consider expanding and investing in areas like cloud computing, OTT services, and data centers to capitalize on emerging opportunities.
  • Adapt to digital transformation trends: Pay close attention to the new regulations aimed at facilitating digital transformation. For instance, consider investing in the development or optimization of mobile applications for subscriber registration and verification to align with the digital transformation push.
  • Strengthen data security and privacy practices: With increased regulatory focus on telecom infrastructure security and network information security, businesses should prioritize robust cybersecurity and network information security measures.

By navigating Decree 163 proactively, telecom enterprises can position themselves for sustainable growth while contributing to Vietnam’s digital economy ambitions.

Related Professionals

Industries

Technology

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

June 23, 2026
On May 14, 2026, Thailand published a ministerial regulation in the Government Gazette to prescribe measures for prevention and suppression of technology crimes. The regulation creates a comprehensive procedural framework for returning money and digital assets to victims of technology crimes. It will take effect 90 days after publication (in mid-August 2026), giving affected entities a limited window to prepare. Mandatory Reporting Obligations for Financial Institutions When a deposit account, e-money account, or digital asset wallet is frozen in connection with a technology crime, the relevant financial institution or business operator must report transaction data to the Anti-Money Laundering Office (AMLO) via AMLO’s designated electronic system. Required data elements include account numbers (sender and receiver), names, identification or passport numbers, legal entity registration numbers, phone numbers, remaining balance, damage amount, transaction reference numbers, and the bank case ID. Institutions that already share data through the information-sharing system under the emergency decree are deemed to have satisfied this reporting obligation, creating an incentive for platform participation. When the Royal Thai Police or the Department of Special Investigation seize or freeze assets related to technology crimes, they must provide AMLO with investigation reports, complaint evidence, money-trail data, and account statements. Notification and Claims Process Once the AMLO secretary-general approves verified reports of a technology crime, the account information of persons connected to the crime will be published in the Government Gazette, triggering a 90-day window for victims to file claims and for related persons to file objections. Officers will also publish details on AMLO’s electronic media and send registered mail to identified victims, which will be deemed received after 7 days domestically or 15 days internationally. Victims have 90 days from the date the crime is published in the Government Gazette to file claims through AMLO’s electronic system. Claims must include
Read More
June 15, 2026
The surge in AI development has led to a desperate demand for large, high-quality training data. However, real-world data can be expensive to collect, difficult to access, and often subject to strict privacy and regulatory constraints. Synthetic data, which consists of artificially generated records that replicate the statistical properties of real-world data without reproducing specific individuals’ information, provides an appealing solution by generating artificial datasets at scale without relying on identifiable personal information. It combines speed, cost efficiency, and regulatory compliance, making it a sensible alternative for organizations seeking to reduce risks while maintaining data utility. When properly anonymized, synthetic datasets may fall outside the scope of laws such as the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) or Thailand’s Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA), reducing compliance burdens while still supporting high-quality model training. However, relying on synthetic data without rigorous legal due diligence could be a strategic mistake. It replaces one set of known risks (scraping, direct privacy liability) with a new set of complex liabilities. The narrative that synthetic data is a “silver bullet” for privacy and IP compliance is dangerous and could be misleading. While synthetic data addresses data scarcity, it also introduces new legal uncertainties. Legal counsel should anticipate downstream risks arising from compromised data sources. Models trained on unlawfully obtained data may need to be decommissioned, even if their outputs appear lawful. What is synthetic data? Synthetic data refers to artificially generated information created using AI techniques such as deep learning and generative models. Instead of copying real records, it reproduces the statistical patterns and relationships found in the original dataset. Synthetic data generally falls into three categories: Fully synthetic data – Entirely new data points generated from learned patterns. The model studies the structure of the original data and produces records that resemble real-world
Read More
June 11, 2026
Thailand’s Electronic Transactions Development Agency (ETDA) has released a revised draft Electronic Transactions Act (ETA) for public hearing from May 12, 2026, to June 15, 2026. This is not merely an amendment to certain provisions of the current ETA, but a comprehensive redrafting of the entire act. The revised draft ETA introduces several significant changes from the current framework, with practical implications for businesses operating in Thailand. Unified Coverage of Public and Private Sectors The current law segregates government transactions into a separate chapter with distinct rules. The draft ETA eliminates this division, defining “transaction” to encompass civil and commercial juristic acts as well as administrative procedures, administrative contracts, and other acts of government agencies. Enhanced E-Signature Definition The definition of “electronic signature” is broadened to expressly include biometric data and refocused on identifying the signatory and demonstrating intent regarding the content of the electronic data. Shift in Burden of Proof When a party challenges the reliability of electronic data created using a “trusted electronic method” or a method prescribed by the ETDA, the burden of proof and the cost of proving unreliability shifts to the challenger. Introduction of New Digital Method Concepts The draft ETA introduces several new digital method concepts that are not currently recognized under the existing ETA framework. These include: Electronic timestamping (e-timestamp) Electronic registered delivery Electronic company seals Electronic stamp duty compliance Electronic identity authentication and verification Electronic transferable records (electronic bills of lading, promissory notes, and similar negotiable instruments) Recognition of Automated Systems and Electronic Contracting The draft ETA expressly recognizes the legal validity and enforceability of contracts formed through automated systems, including contracts concluded entirely between automated systems or between an automated system and a person. A party may not deny the binding effect of such contracts solely because no human review
Read More
June 5, 2026
Vietnam’s AI regulatory framework has reached an important milestone. While the Law on Artificial Intelligence No. 134/2025/QH15 (AI Law) established the foundation for AI governance, many practical compliance requirements were left to implementing regulations. On April 30, 2026, the government issued Decree No. 142/2026/ND-CP (Decree 142), which took effect on May 1, 2026, and provides the first detailed guidance on the implementation of the AI Law. Although an official list of high-risk AI systems is still pending from the prime minister, Decree 142 provides valuable insight into how Vietnam’s risk-based AI regulatory framework will operate in practice. Risk Classification Framework The AI Law adopts a risk-based approach under which AI systems are classified as high-risk, medium-risk, or low-risk. Decree 142 builds on this framework by providing detailed guidance on how these classifications are determined. High-risk AI systems are determined based on factors such as (i) their potential impact on life, health, property, human rights, public interests, or national security; (ii) the sector in which they are deployed; and (iii) the scale of affected users or integration with critical infrastructure. The latest draft list of high-risk AI systems appears to follow these same principles. Medium-risk AI systems generally include systems that may mislead, influence, or manipulate users, particularly where users may not realize they are interacting with AI or AI-generated content. The focus is therefore on transparency and authenticity risks rather than broader societal or safety concerns. Low-risk AI systems are those that do not meet the criteria for either high-risk or medium-risk classification. Importantly, Decree 142 seeks to avoid over-classification. Certain systems may fall outside the high-risk or medium-risk regimes, including internal-use systems, office-support tools, technical editing applications, certain back-end processing systems, and AI systems used in artistic, gaming, cinematic, or other creative contexts. Providers must also review and
Read More