You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

February 28, 2025

Unpacking Vietnam’s Decree 163: Key Implications for Telecom Service Providers

Subscribe to Updates

Vietnam’s Decree No. 163/2024/ND-CP (Decree 163), which has been in full effect since January 1, 2025, provides crucial guidance on the implementation of Vietnam’s 2023 Telecom Law. Decree 163 replaced Decree No. 25/2011/ND-CP dated April 6, 2011 (Decree 25), which guided the implementation of the previous 2009 Telecom Law, and introduces many notable changes to the regulations on telecom service provision. Some key changes that will impact businesses engaged in the telecom sector in Vietnam are detailed below.

1. Classification of Telecom Services

The classification of telecom services into “basic telecom services” and “value-added telecom services” has been retained, in alignment with Vietnam’s WTO commitments in the telecom sector. However, Decree 163 expands the scope of both categories, as follows:

  • Basic telecom services: “Transmission services for machine-to-machine (M2M) communication” and “leasing services of all or part of the telecom network” are added. “Image transmission services” is changed to “transmission services for radio and television.”
  • Value-added telecom services: “Data center services,” “cloud computing services,” and “basic telecom services over the internet” (also known as over-the-top (OTT) telecom services) are added.

2. M2M Communication Services

Since M2M communication services are classified as basic telecom services, without exception, they are subject to the same regulatory framework. Specifically:

  • Cross-border provision: M2M communication services provided across borders must be conducted through a commercial agreement with a Vietnamese telecom enterprise licensed to provide telecom services with an international communication scope.
  • Onshore provision: Onshore M2M communication services will require a telecom license.

3. New Telecom Services (Data Center, Cloud, and OTT Telecom Services)

The 2023 Telecom Law adopted a light-touch management approach for data center, cloud, and OTT telecom services by not requiring the same licensing as previously regulated value-added telecom services, but instead mandating registration or notification before service provision. Decree 163 offers clearer guidance on this approach, specifically:

  • Cloud and OTT telecom services: Both onshore and offshore providers are required to notify the Vietnam Telecommunications Authority (VNTA) under the Ministry of Information and Communications (MIC).
  • Data center services: Offshore providers of data center services only need to notify the VNTA while onshore providers must register with the VNTA.

The required dossiers for notification and registration must be prepared in Vietnamese, following prescribed forms, and can be submitted in person, via postal service, or through the national public service portal. For onshore enterprises providing both data center and cloud computing services, only a registration form needs to be submitted, with cloud service details included in the same form.

Decree 163 specifies a relatively short timeline of three working days for processing these dossiers.

Key Obligations for Service Providers

Enterprises providing these three new services, which can include 100% foreign-owned enterprises in Vietnam, must fulfill certain obligations in addition to registration or notification requirements. These key obligations include storing and managing user information, user verification, and various specific obligations of onshore and offshore providers.

Offshore data center and cloud computing service providers also have certain additional obligations, such as promptly taking necessary measures to block access to information as requested by competent authorities.

Further, Decree 163 imposes certain obligations when data center and/or cloud services are provided to state agencies to serve state activities, such as storing data of the state agencies using these services within Vietnam.

4. Satellite Telecom Services

Onshore service provision: Decree 163 retains the conditions for the establishment of public fixed satellite and mobile satellite telecom networks regarding the charter capital and telecom network deployment from the previous Decree 25, including the commitment to invest at least VND 100 billion in the telecom network within the first three years.

Cross-border service provision: For providing cross-border telecom services via fixed satellite networks or mobile satellite networks, among other conditions, offshore providers must enter into a commercial agreement with a Vietnamese telecom enterprise licensed to provide telecom services with an international communication scope.

5. Telecom Market Management

Decree 163 introduces criteria for identifying telecom service markets under state management, and establishes criteria for identifying telecom enterprises and groups of enterprises with dominant market positions in state-managed service markets, using quantifiable principles suitable for telecom business activities. The decree tends to impose certain obligations on the identified telecom enterprises and groups of enterprises to ensure fair competition in the market.

6. Telecom Infrastructure Management

The development of telecom infrastructure in Vietnam is one of the key focuses of Decree 163, which covers the following main aspects of telecom infrastructure management, among others:

  • Protecting telecom infrastructure: Telecom enterprises are responsible for ensuring the safety of telecom infrastructure, including preventing attacks and incidents, maintaining stability with backups, preventing prohibited activities, ensuring safety for equipment and staff, and adhering to relevant standards and technical regulations.
  • Ensuring network information security: Telecom enterprises must ensure network information security in their operations by, among other measures, protecting information systems and handling incidents at the request of the MIC.
  • Sharing of passive telecom infrastructure: Decree 163 stipulates the authority to resolve the sharing of passive telecom infrastructure in cases where telecom enterprises cannot reach an agreement (except for price issues). The resolution of disputes will be handled by either the local Department of Information and Communications or the MIC, depending on the location of the passive telecom technical infrastructure in question. If the parties cannot reach an agreement on the price for sharing passive telecommunications infrastructure, negotiations must be carried out in accordance with the provisions of the pricing laws.
  • Sharing of active telecom infrastructure: The sharing of active telecommunications infrastructure among telecom enterprises is based on the principle of encouraging sharing to save costs for telecom network deployment, while ensuring compliance with competition law and radio frequency law.

7. Management of Mobile Subscriber Information

Decree 163 dedicates a section to the management of mobile subscriber information, offering comprehensive regulations on the subject. These include methods for registering mobile subscriber information, required documents for registration, verification of subscriber details, the scope of subscriber information, service provision after registration, registration for prepaid subscribers, storage and usage of subscriber data, subscriber responsibilities, and telecom enterprises’ obligations in addressing subscribers with incorrect information.

Business Recommendations

The 2023 Telecom Law, as detailed by Decree 163, demonstrates the government’s clear intent to catch up to and regulate recent advancements, innovations, and emerging business models in the technology and telecom sectors. The following are some recommendations for businesses:

  • Adopt proactive compliance strategies: Ensure familiarity with classifications and specific regulatory obligations for telecom services. Especially, businesses operating in the areas of M2M communication, cloud computing, data center services, and OTT telecom services should update internal compliance systems to address new requirements in these areas to avoid potential non-compliance risks.
  • Leverage emerging opportunities: With the government’s goal of opening markets and attracting foreign investment through incentives that support digital transformation, businesses should consider expanding and investing in areas like cloud computing, OTT services, and data centers to capitalize on emerging opportunities.
  • Adapt to digital transformation trends: Pay close attention to the new regulations aimed at facilitating digital transformation. For instance, consider investing in the development or optimization of mobile applications for subscriber registration and verification to align with the digital transformation push.
  • Strengthen data security and privacy practices: With increased regulatory focus on telecom infrastructure security and network information security, businesses should prioritize robust cybersecurity and network information security measures.

By navigating Decree 163 proactively, telecom enterprises can position themselves for sustainable growth while contributing to Vietnam’s digital economy ambitions.

Related Professionals

Industries

Technology

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

March 6, 2026
Thailand’s Legislation Consideration Committee of the Ministry of Interior has ruled that in-game loot boxes in online games do not constitute gambling under the Gambling Act B.E. 2478 (1935). This first-of-its-kind ruling provides useful guidance for online game operators and digital entertainment companies operating in Thailand. Background The ruling came in response to an inquiry concerning an online role-playing game operator that launched a campaign featuring a loot box mechanism. The mechanism allowed players to purchase a token in exchange for the opportunity to receive a virtual loot box containing randomized in-game items. The key features of this were as follows: The items received were digital, noncash items usable only within the game. The items could not be exchanged, redeemed, or converted into cash with the game operator. Items may differ in rarity but remain purely virtual. The central question was whether paying money to obtain randomized in-game items constituted a risk-based activity involving the chance to receive money or property of monetary value, which would constitute gambling under the Gambling Act. Committee Ruling The committee reached the following conclusions regarding the characteristics of the game’s loot-box mechanism: No cash or monetary equivalent: Players did not receive cash or property that could be exchanged for cash. The in-game items were merely usage rights within the online game ecosystem. No real-world monetary valuation: There was no determination of item value in real currency, and no mechanism for redeeming or converting items into money with the game operator. Any off-platform trading of in-game items between players is irrelevant to online game operators, as any value arising from such transactions is determined by the market rather than by the operators themselves. Service fee characterization: Payments made by players purchasing in-game loot boxes constituted fees for online game services. Accordingly, the committee concluded
Read More
March 5, 2026
Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a criminal complaint against a licensed digital asset broker, its overseas trading platform, and its executives for allegedly operating an unlicensed digital asset exchange targeting Thai customers. The case marks an escalation in the SEC’s enforcement efforts against unlicensed offshore platforms that attempt to serve Thai users through local licensed entities. Criminal Complaint On February 20, 2026, the SEC filed a criminal complaint with the Economic Crime Suppression Division against a local licensed digital asset broker, its overseas global trading platform, and its executives. The SEC alleges that the parties violated the Digital Asset Business Emergency Decree B.E. 2561 (2018) by cooperatively operating a digital asset exchange business on a cross-border basis since 2023 without the required SEC license. According to the SEC, the local broker promoted the overseas platform’s services to the public through Thai-language posts on social media channels, with services available exclusively to customers residing in Thailand. Access to the global platform was provided through the local broker’s website and mobile application. Customers who registered for the local broker’s services were automatically granted access to the global platform without having to undergo a separate identity verification process. The SEC also found that the local broker provided back-office system support services to the global platform. The SEC considers these activities to constitute joint operation of an unlicensed digital asset exchange. The former executives of the local broker are being held liable as the responsible persons during the relevant period. The SEC emphasized that the complaint initiates the criminal process, and the decision to prosecute or convict the accused parties will ultimately be made by law enforcement authorities and the criminal courts. Platform Blocking The SEC has also coordinated with the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society to block public
Read More
February 27, 2026
The Bank of Thailand (BOT) has officially implemented a new regulatory framework supervising systemically important retail payment systems (SIRPS), effective February 21, 2026, with PromptPay being the first payment system designated as a SIRPS. Under this new set of regulations, the BOT may designate payment systems under the Payment Systems Act B.E. 2560 (2017) as SIRPSs based on quantitative and qualitative assessments. Once a system is designated as a SIRPS, the operator becomes subject to expanded supervisory obligations beyond the general requirements of the Payment Systems Act. Enhanced Supervisory Requirements SIRPS operators must comply with a heightened supervisory regime across three key areas, outlined below. 1. Governance SIRPS operators must maintain robust and transparent governance structures, including: Balanced board composition, with at least one-third of the board comprising independent directors who represent stakeholders in the system (such as payment service providers, consumers, and experts). Independent directors may serve for no more than two consecutive terms. Subcommittees to assist the board in overseeing compliance, policy implementation, and operational strategy. Clear separation between executives responsible for risk and information security and those overseeing day-to-day business operations. Risk Management and System SecuritySIRPS operators must implement comprehensive risk management frameworks, including: Clear service agreements between the SIRPS operator and its direct participants (payment service providers who connect directly to the SIRPS), defining roles and responsibilities among stakeholders. These agreements must include obligations for direct SIRPS participants to supervise any indirect participants they onboard to ensure compliance with service agreements and business rules. A business continuity plan covering both IT and non-IT aspects, with annual review. The SIRPS must target service availability comparable to international payment infrastructures, including the ability to recover operations within two hours of a disruption and to maintain scalable operational capacity. Tools and controls to monitor and manage material or
Read More
February 26, 2026
Thailand is preparing to offer new tools for intellectual property enforcement as the Electronic Transactions Development Agency (ETDA) recently released for public consultation a draft notification requiring social media platforms to verify user identities and conduct know-your-customer (KYC) checks on advertisers. The draft Notification of the Electronic Transactions Commission on Measures to Prevent Technological Crimes for Social Media Service Providers, which is to be issued under the Emergency Decree on Measures for the Prevention and Suppression of Technological Crimes B.E. 2566 (2023), as amended in 2025, primarily aims to combat online fraud and technology-related crimes. However, its new obligations also provide IP owners with valuable tools to identify anonymous infringers. Key Regulatory Mandates The draft notification imposes several verification requirements on social media platforms operating in Thailand. These requirements also strengthen IP rights holders’ ability to identify anonymous infringers, as platforms must: Verify user identities through registered phone numbers and link all accounts to verifiable identities. Conduct KYC checks on advertisers, including individuals, companies, and any third-party payers. Perform heightened identity checks for high-risk or repeat offenders before publishing advertisements. Promptly remove content flagged by the Anti-Technology Crime Division and prescreen advertisements for prohibited or high-risk content. How IP Owners Can Use This Notification for Enforcement The phone number–based verification requirement enables IP owners to work more effectively with enforcement authorities in tracing individuals or entities responsible for infringing content. The comprehensive advertiser KYC obligations, including mandatory disclosure of third-party payment sources, create a clear audit trail even when bad actors attempt to obscure their identity through intermediaries or shell accounts. This traceability is essential for pursuing damages and dismantling organized counterfeit operations. The ETDA is now considering adjustments to the draft notification after receiving comments during the public consultation period, which ended on February 2, 2026. Following finalization
Read More