You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

February 24, 2023

Trends and Hurdles for Employers in Southeast Asia in 2023

International Employment Lawyer

Many companies have moved to Southeast Asia to benefit from the advantages of this vibrant and diverse market. The region is already a manufacturing hub for a multitude of industries—computer and automotive products in Thailand, textiles in Cambodia, and footwear and electrical goods in Vietnam, to name a few—and an increasing number of companies worldwide are reconfiguring their supply chains to include regional suppliers.

A key challenge is keeping up to date with employment law trends in these jurisdictions to ensure compliance with local regulations—and avoid costly, time-consuming business interruption. Here we outline trends and recent regulatory developments in Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam, and consider what they mean for employers.

Cambodia

The Ministry of Labour and Vocational Training (MLVT) is likely to pursue a more proactive enforcement strategy in 2023. Last May, the MLVT announced companies would be required to submit a twice yearly self-declaration on labour compliance through a new online system.

The self-declaration form requires companies to confirm and upload evidence of compliance, and the MLVT online system—through which the ministry can easily determine if a company is compliant –generates a report that lists all fines.

Companies should comply with the self-declaration requirement and carefully review the form to understand what fines will apply for non-compliance.

On 1 October 2022, regulations relating to the National Social Security Fund (NSSF) pension system came into effect, and employers and employees began making NSSF pension contributions.

Over the next five years, total compulsory pension contributions will amount to 4% of an employee’s wage, half of which is paid by the employer and half deducted from the employee’s salary. The contribution wage is capped at KHR 1.2m (USD 300).

Employers are currently required to pay a relatively small amount (KHR 24,000, or around USD 6). This will increase to 10.75% over a ten-year period. Further, it is possible that the contribution wage could be increased in the future.

Since the government amended the labour law in October 2021, clarifying that employees with an individual dispute can file a complaint with the Arbitration Council, Cambodia has had a more transparent labour dispute resolution mechanism.

As a result, we are likely to see more employees filing claims against employers over the coming months and years, particularly over termination for cause. Previously, employees with an individual dispute could not access the Arbitration Council and only had recourse to the courts, where cost and transparency issues dissuaded many employees from filing claims.

Accordingly, employers should take care when terminating employees. If terminating an employee for cause, employers need to be sure that they can document the reason for termination.

Thailand

Parliament on 19 January passed the Work from Home Bill (formerly known as Labour Protection Act (No. 8) B.E. 2566 (2023)), which amends the country’s Labour Protection Act (LPA) to reflect current circumstances.

The accompanying legislative remark states that the proposed amendments to the LPA will provide additional options for work arrangements between employers and employees, upgrade the level of labour protection, increase work stability, and improve quality of life for employees in Thailand.

A ministerial regulation requires government, employers, and insurers to contribute to the Social Security Fund according to set contribution rates—one covering the period from 1 October to 31 December 2022, and the other covering the period from 1 January 2023 onward.

At times, the government alters these contribution rates to provide stimulus to employees and employers. This was done, for instance, to provide economic relief during the COVID-19 pandemic. Employers will need to stay alert to potential changes to prescribed contribution rates to the fund.

The Personal Data Protection Committee (PDPC) has released guidelines for data controllers on consent and notification to data subjects of required information (ie, collection, use, and disclosure of personal data). The guidelines do not have a legal binding effect. However, employers as data controllers may rely on these guidelines when processing data on internal subjects (such as employees) and external subjects (such as customers or suppliers).

Additionally, effective 1 October 2022, the minimum wage increased by approximately 5%. The minimum wage varies depending on the province.

Vietnam

Vietnam’s recent accession to the EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement and the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership obligates the country to ratify all core ILO conventions. Vietnam has not yet ratified the Convention on Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining, but this is expected in 2023.

In the latest version of the Labor Code, which came into effect in 2021, Vietnam recognised trade unions independent from the Vietnam General Confederation of Labor (VGCL)—previously the only recognised union system. However, the Code does not provide details on the formation of independent trade unions or on how they will collectively bargain together with VGCL trade unions within an enterprise.

A decree clarifying these details is anticipated in 2023. It will enable formation of independent trade unions, meaning one enterprise may have multiple trade unions within it. Employers may then be required to consult with multiple unions on key management steps and collectively bargain with more than one union. These changes are likely to significantly add to the administrative burden of managing the workforce in Vietnam.

Vietnam has issued a draft decree on personal data privacy that would impose significant obligations on data processors—including employers. Under the decree, employers would need a special permit to process “sensitive personal information”, such as an individual’s financial and health information, criminal record, and other types of information routinely collected during recruitment and onboarding. A cross-border transfer of personal information would require a special permit, and additional security measures would also be required to protect employees’ personal data.

If the decree is passed in its current form, employers will face significant administrative burdens in managing employees’ personal data. It may be prudent to set aside a budget now to cover the costs and additional personnel necessary to implement the obligations under the new decree.

The provincial Departments of Labor, Invalids and Social Affairs and immigration bureaus have introduced internal policies changing application procedures for work permits and work visas, causing significant delays in obtaining these documents for foreign employees. The process now takes an average of four-to-five months (previously, it took two to three).

It is now also very onerous to apply for a work or business visa, as the use of agents to assist with this task has been curtailed. Visas on arrival have also been cancelled, and it is necessary to apply to the Vietnamese embassy or consulate in the worker’s home country.

These issues result in uncertain project timelines, difficulties retaining foreign employees, and delays in introducing foreign workers to Vietnam. Enterprises planning on engaging a foreign worker should begin the work permit application process well in advance and consider preparing contingency plans in case they are unable to obtain the necessary documentation.

The regulatory trends described in this article highlight the importance of having access to local expertise to maintain compliance with fluctuating requirements. With the proper guidance and understanding of employment laws in each jurisdiction, employers can avoid penalties, sidestep delays, and empower their employees to contribute to business success.

 

This article was originally published on the International Employment Lawyer website and is republished here with permission.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Vientiane have contributed the Laos chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Laos chapter was prepared by associates Naiyane Xaechao and Sayphin Singsouvong. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Laos chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Cambodia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Phnom Penh have contributed the Cambodia chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Cambodia chapter was authored by Jay Cohen, partner and director of Tilleke & Gibbins’ Phnom Penh office, and Chanvisal Lok, associate. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Cambodia chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
January 14, 2026
Employers operating in Thailand can enforce post-employment noncompete covenants, but success depends on precise drafting and strong evidentiary support. Thai courts will uphold restraints that protect legitimate employer interests and are fair and reasonable in duration, geographic reach, and substantive scope. Overbroad covenants, however, draw judicial skepticism and may fail unless they are drafted in severable, defensible components tied to the employee’s actual role. This article synthesizes recent trends in Thai case practice, explains how Thai courts assess reasonableness in employment restraints, and provides a practical litigation-focused framework for drafting enforceable covenants, preparing evidence, and pursuing relief through the Labor Court. The Legal Framework and Its Practical Implications Thai courts evaluate noncompete covenants under general principles of contract enforceability and public policy, with particular focus on whether a restraint is necessary to protect a legitimate employer interest and proportionate to that objective. In employment matters, this analysis is shaped by the employee-protective tenor of Thai labor law and by the Labor Court’s equitable discretion in determining appropriate remedies. The practical takeaway is that standardized or broadly drafted covenants rarely survive scrutiny. Courts look for a demonstrable nexus between the employee’s actual exposure to confidential information, trade secrets, or customer relationships and the scope of the restraint. Where that nexus is weak or the restraint operates as a blanket prohibition, courts are inclined to decline enforcement or limit relief to a narrowly tailored prohibition. The employer interests most commonly recognized as legitimate in Thai practice include the protection of trade secrets, confidential business information, and goodwill tied to identifiable customer segments or territories. Courts are more likely to enforce restraints where employers can clearly document what information is at risk, why particular customer relationships matter, and how the employee was involved with those assets. Judges also look closely at the
December 19, 2025
On December 12, 2025, Thailand’s Ministry of Labor published a ministerial regulation prescribing the minimum and maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions. The regulation, which takes effect on January 1, 2026, sets a flat minimum base wage of THB 1,650 per month and a phased increase of the maximum base wage over the following six years, as outlined in the table below. Impact on Social Security Benefits Not only will monthly contributions increase as a result of the adjustment to the maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions, but the maximum benefits available to insured persons will also be enhanced, as shown in the next table. Employer Obligations From January 1, 2026, employers must correctly withhold wages and remit social security contributions for both the employer’s and employees’ portions in compliance with the revised thresholds. Failure to comply may expose employers to penalties under the Social Security Act B.E. 2533 (1990). Employers should ensure that payroll systems are updated as necessary to reflect these changes to the wage ceiling used for social security contribution calculations.