You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

July 9, 2025

The European Power Outage: Key Takeaways for Thailand

On April 28, 2025, a massive power outage swept across the Iberian Peninsula, plunging Portugal, Spain, and parts of southwestern France into darkness for up to ten hours. As Thailand advances its energy transition by increasing renewable integration and regional interconnections, the European blackout serves as a stark reminder of the grid vulnerabilities that still exist.

This article is the third and final installment of From Crisis to Clarity, a three-part series analyzing the recent European blackout and its implications for Thailand. In the first article of the series, we examined the root causes of the outage in the Iberian Peninsula. The second article assessed the likelihood of a similar event occurring in Thailand, considering the country’s current energy infrastructure and its increasing reliance on renewables. The third and final article will present key lessons and recommendations that Thailand can adopt to strengthen its energy system and prevent comparable disruptions in the future.

What Should Thailand Learn from the European Blackout?

The European blackout offers important lessons for Thailand as it advances its energy transition. One clear takeaway is that building a resilient power system goes beyond just adding capacity—it requires investing in flexibility and the ability to respond quickly to unexpected events.

One of the first reactions to the Iberian outage was to blame renewable energy. While it’s true that wind and solar are variable and can complicate grid balancing, the ongoing investigation suggests the core problem lies more in grid structure and operational coordination than in the energy sources themselves. The Spanish experience serves as a warning: without sufficient “inertia”—a term that refers to the ability of the power system to resist changes in frequency when there is a sudden imbalance between supply and demand—or alternative technologies to stabilize the grid, a sudden loss of generation could lead to widespread outages. Urgent upgrades are needed to ensure that grids can cope with the challenges of decarbonization and increased electrification.

The debate in Thailand now centers on how to balance the transition to renewables with the need for grid stability. As Thailand accelerates its decarbonization efforts and increases electrification across sectors, the urgency of upgrading the national grid cannot be overstated. The integration of greater proportions of renewable energy will inevitably test the limits of existing infrastructure. Without timely enhancements to grid flexibility and control systems, the risk of large-scale disruptions will grow.

Another key takeaway from the European outage is the lack of responsiveness in the immediate aftermath of the event; it took a significant amount of time to reconnect the power plants to the grid. Traditional battery storage plays a key role, but newer developments such as supercapacitors and flywheels offer promising solutions for enhancing grid stability. Supercapacitors can store and release energy very rapidly, helping to smooth out short-term fluctuations in power supply and demand. Flywheels, meanwhile, store kinetic energy and can provide immediate bursts of power to stabilize the grid during sudden disturbances.

To address the complexities and challenges associated with these matters, Thailand should consider setting up a professional team similar to ENTSO-E (the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity), which is an organization responsible for coordinating and developing Europe’s electricity transmission network. This team would be responsible for conducting thorough studies and providing expert suggestions to ensure the technical and operational implementation of any relevant initiatives.

The European blackout is a timely reminder that the path to a sustainable energy future is fraught with operational and technical challenges. For Thailand, the key to a successful energy transition lies in building a power system that is not only clean but also resilient, flexible, and responsive. Proactive planning and investment are essential for making Thailand’s energy transition both secure and sustainable.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

February 23, 2021
As many are already aware, following the change of government in Myanmar on February 1, 2021, a draft Cyber Security Law was proposed which attracted widespread criticism. However, less attention has been paid to significant amendments to two existing laws, some of which have a similar effect to parts of the draft Cyber Security Law. In other words, while the draft Cyber Security Law has not progressed further and is under public scrutiny, significant elements of it have found their way into law in Myanmar by other routes. Because these amendments are already law, it is very important that individuals and businesses in Myanmar understand their implications. Amendments to the Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens The Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens (2017), or the “Privacy Law,” was amended on February 13, 2021, less than two weeks after the military government came into power. These amendments chiefly address the power of the government to conduct searches, seizures, and arrests; to extend detention without judicial oversight; and to carry out broad surveillance and investigation activities that could intrude on individual privacy. The amendments accomplish this by suspending various sections of the Privacy Law for as long as the State Administration Council (the military body now governing Myanmar) is in power. The suspended sections include the following: Section 5: Search, seizure, and arrest without civilian observation The relevant part of Section 5 of the Privacy Law states, “The responsible authorities shall … when acting in accordance with existing law, not enter into a person’s residence or a room used as a residence, or a building, compound or building in a compound, for the purpose of search, seizure, or arrest, unless accompanied by minimum of two witnesses who should comprise Ward or Village Tract Administrators…”. The suspension
February 22, 2021
Following the recent imposition of sanctions on Myanmar individuals and companies by the US, the UK and Canada have now imposed new sanctions. As with the US sanctions, these new measures impact UK and Canadian citizens and companies, and non-UK and non-Canadian companies and citizens with interests in those jurisdictions. The EU has indicated that it is planning to issue similar sanctions in the near future. New UK Sanctions In addition to the 16 individuals already sanctioned by the UK government, on February 18, 2021, the UK government announced that three individuals have been sanctioned for serious human rights violations and are now subject to asset freezes and travel bans. The full list of Myanmar individuals and companies sanctioned by the UK is available on the website of the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation. Breaches of UK financial sanctions are criminal offences punishable in the UK by up to 7 years imprisonment and heavy fines. New Canadian Sanctions Also on February 18, timed to coincide with the UK sanctions, new Canadian sanctions were imposed on nine individuals. As with the UK, Canada already had a number of individuals in the Myanmar military on its sanctions list, and the new additions bring the total number of individuals sanctioned by Canada to 54. All assets of these individuals in Canada are now frozen, and they are banned from travelling to Canada. Canadian businesses or entities may not do business with any of the 54 individuals. Full details of the impact of the sanctions are available on the Government of Canada’s website, as is a database of the Myanmar individuals and companies subject to them. Breach of Canadian sanctions carries with it up to 5 years’ imprisonment in Canada and/or a large fine. Other Countries The EU is reportedly drawing up sanctions
February 18, 2021
As you will no doubt know, on February 1, 2021, the Myanmar military declared a state of emergency in Myanmar for a period of one year. State Counsellor Daw Aung Sang Su Kyi was detained, as were the president and various significant political and civil leaders. Min Aung Hlaing, commander-in-chief of the Tatmadaw (Myanmar armed forces) has installed himself as chairman of the State Administration Council, the current administration. New sanctions The reaction of the Biden administration has been swift. On February 10, 2021, President Biden issued Executive Order 14014, which provides bases to impose sanctions on individuals and companies deemed by the US to, among other things: operate in the defense sector of Myanmar; be responsible for policies that undermine democratic processes in Myanmar; have taken actions to undermine democratic processes or institutions, or prohibit, limit, or penalize the exercise of free speech, in Myanmar; or be a spouse or child of the foregoing. On the next day, February 11, the US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), imposed sanctions under the new executive order on ten individuals—including General Min Aung Hlaing—and three companies, including Cancri Gems & Jewelry Co, Myanmar Imperial Jade Co, and Myanmar Ruby Enterprise.  All such individuals and companies have now been designated on the US list of specially designated nationals (SDNs). Effect of sanctions As a result of such sanctions, the property of these individuals or companies that is located in the US or is under the possession or control of US companies and citizens is frozen, and US companies and citizens are generally prohibited from dealing deal with any such property.  Reportedly, roughly USD 1 billion of funds belonging to the individuals and companies blocked on February 11 are located in the US and thus now frozen. The SDN list As many
February 2, 2021
The application period for very small power producers (VSPPs) aiming to participate in the community power plant project is fast drawing to a close, with the deadline set for February 4, 2021. February 4 is also the closing date of the period for public comments on the two draft regulations outlining the pilot project to procure electricity from community power plants. These draft regulations are being finalized by the Energy Regulation Commission (ERC)  as part of an effort to boost the economy at a grassroots level. The community power plant project will procure 150 MW from VSPPs producing electricity from either biomass or biogas. 75 MW will be obtained from biomass VSPPs, with a limit of 6 MW to each biomass VSPP, while 75 MW of the electricity procurement will be obtained from biogas VSPPs with a limit of 3 MW each. VSPPs wishing to apply for the community power plant project must be 90%-owned by a private company, while 10% of ownership must be under a community enterprise or community enterprise network—consisting of at least 200 households—registered with the Department of Agricultural Extension. Furthermore, the fuel used by the VSPP must be either biogas or biomass obtained from the community enterprise or community enterprise network, and must not include fossil fuels. Once VSPPs have submitted their applications, they will be subject to a technical assessment to determine power production readiness, and will undergo a process of competitive bidding. VSPPs will be compared and selected based on a number of factors, including power production capacity, ability to operate for duration of the 20-year project, and the proposed fixed feed-in tariff (FiT). VSPPs that are chosen to participate in this pilot project will be subject to the following FiTs per unit of electricity, based on the type of fuel and