You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 26, 2022

Thailand’s SEC Updates Regulatory Framework for Digital Asset Business Operators

Subscribe to Updates

During the first quarter of 2022, Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced a series of notifications aiming to strengthen the regulatory regime for digital assets while safeguarding investors’ interests. The updated rules and conditions apply to digital asset business operators licensed by the SEC.

The key features of the new notifications, which took effect in March and April 2022, are summarized below.

Custody of customers’ assets (effective March 1, 2022)

As custodians of their customers’ assets, digital asset business operators must:

  • Segregate customers’ assets in their custody so that the operators can clearly identify which assets belong to which investors. If customers’ digital assets are to be deposited with a third party, the operators must inform the customers accordingly.
  • Refrain from seeking benefits from customers’ assets in any manner other than the purpose for which the assets are held. This includes refraining from using customers’ assets to provide benefits to others or to the customers themselves, and from depositing customers’ digital assets with a custodian that intends to lend out the digital assets (but does not include giving the customer’s assets to a licensed digital asset fund manager for investment in digital assets).
  • Reconcile customers’ assets and keep evidentiary documentation for a period of at least five years.

Privacy coin services (effective April 1, 2022)

Digital asset business operators are prohibited from providing privacy coin services that can conceal (or allow the concealing of) specific transactional information, such as data about the transferor, the transferee, and the transfer amount.

Digital asset business operators that provided privacy coin services to customers before the effective date of these new regulations may continue to provide such services, but they must arrange for their customers to disclose at least the required transactional information or agree not to engage in information concealment.

Digital assets as a means of payment (effective April 1, 2022)

Digital asset business operators are prohibited from using digital assets as a means of payment and must not provide any services or undertake any activities that encourage or promote the use of digital assets to pay for goods or services. This includes:

  • Representing to any customer (through an advertisement, etc.) that the business operator will accept payment for goods or services using digital assets;
  • Establishing a system or tool facilitating the use of digital assets to pay for goods or services;
  • Providing e-wallets for the purpose of using digital assets as a means of payment;
  • Providing a service for transferring THB-denominated funds from a customer’s account to third-party accounts;
  • Providing a service for transferring digital assets from a customer’s account to third party accounts in order to pay for goods or services; and
  • Providing any other services that support the use of digital assets to pay for goods or services.

Business operators must take action (e.g., warnings, account suspension or termination, etc.) against customers who fail to comply with service terms and conditions.

Providing customers with activity reports (effective March 30, 2022)

The SEC now requires digital asset operators to provide their customers with a report, within one business day of a transaction, containing specific information about the customers’ digital asset trading, exchanging, and investment activity. Operators must retain the disclosed information for at least 18 months.

Although the requirement came into effect on March 30, there is an initial implementation stage until April 30, 2022, during which operators only need to provide reports to their customers within a reasonable period of time upon request. The reporting requirement will be fully implemented from May 1, 2022, onward.

For more information on the latest SEC rules and regulations for digital assets, or on any aspect of digital asset business or cryptocurrency in Thailand, please contact Kobkit Thienpreecha at [email protected], Onunya Chanpen at [email protected], Sorawit Partomtanasarn at [email protected], or Napassorn Lertussavavivat at [email protected].

Related Professionals

Industries

Technology

Practices

Capital Markets

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

December 12, 2025
Tilleke & Gibbins has updated the Cambodia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters in Multilaw’s Global Data Protection Guide, which collects expert advice from Multilaw member firms in 90 jurisdictions around the world (including a Laos chapter, which is also authored by Tilleke & Gibbins). The guide provides answers to key issues concerning the fast-developing data protection and privacy laws around the world, and helps data protection officers and in-house counsel understand how the regulatory regime for data protection can affect their organizations in various jurisdictions. Each section of the guide identifies the main laws that govern data protection in that jurisdiction, and gives a detailed overview of the legal principles in place as well as the enforcement authorities responsible for overseeing compliance. The guide also covers issues related to data subject rights, data protection officers, impact assessments, data breach notification requirements, and cross border data transfers. The use of personal data in marketing is also considered, with specific information on electronic marketing rules, cookies, and marketing to businesses and consumers. Multilaw, of which Tilleke & Gibbins is a longtime member, is a global network of carefully selected independent law firms able to provide expert legal advice in complex environments around the globe. The full guide is available for free on the Multilaw website.
Read More
December 11, 2025
On December 10, 2025, the National Assembly of Vietnam passed a new Cybersecurity Law, which will take effect on July 1, 2026. The new Cybersecurity Law was developed based on the consolidation of the 2018 Cybersecurity Law and the 2015 Law on Network Information Security. While the final approved version of the new Cybersecurity Law has not yet been published, according to official reports, the following notable requirements are confirmed to be included: The new Cybersecurity Law dedicates a specific article to prohibited acts related to cybersecurity, under which it strictly prohibits posting or disseminating information online that propagandizes against the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. The law also prohibits, among other things, (i) the appropriation, trading, seizure, or intentional disclosure of information classified as state secrets, work secrets, business secrets, personal secrets, family secrets, and private life; (ii) intentionally eavesdropping, recording, or filming online conversations without authorization; and (iii) the use of artificial intelligence (AI) or new technologies to conduct prohibited acts. The Ministry of Public Security (MPS) has the authority to require enterprises providing telecommunications, internet, and online services, as well as system administrators, to remove information violating cybersecurity laws from systems under their management. The MPS is also assigned responsibility for ensuring information security in cyberspace and data security, establishing mechanisms for IP address identity management, verifying digital account registration information, and issuing warnings and sharing information on cybersecurity threats. Information systems are classified into five levels (similar to the 2015 Law on Network Information Security) based on the degree of harm to national security and social order if an incident occurs. The MPS is the lead agency assisting the government in state management of cybersecurity. The Ministry of National Defense is responsible for managing military information systems, and the Government Cipher Committee manages cryptographic and cipher
Read More
December 4, 2025
Thailand has expanded the circumstances under which state agencies may bypass competitive bidding procedures to address urgent security challenges. On November 28, 2025, Thailand’s Ministry of Finance published the Ministerial Regulation Determining Cases of Procurement by Specific Method (No. 6) B.E. 2568 in the Royal Gazette, introducing a new pathway for procuring supplies and services needed to address cyber and military threats that may affect the stability of government agencies or the nation. For technology vendors, cybersecurity firms, and defense contractors, this regulatory change creates immediate opportunities to engage directly with government buyers facing urgent security challenges. New Fast-Track Category for Security Threats The regulation amends Thailand’s Public Procurement and Supplies Management Act B.E. 2560 (2017) to add a new category of procurement that qualifies for the “specific method”—a noncompetitive, direct selection process. Previously, agencies could use this expedited method only in limited circumstances, such as emergencies, cases with proprietary technology requirements, or national security operations. The new provision explicitly covers procurement of supplies related to preventing or resolving cyber or military threats that could impact the stability of a state agency or the country. This addition recognizes the urgent nature of modern security challenges, where competitive bidding timelines may leave agencies vulnerable during critical threat windows. State agencies dealing with active cyberattacks, preparing defensive measures against anticipated threats, or responding to military security concerns can now move directly to negotiate with qualified vendors rather than conducting lengthy public tender processes. Vendor Considerations Vendors offering cybersecurity solutions now have a regulatory avenue to work directly with government clients when stability concerns are present. These solutions include threat detection systems, anti-ransomware tools, incident response services, firewalls, and security consulting. Similarly, defense contractors providing military equipment or specialized security supplies can pursue direct engagement channels where traditional procurement methods would create
Read More
December 3, 2025
Thailand’s Civil Court has issued a regulation targeting the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the preparation of pleadings and other documents submitted to the court. Effective November 17, 2025, the regulation aligns with September 2025 guidance from the president of the Supreme Court, and aims to safeguard accuracy, transparency, and public confidence in civil adjudication. The regulation applies to all parties submitting pleadings or any documents to the Civil Court that are prepared using AI tools or contain AI-generated content. It subjects AI used for these purposes to strict requirements on verification, disclosure, and accountability. Core Obligations The regulation imposes four principal obligations: Lawyers who use AI remain subject to duties of honesty, responsibility to the court, professional standards, and legal ethics, including the duty to assess the appropriateness of the AI tool for the work. Parties and lawyers must verify the accuracy and completeness of all facts, legal provisions, and citations in AI-generated content before submission. Parties and lawyers must disclose to the court any AI-generated content by clearly marking the beginning and end of the AI-generated portion with prescribed statements (see below). Additionally, a certification confirming the use of AI must be provided at the end of the pleading or document, stating that AI was used for certain portions and that the party has reviewed and certifies the accuracy of factual and legal content. Parties and lawyers bear the same full legal and ethical responsibility for AI-generated content as they do for personally authored documents; they cannot evade responsibility or avoid liability by citing AI-related errors. Likewise, parties must ensure that any AI-generated content is truthful, accurate, and unbiased. Prescribed Disclosure Language Each instance of AI-generated content must be preceded by the statement “[The following content was prepared using artificial intelligence]” and must end with “[End
Read More